[Repoze-dev] bfg docs

2009-06-25 Thread Iain Duncan
First off, I am super impressed by the effort put into the bfg docs. The ratio of docs to code is fantastic and IMHO bodes very well for adoption. =) Second, I'm finding some small typos that could be confusing to total beginners. What's the routing for helping out here? thanks Iain

Re: [Repoze-dev] bfg vs buildout

2009-06-25 Thread Chris Withers
Shane Hathaway wrote: I'm not very familiar with pip, but I don't think that's an issue for Buildout. Buildout also has the ability to pin the version of all packages, but I don't think that's what Jens and I want in this case. yep, the only thing buildout is missing is a command to dump

Re: [Repoze-dev] bfg docs

2009-06-25 Thread Chris McDonough
On 6/25/09 3:34 AM, Iain Duncan wrote: First off, I am super impressed by the effort put into the bfg docs. The ratio of docs to code is fantastic and IMHO bodes very well for adoption. =) Second, I'm finding some small typos that could be confusing to total beginners. What's the routing for

Re: [Repoze-dev] bfg vs buildout

2009-06-25 Thread Chris McDonough
On 6/25/09 3:38 AM, Chris Withers wrote: Shane Hathaway wrote: I'm not very familiar with pip, but I don't think that's an issue for Buildout. Buildout also has the ability to pin the version of all packages, but I don't think that's what Jens and I want in this case. yep, the only thing

Re: [Repoze-dev] how to extend basic User, Group, Permission model?

2009-06-25 Thread Malthe Borch
2009/6/25 Cezary Biele cezary.bi...@gmail.com: i'd be grateful for any suggestions how this should be achieved the right way using repoze. The default supplied security policy consults the ``__acl__`` attribute; you could make this attribute dynamic (descriptor) and grant permissions based on

Re: [Repoze-dev] how to extend basic User, Group, Permission model?

2009-06-25 Thread Cezary Biele
Thanks for your reply! could you please point me to some documentation? cezary On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/25 Cezary Biele cezary.bi...@gmail.com: i'd be grateful for any suggestions how this should be achieved the right way using repoze.

Re: [Repoze-dev] bfg- Routes...

2009-06-25 Thread Iain Duncan
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 04:09 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: Just a heads up. BFG currently uses Routes (http://routes.groovie.org) to do URL pattern matching. While fleshing out URL generation and matching support for BFG url dispatch, I've come to the conclusion that it's probably a

Re: [Repoze-dev] bfg- Routes...

2009-06-25 Thread Malthe Borch
2009/6/25 Iain Duncan iaindun...@telus.net: For me personally (admittedly a totally new user to zope/repoze) it's a negative to have bfg moving to share fewer components with Pylons, as one of the main attractions to me of bfg is it's complementary nature to pylons. And conversely, one of the

Re: [Repoze-dev] how to extend basic User, Group, Permission model?

2009-06-25 Thread Malthe Borch
2009/6/25 Cezary Biele cezary.bi...@gmail.com: Thanks for your reply! could you please point me to some documentation? Try looking here: http://docs.repoze.org/bfg/narr/security.html#assigning-acls-to-your-model-objects \malthe ___ Repoze-dev mailing

Re: [Repoze-dev] how to extend basic User, Group, Permission model?

2009-06-25 Thread Gustavo Narea
Cezary said: ps. i'm using repoze with pylons Hold on, you're talking about the Web authorization framework *repoze.what*, not the Web application framework *repoze.bfg*, right? Cheers. :) -- Gustavo Narea xri://=Gustavo. | Tech blog: =Gustavo/(+blog)/tech ~ About me: =Gustavo/about |

Re: [Repoze-dev] bfg- Routes...

2009-06-25 Thread Chris McDonough
On 6/25/09 5:35 AM, Iain Duncan wrote: On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 04:09 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: Just a heads up. BFG currently uses Routes (http://routes.groovie.org) to do URL pattern matching. While fleshing out URL generation and matching support for BFG url dispatch, I've come to

Re: [Repoze-dev] how to extend basic User, Group, Permission model?

2009-06-25 Thread Cezary Biele
Thanks for your answer Gustavo! Just a quick question: what about repoze.who (using sql database) and users/groups/permissions? is it also, like you said,optional? from what I've seen in the docs for repoze.what quickstart, setup_sql_auth needs user, group and permission class as arguments. but

[Repoze-dev] repoze app standalone-ness

2009-06-25 Thread Iain Duncan
I'm new to zope/repoze etc. I'm working on something where I want ultimately to be able to drop it into any wsgi aware environment and have it *just work*. I plan on this project being a stupidly well document stand alone admin interface scaffold for cases where explicit is better than

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze app standalone-ness

2009-06-25 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Iain Duncan wrote: I'm new to zope/repoze etc. I'm working on something where I want ultimately to be able to drop it into any wsgi aware environment and have it *just work*. I plan on this project being a stupidly well document stand alone admin

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze app standalone-ness

2009-06-25 Thread Iain Duncan
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 18:39 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Iain Duncan wrote: I'm new to zope/repoze etc. I'm working on something where I want ultimately to be able to drop it into any wsgi aware environment and have it *just work*. I plan on