Can you show me the path you used for the repository entry in Review Board?
Also, what version of RBTools are you using?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:53 AM,
The path I am using in ReviewBoard to set the repository is
https://codex..net/svn/Tools which is the base dir not a sub one.
Thanks.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
I am trying to set up the configuration file using rbt setup-repo but I
get this error message
D:\user\Testrbt setup-repo --debug
Enter the Review Board server URL: http://10.60.12.159:81
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
The path I am using in ReviewBoard to set the repository is
https://codex..net/svn/Toolshttps://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fcodex..net%2Fsvn%2FToolssa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNHGYk8rCSsxvVPysbvfK2aUAcjERA
which
is the base dir not a sub one. Thanks.
And I am using RBTools 0.5.7
If there's a Subversion repository listed on http://10.60.12.159:81 that
exactly matches the path, character-for-character, that you're seeing in
the RBTools output, it should work.
If that's an identical match, then I'm going to need to see a screenshot of
the repository configuration page and
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-YWxMS5M1QgY/UvJokO0vt_I/AKU/_BG73hz6rag/s1600/1.png
That`s the screenshot of the configuration page of my repository.
My working copy`s path is D:\user\PhabricatorTest
And the exact SVN path from the SVN server is
And also you may interested, I use rbt post --debug
and there`s a error message which is DEBUG:root:Got API Error 206 (HTTP
code 400): The repository path specified is not in the list of known
repositories, have any idea with this one? Thanks!
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
Hi,
When I use the --basedir option in rbt post, it works. Seems the system
looking for a fully match between the working directory and the one on SVN
server? While I think the problem is my local working copy`s path
D:\user\PhabricatorTest is different with the
It should be fine that your local path is different, so long as the
repository root shown by svn info exactly matches what's in Review Board.
You should never need to use --basedir.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. -
It looks like it should be working. I'm not sure why it's not finding it.
You can construct your own file by hand, though. Just create a
.reviewboardrc with:
REVIEWBOARD_URL = 'http://10.60.12.159:81'
REPOSITORY = 'https://codex.xxx.net/svn/Tools'
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
That`s wired, without the --basedir option, the rbt post will fail.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You
If you're logged in, you should be able to click the pencil on any review
request you own and type the name of the reviewers. You can also set
default reviewers based on groups, repositories, or file paths in the
Default Reviewers section of the admin UI.
If you're logged in, own the review
Thank you for your help, I also have another question. How can I specify
the reviewers, there`s not a edit button next to reviewers in the web page.
And the --target-people option can not set it too. Thanks!
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign
Reviewers is a section label. (We're making that more clear in 2.0.)
You want to fill in one of the two fields below it, for specifying users or
groups that you want to review the change.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag,
I am using ReviewBoard 1.7.21. And all other fields has a pencil button
next to them except for Reviewers I am using a Ubuntu virtual machine
as my server and followed all the instructions on your web page.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
As new to Review board, I have many questions... Sorry to trouble you, but
I am wondering is there any features to allow integration with Jira or
Jenkins? Thanks!
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons:
It makes sence... And also I noticed that there`s a auto-complete feature
for rbtools, is that true? Do you guys have a more friendly UI for users to
create a code review? I think use a --o option within rbt post is a way to
do it, right?
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
Which auto-complete feature are you referring to?
Different companies have different ways they handle code reviews. Many do
pre-commit, which is what RBTools is largely used for. Some do post-commit,
which RBTools 0.6 will make easier, and Review Board 2.0 will provide a
nicer web UI for.
-o
In case you missed my last question, here I ask again,
is there any features to allow integration with Jira or Jenkins? Thanks!
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy
Your answers are really helpful!
Another question hopefully this will be the last one :). Can I do a svn
commit with the RBTools? Seems the --commit is not supported with
Subversion when I tried to use rbt patch --commit 5. Thanks!
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
Hi Christian,
I saw the announcment yesterday concerning the release of the new version
of RB Tools, however every time I run easy_install -U RBTools I only get
0.5.6 as the latest version.
I looked in the
directory: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.5/ and the
latest
Hey Darryl,
There was a hiccup in part of the release process, but it should have been
there as of yesterday morning. Sorry for the trouble.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Wed,
Hi,
Found a bug for you :). When I try to upload a file for a review, it get
stunk after I click upload button. And another thing is, the only way for
me to create a code review using web UI is upload a raw diff file, right?
Is it possible to upload a changed file and the review board can
You'll have to see what the JavaScript logs say. You can also try
drag-and-dropping from your file manager directly onto the review request
box.
It's not possible for Review Board to take an arbitrary file and locate the
previous version in the repository. There's no way of knowing what that
On 02/04/2014 04:10 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
RBTools 0.5.7 is released. It's a very small bug fix release for
Perforce, allowing commands to once again be run from within a
subdirectory of a Perforce checkout.
Also, on review notification emails, people get email to them and the group
gets CCed. Which fits what the OP asked for.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us
Hi.
I'm using ReviewBoard 1.7.21 with
- MySQL 5.5.35
- Apache2
- WSGI
I want to use utf8 in Reviewboard, so I did the following,
- change default character set of MySQL Server
- change default character set of ReviewBoard database
- change charset of 'reviews_reviewrequest' table
But when
Hi.
I'm running ReviewBoard 1.7.21 on Linux Mint with
- MySQL 5.5.35
- Apache2, WSGI
I made a review request including 'Korean' language,
but when I see the review, it says '???' instead of Korean letters.
So, I checked the DBMS and did the followings,
- changed the character set of MySQL to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #7 on issue 1478 by trowb...@gmail.com: Username handling for
case-insensitive LDAP login
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1478
Fixed in master (fc95975). This will ship in 2.0 beta 3. Thanks!
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 1674 by trowb...@gmail.com: LDAP: username in django
admin has too strict of validation rules
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1674
Fixed in master (fc95975). This will ship in 2.0 beta 3. Thanks!
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 2924 by trowb...@gmail.com: Spaces in user names using
LDAP
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2924
Fixed in master (fc95975). This will ship in 2.0 beta 3. Thanks!
--
You received this message because this project is
31 matches
Mail list logo
