On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> Any idea on the schedule for 1.1? Is it one day, one week, one
> month, one quarter?
>
> Alfred
>
It's tentatively scheduled for around January, but this depends on our
availability between now and then, and the number of bugs found duri
Hi Christian:
> Also, when you saw ClientError from post-review, that was output
> from the server. So it's the same problem. I'd recommend restarting
> Apache just in case it is an issue with one or two threads not
> having imported it successfully.
I thought I had restarted Apache, but p
Also, when you saw ClientError from post-review, that was output from the
server. So it's the same problem. I'd recommend restarting Apache just in
case it is an issue with one or two threads not having imported it
successfully.
I should also mention that the upcoming 1.1 release does a much bette
Hi,
The only way to get a ClientError is if pysvn didn't import properly. This
sporadic behavior can happen if you've installed pysvn since starting
Apache. Some threads will have failed to import it (back when it didn't
exist) and some will have succeeded (as they tried after the install). This
i
On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:42, Alfred von Campe wrote:
The error I posted yesterday is suddenly gone today; that is, I ran
post-review again in the same sandbox and the review posted without
errors. I have not changed a thing on the server. Furthermore, when
I went into the web interface and
On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:27, David Trowbridge wrote:
> If you run post-review with --debug, it'll spit out a bunch of output
> which should hopefully tell you the real error.
I must be going bling; I didn't see that option in the output of
"post-review -h" but it's right there at the bottom. He
If you run post-review with --debug, it'll spit out a bunch of output
which should hopefully tell you the real error.
-David
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2009, at 6:10, Raghu wrote:
>
>> post-review is usually run from the user's development box, not
On Oct 10, 2009, at 6:10, Raghu wrote:
> post-review is usually run from the user's development box, not the
> server. It will connect to the server over http(s) and upload the
> review request.
Yes, I realize that, which is why I asked how I can get post-review
installed on all the develope
post-review is usually run from the user's development box, not the
server. It will connect
to the server over http(s) and upload the review request.
-Raghu
On Oct 8, 10:47 pm, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> I'm still in the process of setting up out ReviewBoard server
> (struggling with LDAP/AD i
I'm still in the process of setting up out ReviewBoard server
(struggling with LDAP/AD integration at the moment), but I'm looking
slightly ahead. It appears that post-review is the recommended way to
create a review (we're using Subversion if that matters), and I can
see that post-review
10 matches
Mail list logo
