Hi Ze,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ze Lin Xiao wrote:
> We've solved this problem with our in house patch and it's been in place for
> over 3 years. It's something called "Publish (Silent)" and yes it's a new
> button.
>
> Publish (Silent) is only available AFTER the initial publish of the
We've solved this problem with our in house patch and it's been in place for
over 3 years. It's something called "Publish (Silent)" and yes it's a new
button.
Publish (Silent) is only available AFTER the initial publish of the review so
that subsequent emails can be suppressed. We've found it
On 2013-10-21 07:05, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 10/18/2013 10:41 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-10-18 01:45, Kim Gräsman wrote:
I might try to come up with a patch, but I haven't really thought
about user experience. A new button seems a little brutal.
If you've thought about this before,
On 10/18/2013 10:41 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2013-10-18 01:45, Kim Gräsman wrote:
>> I might try to come up with a patch, but I haven't really thought
>> about user experience. A new button seems a little brutal.
>>
>> If you've thought about this before, have you come up with any ideas
>> f
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> On 2013-10-18 01:45, Kim Gräsman wrote:
>>
>> I might try to come up with a patch, but I haven't really thought
>> about user experience. A new button seems a little brutal.
>>
>> If you've thought about this before, have you come up with a
On 2013-10-18 17:37, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-10-18 17:19, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yep. demo.reviewboard.org and reviews.reviewboard.org are running this
(though a week out of date I think).
Hmm, both of those 403 for me...?
T
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> On 2013-10-18 17:19, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>>
>> Is there is a 'sandbox' server running the bleeding edge anywhere? I
>>> suppose I could always roll my own, but it would be
On 2013-10-18 17:19, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Is there is a 'sandbox' server running the bleeding edge anywhere? I
suppose I could always roll my own, but it would be cool if there was a
convenient way for curious folks to play around with
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> On 2013-10-17 16:19, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>>
>>> Wait... what happened to 1.8? :-)
>>>
>>
>> 1.8 is becoming 2.0.
>>
>> Here's a brief summary of what's changed since 1.7:
>>
On 2013-10-17 16:19, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Wait... what happened to 1.8? :-)
1.8 is becoming 2.0.
Here's a brief summary of what's changed since 1.7:
[...]
Thanks. Sounds very cool and exciting!
* Given the rewrite, we have fewer
Extensions written for 1.7.x are compatible. The changes in 2.0 will just
make a lot of things (like shipping javascript/css as part of your
extension) a lot easier and adds new hooks and capabilities.
-David
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:56 PM, wrote:
> Sounds cool!
>
> Would you expect the revi
Sounds cool!
Would you expect the revised extension framework to be backwards compatible
with 1.7 extensions ?
thanks
Mark
On Thursday, October 17, 2013 1:19:56 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Matthew Woehlke
>
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2013-10-17 15:31, Ch
On 2013-10-18 01:45, Kim Gräsman wrote:
I might try to come up with a patch, but I haven't really thought
about user experience. A new button seems a little brutal.
If you've thought about this before, have you come up with any ideas
for how this might be controlled?
What about a 'trivial chan
Hi Christian,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> This feature doesn't exist, though it does come up from time to time. If
> done right, I'd be okay taking a patch for it, but our plate's pretty full
> right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to ship.
Good to hear!
I might
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> On 2013-10-17 15:31, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> [...] our plate's pretty full right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to
>> ship.
>>
>
> Wait... what happened to 1.8? :-)
>
> If you're really planning a major version bump (i.e. that wasn
On 2013-10-17 15:31, Christian Hammond wrote:
[...] our plate's pretty full right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to
ship.
Wait... what happened to 1.8? :-)
If you're really planning a major version bump (i.e. that wasn't a
typo), is there a page somewhere with at least a brief overview of
wh
Hi Kim,
This feature doesn't exist, though it does come up from time to time. If
done right, I'd be okay taking a patch for it, but our plate's pretty full
right now trying to get RB 2.0 ready to ship.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.or
17 matches
Mail list logo
