On Wednesday, May 09, 2012, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
auto setting does and how/if it works, and why the default behaviour is
auto.
I guess the feature was invented to solve a known sequencing problem ?
More or less, the feature was invented to solve the problem of what to do when
you've
On Wednesday, May 09, 2012, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
...It's a prettier example of the same sort of breed as that car.
After a bit more reflection, it occurs to me the real problem is not the
eclectic design, but that every neat little gizmo bolted onto this thing was
manufactured by a
liberal arts major.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu1VhsNOwPU
No great loss. Software is a pain in the ass.
It is. And any professional software of this size and complexity would be
equally gnarly. It's just the way it is and we all learn to accept this
eventually because for some of us
On 10 May 2012 12:38, Richard Bown richard.b...@ferventsoftware.com wrote:
On one point - who hosts the RG website currently and any chance making this
editable with some non stone-age tools and for multiple users?
I host it. It gets updated automatically from the Subversion repo.
Hi Michael,
Thank you for all of your efforts on this project. I know its overwhelming
and lonely at times. You have all my gratitude for keeping it going. I am
looking forward to delving into this release. It comes at a time when I
actually have the time to compile it and not wait for a binary
I guess this problem affects all software development, but I wouldn't know
that, because I'm not a professional by any means. I guess Rosegarden is my
rude awakening to all the jubilation and glee I missed out on by being a
liberal arts major.
No great loss. Software is a pain in the ass.
--
[cc -devel]
On 10 May 2012 13:41, Ian Gardner ilgard...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I guess people like me are part of the problem in this regard, turn up one
day, chuck something in to do with linked segments and then f. off into the
sunset. Fly-by-night, here today and gone tomorrow contributors
Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could
contribute to new website/direction/developments.
Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some
people who are big current contributors. This is just to get the ball rolling
so apologies in
Richard Bown wrote:
Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could
contribute to new website/direction/developments.
Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some
people who are big current contributors. This is just to get the ball
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Holger Marzen hol...@marzen.de wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Richard Bown wrote:
Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could
contribute to new website/direction/developments.
Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have
Hello there,
I wanted to support Rosegarden on flattr. There is a rosegarden-on-Flattr,
but I wanted to ask you first if Rosegarden is actually registered
there and I'm spending my money actually on it.
Best regards, Manuel
I can try and recruit some Mac developers but I am not a developer myself.
I know how to compile things but not write code.
I could also contribute something in the songwriting area.
Another thought is that Debian used to post a list of consultants (probably
still does) where people could go for
On 10 May 2012 16:18, Richard Bown richard.b...@ferventsoftware.com wrote:
Devs or Interested in Ports
I'm not particularly interested in a Mac port and don't especially
want one, but I'm certainly competent to make one and would try to
help out if there was more general interest.
(Why not
On Wed, 9 May 2012 07:20:25 +0200 (CEST)
Holger Marzen hol...@marzen.de wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2012, Abrolag wrote:
On the promotional side...
For what it's worth, absolutely every track on my website - and there are
one or
two there :) - was developed and performed using Rosegarden.
On Thu, 10 May 2012 17:18:11 +0200
Richard Bown richard.b...@ferventsoftware.com wrote:
Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could
contribute to new website/direction/developments.
Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some
people
On 05/10/2012 05:46 AM, Andy wrote:
Richard Bown wrote:
Ok so a quick trawl of emails turned up some names perhaps that could
contribute to new website/direction/developments.
Just to say that this is just a quick scan and I may have missed out some
people who are big current
16 matches
Mail list logo
