Hi Stephen,
> It's fixed!!! Recap: large RT database (host Ubuntu 14.04LTS, database
server
> MySQL 5.7.x on Windows Server 2012). Backup .sql files became truncated at
> ~18GB when the database is easily 20GB.
Good to hear. Does your my.cnf file not have a "[mysqldump]" section? That's
where mys
It's fixed!!! Recap: large RT database (host Ubuntu 14.04LTS, database server
MySQL 5.7.x on Windows Server 2012). Backup .sql files became truncated at
~18GB when the database is easily 20GB.
It looks like (for whatever reason) the max_allowed_packet option is not
carrying over to the backup s
The problem has become more interested. Switching from --results-file to >
exposed the max packet problem but now, I can't seem to get around it. I
currently have my max_allowed_packet set to 1024M and it's still dying. I have
the approximate row & attachment ID where it's failing and if I'm rea
It looks like I've found the problems. To recap: I've got MySQL Server 5.7 on a
Windows Server 2012 host running an RT database of ~20GB. My mysqldump backups
started becoming truncated for some reason.
I'm not sure how much of this is relevant to Windows, but it turns out this is
what was happ
+0000
From: "Cena, Stephen (ext. 300)"
To: "rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com"
Subject: Re: [rt-users] MySQL backups of RT 4.4.1 truncated
Message-ID:
<87f81e27495dc8489147e34a4152e268a4966...@mailstore2010.ogp.qvii.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="
Update on my MySQL backup issue: no change. I've now moved the Windows TEMP
folders to the larger drive to see if the issue was running out of temp space
and it has not helped. I will keep the group updated to any developments, but
will refrain if its not anything noteworthy. I'm going to try c
Excellent point. The MySQL TEMP folder was moved, but not the operating system
ones. I'll see if I can move the OS temp locations to the larger drive today &
see what that gets me. I've just gotten the last 30 lines of the "attachments"
table .sql file so I'm checking that to see if maybe there'
ng new.
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:04:04 +
From: "Cena, Stephen (ext. 300)"
To: 'Jeffrey Pilant' ,
"'rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com'"
Subject: Re: [rt-users] MySQL backups of RT 4.4.1 truncated
Message-ID:
<87f8
All the backups I'm doing are local to keep performance high. I sadly lost the
"discussion" to keep the MySQL server on a Linux machine. What we're going to
try is the following:
We're snapshotting/backing up the system at regular intervals so I will always
have a backup of the .sql files. I'm g
I just looked into this now. Got a little swamped yesterday. It looks like the
system is using the OS drive which barely has 19GB free so it's possible that's
what's tripping it up. I checked the error log & the only errors I'm seeing are
dropped packets from my RT systems around the time of the
Jeff - No limit that I'm aware of. If I look at a VM backup in December, the
SQL files actually hit 19GB+ versus the "18 and change". The only other
possibility that it COULD be is I've had to turn on Windows folder compression
because the backups are getting so large their filling the drive. I
lto:t.baetz...@bringe.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 8:36 AM
To: Cena, Stephen (ext. 300) ;
'rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com'
Subject: Re: [rt-users] MySQL backups of RT 4.4.1 truncated
Hi Stephen,
Am 19.01.2017 um 13:33 schrieb Cena, Stephen (ext. 300):
> I had that issue in
Hi Stephen,
Am 19.01.2017 um 13:33 schrieb Cena, Stephen (ext. 300):
> I had that issue initially, and changed the value to 64MB. It was
> originally 4MB, then I increased it to 16MB, it’s been at 64MB for some
> time.
You can check your RT database to see whether 64MB is enough by running
n
Cena, Stephen (ext. 300)
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2017 18:23
An: 'rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com'
mailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com>>
Betreff: Re: [rt-users] MySQL backups of RT 4.4.1 truncated
I just ran a test with the attachments table "ignored", and
27;rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com'
Betreff: Re: [rt-users] MySQL backups of RT 4.4.1 truncated
I just ran a test with the attachments table ignored, and the backup
worked perfectly. As a sanity check, I also ran mysqlcheck on the schema &
no errors were found. Should I split my b
I just ran a test with the attachments table "ignored", and the backup worked
perfectly. As a "sanity check", I also ran mysqlcheck on the schema & no errors
were found. Should I split my backup job into two pieces, or is there a better
way to get a backup all in one shot?
16 matches
Mail list logo