[rt-users] CommandByMail extension not working on RT 4.0.5

2012-04-18 Thread Fritz Mahnke
I recently upgraded our RT 3.8.9 by making a new RT 4.0.5 installation and then moving and upgrading the database by the upgrade instructions. Before doing so, I upgraded the OS of the computer from Debian Lenny to Debian Squeeze. After that, I installed RT-Extension-CommandByMail-0.10 using the

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail extension not working on RT 4.0.5

2012-04-18 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 04/18/2012 09:59 AM, Fritz Mahnke wrote: I made the required changes to /opt/rt4/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm: @MailPlugins = qw(Auth::MailFrom Filter::TakeAction); Set(@Plugins, (qw(RT::Extension::CommandByMail))); You're using the RT 3.6 era syntax for @MailPlugins, not the 3.8 and beyond era

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail extension not working on RT 4.0.5

2012-04-18 Thread Fritz Mahnke
That's true, but I tried it both ways. I just changed it: Set(@MailPlugins, qw(Auth::MailFrom Filter::TakeAction)); And then I issued /etc/init.d/apache2 restart. But the ticket still doesn't process correctly and no CommandByMail messages in the logs.

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail extension not working on RT 4.0.5

2012-04-18 Thread sunnavy
I suggest you check /Admin/Tools/Configuration.html to see if @MailPlugins and @Plugins were set successfully. sunnavy On 12-04-18 09:30, Fritz Mahnke wrote: That's true, but I tried it both ways. I just changed it: Set(@MailPlugins, qw(Auth::MailFrom Filter::TakeAction)); And then I

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail extension not working on RT 4.0.5

2012-04-18 Thread Fritz Mahnke
Thank you very much for that useful hint. @MailPlugins was not being set correctly and I traced it to a typo in RT_SiteConfig.pm after all. Thanks again!

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-03-03 Thread Ken Crocker
To list, I've finally got CommandByMail to work with Custom Fields. Apparently, for any Custom Field to work, it needs to have a one-word name or a hyphenated name. I didn't read this in any of the READ ME's. So, since 98% of my Custom Fields have more than one word, like Migrated Date, I

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-03-03 Thread Kenneth Marshall
Since the parsing for this is via regex, maybe we can adjust the regex used to incorporate spaces in CFs. Cheers, Ken On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:39:29AM -0800, Ken Crocker wrote: To list, I've finally got CommandByMail to work with Custom Fields. Apparently, for any Custom Field to work, it

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-03-03 Thread Kenneth Marshall
Oops, the syntax for Custom Fields using CommandByMail is CustomField.{CFName}: custom field value or CF.{CFName}: custom field value That works here with spaces. Cheers, Ken On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:09:46PM -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote: Since the parsing for this is via regex, maybe we

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-03-03 Thread Kenneth Marshall
Oh, and the dot (.) should not be there. You also need the latest release to fix the regex space bug. Cheers, Ken On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:29:07PM -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote: Oops, the syntax for Custom Fields using CommandByMail is CustomField.{CFName}: custom field value or

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-03-03 Thread Ken Crocker
Kenneth, Are you saying I need a and a on each side of the CF name? In addition to the brackets? Kenn LBNL On 3/3/2010 12:29 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote: Oops, the syntax for Custom Fields using CommandByMail is CustomField.{CFName}: custom field value or CF.{CFName}: custom field

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-03-03 Thread Ken Crocker
Kenneth, To be honest, we just installed this a few day (maybe a week) ago. So I assumed we HAD the latest version. I'll take a look in the wiki and see what's up. Kenn LBNL On 3/3/2010 12:37 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote: Oh, and the dot (.) should not be there. You also need the latest

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-03-03 Thread Kenneth Marshall
Use version 0.08 from last August. You do not include , just the text of the name or value. Ken On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:35:36PM -0800, Ken Crocker wrote: Kenneth, Are you saying I need a and a on each side of the CF name? In addition to the brackets? Kenn LBNL On 3/3/2010 12:29

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-03-03 Thread Ken Crocker
Kenneth, That was it. My guy installed .08 and now all works well. I do get an error for the command Content, but as long as I put any comments at the end, it works fine. Thanks again for your help. Kenn LBNL On 3/3/2010 12:53 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote: Use version 0.08 from last August.

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-02-25 Thread Ken Crocker
Kevin, Did you get my earlier response with the data I used in the Email? Kenn LBNL On 2/23/2010 1:43 PM, Kevin Falcone wrote: On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:59:51AM -0800, Ken Crocker wrote: I've installed CommandByMail. The instructions describe the ability to create a ticket WITH

[rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-02-23 Thread Ken Crocker
To list, I've installed CommandByMail. The instructions describe the ability to create a ticket WITH CustomField values. However, I'm finding this doesn't seem to be true. Do I also need to install an additional extension for this? Thanks. Kenn LBNL

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-02-23 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:59:51AM -0800, Ken Crocker wrote: I've installed CommandByMail. The instructions describe the ability to create a ticket WITH CustomField values. However, I'm finding this doesn't seem to be true. Do I also need to install an additional extension for this? What

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2010-02-23 Thread Ken Crocker
Kevin, Thanks for responding. The following are the several tries to get a CustomFIeld set: This was in the body the first time: Status: open Owner: CACasaretto Priority: 3 CustomField.{Description}: This is the first test for CommandByMail

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2007-05-16 Thread Robert G. Werner
José de Paula Eufrásio Júnior wrote: [snip] But I have other fields, like CF.{Classificação do Chamado} that are not working with the CommandByMail extension. No log messages, nothing, it just don't execute the command. I have two theories: 1) The extension has some problem with the

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2007-05-16 Thread Ruslan Zakirov
I agree that it's most probably an issue with encodings, but I don't when we'll have time to fix it, so patches are welcome. On 5/16/07, Robert G. Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: José de Paula Eufrásio Júnior wrote: [snip] But I have other fields, like CF.{Classificação do Chamado} that are

[rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2007-03-30 Thread Helmuth Ramirez
Hi everyone, I am having trouble installing the CommandByMail extension. I have looked through the archives but only managed to find how easy it was to installbut they forgot to mention the easy steps they took. Is there a step by step somewhere I could follow? When I type in the

Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2007-03-30 Thread chaim rieger
Helmuth Ramirez wrote: Hi everyone, I am having trouble installing the CommandByMail extension. I have looked through the archives but only managed to find how easy it was to install….but they forgot to mention the easy steps they took. Is there a step by step somewhere I could follow?

RE: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension

2007-03-30 Thread Helmuth Ramirez
. No wonder the Makefile never worked. Thanks Chaim! -Original Message- From: chaim rieger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 5:28 PM To: Helmuth Ramirez Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] CommandByMail Extension Helmuth Ramirez wrote: Hi