On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 05:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
since there seems no permanent maintainer of Pynac I propose
to do the next release of Pynac. I have already transferred the
source/history as planned to github at:
https://github.com/rwst/pynac
Ralf, this
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 03:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to tell you what you already know, the symbolic ring is the
parent of last resort if there is nothing more specific. So its to be
expected that you don't have any canonical maps elsewhere.
Pynac should
On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 11:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 6 September 2014 20:34:56 UTC+2, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Note that Cython supports cProfile these days:
http://docs.cython.org/src/tutorial/profiling_tutorial.html
However, that won't help
Hi Marc,
I'm copying sage-devel where more experienced people can help.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:42:45 +0200
Marc Masdeu marc.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Burcin,
I saw you had made a spkg for the CGAL libraries. I would like to
resuscitate this code and adapt it to CGAL 4.0 if possible. Do
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 06:57:20 -0700
William A Stein wst...@uw.edu wrote:
snip
This is absolutely not how Sage should behave. The fixes I can
think of:
(1) Run sage -b as part of installing any package that requires it
for the install to finish. Your argument not to run sage -b isn't
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:56:41 +
Martin Albrecht martinralbre...@googlemail.com wrote:
what happened to the Sage 2012 GSoC project on lattices described
here:
http://gsoc-sage-lattices.blogspot.co.uk/
It doesn't seem to have been merged (?) I could use it to give my
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 04:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:52:06 AM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
Hello, I'm the annoying person digging up old tickets.
Which is much appreciated!
+1. Many thanks for finally getting all those
Hi,
this year Sage [1] and lmonade [2] are mentoring organizations for the
Google Summer of Code [3] again.
[1] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org2/google/gsoc2014/sagemath
[2] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org2/google/gsoc2014/lmonade
[3]
Hi,
the application period for the Google Summer of Code starts next week.
If we want to apply, we should have a project ideas list ready for
review by Google by February 14th. Here is last year's list:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ipzvwbhfujaubDe0QVO-V9JmmRcLZvitaeXh4r2WNqA/pub
Harald
Hi Jori,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:29:45 +0300 (EEST)
Jori Mantysalo jori.mantys...@uta.fi wrote:
I just make a small test:
P.a,b,c,d=QQ[]
for i in range(1,10):
p1=ZZ.random_element(1,5)*P.random_element()
p2=ZZ.random_element(1,5)*P.random_element()
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Fredrik Johansson fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
Curious that no one seems to have attempted to port Rubi to Sage yet!
Perhaps a possible project for next year's GSoC?
This might be an interesting exercise to test our symbolics and pattern
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 11:31:43 -0500
Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 9/3/13 11:26 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
And a collaborative annotation system for books is certainly
something interesting to see.
*Especially* if there is an easy way to export the annotations out of
the
Hi,
is there a way to see the default owners assigned to trac components?
I just noticed that I am not assigned to new symbolics tickets any
more. I can't decide yet if that's good or bad yet. Was there a reason
behind this change?
Cheers,
Burcin
--
You received this message because you are
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:23:51 +0200
Hikari Boulders hikari.bould...@gmail.com wrote:
about 4ti2: is there some master-plan to make sage more modular or
smaller?
Unfortunately, no. lmonade takes a step in this direction by making the
package system more flexible:
http://www.lmona.de
In the
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 04:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
vdelecroix 20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote:
If the differential forms are somewhat immutable we may also save the
result of is_zero once for all. Why do not make is_zero a
cached_method of symbolic expressions ?
Do you mean wrapping
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Eric Gourgoulhon egourgoul...@gmail.com wrote:
Meanwhile, I've written the following workaround in python:
basically, it scans all the sqrt's in a given symbolic expression,
send them to radcan, takes the absolute value of the output and then
calls
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:48:55 -0700
William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Victor Miller [1], Sage one the Jenks Prize [2] last
night. Congrats to us Sage developers!
[1] https://plus.google.com/112503503275509870006/posts
[2] http://www.sigsam.org/awards/jenks/awardees/
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Timo Kluck tkl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think most time is spend in the is_zero() method for a symbolic
expression, and that the reassignments you refer to are largely
irrelevant. The thing is that it can cost a lot of time to decide
whether, for example
Hi,
here is an official announcement for the swMATH project.
Cheers,
Burcin
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:00:29 +0200
From: Gert-Martin Greuel gre...@mathematik.uni-kl.de
Subject: swMATH
Dear all,
I would like you to inform you about a new service on mathematical
Cheers,
Burcin
On 17 June 2013 19:59, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi,
here is an official announcement for the swMATH project.
Cheers,
Burcin
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:00:29 +0200
From: Gert-Martin Greuel gre...@mathematik.uni-kl.de
Subject
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 03:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Brickenstein brickenst...@mfo.de wrote:
Yes, and it even includes Sage ;-). Well, at the moment it's
at position 8 in total number of citations which is not bad,
considering it's age.
How do you see this on the current swmath.org
http://www.phas.ubc.ca/%7Eeviatarb/ – University of
British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada
(Mentor: Flavia Stan, Backup: Burcin Erocal)
Sage interfaces with multiple third-party libraries, such as MPFR,
GSL, GP/PARI, mpmath, and Maxima, for numerical evaluation of
special functions
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:17:43 + (UTC)
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-01-17, Robert Bradshaw rober...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2013-01-16, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:31:41 + (UTC)
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-01-17, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:17:43 + (UTC)
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
This still looks like an ugly hack. Shouldn't we rather use
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 01:49:22 -0800 (PST)
Timo Kluck tkl...@gmail.com wrote:
Op woensdag 16 januari 2013 04:17:48 UTC+1 schreef Michael Orlitzky
het volgende:
Gentoo: emerge sage
Fedora: yum install sage
Debian: apt-get install sage
Ubuntu: apt-get install sage
Mac:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 08:43:15 +0100
Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 15/01/2013 23:28, Volker Braun a écrit :
The specialist mathematical libraries, by contrast, don't get much
exposure. And even if somebody packaged them then generally in
useless form. E.g. Fedora ships
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:27:38 -0500
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso jord...@octave.org wrote:
Actually, I don't see what ditching hg has anything to do with the
real meat of the actual problem, fixing the build system.
+1000
I don't recall the design of the new development model, directory
structure
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:32:29 -0800 (PST)
Timo Kluck tkl...@gmail.com wrote:
Op dinsdag 15 januari 2013 17:01:09 UTC+1 schreef Burcin Erocal het
volgende:
Why don't we discuss the solutions to these problems
separately and put them into action?
- Development model:
I like
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:44:13 -0800
R. Andrew Ohana andrew.oh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org
wrote:
Keshav, Jordi and many others have pointed these out before, but
our main problem seems to be:
- we are not really using a DVCS
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:15:45 +0800
P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/10/2013 10:09 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
H Yep, log2 and log10 sound good indeed !
So what do we do, in the end ?
ln(e) = 1
log(10) = 1
log2(2) = 1
Or do we stick log(e) = ln(e) = 1 ?
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:16:05 +0100
Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
This was indeed intentional at the time. When writing the new
symbolics code based on pynac, William and I thought that this
behavior was the one that led to least confusion.
Working with expression trees that involve
Hi Karl-Dieter,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 05:11:44 -0800 (PST)
kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
The last few weeks there has been a marked increase in spam of the
following nature on ask.sagemath
Title: Irrelevant Question
Content: How do I do something unrelated to Sage
Answer (by different
Hi Charles,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:37:33 +0100
Charles Bouillaguet charles.bouillag...@gmail.com wrote:
I (amongst with others) have written a library that solves boolean
equations in some way. I wanted to include it as an experimental
spkg. I thus wrote a cython interface to Sage. To be
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:15:38 +0100
Charles Bouillaguet charles.bouillag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/20/2012 01:02 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
What should I do ? Unconditionally include the cython interface to
the sage library, and mark all doctests as optional ?
Can you compile the Cython
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:15:51 +0100
Martin Albrecht martinralbre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to include the Cython interface in the
package? AFAIK, Cython's build system improved significantly and
there is no reason to use Sage's build system for a Cython
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:10:55 +0100
Charles Bouillaguet charles.bouillag...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not suggesting to patch the Sage library when installing your
package. You can put the interface in a separate Cython module
which is built by the usual Python/Cython setup.py magic and
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:15:57 -0800
Benjamin Jones benjaminfjo...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
It's hard to tell from the implementation if this behavior is
intentional, unintentional, or a bug. The implementation is just
that multiplication maps over relational operators like ==, , =,
etc. But I
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 01:53:31 +0800
P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote:
snip Robert's post
I think the Sage community could quickly expand and there could be
tens, if not hundreds, of git development branches once the switch to
git occurs. It would be quite hard to keep track of all the
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:16:55 -0800 (PST)
Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC there was some work about this done (but not merged?).
No time to search myself now, but searching trac and the pynac-devel
list should give some hints, or contacting Burcin and or Florent
Hivert.
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 05:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:01:07 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 11:08:15 PM UTC, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
Returning a Sage Integer would be consistent with this:
I also
Hi,
the patchbot site shows a traceback suggesting the mongodb server is
down.
http://patchbot.sagemath.org/
Am I looking at the right page? Can somebody bring the database up?
Thanks.
Burcin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
Hi Noud,
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 04:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Noud noud.aldenho...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's first take a look at this example
sage: f = 2*cos(1/2)
sage: f
2*cos(1/2)
sage: f.n()
1.75516512378075
I would like to program something like cos(x) that behaves the same
as what I showed
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:05:56 +
Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi,
On 29 August 2012 06:38, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 28 August 2012 20:55, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
See the exchange below. I'm curious if there is anybody reading
Hi Timo,
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Timo Kluck tkl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that the distinction between
def f(x):
return x^2
and
f(x) = x^2
is a common source of confusion, and everyone will run into it when
trying to define piecewise functions. It would be
Hi Jean-Pierre,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll do when I'm finished, for the moment, I'll just keep track of
the progress on the wiki page.
Hopefully there is only one problematic file left: expression.pyx.
I've looked into this all
On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
My problem was that i needed to do implicit derivation. Something
like:
sage: f=3*x^2*y^3-5*x*y+x^2-3*y^2+4*x-3*y+1
sage: f.diff(x)
9*x^2*y(x)^2*D[0](y)(x) + 6*x*y(x)^3 - 5*x*D[0](y)(x) - 6*y(x)*D[0](y)
(x) + 2*x -
On Mon, 14 May 2012 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
I don't think the problem here is coercion, but conversion (and,
mostly, the ability of the symbolic framework to handle these
numbers).
The symbolics framework can handle these numbers. You can use
arbitrary python
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:36:40 -0500
Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/27/12 4:13 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ivan
Andrusdarthand...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, when I subscribed to this list I apparently signed up for
the no email option
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:52:10 -0500
Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/27/12 7:47 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
This happened to me as well. I could still change the options even
though I don't use a gmail address. I fixed your membership options
nevertheless.
How did you
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:56:13 +0800
Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org writes:
snip
Just to be clear, sage-on-gentoo itself has no goal of being a way
to distribute Sage in general. It is simply a port of Sage and its
SPKGs to the Gentoo package
Hi Keshav,
thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an interesting
title to discuss the future directions for Sage. :) I added
gentoo-science to the CC list, since that is the most likely location
for sage-on-gentoo discussion and the gentoo-developers might be
interested in the
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:22:32 -0800 (PST)
Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12511 is now awaiting
review. Thanks, Robert!
Robert's patch now has positive review and is waiting to be merged.
Thanks to Robert for the quick fix, Keshav and aapitzsch
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:58:49 -0800
William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 02/13/12 11:18 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 2/13/12 4:17 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Since some of packages will not have the or
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:34:40 +
Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 02/13/12 05:19 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
If I understand correctly, William's point is that simply placing a
copy of the GPL, with a version number attached or otherwise, with a
or any later version included
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:23:19 -0800 (PST)
John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
Various aspects of building Sage might be cleaner if we used autoconf:
./configure OPTIONS
make
OPTIONS could include a location to install Sage, various flags for
building ATLAS, and other
Hi Maximillian,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:27:45 +0100
Maximilian Trescher faucon.emeril...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm very new to the developers list.
About my background: I'm studying physics (in Berlin) and I'm using
sage regularly for some physical calculations.
Three days ago I wondered if
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:26:33 -0800 (PST)
kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Publishing Computational Mathematics, by Tim Daly (of Axiom, a
frequent contributor on sage-devel)
http://www.ams.org/notices/201202/rtx120200320p.pdf
Literate programming is not just adding comments to code, but
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Jan 17, 2:54 am, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
How does it make anything easier
or clearer or better for the interactive user that var() injects
things into global scope? We found ourselves trying
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Once again, let me bring up the numerical noise issue on ARM.
The problem is that while we pretty much narrowed it down to a
particular function computing the log of the gamma-function,
lgammal, in elibc, an
Hi Maarten,
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Maarten Derickx m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com wrote:
I was merging my new ipython spkg wich needed review for some time
already at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11235 but now
needs work because in the time that it needed review
Hi Jean-Pierre,
thanks a lot for looking into this.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:13:49 -0800 (PST)
Jean-Pierre Flori jpfl...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way:
- I used Burcin's patch, somehow I could not use Florent's one
- The patch is based on pynac-0.2.2, but applies on 0.2.3
Here is the output of
Hi Simon,
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 06:58:15 -0800 (PST)
Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
After some serach_src, it seems to me that there are no SAGBI bases
in Sage.
Are there plans to add them? Is there free software (with appropriate
licence) that one could build upon? If I remember
Hi Florent,
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:20:26 +0100
Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote:
I'm working on #11576 make it possible to generate sequences of
variables easily. I actually need to achieve a larger goal: I need
to have symbolic variables indexed by any Sage objects (eg: integers,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:41:56 -0800 (PST)
kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it exists, The symbolic functionality in Sage is
supposed to make it easy for users to define a new symbolic
function at runtime, including how that function gets simplified.
This is supposed
Hi Florent,
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:04:13 +0100
Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote:
Follow up from thread indexed symbolic variables.
Do we have to call Maxima to compute the numerator of a rational
fraction ? Is seems to me that Pynac/Ginac should be able to do
it by
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:16:18 -0800
William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Jeroen Demeyer
jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
When searching sage-support, there are several threads about people
complaining they cannot plot x^(1/3) or similar on the negative axis
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:56:51 +0100
Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote:
method. Thanks to Cython, this is very easy. However, Maxima and
Ginac have a different semantic for those two functions:
- Maxima: Does not change the expression; if the expression is
not a
Hi Florent,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:44:35 +0100
Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 03:48:10PM +0100, Burcin Erocal wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:10:54 +0100
Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote:
Pynac supports indexed expressions already. It just
Hi Florent,
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:29:38 +0100
Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote:
moved indexed variable discussion below
So I'm trying to inherits from Expression. Here is my code:
from sage.symbolic.expression import Expression
class IndexedVarExpr(Expression):
def
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:10:54 +0100
Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote:
Pynac supports indexed expressions already. It just isn't wrapped in
Sage yet. Again, there is an experimental patch available:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/burcin/indexed_expression-20110727.patch
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:00:57 -0800
William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Twice in the last day I've hit this deprecation warning due to making
a stupid typo:
sage: d(N) = (1/2)*(N^2-1)(N^2-N)/(N-1) # contains stupid typo
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 5 Nov., 21:24, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2011, at 12:16 , Julien Puydt wrote:
Le 05/11/2011 17:42, William Stein a écrit :
What do you base this probably on? Having started and watched
Hi Simon,
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 27 Okt., 11:39, Martin Albrecht martinralbre...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2011, Simon King wrote:
Is that something to worry about?
Yes!
Good. I created trac ticket
Hi Pablo,
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:49:39 -0300
Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I need to perform computations with linear differential operators
whose coefficients are polynomials
in several
Hi Pablo,
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:32:12 -0300
Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
Many thanks!
I see that with this patches, it would be esasy to have also a Weyl
algebra implementation in Sage
Yes, writing constructors for Weyl algebras will be an easy step when
it is merged.
We've
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Bump.
On 13 Okt., 08:43, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
...
sage: q1 = SR(p1)
sage: q2 = SR(p2)
sage: q3 = SR(p3)
sage: q4 = SR(p4)
sage: q5 = SR(p5)
sage: q =
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Benjamin Jones benjaminfjo...@gmail.com wrote:
In Trac ticket #11143, there is some discussion [1] about the naming
of exponential integral type special functions which are added to the
global namespace there. Here are the names of the functions which
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 18 Okt., 19:08, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
ATM, simplify() just converts the expression to maxima and get's it
back. If you change the coefficient ring for the polynomial ring to
one that we
Hi Keshav,
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 03:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that error message is propagated from GiNaC. See line 523
of src/ginac/power.cpp in the pynac spkg. The error message is
hard-coded and doesn't refer to python's eval() function.
This
Hi,
I just uploaded a prototype python wrapper for the new library
interface to polymake on bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/burcin/pypolymake
The docstrings in polymake.pyx contain examples of what is possible
right now:
https://bitbucket.org/burcin/pypolymake/src/tip/polymake.pyx#cl-105
Hi,
there will be a Sage/Singular workshop in Kaiserslautern, Germany on
September 26-30, 2011.
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days34
The main focus of the meeting will be to improve libSingular and the
Sage - Singular interface.
We anticipate a coding oriented event with few talks. Newcomers,
Hi Andrey,
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just looked over PARI citing discussion and recently I had a
talk with a developer of a software package X who was concerned that
inclusion of X into Sage will mean that people will stop
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:40:02 -0700
William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev
novos...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just looked over PARI citing discussion and recently I had a
talk with a developer of a software package X who was concerned that
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:20:35 -0400
Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 07/20/11 13:26, Burcin Erocal wrote:
If you are adding tests only for integration, starting a new file
sage/symbolic/tests.py might be better.
...
Don't forget to mention the ticket number
Hi,
Feza Gursey Institute in Turkey, which hosted the only Sage notebook
server in Turkey and contributed a Turkish translation of the notebook
as well as hosting many workshops to popularize computational algebra,
is being closed.
There is more information below, with a (hidden) link to the
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Eviatar eviatarb...@gmail.com wrote:
I am working on a physical constants module, but for whatever reason I
can't get it to correctly import the units module.
I import the units class using from units import units, but I get:
snip
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:44:10 -0400
Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
2. Subject to #1, where is the most appropriate place to add the
tests? My first guess would be in the TESTS: section of
sage/calculus/calculus.py, but there appear to be some standalone
tests defined in
Hi Simon,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 07:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 14 Jul., 16:37, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Perhaps it would be best to study
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/burcin/dense_ctypes.patch
Is there a ticket where that patch is
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 12 Jul., 21:09, Martin Albrecht martinralbre...@googlemail.com
wrote:
If one is serious about this then one should probably use the
FFLAS/FFPACK low-level routines directly (Burcin might have some
old
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:08:27 -0700
Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 6/18/11 10:59 PM, Ars-Magna wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that in the 4.6.2 one has the following expected behavior
sage: list(x.iterator())
[]
where as in 4.7
sage: list(x.iterator())
ValueError .
Merhaba Ege,
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Ege Sertçetin sertce...@itu.edu.tr wrote:
I now translated it. Does the person I will show it have to be a
developer of Sage?
I'd be happy to review the translation. When you open a ticket [1]
add me (user name: burcin) to the CC list
Hi,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:27:47 +0100
Martin Albrecht martinralbre...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm wondering whether we should do a Sage-FLINT days thingy/coding
sprint (either somewhere in the big blue room or online) to make use
of all the cool new features in FLINT 2.x?
Or should we wait
Hi,
we are planning to organize Sage/Singular days in Kaiserslautern some
time in September. The focus will be on the development of
the Sage-Singular interface, and libSingular, but anybody interested
is welcome to participate.
Financial support will be available, especially for the brave who
On Sun, 15 May 2011 20:51:54 +1200
Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On the other hand singular seems to be getting a python interface it
may be an idea to investigate switching to that.
This interface allows calling python from the Singular interpreter,
which gives
On Sun, 08 May 2011 07:06:03 +1200
Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2011 21:15:11 +1200
Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Removing the sse2 use flag makes the gf2x build crash. Should
NTL depend on gf2x conditionally?
snip
On Sat, 7 May 2011 08:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, May 7, 2011 3:57:02 PM UTC+1, Burcin Erocal wrote:
Since there is already the standard CFLAGS variable I didn't
implement an extra WRAPPER_CFLAGS.
I want the compiler wrapper to handle
On Wed, 11 May 2011 00:10:29 +1200
Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On Sun, 08 May 2011 07:06:03 +1200
Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2011 21:15:11 +1200
Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2011 21:15:11 +1200
Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On Thu, 05 May 2011 00:33:57 +1200
I added support for logging and put the repository on bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/burcin/sage-prefix
I will be heading home now. No time to make a
On Sat, 07 May 2011 21:15:11 +1200
Francois Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Removing the sse2 use flag makes the gf2x build crash. Should NTL
depend on gf2x conditionally?
That's not normal. Could you forward me the failing log? As for
conditional dependency it used to be
On Sat, 7 May 2011 07:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
You shouldn't need autotools to build anything, only the
autogenerated scripts that are in the source tarball. But it seems
like some patches are re-running autoconf. On my Fedora 14 install it
breaks early on:
1 - 100 of 389 matches
Mail list logo
