to stand up an entire Solr stack, from scratch, including
ZooKeeper, Solr, solr.xml, config upload, collection creation, replica
creation, content indexing, etc. It is a delight to see when it works.
Upayavira
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, at 09:30 AM, Björn Häuser wrote:
> Hi Raja,
>
> we
You have a stemming filter in your analysis chain. Go to the analysis
tab, select the 'text' field, and put "Roche" into both boxes. Click
analyse. I bet you you will see Roch, not Roche, because of your
stemming filter shown below.
That's what Ahmet shrewdly identified above.
Upayavi
Thx for these both, we'll give them both a try, see what difference they
make.
Upayavira
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, at 12:27 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Upayavira:
>
> bq: I would have expected that, because the data is being indexed
> concurrently across replicas, that the pattern of
deletes would be concentrated
into a single large segment.
Has anyone seen this sort of thing before, and does anyone have
suggested strategies as to how to encourage IDF values into a similar
range across replicas?
Upayavira
addresses to 64bit, and consequently until you reach
the upper bound, you will see no benefit - or worse, you'll see worse
memory behaviour as you'll effectively have less available.
Upayavira
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, at 08:31 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I strongly suspect you're not getting &q
What do you mean by a "transition"?
Can you configure a sidekick container within your orchestrator? Have a
sidekick always run alongside your SolrCloud nodes? In which case, this
would be an app that does the calling of the API for you.
Upayavira
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, at 08:53 PM, St
know if this is interesting to you. If so, I'll post it here when
I'm done with it.
Upayavira
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, at 02:46 PM, Lorenzo Fundaró wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I am trying to run Solr on my infrastructure using docker containers and
> Mesos. My problem is that I don't h
Don't forget you can set a default value in the field definition in your
schema.
Upayavira
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, at 03:21 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> All the parameters are here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Uploading+Data+with+Index+Ha
Tracked it down to this ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6590
which changed the implementation of normalize() in
org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TFIDFSimilarity.
I've asked for comment on that ticket.
Upayavira
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, at 01:39 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote
Here's a recently created ticket that covers this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9185
Let's hope we see some traction on it soon, as many people suffer from
this issue.
Upayavira
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, at 09:10 PM, MaryJo Sminkey wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:50 PM,
.10 and 5.5?
Thanks!
Upayavira
4.10 score
"2937439": {
"match": true,
"value": 5.5993805,
"description": "weight(description:obama in 394012)
[DefaultSimilarity],
, and
will get you into trouble (e.g. like this), so I'd suggest you just
start up a Solr as described in all of the tutorials, and use it the
normal way.
Upayavira
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, at 01:36 PM, SRINI SOLR wrote:
> Hi Upayavira / Team -
> Can you please explain in-detail - how to do the
Are you executing a commit?
You must commit before your content becomes visible.
Upayavira
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, at 11:13 AM, SRINI SOLR wrote:
> Hi Team -
> Can you please help me out on the below issue ...
>
> We are using the Solr 4.3.1 version.
>
> Integrated So
the DB to
Solr).
Upayavira
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016, at 10:52 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
> Hi Pithon,
>
> I have to state beforehand that I worked with transactions on Solr 4.8.1,
> so I'm not sure the transactions are changed in Solr over time.
> And, I have to add, the transactions supp
:-)
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, at 06:50 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> I'm sorry for thinking sooo slow.
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Ahhh, seen it now in your SubQueryAugmenterFactory, via the threadLocal.
> > Somewhat scar
Ahhh, seen it now in your SubQueryAugmenterFactory, via the threadLocal.
Somewhat scary code, but I think I can work with it!
Thanks!
Upayavira
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, at 10:30 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Had you check
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/6_0_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/r
I was always under the impression that a search component couldn't
modify the output of a previous search component. If it can, then the
highlight component could add its results to the output of the query
component, and we're done.
Upayavira (who sees the confusion on people's faces often when
can retrieve the
"highlighting" element.
Make sense?
On Fri, 27 May 2016, at 02:45 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Upayavira,
>
> It's not clear what do you mean in "results themselves", perhaps you mean
> SolrDocuments ?
>
> public abstract class Result
quest getRequest();
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mikhail,
> >
> > Is there really? If I look at ResultContext, I see it is an abstract
> > class, completed by BasicResultContext. I don't see any contex
are
suggesting?
Upayavira
On Thu, 26 May 2016, at 06:28 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is a protected ResultContext field named context.
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Looking at the code for a s
something?
Upayavira
On Thu, 26 May 2016, at 01:02 PM, Zaccheo Bagnati wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a SOLR core containing documents:
> document (id, type, text)
> and a core containing annotations (each document has 0 or more
> annotations):
> annotation (id, document_id, user, text)
>
> I can filter annotations on
Why would you want to do this?
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016, at 04:15 AM, Aditya Desai wrote:
> Hello SOLR Experts
>
> I am interested to know if SOLR 5.5 supports Same Origin Policy. I am
> trying to read the data from http://localhost:8984/Solr_1/my/directory1
> and
> display it on UI on
that it works with a specific
container.
Think of Solr much like you would any other app such as Mysql or Mongo.
You just install the app, not making it depend upon any other
'container'.
Upayavira
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, at 09:54 AM, Adel Mohamed Khalifa wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> What is the re
no effect on the score, whereas a boost of 1 doubles
the score. If you use plain multiplicative here, a boost of 0 wipes out
the score entirely, which can have nasty effects (it has, at least, for
me).
Upayavira
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, at 06:58 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Think about us
.
Upayavira
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, at 09:29 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hmmm, I don't think anyone's really documented this as the
> supposition is that one would only run embedded for sandboxes
> and set up an external ensemble "for real".
>
> So, with the caveat that I
be misled into installing Solr alongside lots of
other things.
Even if the only thing that gets put onto a node is a Docker install,
then a Solr Docker image, it is *still* way easier to do than anything
else I've tried and still very worth it.
Upayavira (who doesn't, yet, have Dockerised Solr
any info!
If you really must do that on the Solr side, I'd suggest you try doing
it in an UpdateProcessor. You can either code these in Java, or in a
scripting language with the StatelessScriptUpdateProcessor. You could
strip out all of the non-numeric characters before they get to the
index.
Upayavira
The screenshots didn't come through. Can you paste text into email? The
query URL is the most important thing.
Thx
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, at 02:00 PM, Anil wrote:
> HI Upayavira,
>
> Thanks for your response. Following are the screenshots of the same
> query with and without par
Show us the query URL. It would seem like your timeallowed isn't taking
effect.
Upayavira
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, at 12:48 PM, Anil wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> in my test, i have timeallowed 10 ms. response has no partial results (no
> partial flag in the response header) and Qtime i
receive its information.
Upayavira
, and solr_home becomes
purely about data alone.
Does that work?
Upayavira
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> Hmm, I've worked around this by setting the directory where the
> indexes should live to be the actual solr home, and symlink the files
> from the curren
facet.contains=
Beware that it is relatively new, so will only be in the latest few Solr
releases.
I think this was it [1], which suggests it is in 5.1+
Upayavira
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1387
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 10:38 AM, Anil wrote:
> HI ,
>
>
deleted or not) for your index. I bet one will be
2x the other.
Upayavira
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016, at 08:12 PM, Steven White wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm fixing code that I noticed to have a defect. My expectation was that
> once I make the fix, the index size will be smaller but i
things because when
you start to work at that scale, the implementation details behind
Lucene really start to matter and impact upon your ability to succeed.
I'd suggest that what you are undertaking can certainly be done, but is
a substantial project.
Upayavira
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016, at 09:48 PM
but it is intended for getting larger amounts of
data out of a Solr index.
Upayavira
.
How would you later use this data, and what advantage is there to
storing it in Solr?
Upayavira
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016, at 03:40 PM, Mark Robinson wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for all your suggestions. I took some time to get the details to
> be
> more accurate. Please find what I have gather
to identify/manage that.
Upayavira
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016, at 08:43 PM, tedsolr wrote:
> I have a Solr Cloud cluster (v5.2.1) using a Zookeeper ensemble in my
> primary
> data center. I am now trying to plan for disaster recovery with an
> available
> warm site. I have read (many time
Not a tutorial as such, but here's some simple infrastructure for
building Solr components alongside Solr:
https://github.com/upayavira/custom-solr-components
I suspect you're past that stage already though.
Upayavira
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016, at 04:45 PM, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> Here's a cou
accepting a larger query).
Upayavira
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Midas A wrote:
> Is there any drawback of POST request and why we prefer GET.
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Salman Ansari <salman.rah...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Cool. I would give POST a try
Try the MLT query parser, which is a much newer way of doing this.
Perhaps it will work better for you.
Upayavira
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016, at 06:31 PM, Robert Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had to switch to using the MLT component, rather than the handler,
> since I'm running on So
The field is not stored in a discrete place, rather it is mixed up with
all other field/document data. Therefore, I would suggest that
attempting to discern the disk space consumed by a single field would be
a futile endeavour.
Upayavira
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016, at 12:04 PM, KNitin wrote:
> I w
This is not a use-case to which Lucene lends itself. However, if you
must, I would try the terms query parser, which I believe is used like
this:
{!terms f=id}2,3,6,7
Upayavira
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Mugeesh Husain wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have a requirement to search ID field va
you search against multiple terms, Lucene needs to merge those into
a definitive list of matching documents, and for large numbers of terms,
that can be costly.
Upayavira
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016, at 04:29 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Best of luck with that ;). 250ms isn't bad at all for "s
Solr does store the term positions, but you won't find it easy to
extract them, as they are stored against terms not fields.
Your best bet is to index field lengths into Solr alongside the field
values. You could use an UpdateProcessor to do this if you want to do it
in Solr.
Upayavira
On Tue
Ask yourself what you want out of the index, how you want to query it,
then the way to structure your index will become more clear.
What sort of queries do you need to execute?
Upayavira
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016, at 01:30 PM, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Recently I have starte
Hrmph. I've got an Ant based codebase for building custom components
against Solr. I've been asked on numerous occasions to publish this
codebase. It is now at:
https://github.com/upayavira/custom-solr-components
There's no sample code in there yet. I'll see if I can stick one in
there now
based upon that.
With some coding, you could probably get that to be a single request to
Solr, but it is going to remain two queries against the index.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016, at 09:07 PM, William Bell wrote:
> Example.
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/providersearch/select?wt=
, or you could write your own - they're not that hard to
create. Or, you could create a search component that operates before the
QueryComponent does.
A simple queryparser of your own would seem like a pretty lightweight
thing - probably 20 lines of code or less.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016, at 09
, the query() function does *not* do a query, it just says "what
would this document score for this query?"
Can you describe in English what you are trying to do?
Upayavira
to
calculate the facet counts for this field, you will need to increment
the bucket for every value for your field for each document, and in such
a case you can expect performance to collapse.
Upayavira
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Vishnu perumal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using SOLR 4.1
not familiar with Java, get someone else to do it).
Unfortunately, that is the nature of open source - there's so many such
features that *could* be extended, they tend to get the feature when
someone actually needs it.
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015, at 06:14 PM, Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
wrote
That might work, but this might be clearer:
q={!boost b=recip(dist(2, 0, star_rating, 0, 3),1,10,10) v=$mlt}&
mlt={!mlt qf=name,description,facilities,resort,region,dest_level_2
mintf=1 mindf=3 maxqt=100}43083
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
> I
Firstly, don't use an embedded Zookeeper for anything other than
experimentation,
Set up your own zookeeper ensemble, otherwise your one box doing GC will
take down all of your solr instances.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015, at 01:24 PM, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> Hi Elvis,
> We're having a similar problem with
of course, require some Java coding.
Upayavira
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015, at 09:17 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Sorry hit send too early
>
> Is there a mechanism in solr/lucene that allows customization of the
> fields
> returned that would have access to the field content and payload?
> On De
parsers and such for free.
Upayavira
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015, at 07:37 PM, Tim Hearn wrote:
> One workaround is to use the 'important terms' feature to grab the query
> generated by the MLT handler, then parse that list into your own solr
> query
> to use through a standard search handle
Which morelikethis are you using? Handler, SearchComponent or
QueryParser?
You should be a able to wrap the mlt query parser with the boost query
parser with no problem.
Upayavira
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015, at 05:18 AM, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> Have you tried applying the boosts to individual fie
, and, as you are seeing, have far less control over what
happens inside than you would if Tika was consumed by your own
application.
Upayavira
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015, at 03:11 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm also facing the same issue as what you faced 2 months back,
You add shards to reduce response times. If your responses are too slow
for 1 shard, try it with three. Skip two for reasons stated above.
Upayavira
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015, at 04:27 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> 8,000 TPS almost certainly means you're firing the same (or
> same few) request
ound that already.
As to deprecation, these sort of things in my experience don't get
deprecated as such, we just find that one gets better than the other -
the better it gets, the more adoption it sees.
Upayavira
u mean "service"?
Upayavira
I did not deliberately remove that button, so if it is missing, it could
be a bug. Is it missing on the old, or new, or both UIs?
Thanks!
Upayavira
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015, at 07:08 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Right, the whole optimize thing is in a bit of a state of flux. For
> i
pt)
That is up to you. Use the inbuilt Jetty, along with the bin/solr
script. The init script installer is a convenience tool should you
choose to use it.
Upayavira
failure after a 200ms wait, and requests always succeeded
whenever I killed a node.
Load balancers I have worked with take 20s or so to spot a down server.
Upayavira
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015, at 03:37 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You're over-complicating it, the complexity is already in S
If you have two replicas (one leader/one replica) for each shard of your
collection, and you ensure that no two replicas are on the same node,
and you have three independent Zookeeper nodes, then yes, you should
have HA.
Upayavira
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015, at 05:48 PM, Peter Tan wrote:
> Hi J
, even using the
Javascript ScriptUpdateProcessor. Probably simpler though in the code
that pushes the docs to Solr.
Upayavira
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015, at 09:05 PM, Novin Novin wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Actually, it is not multi value field. it is nested document.
>
> Novin
>
> On 1
ally wrong, and also
problematic in a SolrCloud world. Taking the DIH codebase and running it
*outside* Solr you get the best of DIH without the same set of issues.
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, at 05:47 AM, Anil Cherian wrote:
> Dear Team,
>
> I use DIH extensively and even wrote my own
ore better, then add a phrase version boosted:
"apple computer company"^2 (apple computer company)
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, at 07:35 AM, Yangrui Guo wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've been using 5.3.1. I would like to enable this feature: when user
> enters a query, the
I concur - this makes sense.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, at 01:39 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Yes, that’s why I believe it should be:
> 1) if only authentication is enabled, all users must authenticate and all
> authenticated users can do anything.
> 2) if authz is enabled, then all users must still
Cab you give an example? I cannot understand what you mean from your
description below.
Thx!
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015, at 12:42 AM, Yangrui Guo wrote:
> This will be a very common situation. Amazon and Google now display
> keywords missing in the document. However it seems that Solr parent-child
>
14 December 2015, Apache Solr™ 5.4 available
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, dynamic
clustering, database integration, rich document (e.g.,
it, Jamie.
Make a proposal for what you think could work. Post a patch that
demonstrates it. I suspect you'll be more likely to get more traction
that way. Also, copy the content of that link into the description of
the ticket so people don't need to leave the ticket to get its full
context.
Upayavira
I understood that on later Solrs, those join issues have been
(partially) resolved. So long as your joined-to collection is replicated
across every box, you should be good.
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, at 04:17 PM, Mugeesh Husain wrote:
> Thanks Toke Eskildsen,
>
> Actually i nee
This is exactly right. Schemaless can be a great discovery tool, but not
something it is useful to use in production, I'd say.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015, at 08:21 PM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] wrote:
> So, I actually went to an Elastic Search one day conference. One person
> spoke about having to
you
think about the schema. The managed schema has been there for ages, but
now the UI has support for it in the schema tab. Being able to really
easily create and remove fields certainly does things to my brain
because it is just so easy.
Upayavira
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015, at 08:35 PM, Erick Erickson
y "core" centric so that you can
> see the details of every replica, but if you look at the "Cloud" screen
> in
> the UI it will in fact show you the collections and what cores make up
> that collection...
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Cloud+Screens
The UI from 5.4 will fix this - it will show separate drop downs for
collections and cores, which I hope will make this much clearer.
Upayavira
bet you!
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 08:04 PM, Kelly, Frank wrote:
> Context: Solr 5.3.1 with ZooKeeper 3.4.6 (SolrCloud)
>
> Via the REST APU I am trying to create a collection and tie it to a
> configuration I have loaded into ZooKeeper
>
> Here are the configs loa
of this community.
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 04:36 PM, Scotten Stuart wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I hope this is the way to ask a question - please guide me if there is a
> different protocol
>
> I have a question about results ranking for Solr V4.2 in combination with
>
;>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 12/1/15, 5:10 PM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> &
this, you point your client at Zookeeper, not Solr. It works out
the location of the correct Solr to hit based upon the information in
ZK.
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 06:29 AM, William Bell wrote:
> ok.
>
> What about using DIH handler? Does it index in a SolrCloud setup ? Or ho
tting up a 3 shard 3 server
> cluster?
I guess, if you have three shards, then you want one shard per server
obviously. You could just have a replica of each shard on each of your
servers, that way you have 9 cores in total, three per node. But that
wouldn't make straight-forward use of your to SSDs per instance.
Upayavira
of the queries
that Solr gives to you, along with the JSON/XML that wraps them?
Upayavira
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 10:45 AM, Modassar Ather wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a query title:(solr lucene api). The mm is set to 100% using q.op
> as
> AND.
> When the query is executed it
traffic.
7. Faceting should work just fine (as you describe) across shards. I
would check specifically on newer faceting features though before
assuming anything.
8. facet.sort+counts, have you tried it?
9. I would consider this to be a more up-to-date place to go:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/SolrCloud
Upayavira
?
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Adrian Liew wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to figure out how to setup 3 shard 3 server setup with a
> replication factor of 2 with SolrCloud 5.3.0.
>
> In particular trying to follow this setup described in this blog:
> http://lucidw
files, then shut down. What changes have you seen? Did the
commit 'take' and cause the files to be written?
Upayavira
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Oliver Schrenk wrote:
> Yes. Hard commit using SolrJ 4.10.4 client with UpdateResponse.commit()
> which defaults to waitFlus
framework interacting with it, e.g. having
an admin-ui (or just a UI) role covering the whole UI. More
sophisticated UIs are, for sure, possible, but I for one haven't thought
that far yet.
Upayavira
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015, at 09:42 PM, Don Bosco Durai wrote:
> In traditional web interface applicat
running as before
You can point Solr 5 at an existing directory (SOLR_HOME) that contains
your index and configs with the -s parameter:
bin/solr start -s /path/to/old/solr_home
Upayavira
I'm very happy for the admin UI to be served another way - i.e. not
direct from Jetty, if that makes the task of securing it easier.
Perhaps a request handler specifically for UI resources which would make
it possible to secure it all in a more straight-forward way?
Upayavira
On Wed, Nov 18
too.
Upayavira
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 07:46 AM, Noble Paul wrote:
> The authentication plugin is not expensive if you are talking in the
> context of admin UI. After all it is used not like 100s of requests
> per second.
>
> The simplest solution would be
>
> provide a
Just to be sure, are you installing Solr inside a different Jetty, or
using the Jetty that comes with Solr?
You would be expected to use the one installed and managed by Solr.
Upayavira
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Behzad Qureshi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using Tomcat server
Okay, makes sense. As to your question - making a new ValueSourceParser
that handles 'equals' sounds pretty straight-forward.
If it helps, I have somewhere an Ant project that will unpack Solr and
compile custom components against it. I could push that to github or
something.
Upayavira
On Thu
Erick,
I saw mention of openSearcher for SolrJ, so I looked in the source of
the UpdateRequestHandler, and there is no mention of openSearcher in
there that I can see, for XML, JSON or SolrJ requests.
So my take is that this isn't possible right now :-(
Upayavira
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 02:53
away from finding it.
> Most of the constants you see in UpdateRequestHandler look like dead code
> that should be removed.
Fair enough.
Upayavira
I concur with Jan - what does b= do?
Also asking, how did you identify that it worked?
Upayavira
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 02:58 AM, William Bell wrote:
> I was able to get it to work kinda with a map().
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*=1=
> <http://localhost:898
t making contributions via JIRA, and after a while, if
you keep that up, your efforts will be noticed and you will be invited
to participate as a committer.
Upayavira
, requiring credentials to
see the UI would be more conventional, and therefore lead to less
confusion. Is it possible for us to protect the UI static files, only
for the sake of user experience, rather than security?
Upayavira
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> The admin UI is a bu
Is the authentication plugin that expensive?
I can help by minifying the UI down to a smaller number of CSS/JS/etc
files :-)
It may be overkill, but it would also give better experience. And isn't
that what most applications do? Check authentication tokens on every
request?
Upayavira
On Tue
Or, rather than touch Jetty, you could simply use iptables or such
firewall as is provided by your operating system.
Upayavira
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015, at 08:08 AM, Vijay Mhaskar - 2 wrote:
> Or you can try configuring IP based access control mechanism using
> IPAccessHandler in jetty.
change? Harder than just updating a shell script, I
know, but could be very useful.
Upayavira
Yago,
I think a JIRA has been raised for this. I'd encourage you to hunt it
down and make a patch.
Upayavira
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015, at 03:09 PM, Yago Riveiro wrote:
> The time that init.d script waits before shutdown should be configurable
>
> The 5 seconds is not enough to all my shar
1 - 100 of 854 matches
Mail list logo
