Depends on where the bottlenecks are I guess.
On a single system, increasing shards decreases throughput (this
isn't specific to Solr). The increased parallelism *can* decrease
latency to the degree that the parts that were parallelized outweigh
the overhead.
Going from one shard to two shards
The other thing to realize is that it's only insanity if it's
unexpected or not-by-design (so the term is rather mis-named).
It's more for core developers - if you are just using Solr without
custom plugins, don't worry about it.
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:27 PM,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
bq. I believe there were some changes made to the clusterstate.json
recently that are not backwards compatible.
Indeed - I think yonik committed something the other day - we prob
should send an email out about this.
already-optimized, single-segment index
That part is interesting... if true, then the type of insanity you
saw should be impossible, and either the insanity detection or
something else is broken.
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
Folks,
Some changes have been committed in the past few days related to
SOLR-3815 as part of the groundwork
for SOLR-3755 (shard splitting).
The resulting clusterstate.json now looks like the following:
{collection1:{
shard1:{
range:8000-,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote:
Folks,
Some changes have been committed in the past few days related to
SOLR-3815 as part of the groundwork
for SOLR-3755 (shard splitting).
The resulting clusterstate.json now looks like the following:
{collection1
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
I used GC in different situations and tried back and forth.
Yes, it reduces the used heap memory, but not by 5GB.
Even so that GC from jconsole (or jvisualvm) is Full GC.
Whatever Full GC means ;-)
In the past
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Mike Schultz mike.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'm figuring 3MB per entry. With CacheSize=512 I expect something like
1.5GB of RAM, but with the server in steady state after 1/2 hour, it is 7GB
larger than without the cache.
Heap size and memory use aren't
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote:
After investigating more, here is the tomcat log herebelow. It is indeed
the same problem: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2,.
could not be solr able to close oldest warming searcher and replace it by
new one?
That
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:03 PM, sy...@web.de wrote:
The purpose of stored=true is to store the raw string data besides the
analyzed/transformed data for displaying purposes. This is fine for an
analyzed solr.TextField, but for an StrField both values are the same. So is
there any reason
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
A trie field probably doesn't work properly, as it indexes multiple terms
per value and you'd get odd values.
I don't know about pivot faceting, but all of the other types of
faceting take this into account (hence
I believe this is caused by the regex support in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039
It certainly seems wrong to interpret a slash in the middle of the
word as the start of a regex, so I've reopened the issue.
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Alexandre
It's actually limited to 24 bits to point to the term list in a
byte[], but there are 256 different arrays, so the maximum capacity is
4B bytes of un-inverted terms, but each bucket is limited to 4B/256 so
the real limit can come in at a little less due to luck.
From the comments:
* There is
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Voth, Brad (GE Corporate)
brad.v...@ge.com wrote:
Anyone know the actual status of SOLR-2565, it looks to be marked as resolved
in 4.* but I am still seeing long pauses during commits using 4.*
SOLR-2565 is definitely committed - adds are no longer blocked by
In 4.0 you can use the def function with pseudo-fields (returning
function results as doc field values)
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#def
fl=a,b,c:def(myfield,10)
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Rohit Harchandani rhar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Is
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Peter Kirk p...@alpha-solutions.dk wrote:
Hi, a question about sorting and dynamic fields in Solr Specification
Version: 3.6.0.2012.04.06.11.34.07.
I have a field defined like
dynamicField name=*_int type=int indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=false/
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Bing Hua bh...@cornell.edu wrote:
Thanks for the information. It definitely helps a lot. There're
numDeletesToKeep = 1000; numRecordsToKeep = 100; in UpdateLog so this should
probably be what you're referring to.
However when I was doing indexing the total
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:47 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
Information I've read vary on exactly what is the accuracy of float
vs double but at a kilometer there's no question a double is overkill.
Back of the envelope:
23 mantissa bits + 1 implied bit == 24 effective
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:31 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
Is there any documentation on the updateLog transaction log feature in Solr
4?
Not much beyond what's in solrconfig.xml
I started a quick prototype using Solr 4 alpha with a fairly structured
schema; no big
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
I've increased the connection time out on all 10 Tomcats from 1000ms to
5000ms. Indexing a larger amount of batches seems to run fine now. This,
however, does not really answer the issue. What is exactly timing
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Bing Hua bh...@cornell.edu wrote:
I'm a bit confused with the purpose of Transaction Logs (Update Logs) in
Solr.
My understanding is, update request comes in, first the new item is put in
RAM buffer as well as T-Log. After a soft commit happens, the new item
Stack trace looks normal - it's just a multi-term query instantiating
a bitset. The memory is being taken up somewhere else.
How many documents are in your index?
Can you get a heap dump or use some other memory profiler to see
what's taking up the space?
if I stop query more then ten minutes,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Timothy Hill timothy.d.h...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, all ...
According to http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery/#What_is_a_Function.3F,
it is possible under Solr 4.0 to perform parameter substitutions
within function queries.
However, I can't get the
Could this be just a simple case of a socket timeout? Can you raise
the timout on request threads in Tomcat?
It's a lot easier to reproduce/diagnose stuff like this when people
use the stock jetty server shipped with Solr.
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:39 PM,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:58 AM, jayakeerthi s mail2keer...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a requirement, where we need to implement 2 fields as Facetable,
but the values of the fields should not be Searchable.
The user fields uf feature of the edismax parser may work for you:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Nagendra Nagarajayya
nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com wrote:
SolrIndexSearcher is a heavy object with caches, etc.
As I've said, the caches are configurable, and it's trivial to disable
all caching (to the point where the cache objects are not even
created).
The
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Nagendra Nagarajayya
nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com wrote:
Realtime NRT algorithm enables NRT functionality in
Solr by not closing the Searcher object and so is very fast. I am in the
process of contributing the algorithm back to Apache Solr as a patch.
Since
I think what makes the most sense is to limit the number of
connections to another host. A host only has so many CPU resources,
and beyond a certain point throughput would start to suffer anyway
(and then only make the problem worse). It also makes sense in that a
client could generate documents
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Nils Abegg nils.ab...@ffuf.de wrote:
I have installed the 4.0 Alpha with the build-in Jetty Server on Ubuntu
Server 12.04…i followed this tutorial to set it up:
http://kingstonlabs.blogspot.de/2012/06/installing-solr-36-on-ubuntu-1204.html
Instead of trying to
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:43 AM, maurizio1976
maurizio.picc...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,
sorry Just a typo.
I meant
q=*:*fq=start=0rows=10qt=wt=explainOther=fl=product:(if(show_product:true,
product, )
thanks
Functions normally derive their values from the fieldCache... there
isn't currently
Do you have the following hard autoCommit in your config (as the stock
server does)?
autoCommit
maxTime15000/maxTime
openSearcherfalse/openSearcher
/autoCommit
This is now fairly important since Solr now tracks information on
every uncommitted document added.
At some
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Nick Koton nick.ko...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have the following hard autoCommit in your config (as the stock
server does)?
autoCommit
maxTime15000/maxTime
openSearcherfalse/openSearcher
/autoCommit
I have tried with and without that
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jack Krupansky
j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
Maybe your rate of update is so high that the commit never gets a chance to
run.
I don't believe that is possible. If it is, it should be fixed.
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
So this got me close
facet.field=testfieldfacet.field=%7B!key=mylabel%7Dtestfieldf.mylabel.limit=1
but the limit on the alias didn't seem to work. Is this expected?
Per-field params don't currently look under the
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a flag for: if document does
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
But later on when I want to append cat3 to the field by doing this:
mv_f:{add:cat3},
...
I end up with something like this
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Erick Erickson
The partial documents update that Jonatan references also requires
that all the fields be stored.
If my only fields with stored=false are copyField (e.g. I
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a flag for: if document does not exist, create it for me?
Not currently, but it certainly makes sense.
The implementation should be easy. The most difficult part is figuring
out the best syntax to
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Pavitar Singh psi...@sprinklr.com wrote:
We upgraded to Solr 4.0 Alpha and our CPU usage shot off to 400%.In
profiling we are getting following trace.
That could either be good or bad. Higher CPU can mean higher
concurrency. Have you benchmarked your indexing
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently the caches are stored per-multiple-segments, meaning after each
'soft' commit, the cache(s) will be purged.
Depends which caches. Some caches are per-segment, and some caches
are top level.
It's also a
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running off of a snapshot taken 5/3/2012 of solr 4.0 and am
noticing some issues around deleteById when a commitWithin parameter
is included using SolrJ, specifically commit isn't executed. If I
later just call commit
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Why would the documentCache not be populated via firstSearcher warming
queries with a non-zero value for rows?
Solr streams documents (the stored fields) returned to the user (so
very large result sets can be
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 27, 2012, at 12:01 , Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Why would the documentCache not be populated via firstSearcher warming
queries
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:50 PM, mcb thestreet...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a function query that returns miles as a score along two points:
q={!func}sub(sum(geodist(OriginCoordinates,39,-105),geodist(DestinationCoordinates,36,-97),Mileage),1000)
The issue that I'm having now now my results
Atomic update is a very new feature coming in 4.0 (i.e. grab a recent
nightly build to try it out).
It's not documented yet, but here's the JIRA issue:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote:
but i see RankingAlgorithm has fantastic results too and looking at its
reference page it even powers sites like oracle.com and ebay.com.
What reference page are you referring to?
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote:
What reference page are you referring to?
http://tgels.com/wiki/en/Sites_using/downloaded_RankingAlgorithm_or_Solr-RA
Ah, ok sites using/downloaded
So someone with a .oracle email / domain checked it out - that
certainly
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu wrote:
The explain (debugQuery) shows the following for fieldnorm:
0.625 = fieldNorm(field=ocr, doc=16624)
What does the doc=16624 mean?
It's the internal document id (i.e. it's debugging info and doesn't
affect scoring)
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Michael Kuhlmann k...@solarier.de wrote:
However, I doubt it. I've not been too deeply into the UpdateHandler yet,
but I think it first needs to parse the complete XML file before it starts
to index.
Solr's update handlers all stream (XML, JSON, CSV), reading
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:43 PM, rjain15 rjai...@gmail.com wrote:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=title:monsterswt=jsonindent=true
Try switching title:monsters to name:monsters
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2598
Looks like the data was changed to use the name field instead and
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:36 PM, rjain15 rjai...@gmail.com wrote:
No. Changing to name:monsters didn't work
OK, but you'll have to do that if you get the other part working.
Here is my guess, the UpdateJSON is not adding any new documents to the
existing index.
If that's true, the most
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:10 PM, rjain15 rjai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Firstly, apologies for the long post, I changed the quote to double quote
(and sometimes it is messy copying from DOS windows)
Here is the command and the output on the Jetty Server Window. I am
highlighting some important
In trunk, see:
* SOLR-2335: New 'field(...)' function syntax for refering to complex
field names (containing whitespace or special characters) in functions.
The schema in trunk also specifies:
!-- field names should consist of alphanumeric or underscore
characters only and
not start
I think this may be due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2857
JIRA is down right now so I can't check, but I thought the intent was
to have some back compat.
Try changing the URL from /update/json to just /update in the meantime
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
On Mon, May 14,
:58 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
wrote:
I think this may be due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2857
JIRA is down right now so I can't check, but I thought the intent was
to have some back compat.
Try changing the URL from /update/json to just /update
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
support for CouchDb, Voldemort or whatever.
Hmmm... Or Solr!
-Yonik
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
And how should we detect if data is compressed when
reading from ZooKeeper?
I was thinking we could somehow use file extensions?
eg synonyms.txt.gzip - then you can use different compression algs depending
on the
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:26 PM, okayndc bodymo...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I've experimented with this:
str name=facet.field{!ex=dt key=Categories and Stuff}category/str
I'm not really sure what 'ex=dt' does but it's obvious that 'key' is the
desired display name? If there are spaces in the
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe
tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this still true? Assuming that I know that there hasn't been updates or
that I don't care to see a different version of the document, are the term
QP or the raw QP faster than the real-time get handler?
Sort
Darn... looks likely that it's another bug from when part of
UnInvertedField was refactored into Lucene.
We really need some random tests that can catch bugs like these though
- I'll see if I can reproduce.
Can you open a JIRA issue for this?
-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:02 AM, mav.p...@holidaylettings.co.uk
mav.p...@holidaylettings.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
This is what the thread dump looks like.
Any ideas?
Looks like the thread taking up CPU is in LukeRequestHandler
1062730578@qtp-1535043768-5' Id=16, RUNNABLE on lock=, total cpu
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Trym R. Møller t...@sigmat.dk wrote:
Hi
I experience that a Solr looses its connection with Zookeeper and
re-establish it. After Solr is reconnection to Zookeeper it begins to
recover.
It has been missing the connection approximately 10 seconds and meanwhile
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:18 AM, mav.p...@holidaylettings.co.uk
mav.p...@holidaylettings.co.uk wrote:
We have an index of about 3.5gb which seems to work fine until it suddenly
stops accepting new commits.
Users can still search on the front end but nothing new can be committed and
it
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:23 PM, mav.p...@holidaylettings.co.uk
mav.p...@holidaylettings.co.uk wrote:
Hi again,
This is the only log entry I can find, regarding the failed commits…
Still timing out as far as the client is concerned and there is actually
nothing happening on the server in
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jason Cunning jcunn...@ucar.edu wrote:
My question is, what is the AppropriateJavaType for populating a solr field
of type LatLonType?
A String with both the lat and lon separated by a comma. Example: 12.34,56.78
-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
Interestingly, I worked at two different web search companies with two
different completely different search engines, and one arrived at an 8X title
boost and the other at a 7.5X title boost. So I consider 8X a
Folks,
If you're using a trunk version after 2/1/2012 in conjunction with the
shipped solrconfig.xml (which uses openSearcher=false in an autoCommit
by default),
then you should upgrade to a new version. There's a searcher leak
when openSearcher=false is used with a commit that leads to files not
I can reproduce some kind of searcher leak issue here, even w/o
SolrCloud, and I've opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3392
-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference.
Boston May 7-10
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Trym R. Møller t...@sigmat.dk wrote:
Hi
I am using Solr trunk and have 7 Solr instances running with 28 leaders and
28 replicas for a single collection.
After indexing a while (a couple of days) the solrs start hanging and doing
a thread dump on the jvm I see
facet.field={!terms=$organization__terms}organization
This is referring to another request parameter that Solr should have
added (organization__terms) . Did you cut-n-paste all of the
parameters below?
-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference.
Boston May 7-10
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Kissue Kissue kissue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am faceting on a boolean field called usedItem. There are a total of
607601 items in the index and they all have value for usedItem set to
false.
However when i do a search for *:* and faceting on usedItem, the
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Michael Ryan mr...@moreover.com wrote:
Is it safe to change the precisionStep for a TrieField without doing a
re-index?
Not really - it changes what tokens are indexed for them numbers and
range queries won't work correctly.
Sorting (FieldCache), function
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to execute the following on my cluster, but it had no results.
Should this work?
curl http://host:port/solr/collection1/update/?commit=true -H
Contenet-Type: text/xml --data-binary
'deletequery*:*/query/delete'
2012/4/16 Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com:
I'm wondering if Solr is the best tool for this kind of usage. Solr is a
text search engine
Well, Lucene is a full-text search library, but Solr has always been far more.
Dating back to it's first use in CNET, it was used as a browse engine
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Rohit ro...@in-rev.com wrote:
The machine has a total ram of around 46GB. My Biggest concern is Solr index
time gradually increasing and then the commit stops because of timeouts, out
commit rate is very high, but I am not able to find the root cause of the
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
It seems to me that http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery should
explain the *effect* of including an _val_ term in an ordinary query,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
That's just because Lucene normalizes scores. By default, this is
really just multiplying scores by a magic constant (that by default is
the inverse of the sum of squared weights)
Sorry... I missed the square
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I guess my first question is whether using stirngs
is fast enough, in which case there's little reason to
make your life more complex.
But yes, range queries will be significantly faster with
any of the Trie
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
We have a system with nTiers, that is:
Solr front base --- Solr front -- shards
Although the architecture had this in mind (multi-tier), all of the
pieces are not yet in place to allow it.
The errors you see are a direct
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Please see the documentation:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Required_Config :
: schema.xml
:
: You must have a _version_ field defined:
:
: field name=_version_ type=long indexed=true stored=true/
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM, vybe3142 vybe3...@gmail.com wrote:
This morning, I've been looking at the autocommit functionality as defined
in solrconfig.xml. By default, it appears that it should kick in 15 seconds
after a new document has been added. I do see this event triggered via the
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:51 AM, arunssasidhar arunssasid...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a PHP web application which is using SOLR for searching. The APP is
using CURL to connect to the SOLR server and which run in a loop with
thousands of predefined keywords. That will create thousands of
are not guaranteed
to be the same across shards should the sorting use the uniqueId field
as the tie breaker by default?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try to dig for the JIRA. Also
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Joseph Werner telco...@gmail.com wrote:
For more routine changes, are record updates supported without the
necessitity to rebuilt an index? For example if a description field for an
item needs be changed, am I correct in reading that the recodrd need only
be
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mark. The delete by query is a very rare operation for us and
I really don't have the liberty to update to current trunk right now.
Do you happen to know about when the fix was made so I can see if we
are before or
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:14 PM, vybe3142 vybe3...@gmail.com wrote:
Updating a single field is not possible in solr. The whole record has to
be rewritten.
Unfortunate. Lucene allows it.
I think you're mistaken - the same limitations apply to Lucene.
-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Erick Erickson
erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Try escaping the '+' with %2B (as I remember).
Shouldn't that be the other way? The admin UI should do any necessary
escaping, so those + chars should instead be a spaces?
-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
5-7 seconds- there's the problem. If you want to have documents
visible for search within that time, you want to use the trunk and
near-real-time search. A hard commit does several hard writes to the
disk (with the fsync()
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Rafal Gwizdala
rafal.gwizd...@gmail.com wrote:
Below i'm pasting the thread dump taken when the update was hung (it's also
attached to the first message of this topic)
Interesting...
It looks like there's only one thread in solr code (the one generating
the
Oops... my previous replies accidentally went off-list. I'll cut-n-paste below.
OK, so it looks like there is probably no bug here - it's simply that
commits can sometimes take a long time and updates were blocked during
that time (and would have succeeded eventually except the jetty
timeout was
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Alexandre Rocco alel...@gmail.com wrote:
http://localhost:8984/solr/select?q=*:*fq=local:[-23.6677,-46.7315 TO
-23.6709,-46.7261]
Range queries always need to be [lower_bound TO upper_bound]
Try
http://localhost:8984/solr/select?q=*:*fq=local:[-23.6709,-46.7315
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Alexandre Rocco alel...@gmail.com wrote:
Yonik,
Thanks for the heads-up. That one worked.
Just trying to wrap around how it would work on a real case. To test this
one I just got the coordinates from Google Maps and searched within the pair
of coordinates as
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, does it matter that we are also updates to documents at
various times? Do the deleted documents get removed when doing a
merge or does that only get done on an optimize?
Yes, any merge removes documents that have
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently got this stack trace when trying to execute a facet based
query on my index. The error went away when I did an optimize but I
was surprised to see it at all. Can anyone shed some light on why
this may have
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, with my custom component out of the picture I still have the same
issue. Specifically, when sorting by score on a leader and replica I
am getting different doc orderings. Is this something anyone has
seen?
This is
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Jamie Johnson jej2...@gmail.com wrote:
HmmmOk, I don't see how it's possible for me to ensure that there
are no ties. If a query were for *:* everything has a constant score,
if the user requested 1 page then requested the next the results on
the second
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ramdev.wud...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
Hi:
We have been keen on using polyfields for a while. But we have been
restricted from using it because they do not seem to support Multi-values
(yet).
Poly-fields should support multi-values, it's more what uses
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:38 PM, vybe3142 vybe3...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, I added the javabin handler snippet to the solrconfig.xml file
(actually shared across all cores). I got further (the request made it past
tomcat and into SOLR) but haven't quite succeeded yet.
Server trace:
Mar 19,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:48 PM, vybe3142 vybe3...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the response
No, the file is plain text.
All I'm trying to do is index plain ASCII text files via a remote reference
to their file paths.
The XML update handler expects a specific format of XML.
The json, CSV,
Hmmm, this looks like it's generated by DocumentBuilder with the code
catch( Exception ex ) {
throw new SolrException( SolrException.ErrorCode.BAD_REQUEST,
ERROR: +getID(doc, schema)+Error adding field ' +
field.getName() + '=' +field.getValue()+', ex );
601 - 700 of 2724 matches
Mail list logo
