To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: New topic,Foam Pit (Topic 2 Dead end sprinkler distance
increase)
We have a Gymnastics' training center in a OH II sprinkler facility. They
have mats on the walls, and a 5'-0 deep Foam filled Pit at the end of a
tumbling run out for spring board and vaulting
Ken, that table was suggested in earlier post on the subject and I have
taken it into consideration. Thanks for taking the time to offer the info.
Russell Rewis
Brown Automatic Sprinklers, Inc.
107C Hemlock Street
Valdosta, Georgia 31601
229-244-8130
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Table 8.6.2.2.1(d) of the
I agree and that's the approach I've always taken. Hydraulic calculations
are one of the many deciding factors for me. I've learned closer spacing
allows smaller pipe sizes, to a point of course. The rub for him is that 13
has segregated storage from the rest. He didn't question it when 231 and
, August 06, 2008 8:12 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: New topic
I agree and that's the approach I've always taken. Hydraulic calculations are
one of the many deciding factors for me. I've learned closer spacing allows
smaller pipe sizes, to a point of course. The rub for him
Also add Table 8.8.2.1.2 for Extended Coverage for Storage
Here's a related wrinkle. Well actual the text says High PIled
storage which is defined as storage greater than 12 ft high. What
about Group A plastic greater than 5 ft (which falls in full storage
vs Class I-IV going to Chap 13
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:59 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: New topic Round 2
Also add Table 8.8.2.1.2 for Extended Coverage for Storage
Here's a related wrinkle. Well actual the text says High PIled
storage
Okay, thanks, I'll add that table to the list. The vs part is where it
gets fuzzy.
Russell Rewis
Brown Automatic Sprinklers, Inc.
107C Hemlock Street
Valdosta, Georgia 31601
229-244-8130
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also add Table 8.8.2.1.2 for Extended Coverage for Storage
Here's a related wrinkle.
The reasonable and obvious action is to follow the same maximum area
as driven by the density BUT the amusing part is that there was no
actual guidance. This is a legacy from the old days when high piled
had intended meaning. This was fixed at the recent ROP meeting.
Roland
On Aug 6,
Yeah, I'm an 'old day kinda guy and that's why the calc's. have always been
a big part of my decision tree.
Russell Rewis
Brown Automatic Sprinklers, Inc.
107C Hemlock Street
Valdosta, Georgia 31601
229-244-8130
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The reasonable and obvious action is to follow the same
Russell,
Table 8.6.2.2.1(d) of the '07 indicates that for storage applications
with densities 0.25, the maximum coverage area is 100 square feet, and
the maximum spacing is 12'.
The same table advises that if the density is 0.25, the maximum
coverage area is 130 square feet, and the
You need to provide a bit more info. When dealing with storage occupancies you
need to clarify what is being stored, how it's being stored (racks, shelves,
bins, on floor, pallets), in what type of container (box, crate, tote, jars,
etc.), encapsulated, heights of said commodities, etc.
Once
Table 8.6.2.2.1 (d) of the 02'
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russell
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 2:21 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: New topic
Okay here's one. Please someone direct me to the text that states the
I thought you were going to reply it's a spec warehouse
How bout them Mets?
glc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Burtell
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 4:43 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: New topic
Table
Geez, I sure am having a big problem finding things lately. Just another
sign of senility. Looks like maybe it's the nervous hospital for me.
Thanks a bunch Joe.
Russell Rewis
Brown Automatic Sprinklers, Inc.
107C Hemlock Street
Valdosta, Georgia 31601
229-244-8130
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, classifying the stored item only gives me the Class 1 ,2, etc. but I
do not see anywhere that the class is associated with a particular sprk.
s.f. like Class 1, with double row racks less than twenty feet high,
non-encapsulated, no in-rack sprk. I don't have a specific project but
rather an
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russell
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 5:16 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: New topic
Well, classifying the stored item only gives me the Class 1 ,2, etc. but I do
not see anywhere that the class is associated with a particular sprk.
s.f. like
Try 8.6.2.2.1(c) '07 Ed.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russell
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 2:16 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: New topic
Well, classifying the stored item only gives me the Class 1 ,2, etc. but
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
