ay 08, 2017 9:29 AM
To:
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Subject: Re: special inspections
Ahhh I was waiting for that question. Because it's in the sprinkler standard,
noted on the sprinkler plans by the sprinkler designer, and often the architect
nor
sprinkler.org
<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
*Subject:* Re: special inspections
Ahhh I was waiting for that question. Because it's in the
sprinkler standard, noted on the sprinkler plans by the sprinkler
designer, and often the architect nor engineer know the sprinkler
;>
>>
>>
>> Steve L.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
>> On Behalf Of John Drucker
>> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 9:29 AM
>>
>>
>> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firespr
gt;
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] *On Behalf Of *John
> Drucker
> *Sent:* Monday, May 08, 2017 9:29 AM
>
>
> *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> *Subject:* Re: special inspections
>
>
>
> Ahh
AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: special inspections
Ahhh I was waiting for that question. Because it's in the sprinkler standard,
noted on the sprinkler plans by the sprinkler designer, and often the architect
nor engineer know the sprinkler designer took that option
m-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] *On Behalf Of
*Travis Mack, SET
*Sent:* Monday, May 8, 2017 10:30 AM
*To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
*Subject:* Re: special inspections
In this project, it was shown on the architectural plans. Quite
clearly called out.
Travis Mack, SET
MFP Desig
Travis. Then you would be good to go in our department, we would be inspecting
it and you wouldn't be writing these emails.
John Drucker
Assistant Construction Official
Fire & Electrical Subcode Official
Building Inspector
Borough of Red Bank, NJ
Cell/Text 732-904-6823
On May 8, 2017 12:30 PM,
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Mack, SET
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 10:30 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: special inspections
In this project, it was shown on the architectural plans. Quite clearly calle
In this project, it was shown on the architectural plans. Quite clearly
called out.
Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
fax: 866-430-6107
email:tm...@mfpdesign.com
http://www.mfpdesign.com
Ahhh I was waiting for that question. Because it's in the sprinkler standard,
noted on the sprinkler plans by the sprinkler designer, and often the architect
nor engineer know the sprinkler designer took that option, or it conflicts with
the architects design.
As a result we deny such
Yes..that has been standard practice in all areas I've been involved in.
Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
fax: 866-430-6107
email:tm...@mfpdesign.com
http://www.mfpdesign.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692
Send
Seems to me that if the architect or GC wants to fill the space with
insulation instead of sprinkle ring it's between him and the insulator to
get it right. If the AHJ wants to get involved then OK, but with them. If
you don't put in sprinklers because insulation has been approved what
business is
Hi Travis, do you care to name the "official" or at least the jurisdiction? Off
line?
Mark at Aero
602 820-7894
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 8, 2017, at 8:54 AM, John Drucker - Home
> wrote:
>
> Members,
>
> When an interstitial space is filled entirely with
Members,
When an interstitial space is filled entirely with non-combustible insulation
we coordinate with the contractor and perform the inspection ourselves.
John
John Drucker, CET
Assistant Construction Official
Fire Protection Subcode Official
Electrical Subcode Official
Building
rforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: special inspections
To the AHJ’s comment that you’ll do it his way or else, I would offer (and I
disclaim this opinion as even remotely expert with regard to the laws in other
states) that the AHJ is wrong if the implication is that he or she ca
d a war that we all find that we end up
> losing ...
>
> MY OPINION ONLY,
>
> Steve L.
>
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
> On Behalf Of Travis Mack
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 6:25 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.fi
...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Mack
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 6:25 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: special inspections
Sorry I don't have one. This has never been required. The city form we were
instructed to use has nothing about this either.
This ahj has not done
;>>
>>>
>>> Joe Triolo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Sprinklerforum
>>> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Pete
>>> Schwab
>>> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 8
o
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [
> mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
> <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>] *On Behalf Of *Pete
> Schwab
> *Sent:* Monday, May 08, 2017 8:32 AM
> *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> *Subject:* RE:
esprinkler.org]
> On Behalf Of Pete Schwab
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 8:32 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: special inspections
>
> Travis
> I wish more AHJ’s would require this. Then we might see GC’s opt to go with
> Interstitial Sprink
I think it’s a good idea, Travis do you have a copy you could send me? Thanks
Joe Triolo
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Pete Schwab
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 8:32 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: special
Travis
I wish more AHJ’s would require this. Then we might see GC’s opt to go with
Interstitial Sprinklers instead.
Pete
Peter Schwab
VP of Purchasing and Engineering technologies
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers Inc.
222 Capitol Court
Ocoee, Fl 34761
Mobile: (407) 468-8248
Direct: (407)
A little off track but still applicable, when applying the FILL with
insulation, attics need some ventilation just under the roof. Some but not all
of the exceptions identify a 2 inch air gap is allowed. This was explicated
stated in the 2013 ed but if you are in an older version, ensure
23 matches
Mail list logo