I'm a system administrator of a private home network, providing internet to
subscribers via ethernet. The corporate policy prohibits the use of ANY p2p
network by subscribers. The question is - is it possible to detect freenet
nodes on my LAN? I could indeed use connection statistics, but this is
I don't know about others, but I would not will to help you.
2009/8/21 Alex Pyattaev alex.pyatt...@gmail.com
I'm a system administrator of a private home network, providing internet to
subscribers via ethernet. The corporate policy prohibits the use of ANY p2p
network by subscribers. The
Portscanning? I tried nmap on my node, but it can't identify the
application. I don't know if other tools are able to.
-ermanno
2009/8/21 Alex Pyattaev alex.pyatt...@gmail.com:
I'm a system administrator of a private home network, providing internet to
subscribers via ethernet. The corporate
Hopefully the answer to Alex's question is: It can't be done.
If he can detect freenet nodes on his network, you must assume that
governments and the like can as well. I would rather we help Alex try
(and hopefully fail) in detecting nodes on his private home network,
than just ignore the fact
Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that try to
connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed tell you. Hope
I'll ban some nasty users before you make a patch, so that I can sleep well
knowing that my bosses will never know about the freenet users in the
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
I'm a system administrator of a private home network, providing
internet to subscribers via ethernet. The corporate policy prohibits
the use of ANY p2p network by subscribers. The question is - is it
possible to detect freenet nodes on my LAN? I could indeed use
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
try to connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed
tell you. Hope I'll ban some nasty users before you make a patch, so
that I can sleep well knowing that my bosses will never know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Victor, you basically repeat my idea (about the harvester), so i will
think about implementation. Statistics method is not an option, almost
the same stats are shown for online games (especially real-time) that
utilize UDP. almost constant, mostly
Luke771 wrote:
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
try to connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed
tell you. Hope I'll ban some nasty users before you make a patch, so
that I can sleep well knowing that my bosses will
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, VolodyA! V
Anarhistvolo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
Luke771 wrote:
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
try to connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed
tell you. Hope I'll ban some
He has stated that the network does not allow P2P applications running
Freenet
as pure darknet will technically be F2F, now we can start arguing whether
F2F
is a subset of P2P or a distinctly different thing. But if we accept that
F2F
and P2P are different, then people who haven't enabled
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Alex Pyattaevalex.pyatt...@gmail.com wrote:
He has stated that the network does not allow P2P applications running
Freenet
as pure darknet will technically be F2F, now we can start arguing
whether F2F
is a subset of P2P or a distinctly different thing. But
At 09:15 AM 8/21/2009, Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Victor Denisovvdeni...@redline.ru wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luke771 wrote:
What you're doing here is catching Opennet users. Pure Darknet users
wont be that easy to catch.
No,
Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, VolodyA! V
Anarhistvolo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
Luke771 wrote:
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
try to connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed
tell you.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:57:15PM +0100, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
Evan Daniel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, VolodyA! V
Anarhistvolo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
Luke771 wrote:
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
Please upgrade to 1231. Changelogs:
1229:
- XML vulnerability warnings fixes.
- Fix an NPE in plugins.
- Minor internal stuff.
1230:
- Detect the XML vulnerability on OS/X. Try to detect it on OpenJDK, maybe not
very well.
- Clarify an english string (Completed downloads to temporary space not
You know, I do think that freenet is a good idea. And in fact, until freenet
users will consume too much traffic, i'm not going to ban them. Because i
don't want to. In fact, right now 100.0% of major traffic consumers are
using *other* P2P networks. Mostly torrents, some use mule DC, but they
Congrats :)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Matthew
Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote:
Please upgrade to 1231. Changelogs:
1229:
- XML vulnerability warnings fixes.
- Fix an NPE in plugins.
- Minor internal stuff.
1230:
- Detect the XML vulnerability on OS/X. Try to detect it on
1232 fixes a severe bug preventing startup on some nodes. Sorry, we did try to
test it, but apparently messed up...
On Friday 21 August 2009 18:11:43 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Please upgrade to 1231. Changelogs:
1229:
- XML vulnerability warnings fixes.
- Fix an NPE in plugins.
- Minor
It appears that the problem only occurs in conjunction with FMS (0.3.41
at least). That is, freenet (I believe the problem started with 1229,
and it's still here with 1232. I really should test 1228) will run
normally -- and only after I launch FMS does it skyrocket to consume all
available cpu
20 matches
Mail list logo
