On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, VolodyA! V Anarhist<volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org> wrote: > Luke771 wrote: >> Alex Pyattaev wrote: >>> Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that >>> try to connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed >>> tell you. Hope I'll ban some nasty users before you make a patch, so >>> that I can sleep well knowing that my bosses will never know about the >>> freenet users in the LAN=) >>> >> What you're doing here is catching Opennet users. Pure Darknet users >> wont be that easy to catch. > > He has stated that the network does not allow "P2P applications" running > Freenet > as pure darknet will technically be "F2F", now we can start arguing whether > F2F > is a subset of P2P or a distinctly different thing. But if we accept that F2F > and P2P are different, then people who haven't enabled Opennet are actually > not > violating that particular network's guidelines.
Except that it's really, really obvious that friends are a subset of peers. See definition of peers. In a computing context, peers is as distinct from client/server etc. This is a silly argument, and any sysadmin will (rightly) tell you you're an idiot if you try to make it. Evan Daniel _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe