Known problem. Should be fixed soon. The practical effect of it is that
the node isn't using the native FEC libraries and is falling back on the
pure java ones (which are several times slower). This has been happening
for a while but is made obvious in recent builds.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at
Freenet 0.7 build 978 is now available. Please upgrade. Changelog:
- Some (hopefully minor) crypto fixes relating to DSA.
- Some refactoring.
- Fixes to probe requests. (These are a way to probe the keyspace
distribution and the size of the network).
- Better sanity checking for throttle.dat
Known problem. Should be fixed soon. The practical effect of it is that
the node isn't using the native FEC libraries and is falling back on the
pure java ones (which are several times slower). This has been happening
for a while but is made obvious in recent builds.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at
Freenet 0.7 build 982 is now available. Please upgrade. It should be
available through the auto-updater (if that doesn't work please tell
me). It should also be available to the update scripts or from
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ .
Changelog:
- Fixed an exploitable bug in the CSS
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:22:51AM -0400, Ken Snider wrote:
> Brandon Low wrote:
> >Well, it's moot any way, since I have no applicable code, but you are
> >right, it doesn't impact Freenet the same way that it does Linux, my
> >concern is more one of compatibility with GPL2 distributions as
>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:49:30PM -0500, Brandon Low wrote:
> Well, it's moot any way, since I have no applicable code, but you are
> right, it doesn't impact Freenet the same way that it does Linux, my
> concern is more one of compatibility with GPL2 distributions as
> discussed in the linux
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:05:11PM -0500, Brandon Low wrote:
> I do not give permission for any microscopic amount of code that may
> exist of mine in current freenet to be tagged GPL V2 or later, GPL V2
> only for me.
As far as I can see you haven't made any commits that affect 0.7.
>
> I won't
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:49:30PM -0500, Brandon Low wrote:
Well, it's moot any way, since I have no applicable code, but you are
right, it doesn't impact Freenet the same way that it does Linux, my
concern is more one of compatibility with GPL2 distributions as
discussed in the linux kernel
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:22:51AM -0400, Ken Snider wrote:
Brandon Low wrote:
Well, it's moot any way, since I have no applicable code, but you are
right, it doesn't impact Freenet the same way that it does Linux, my
concern is more one of compatibility with GPL2 distributions as
discussed
Freenet 0.7 build 978 is now available. Please upgrade. Changelog:
- Some (hopefully minor) crypto fixes relating to DSA.
- Some refactoring.
- Fixes to probe requests. (These are a way to probe the keyspace
distribution and the size of the network).
- Better sanity checking for throttle.dat
Freenet 0.7 build 979 is now available. It fixes a bug affecting FCP.
Sorry folks. Please upgrade.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:41:05PM +0100, toad wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 978 is now available. Please upgrade. Changelog:
- Some (hopefully minor) crypto fixes relating to DSA.
- Some refactoring
Freenet status report, 26/09/06
---
0. Status Report.
The last time I put out a status report was in March. The last time Ian
put out one was in July. Clearly a lot has changed since then!
ToC:
1. Financial.
John Gilmore, one of the founder members of the EFF, the
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:05:11PM -0500, Brandon Low wrote:
I do not give permission for any microscopic amount of code that may
exist of mine in current freenet to be tagged GPL V2 or later, GPL V2
only for me.
As far as I can see you haven't made any commits that affect 0.7.
I won't go
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:45:57AM -0700, an ominous cow herd wrote:
> I find it funny that all of these 0.7 users are saying that the 0.7 network
> is
> better and more secure than the 0.5 network. They say this even while we see
> these warnings about critical bug fixes, peers in the 0.7
see
> https://www.winstonsmith.info/pws or
> https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
>
> -BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
> Message-type: plaintext
>
> In <20060918233820.GA27941 at amphibian.dyndns.org> toad amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at
-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:10:57PM +0100, Volodya wrote:
Lars Juel Nielsen wrote:
On 9/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:45:57AM -0700, an ominous cow herd wrote:
I find it funny that all of these 0.7 users are saying that the 0.7 network
is
better and more secure than the 0.5 network. They say this even while we see
these warnings about critical bug fixes, peers in the 0.7 network
Freenet 0.7 build 977 is now available. This fixes various bugs and
introduces an experimental feature for inserting a frost message from a
NIM-like page (see http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetFINs). This
build is thanks to nextgens, volodya, dbkr, ljn1981, Jogy and me in no
particular order.
Freenet 0.7 build 977 is now available. This fixes various bugs and
introduces an experimental feature for inserting a frost message from a
NIM-like page (see http://wiki.freenetproject.org/FreenetFINs). This
build is thanks to nextgens, volodya, dbkr, ljn1981, Jogy and me in no
particular order.
We've had some problems on our IRC channel on Freenode with spam coming
in through tor. Privmsg's are blocked for unregistered users, so the
spammer is using notices and CTCP to the channel. At the moment, the
solution we have implemented is this:
- Tor users cannot speak
- They can be manually
We've had some problems on our IRC channel on Freenode with spam coming
in through tor. Privmsg's are blocked for unregistered users, so the
spammer is using notices and CTCP to the channel. At the moment, the
solution we have implemented is this:
- Tor users cannot speak
- They can be manually
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:10:57PM +0100, Volodya wrote:
> Lars Juel Nielsen wrote:
> > On 9/11/06, anon-bounces at deuxpi.ca wrote:
> >> -BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
> >> Message-type: plaintext
> >>
> >> I read this on frost recently. How is this best addressed?
> >>
> >> - -
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:10:57PM +0100, Volodya wrote:
Lars Juel Nielsen wrote:
On 9/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
I read this on frost recently. How is this best addressed?
- - [EMAIL
They're about the same. Freenet is much safer than the WWW. Some of the
main weaknesses:
- It's harder to protect huge downloads than small ones. Big splitfiles
are less anonymous than single files. However we will soon put out a
new build which will greatly reduce the risk from correlation
A. Calamari wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 17:02 +, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:36:13PM +, Ben Golding wrote:
Doesn't storing decrypted data on disk break the deniability property
of Freenet, which is important for freedom of speech?
I'd have to check what the current
Hi. What version (build number) are you running, and under what operating
system?
If you go to Advanced mode on the Web Interface, then click on Open
Connections, how many connections are open (and how many are inbound) ?
Are you behind a NAT, firewall or DSL router?
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at
What's the typical MTU on a modem? Someone said he had seen one with 256
bytes, but is that typical?
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
The encrypted files are stored in the store.
The decrypted files may be stored in the temp directory as well. Which
is often in the store, subdir temp.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:55:17PM -0500, n/a n/a wrote:
When surfin through the freenet gateway, the websites you view get stored
on your
Yuck! I'm skeptical... Could well be snake oil. Please find me an
internet standard that mentions an MTU of 576 bytes - or even some cisco
documentation. It seems pretty clear that bigger is better within the
limits available...
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:32:02PM +, Ben Golding wrote:
I
them, in fproxy, at present...
We should fix this, obviously.
(after all, you can disable writing the cache to disk, even in IE!)
Ben Golding
- Original message -
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@freenetproject.org
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:53:51 +
Subject: Re: [freenet
Are you saying that hosts are required to support MTUs of at least 576
bytes? People have said that some dialup connections use 256 byte
MTUs...
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:04:25PM +, Ben Golding wrote:
Toad Please find me an internet standard that mentions an MTU of 576
bytes
RFC879
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 05:39:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I consider running my own node and have the following Questions:
(By the way, you really should put some examples about bandwith, traffic and
so on in the faq-section!)
1.
I?ve DSL with a variable IP that changes
Thanks for your previous donations. You have to do this yourself. Log
into your paypal account, there is a page with your subscriptions;
cancel it there.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 06:34:34PM -0500, Lucian Florea wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I wish to cancel this subscription as I have very little funds
256kB, 512kB, or 1024kB (1MB). Depending on the size of the original
file.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:57:22AM +0100, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
Which is the normal lenght of a block in a FEC
splitfile ?
I guess 256K, but this is always true ?
Can I control it in some way, with usual
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 07:02:30PM +0100, David Gubler wrote:
Hi
This is my first post to this mailing list, so beware...
If you set outputBandwidthLimit in the config file to a value above 50
(I did not try the exact value, but at 100 (1 MB/s) at least some of
the problems
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 05:18:47PM +0100, David Gubler wrote:
This is normal. :( The exception will not cause connections to get killed;
it is never thrown, only logged. Whatever causes the timeouts might though.
I don't know, anyway these exceptions only appear when I set the bandwidth
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 05:14:19PM +, Grim Reaper wrote:
Hey everyone,
I am a student at college, and I have freenet...
It loads the node pages fine, but when it comes to a site like;
http://127.0.0.1:/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/CofE//
For example, it just doesn't work... It might be
Please upgrade to at least Java 1.4.1. 1.4.0 has some major problems.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 03:42:31PM +0100, Alexander Kurtz wrote:
Hello,
A few days ago I heard of a new filesharing systems. I thougt,well let's
test it, but now I?ve got a little problem:
When I start Freenet I get
We need the athlon64 binaries in the freenet-ext.jar. Are they long
mode?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:23:12AM +, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Anders Bruun Olsen support@freenetproject.org wrote:
Hi,
I have just installed Freenet on my Gentoo machine and have
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:13:30AM +1100, Duana Stanley wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 07:58, Toad wrote:
You need to allow incoming connections on the FNP port, which is not
8481. 8481 is FCP, which is used for local connections - Frost, FIW,
FUQID and so on. The FNP port is the port
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 09:36:17PM -0600, Paul Landers wrote:
When requesting a large split-file via fproxy, it usually eventually
fails with the following:
Request failed gracefully: Next failed: Could only fetch 25 of 26
blocks in segment 1 of 1: 14 failed, total available 39
However,
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 05:30:35PM -0800, Sonax wrote:
Hi all.
Money:
I'm not into the details of how often toad get's paid or how much
money is usually raised on a average month, but it would seem that
the project has some extra money currently. If it is just a result
of people being
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 10:25:22AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My node often overloads with too many transfers. You will see that I
have 467 active transfers transmitting.
Woah! What's your outgoing bandwidth? This could perhaps be an
accounting bug... Were you using the node at the
Should just work, albeit a little slowly due to not having native math
or FEC libraries in the freenet-ext.jar for x86-64 yet.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:44:58PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted to try to get freenet running in Linux x86_64, tried but wouldn't work
and was wondering if
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 06:33:24AM +0200, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted to try to get freenet running in Linux x86_64, tried but wouldn't
work
and was wondering if there was any info on making it work
What exactly did you do? I had no trouble getting Freenet to run
Well tell us if you need any help.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:35:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, actually I have it running with the 32bit jre 1.5.0, but it didn't like
the 64bit jre,
but I may have figured out why will look into it
Should have explained better :)
Some more detail would be nice. There are several different Couldn't
retrieve key messages... Either Data Not Found, or Route Not Found,
usually. You can get extra detail by going to Advanced mode on the
main web interface page ( http://127.0.0.1:/ ).
Also make sure you can accept connections
Hi. You have installed Freenet, and you go to http://127.0.0.1:/
(Web Interface), and the bookmark links don't work?
Several obvious things:
- Click Advanced mode
- Click on Open Connections, and send us the top few lines - how many
open connections, inbound, outbound and total, how many
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 11:22:12AM +1100, John wrote:
Hi
I'd like to know what the minimum information needed is to connect to a
freenet node via FNP. Is it just the TCP address? Or do you need all
the fields included in the node's reference? I figure most of that is
just extra
The logic behind this is simply that nonmember posts to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] are 99% of the time spam. However, since I have been
working for the project, nonmember posts ARE being moderated manually.
Unlike in the previous years, where we just held nonmember posts
forever. :|
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004
Oh, send me your freenet.conf (or freenet.ini) too please.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:05:22PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know why I just started receiving these errors. I have a fixed
IP address in my .conf file so I have no need for an IPAddressDetector.
btw, how does that
No idea... Maybe a proxy problem? Are you behind any serious
firewalling? Might be a temporary failure... you retried recently?
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:33:54PM +0100, Randy van den Dungen Bille wrote:
Dear Support,
When trying to install Freenet there are several files (seednotes.ref,
Argh. Hmm. You have tried completely removing Freenet and then
reinstalling it? Looks like it could be a corrupt node file.. Otherwise,
what java version exactly did you install? It might be a JVM bug.
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 03:30:48PM +, Amir Kabil wrote:
Please can you help!
I had just
Hmm. Delete freenet entirely and then reinstall. This is a corrupt
routing table, I think...
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 09:42:38PM +, Amir Kabil wrote:
please find below error message what do i do next?
node did work then stopped
please help
Dec 5, 2004 7:51:24 PM (freenet.node.Main, main,
reasons. I guess you'll have to contact me at
freenethelp.org, now. I have no official policy in regards to financial or
hardware aid, because untill now I didn't consider anyone would want to help
out in that regard. Toad offered some RAM, though, originally meant for a
testnetwork node
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad schrieb:
| It shouldn't slow your browsing down much if correctly configured i.e.
| if the output limit is appropriate for your connection and what else you
| want to run on it. It may slow down your gaming and other CPU/memory heavy
| tasks, but that's another
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 08:42:10AM -0600, S wrote:
Give it a fucking rest, already, and let's get back to making Freenet
better.
That is just the problem. Newsbyte's core argument is that the ONLY way
to make Freenet better is to abandon Freenet and implement something
completely different (oh
Could be a bug, could be severe CPU overload.
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:44:52PM -0800, Nick wrote:
Recently I started getting Consecutive same winner messages in my event
log. It mostly happens when I try to download something big (around
700mb). Any hint what could this mean? I am
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:24:23PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
There can be more than one reason.
Yes, but reasons 'afterwards' are always easily found (and even believed by
themselves). It's called 'to rationalise'. The reason why it actually got
deleted, is the reason first given in the email,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 12:49:29AM -0600, S wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:57:09 +
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So he should link to the project page, first and foremost. That's called
doing your research.
FYI, a Google search for Freenet returns freenet.sourceforge.net as the
3rd
and other animals (Toad)
5. Re: and another thing (Toad)
6. Re: a dead horse and other animals (Wayne McDougall)
7. Re: a dead horse and other animals (Newsbyte)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:22:04
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:40:10PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, so I tried Freenet... or rather, I'm trying to try it.
It's running for about 36 hours now, with pauses because I have to go offline
every 12 hours. (is that a problem?)
Not if it's a brief offline.
A Freenet site
Motion to ban as a troll?
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:39:54AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
So you're saying it should be faster? But even when I used the Freenet
gateways, they were very slow.
Actually, I was being sarcastic, which you may not have noticed, being a
newbie. If you scroll to my
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:53:58AM +, Clueless wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 01:39:54 +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
Actually, I was being sarcastic, which you may not have noticed, being a
newbie.
OIC. :-)
version. The version is one thing, the build something else. It should be
5100 (you can
What you actually said was, in your own annoying paste style:
Frustrating? Can't be! It has much improved, *much* I say. If you don't
believe me, ask toad and Ian!Even the simulations say so! We have NIO
and
NGR now, so things definately have improved for noobs like you, whatever
you
may think
on it. And some of your suggestions, such as rewriting Fred over
I2P, are not supported by ian, me, and the devs in general, and will not
be implemented in the foreseeable future.
I am implying in an ironic way, that if he has trouble believing that it
works better, he should ask you or toad, since you
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:33:28AM +, Clueless wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:37:52 +0100, Someone wrote:
Even on ADSL it isn't so slow. Shure it is much slower than browsing a
normal Website. But this I do expect when the data has to pass through
multiple nodes, with maybe even some ISDN
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:27:55AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
Newsbyte: Go back to i2p if you like it that much, or try to give some
real critics instead of just posting polemic and sarcasmic whine messages.
That is a stupid remark, and you know it. For someone (no pun intended) that
says I
Some guys talked about putting things [discussions?] onto the correct
mailing lists.. does that [discussion] really fit into [this list]?
Just a question.
Maybe you should do [this flame-war or debate] by private messages. I
don't like the feelings here, even if I'm not an official member with a
and an alternative - which some selectively remembering
dudes claim I never do or did - and a good one at that, because there was a
time we (at least Toad) agreed to it too. Do you here about it any longer?
Well, no, it's been put back in the freezer because it was prefered to play
with simulations
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 07:41:27PM +, Clueless wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:35:48 +, Toad wrote:
That has generally been true of freenet in the past, unfortunately. We
have made some progress, but nodes not working well for newbies is
expected.
That's OK, as long as the newbie
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:05:05PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
Saying freenet sucks, it's gotten worse, it'll never get better, and
implying that this is because of the people building it, is not helpful.
Saying and implying it to newbies when we are particularly vulnerable
due to our slow initial
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:11:26PM -0600, John McCain wrote:
+++ Newsbyte [02/12/04 22:26 +0100]:
freenet sucks, etc.
(paraphrased)
As long as we've agreed to continue this silliness, just what is your current
position? That you should get your freenet.org e-mail address back because
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:45:45PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
As long as we've agreed to continue this silliness, just what is your
current position? That you should get your freenet.org e-mail address back
because freenet sucks?
If we follow the argument of toad, who says it is correct that my
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:00:09AM +, Scoobae wrote:
Well,
I'm a novice to freenet upon installing the software Fred is up and running
I invoke open gateway and everything seems to be operational with exception
to the initial thumb pages do not load nor any other addresses.
Leave it for
Any testing would be appreciated.
- Forwarded message from mazzanet [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Zeus
X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.22-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.71):. Processed in
1.862938 secs Process
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 02:22:04PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
I've been getting TFE fine, but I haven't been able to load FIND for almost
a
week. The lists are pretty silent lately, as well. Conspiracy theory,
anyone?
No, the explanation is simply this, that many active (meaning formerly
So he should link to the project page, first and foremost. That's called
doing your research. We could release a 0.6.0-pre1, but it'd be
dubious...
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 04:23:45PM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
As I said on IRC, a collegue of mine has made an article (well, actually
more of a
Freenet stable build 5100 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Please upgrade.
Changes:
- Removed the (primary) failure table. This may have been causing many
fast DNFs recently on files that may well actually be available, but
which through getting requests and failing have
Umm, if it's not working because of a NullPointerException, that simply
will not just go away. If the node never starts up in the first
place, there is a problem beyond the the node needs to learn the
network problem. My recommendation is that you uninstall Freenet and
then reinstall it. I'd be
What build number?
And you get this on EVERY page? Do you have a very small datastore?
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 06:52:33PM +, bob wrote:
freenet.client.WrongStateException:
Wrong state: FAILED should be DONE: null:
Transfer failed with 36988 moved.
at
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 10:04:28AM +0100, Klaus Eckhoff wrote:
Hi
I'm running freenet together with ProtoWall (http://www.buetack.co.uk)
a software blocking connections to and from unwanted IP-ranges.
From the ProtoWall log I can see, that freenet tries to connect to
some strange IPs from
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:16:21PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
also i have a website with losta files and stuff and it is in BT
but i am worried about getting tracked and caught so i am trying to
make this switch... so i need to know how to seed to... if
That's bad... Probably a JVM crash. Is your computer overheating? Have
you tried it with another version of the JVM? Do you have bad RAM?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 04:53:21PM +, Sara Mill wrote:
I have 3 of these now. Filenames as hs_err_pid1089.log in Freenet
directory.
---begin
Yes. You probably want to set localIsOK=true in the config files of each
node. Then you want to set up a bunch of nodes, and export their
references (java freenet.node.Main --export) to a file, put them all
together and use this as the seednodes. Then they should all be
connected and you can test
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 10:04:28AM +0100, Klaus Eckhoff wrote:
Hi
I'm running freenet together with ProtoWall (http://www.buetack.co.uk)
a software blocking connections to and from unwanted IP-ranges.
From the ProtoWall log I can see, that freenet tries to connect to
some strange IPs from
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 04:38:25PM +0100, BlueStar88 wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://freenet.thing.net/gateways/
Hummm.. it seems that i'm not the only one with errors since 5099.
Checked their logs. The nodes have some 'red' priority errors too.
Mostly TWCMs and some Java IO
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 10:42:47PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
How about teaching us something since there are far more than a simple
majority of us that became network administrators because we purchased a
machine with Windows XP or Windows 2000 pre-installed and have that ducky
error
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 05:05:23PM -0600, Eric Gillingham wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 10:34:05PM +0100, Frank v Waveren wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 09:59:40PM -0600, Eric Gillingham wrote:
I do have a hostname as my ipAddress so it would have to resolve that
however I did copy
Sure. Copy the data from one store into the other. The directories are
compatible. Then delete the index file.
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 10:28:04PM +0100, BlueStar88 wrote:
Is it anyhow possible to merge different node data stores? Maybe a
kind of making additional subdirectories, copy data in
Cool. Thank you. We should link to this.. what exactly is the content at
present? Translations of a few of our pages?
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:29:42AM +0100, Webmaster @ p2psicuro.it wrote:
Dear FreeNet staff,
my name is VedoVa_NeRa admin ad www.p2psicuro.it/
I have set up a Freenet Italian
It may be. I will contact you if I need more info.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 05:55:31PM +0200, Klaus Eckhoff wrote:
Hi,
Freenet (5099) is running (Frost an FUQID) for me so far, but I
have some strange error messages like this repeating in my logfile:
09:08:44 Consecutive same winner:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 08:19:03AM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
To *any port* at *any ip* and to *listen port*, that's fine with me.
But i've noticed the use of *all local available ip adresses* for
*outgoing* connections.
Thought you've got that. You've said to avoid any unwanted
connections i
Did you show the full stack trace for the NPE in another mail?
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:50:54AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Is me posting these errors at all helpful or interesting to anyone?
Or should I just shutup and wait for toad ex machinus to deliver a new version
from on high
Yes, this is why you are supposed to update while the node is switched
off. ;)
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:11:23AM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:20:40 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the seednodes, so upgrading should be relatively uneventful. You may be
able to use
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 12:00:19AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stable build 5099 is now available widely.
Do we have to do the wait-for-larger-network-to-get-new-seednodes thing, as was
stated with 5097 and 5098?
Read the rest of the email! We have 64
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 11:46:15PM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
Toad schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:28:58PM +0200, BlueStar88 wrote:
Hi,
there is an important need to bind the external port to a specific
IP-address, for some anonymity reasons:
I have some virtual IP-adresses
What do you mean by failed?
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 06:27:32PM +, Robert Greenage wrote:
I have been unable to d/l 5099. I have tried three times from the snapshot
update and all three times it has failed.Help.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey -
Stable build 5099 is now available widely. This is a stable network
reset; you WILL need to reseed if you are still on 5096 or earlier.
Thanks to all who helped to test 5097, 5098 and 5099. Thanks partly to
their efforts, this build appears to have greatly improved insert
performance relative to
That would probably help..
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 01:02:43PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Argh. As usual it doesn't happen for me, so I can't fix it :
OK I'm now half way through Java - an introduction (although I ahd to return it
to the library today
101 - 200 of 706 matches
Mail list logo
