Am Sonntag, 11. Juli 2004 15:50 schrieb rensinghoff:
> Thank you soo much for your help.. I LOVE OPEN SOURCE PEOPLE !!!
another free hint: you posted your user-id along with your password.
you should now change the password as soon as possible :-)
good byte
pgpdmkaNh1pAY.pgp
Description: signat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| Blackdown works well with Freenet? I heard one bad report...
Unless it's causing my slowness, blackdown works fine for me. I'd
rather be using Kaffe, but I've had issues making that work on Gentoo.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| Changing bandwidth limits on the fly may be quite difficult, but we'll get
| around to it eventually.. :)
Really? Would it be feasable to do an Apache-style "graceful restart"?
~ (Since files that are really too big should have a splitfi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:12:19PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
|
| Strange. It didn't produce actual error messages? Usually the node
| responds in a reasonable time nowadays... of course if your browser is
| set to only use 2 connections
Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
> > There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits,
> > and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under
> > control. It works very well for those of u
Todd, now that you're back with us: Obviously going into the 100% state
after loosing a connection does nothing beneficial for the network. If
I kill my note each evening in anticipation of the death and then
reactivate it when I regain rationality the next day will this on-n-off
activity of
When was outputBandwidthLimit EVER in kilobytes/sec? Maybe the Windows
configurator used kB/sec...
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:46:29AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:07:00PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
> > > Yes, it works r
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:03:22PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:20:59PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > > Ouch. I thought it just got dyndns to detect your IP on the other end?
> >
> > Unfortunately sometimes the provide
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:07:00PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
> > Yes, it works really well. And the default Blackdown JAVA-install works
> > right out of the box too, eliminating the need for messing aroud with SUN
> > JRE. I've had Freenet running o
Joachim Scharfetter schrieb:
Hi, I have got a "fair use" DSL account with limited download volume.
How much download traffic will a permanent freenet node approximately
cause?
Depends on the personal use. In an "idle"-state (when I'm not browsing
freesites or downloading splitfiles) my stable node
Toad wrote:
Please CC the original poster if at all possible in future. Mostly they
aren't subscribers. Thanks.
Sorry, different email client to the one I normally use. Serves me right for posting
to the list at work :P
Anyway, noted, I'll remember hopefully.
__
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:21:17AM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
> Joachim Scharfetter wrote:
>
> >Hi, I have got a "fair use" DSL account with limited download volume.
> >How much download traffic will a permanent freenet node approximately
> >cause?
> >
> As much as your bandwidth allows. On a
Please CC the original poster if at all possible in future. Mostly they
aren't subscribers. Thanks.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:19:50AM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
> Dynamo wrote:
>
> >HI,
> >
> >I got a problem with freenet . I am sure I configured freenet
> >correctly and forwarded the righ
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:27:35AM +0200, Dynamo wrote:
> HI,
>
> I got a problem with freenet . I am sure I configured freenet correctly and
> forwarded the right ports I although createt an dyndns.org account only for
> freenet
Do you have incoming connections on
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/n
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
> There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits,
> and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under
> control. It works very well for those of us with monthly bandwidth caps.
It does?!
Joachim Scharfetter wrote:
Hi, I have got a "fair use" DSL account with limited download volume.
How much download traffic will a permanent freenet node approximately
cause?
As much as your bandwidth allows. On a capped 256/128 connection Freenet
managed to use 1.5GB in a day. Now I have a 10GB ca
Dynamo wrote:
HI,
I got a problem with freenet . I am sure I configured freenet
correctly and forwarded the right ports I although createt an
dyndns.org account only for freenet
To get the node running well (ip in dydns.org database is up to date)
! But when I try to open a site I got the m
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:00:28PM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
> Florian Streck wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:30:57PM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
> >
> >>Saw the port 8891 in freenet.conf only today What are distribution
> >>servlets used for? My nodes seems to be running ok with this
Hi, I have got a "fair use" DSL account with limited download volume.
How much download traffic will a permanent freenet node approximately
cause?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe
HI,
I got a problem with freenet . I am sure I configured
freenet correctly and forwarded the right ports I although createt an
dyndns.org account only for freenet
To get the node running well (ip in dydns.org
database is up to date) ! But when I try to open a site I got the message “
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 07:20:23PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
> Stephen P. Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf
> > settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I
> > increased the storage to
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 05:06:46AM -0400, Stephen P. Schaefer wrote:
> I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf
> settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I
> increased the storage to 1G, which required restarting fred. A couple
> days a
Toad wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I installed
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> >
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:19:28AM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
> Toad wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:00:25PM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
> >
> >>Specifically, the I am referring to the histograms that you can get from
> >>/servlet/nodestatus/. Also does the Y axis represent the entire key s
Anyway, how does the code work? Is it open source? Does it use UP&P?
Could we adapt it?
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:20:59PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > Ouch. I thought it just got dyndns to detect your IP on the other end?
>
> Unfortunat
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:20:59PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > Ouch. I thought it just got dyndns to detect your IP on the other end?
>
> Unfortunately sometimes the providers put in some NAT boxes or a proxy
> that prevents this system
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 03:11:46AM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul spake thusly:
> > Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
> > the crypto required for even simple connections.
>
> Which is why we need to use native BigInt a
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 09:58:52PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Good luck (and I don't mean that sarcastically). I've never gotten
> Kaffe to run a Hello World program.
Kaffe runs loads of stuff, big stuff like JBoss. GCJ runs ECLIPSE!
Seriously,
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:12:19PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>
> Toad wrote:
>
> | On stable? How many live connections? Do you get RNFs? DNFs?
>
> I think stable was actually better last I checked than unstable.
Hmm. In what sense?
On Sunday 11 July 2004 10:58 pm, David Masover wrote:
> | not sure my archives even go back that far, but the basis for
> | choosing Java should be obvious; platform independence and a
> | rich API that comes standard with the language.
>
> As a purely academic argument, Parrot and .NET both do tho
Stephen P. Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Wayne McDougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I *think* that freenet.conf is set by default to assume as 256Kbits
connection
> > (based on a rule of thumb of setting limits to half bandwidth capacity).
> >
> > You would want to adjus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Quoting Steffen Schwientek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I can?t connect to my freenet-core. If I point my browser to
>> localhost:, i just get not found.
>
> Once you run the startup script, it will take a couple minutes (sic) for
> the
> node to start. Believe it
33 matches
Mail list logo
