- Freenet 0.7.5 Build #1232 build01232
- Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
So far I've understood the backoff percentages in advanced connection
details but no longer.
The attached picture shows what I'm saying.
What ticks me off the most is being connected for over 90 minutes to peers
that are
It appears that the problem only occurs in conjunction with FMS (0.3.41
at least). That is, freenet (I believe the problem started with 1229,
and it's still here with 1232. I really should test 1228) will run
normally -- and only after I launch FMS does it skyrocket to consume all
available cpu pow
1232 fixes a severe bug preventing startup on some nodes. Sorry, we did try to
test it, but apparently messed up...
On Friday 21 August 2009 18:11:43 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Please upgrade to 1231. Changelogs:
> 1229:
> - XML vulnerability warnings fixes.
> - Fix an NPE in plugins.
> - Minor in
Congrats :)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Matthew
Toseland wrote:
> Please upgrade to 1231. Changelogs:
> 1229:
> - XML vulnerability warnings fixes.
> - Fix an NPE in plugins.
> - Minor internal stuff.
> 1230:
> - Detect the XML vulnerability on OS/X. Try to detect it on OpenJDK, maybe
> not
You know, I do think that freenet is a good idea. And in fact, until freenet
users will consume too much traffic, i'm not going to ban them. Because i
don't want to. In fact, right now 100.0% of major traffic consumers are
using *other* P2P networks. Mostly torrents, some use mule & DC, but they
ar
Please upgrade to 1231. Changelogs:
1229:
- XML vulnerability warnings fixes.
- Fix an NPE in plugins.
- Minor internal stuff.
1230:
- Detect the XML vulnerability on OS/X. Try to detect it on OpenJDK, maybe not
very well.
- Clarify an english string ("Completed downloads to temporary space" not
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:57:15PM +0100, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> Evan Daniel wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, VolodyA! V
> > Anarhist wrote:
> >> Luke771 wrote:
> >>> Alex Pyattaev wrote:
> Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
> try to conn
Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, VolodyA! V
> Anarhist wrote:
>> Luke771 wrote:
>>> Alex Pyattaev wrote:
Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
try to connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed
tell you. Hope I'll ba
At 09:15 AM 8/21/2009, Evan Daniel wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Victor Denisov wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Luke771 wrote:
> >> What you're doing here is catching Opennet users. Pure Darknet users
> >> wont be that easy to catch.
> >
> > No, they
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Alex Pyattaev wrote:
>
>> He has stated that the network does not allow "P2P applications" running
>> Freenet
>> as pure darknet will technically be "F2F", now we can start arguing
>> whether F2F
>> is a subset of P2P or a distinctly different thing. But if we acce
> He has stated that the network does not allow "P2P applications" running
> Freenet
> as pure darknet will technically be "F2F", now we can start arguing whether
> F2F
> is a subset of P2P or a distinctly different thing. But if we accept that
> F2F
> and P2P are different, then people who haven't
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM, VolodyA! V
Anarhist wrote:
> Luke771 wrote:
>> Alex Pyattaev wrote:
>>> Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
>>> try to connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed
>>> tell you. Hope I'll ban some nasty users before yo
Luke771 wrote:
> Alex Pyattaev wrote:
>> Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
>> try to connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed
>> tell you. Hope I'll ban some nasty users before you make a patch, so
>> that I can sleep well knowing that my bos
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Victor Denisov wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Luke771 wrote:
>> What you're doing here is catching Opennet users. Pure Darknet users
>> wont be that easy to catch.
>
> No, they'll be extremely easy to catch, along with their friends' IP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luke771 wrote:
> What you're doing here is catching Opennet users. Pure Darknet users
> wont be that easy to catch.
No, they'll be extremely easy to catch, along with their friends' IP
addresses. Detect local darknet nodes via generic traffic analysi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luke771 wrote:
> If you do detect any nodes, pleaser tell us because that would mean that
> Freenet must be fixed.
> thanks for your help.
No, it means no such thing. Freenet is *extremely* vulnerable to local
traffic analysis, as its traffic pattern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Victor, you basically repeat my idea (about the harvester), so i will
> think about implementation. Statistics method is not an option, almost
> the same stats are shown for online games (especially real-time) that
> utilize UDP. almost constant, mos
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
> Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that
> try to connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed
> tell you. Hope I'll ban some nasty users before you make a patch, so
> that I can sleep well knowing that my bosses will never know a
Alex Pyattaev wrote:
> I'm a system administrator of a private home network, providing
> internet to subscribers via ethernet. The corporate policy prohibits
> the use of ANY p2p network by subscribers. The question is - is it
> possible to detect freenet nodes on my LAN? I could indeed use
> c
Victor, you basically repeat my idea (about the harvester), so i will think
about implementation. Statistics method is not an option, almost the same
stats are shown for online games (especially real-time) that utilize UDP.
almost constant, mostly symmetrical(not always, e.g. spring produces
asymme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd suggest detecting Freenet nodes by their UDP traffic usage. No
amount of VoIP or gaming activity will generate a near-constant UDP
stream to ~20 external nodes. If your firewall/billing/traffic logging
software provides for this, I think it'll be t
Ok people, I'll try to adopt my own freenode to track the users that try to
connect to freenet. If I come up with solution, I'll indeed tell you. Hope
I'll ban some nasty users before you make a patch, so that I can sleep well
knowing that my bosses will never know about the freenet users in the LA
Hopefully the answer to Alex's question is: It can't be done.
If he can detect freenet nodes on his network, you must assume that
governments and the like can as well. I would rather we help Alex try
(and hopefully fail) in detecting nodes on his private home network,
than just ignore the fact tha
Portscanning? I tried nmap on my node, but it can't identify the
application. I don't know if other tools are able to.
-ermanno
2009/8/21 Alex Pyattaev :
> I'm a system administrator of a private home network, providing internet to
> subscribers via ethernet. The corporate policy prohibits the us
I don't know about others, but I would not will to help you.
2009/8/21 Alex Pyattaev
> I'm a system administrator of a private home network, providing internet to
> subscribers via ethernet. The corporate policy prohibits the use of ANY p2p
> network by subscribers. The question is - is it possi
25 matches
Mail list logo
