Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:37:11 -0500, /art/:
When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break
delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain
text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to cut/paste/edit
the link before using it instead of just
Mr. Cheese a écrit :
Rick Merrill wrote:
Mr. Cheese wrote:
I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists.
Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's
other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is
longer than the email
Is anyone having problems with the following? Any caveats to share?
From http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0/
Extensions and Themes
Extensions installed under SeaMonkey 1.x are not migrated to SeaMonkey 2,
and may not be compatible for reinstalling in this version due to
Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
(snip)
Any ideas what this might be about?
The website is using XHTML, which requires it to be well-formed. But
it's not
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product)
configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I
can send and receive mail normally, no complaints.
SM 1.1.16.
Hi Paul
Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:02:27 +0200, Stanimir Stamenkov
s7a...@netscape.net in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:37:11 -0500, /art/:
When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break
delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain
jean-francois.per...@laposte.net wrote:
Mr. Cheese a écrit :
Rick Merrill wrote:
Mr. Cheese wrote:
I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists.
Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's
other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often
On Nov 20, 9:51 pm, David Wilkinson no-re...@effisols.com wrote:
Campy wrote:
2. The size of the site showing on the screen typically has to be
reduced to 75% in order to be able to see it without a lot of
scrolling back and forth. I have tried reducing the size of the
fonts, however
I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the
upgrade to Windows 7.
The problem:
1. I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it
will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not
connect or something similar. These are sites such as
When receive pictures in an email unable to forward or reply and send
the pictures. Like the system except for that. willy
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/
Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification
Cedar:
[www.cattlenetwork.com]
Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as
to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated.
Well, using http://validator.w3.org/:
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Result:
On 11/21/2009 4:27 AM, Benoit Renard wrote:
Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
(snip)
Any ideas what this might be about?
The website is using XHTML, which
/Paul B. Gallagher/:
Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
(...)
Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind
as to try this website and see if
With patience akin to a cat's, Hartmut Figge, on 11/19/2009 9:53 PM typed:
David E. Ross:
One warning: You cannot have both SM 1.1.18 and SM 2.0 running at the
same time. Once one of them is running, attempting to launch the other
will merely launch a new window of the one that is already
I'm using Seamonkey 1.1.18 on a Windows XP Pro system. I have set up
several filters, and all of a sudden, after working forever, I'm getting
an error message asking if: 1) I have 'rights' to the disk; and 2)
asking if the disk is full. 1st of all, I'm logged in as the
administrator, and 2ndly
D. K. Kraft:
Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0
shortcuts? Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut?
I haven't tested this. When i need SM1 while running SM2 i start SM1
with -no-remote. Or when i need SM2 while running SM1 i start SM2
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
c
/Paul B. Gallagher/:
Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
(...)
Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind
as to
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:54 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote:
D. K. Kraft:
Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0
shortcuts? Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut?
I haven't tested this. When i need SM1 while running SM2 i start SM1
with
Philip Chee:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:54 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote:
And the new version of Karsten should be ready soon. :)
So aliens have kidnapped Karsten and are preparing a doppelgänger to
infiltrate the highest echelons of the SeaMonkey Council?
:-P
Hartmut
On 11/21/2009 8:31 AM, Neil Marcus wrote:
I'm using Seamonkey 1.1.18 on a Windows XP Pro system. I have set up
several filters, and all of a sudden, after working forever, I'm getting
an error message asking if: 1) I have 'rights' to the disk; and 2)
asking if the disk is full. 1st of all,
With patience akin to a cat's, Philip Chee, on 11/21/2009 8:56 AM typed:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:54 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote:
D. K. Kraft:
Harmut, does one need the -no-remote parameter on both the 1.1.18 and the 2.0
shortcuts? Or does it suffice just to have it on the 2.0 shortcut?
I
Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they
Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port
110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me .
This is True
Philip Chee wrote:
I think an interim workaround is to port the Firefox Form Autofill extension
which (I think) uses it's own storage format and allows autofilling whole forms
as well as it's own editor to access stored forms data.
Another extension supporting form filling calling itself
Mr. Cheese wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Mr. Cheese wrote:
I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists.
Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's
other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is
longer than the email
I have successfully imported everything except passwords. I guess I
need to do it manually but the password file does not seem to be in the
same place or have the same name in 2.0. Can someone guide me?
Thanks,
Steve
___
support-seamonkey mailing
Steve B.:
I have successfully imported everything except passwords. I guess I
need to do it manually but the password file does not seem to be in the
same place or have the same name in 2.0. Can someone guide me?
In SM1 is a file named numbers.s in the profile. Copy it to the
profile of SM2
Hartmut Figge:
In SM1 is a file named numbers.s in the profile. Copy it to the
profile of SM2 and make sure, that signon.SignonFileName in prefs.js of
SM2 points to this file. Also delete every file in the profile of SM2
which begins with signon.
Also the file key3.db should be copied from the
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Mr. Cheese wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Mr. Cheese wrote:
I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists.
Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's
other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is
longer
Campy wrote:
I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the
upgrade to Windows 7.
The problems:
1. I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it
will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not
connect or something similar. These
Lee wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product)
configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I
can send and receive mail normally, no complaints.
SM 1.1.16.
Hi Paul
Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported
Lee wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product)
configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I
can send and receive mail normally, no complaints.
SM 1.1.16.
Hi Paul
Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported
Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they
Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port
110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me .
This is
Cedar wrote:
Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup?
Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes
Checked .
Seriously I do not have an Answer for you
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
Paul wrote:
Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but
they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must
use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me .
Paul wrote:
Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but
they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must
use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me .
I've downloaded 2.0 and attempted to install it twice. Both times the
same thing happened. When 2.0 starts up the first time it prompts me to
import the items from 1.18 I tell it to go ahead and both times it just
froze. Will someone please tell me how to fix this problem?
Thanks,
Serge
Bush wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup?
Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes
Checked .
Seriously I do not have an Answer for you
Hmmm...darn! Oh welltoday all the headers disappeared from the
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Cedar:
[www.cattlenetwork.com]
Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else would be so kind as
to try this website and see if you get the same would be appreciated.
Well, using http://validator.w3.org/:
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0
Paul wrote:
Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They
No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but
they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must
use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me
Arne wrote:
When installing AVG 9.0, did you choose the Personal E-mail Scanner
when AVG requested you to choose the plugin? There is only 2 options,
one for Outlook and one for all other email app's.
Check in Components E-mail scanner if the Installed e-mail
protections is indeed Personal
On 11/21/09 5:02 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:37:11 -0500, /art/:
When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break
delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain
text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient may have to
Cedar wrote:
Bush wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup?
Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes
Checked .
Seriously I do not have an Answer for you
Hmmm...darn! Oh welltoday all the headers disappeared
On 11/20/2009 11:34 PM, Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/
Line Number 36, Column 449:meta name=google-site-verification
I can't get the ietab.dll plugin to work with 1.18 and Windows 7 64-bit.
Any advice?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0.
So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import
multiple identities with out having to do the extra ones manually?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Nairda wrote:
Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0.
So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple
identities with out having to do the extra ones manually?
If you planning on waiting, it will be a long wait. I don't think it
will ever be available.
Lee
Serge Popper wrote:
I've downloaded 2.0 and attempted to install it twice. Both times the
same thing happened. When 2.0 starts up the first time it prompts me to
import the items from 1.18 I tell it to go ahead and both times it just
froze. Will someone please tell me how to fix this problem?
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Serge Popper wrote:
I've downloaded 2.0 and attempted to install it twice. Both times the
same thing happened. When 2.0 starts up the first time it prompts me to
import the items from 1.18 I tell it to go ahead and both times it just
froze. Will someone please tell me how
Philip Chee wrote:
Actually the only reason that 1.1 on linux supports -no-remote is that
on linux seamonkey is a shell script that translates -no-remote into
set MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1
seamonkey-bin etc.
Well, supports suggests it checks for exactly that option. The truth
is that
NoOp wrote:
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
...
As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux
distributions?
+1
Why no 'official' 64bit linux build?
Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use at your own risk of
course):
Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been
getting the following message when trying get my mail:
could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was
refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so
later it will start working for whatever
Serge Popper wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Serge Popper wrote:
/snip/
Fifteen minutes on the first attempt and over 30 minutes on the second
attempt. As a matter of fact, when I clicked on the screen, after thirty
minutes, a screen came up which said not responding. Think I should wait
longer?
Bush wrote:
Lee wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product)
configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I
can send and receive mail normally, no complaints.
SM 1.1.16.
Hi Paul
Well I have to SM 2.0 and
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Serge Popper wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Serge Popper wrote:
/snip/
Fifteen minutes on the first attempt and over 30 minutes on the second
attempt. As a matter of fact, when I clicked on the screen, after thirty
minutes, a screen came up which said not responding.
Norvin wrote:
Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been
getting the following message when trying get my mail:
could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was
refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so
later it will start working
On 11/21/2009 03:47 PM, Edward wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Subject: says it all. :)
...
As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux
distributions?
+1
Why no 'official' 64bit linux build?
Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been
getting the following message when trying get my mail:
could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was
refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so
later
Serge Popper wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Serge Popper wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Serge Popper wrote:
/snip/
Fifteen minutes on the first attempt and over 30 minutes on the second
attempt. As a matter of fact, when I clicked on the screen, after thirty
minutes, a screen came up which said
norm wrote:
Bush wrote:
Lee wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product)
configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is
unaffected. I
can send and receive mail normally, no complaints.
SM 1.1.16.
Hi Paul
Well I have to SM
Windows XP SP3
Firefox 3.6 Beta 3
1. I can copy from a web page in Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 and paste it
anywhere including into the Sea Monkey Composer.
2. I cannot copy anything from a Sea Monkey 2.0 web page anywhere.
The information never gets posted to the Clipboard. I even tried
saving a web
Paul wrote:
Paul wrote:
Bush wrote:
Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues ,
They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl)
but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users
must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any
John Galt wrote:
Windows XP SP3
Firefox 3.6 Beta 3
1. I can copy from a web page in Firefox 3.6 Beta 3 and paste it
anywhere including into the Sea Monkey Composer.
2. I cannot copy anything from a Sea Monkey 2.0 web page anywhere.
The information never gets posted to the Clipboard. I even
On 11/21/2009 8:08 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
/Paul B. Gallagher/:
Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
(...)
Any ideas what this might be about? If someone else
Bush wrote:
Cedar wrote:
Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup?
Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes
Checked .
Seriously I do not have an Answer for you
I am seeing that the last couple of days as well.
Years ago I had that
Paul wrote:
Campy wrote:
I am running SeaMonkey 2.0 on an HP computer with an I7 chip and the
upgrade to Windows 7.
The problems:
1. I have to click on a bookmark between 5 and 15 times before it
will finally go to the web site and not say Site not found, could not
connect or something
art wrote:
On 11/21/09 5:02 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:37:11 -0500, /art/:
When sending a hyperlink, SM2 treats the / character as a word break
delimiter and subsequently wraps the link if it is longer than the plain
text word wrap setting. Thus, the recipient
NoOp wrote:
On 11/20/2009 11:34 PM, Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected:/meta.
Location: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/
Line Number 36, Column 449:meta
Serge Popper wrote:
When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in
1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI
RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not
provide secure up dadates.
I went into
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Serge Popper wrote:
When attempting to install the RoboForm adapter, which worked fine in
1.18, the following message was displayed - Incompatible Extension. AI
RoboForm Toolbar for Seamonkey will not be installed because it does not
provide secure up dadates.
I went into
Norvin wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been
getting the following message when trying get my mail:
could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was
refused. This will happen for a short period of time and
Norvin wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Norvin wrote:
/snip/
So you have SSL enabled on the account?
Lee
Yes, SSL is enabled
Now its working again, for how long?
Well, lets hope forever.
If not I suspect its on ATTYahoo's end.
Post back if the problem recurs.
Lee
Norvin wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been
getting the following message when trying get my mail:
could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was
refused. This will happen for a short
On 11/21/2009 5:21 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/21/2009 8:08 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
/Paul B. Gallagher/:
Cedar wrote:
When I go to this website with SM 2: www.cattlenetwork.com, I get the
following error message:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: /meta.
(...)
Any
Nairda wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Nairda wrote:
Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0.
So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import multiple
identities with out having to do the extra ones manually?
If you planning on waiting, it will be a long wait. I don't think it
will
norm wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Norvin wrote:
Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been
getting the following message when trying get my mail:
could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was
refused. This will happen for
Nairda wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Nairda wrote:
Nairda wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Nairda wrote:
Hay gang. Nice work with SM 2.0.
So how many versions of SM 2.X will it be before we can import
multiple
identities with out having to do the extra ones manually?
If you planning on
77 matches
Mail list logo
