Re: SM 2.1 much faster on old PC

2011-06-19 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 19/06/2011 19:51, Ant told the world: > On 6/19/2011 3:08 PM PT, User typed: I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was there and works fine, without a glitch.

Re: Two Problems I'm Having With Seamonkey 2.1

2011-06-19 Thread Philipp van Hüllen
Sridhar Ayengar schrieb: Second, I don't like the new scrolling tab bar. I prefer the old behavior where the tabs just become unreadably small. I tend not to pay attention to what the tabs read. Rather, I memorize the *order* of my tabs. In this case, being able to see, at a glance, *how many* ta

How do I read, traverse, a threaded list of articles?

2011-06-19 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Currently SM 2.0.14. I want to be able to read the articles in a thread in their threaded order. How do I need to set my various options in 'view' so that I can do it? Right now I have 'view' options set for: Layout: classic, thread pane, folder pane sort by: order received, ascending, threaded

Re: PHP 5

2011-06-19 Thread Mike
Ken Rudolph wrote: I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site using the Netscape & Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that some "scripts" (I have

Re: Two Problems I'm Having With Seamonkey 2.1

2011-06-19 Thread Ed Mullen
PhillipJones wrote: Sridhar Ayengar wrote: Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos. However, there are two things I'm finding

Re: Two Problems I'm Having With Seamonkey 2.1

2011-06-19 Thread David E. Ross
On 6/19/11 7:40 PM, Sridhar Ayengar wrote: > > Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience > has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one > core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos. > > However, there are two thing

Re: PHP 5

2011-06-19 Thread Ed Mullen
Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site using the Netscape & Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that som

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread David E. Ross
On 6/19/11 7:53 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 6/19/2011 10:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote: >> On 6/19/11 6:04 PM, Steve Wendt wrote: >>> On 06/19/11 04:50 pm, David E. Ross wrote: >>> > Preserve Download Modification Timestamp >

Re: SM 2.0.14 says no new updates available

2011-06-19 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 6/19/2011 10:18 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/19/2011 9:37 PM, Jim wrote: Why doesn't SM 2.0.14 list SM 2.1 as an update? Because we don't have MU (Major Update) Offers setup yet. Those require a bit more intensive testing as they follow a slightly differe

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 6/19/2011 10:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 6/19/11 6:04 PM, Steve Wendt wrote: On 06/19/11 04:50 pm, David E. Ross wrote: Preserve Download Modification Timestamp is compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1. That extension is compa

Re: Two Problems I'm Having With Seamonkey 2.1

2011-06-19 Thread PhillipJones
Sridhar Ayengar wrote: Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos. However, there are two things I'm finding irritating with the

Two Problems I'm Having With Seamonkey 2.1

2011-06-19 Thread Sridhar Ayengar
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos. However, there are two things I'm finding irritating with the new version. First

Re: SM 2.0.14 says no new updates available

2011-06-19 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/19/2011 9:37 PM, Jim wrote: Why doesn't SM 2.0.14 list SM 2.1 as an update? Because we don't have MU (Major Update) Offers setup yet. Those require a bit more intensive testing as they follow a slightly different update path. Ok. So when do you expect the re

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread David E. Ross
On 6/19/11 6:04 PM, Steve Wendt wrote: > On 06/19/11 04:50 pm, David E. Ross wrote: > >>> Preserve Download Modification Timestamp >>> is >>> compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1. >> >> That extension is compatible only if you tweak the m

Re: SM 2.0.14 says no new updates available

2011-06-19 Thread Justin Wood (Callek)
On 6/19/2011 9:37 PM, Jim wrote: Why doesn't SM 2.0.14 list SM 2.1 as an update? Because we don't have MU (Major Update) Offers setup yet. Those require a bit more intensive testing as they follow a slightly different update path. -- ~Justin Wood (Callek) ___

SM 2.0.14 says no new updates available

2011-06-19 Thread Jim
Why doesn't SM 2.0.14 list SM 2.1 as an update? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread Steve Wendt
On 06/19/11 04:50 pm, David E. Ross wrote: Preserve Download Modification Timestamp is compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1. That extension is compatible only if you tweak the maxVersion in file install.rdf. ??? Works with: SeaMonk

Re: PDF problems and jokulsarlon - open with?

2011-06-19 Thread Robert Kaiser
Francesco Presel schrieb: Is it possible to choose the program I want to use to open a file I've just downloaded with jokulsarlon? Moreover, where does it get the information from, about what program it should use (I'm using linux)? It uses what the normal internal download manager uses as well

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread David E. Ross
On 6/19/11 2:53 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:20:40 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/: > >> > > Preserve Download Modification Timestamp > is > compatible with SeaMonk

Re: SM 2.1 much faster on old PC

2011-06-19 Thread Ant
On 6/19/2011 3:08 PM PT, User typed: I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM 2.1 for about a week now. SM 2.0.14 sometimes crashed, SM 2.1

Re: PHP 5

2011-06-19 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
PhillipJones wrote: > Not likely. The only other way you could write PHP as described in > other threads is use a Application such as DreamWeaver or RapidWeaver > to do so, Since neither of those applications has any way to 'compose' intricate functions and routines, it would be nearly pointless

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:59:04 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/: Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:20:40 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/: Preserve Download Modification Timestamp is compati

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread Steve Wendt
On 06/19/11 01:20 pm, Jens Hatlak wrote: As you can see, it's not pretty and has low usability. (that's what AMO is for!) Right - so what's this wiki page for, exactly? ___ support-seamonkey maili

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread Jens Hatlak
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:20:40 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/: Preserve Download Modification Timestamp is compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1. Thanks, added. But, you

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread Stanimir Stamenkov
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:20:40 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/: Preserve Download Modification Timestamp is compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1. -- Stanimir

Re: SM 2.1 much faster on old PC

2011-06-19 Thread Ant
On 6/19/2011 11:55 AM PT, Zanqeutil typed: I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM 2.1 for about a week now. SM 2.0.14 sometimes crashed,

Re: PHP 5

2011-06-19 Thread Ray_Net
Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site using the Netscape & Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that som

Re: Windows Live Not Working

2011-06-19 Thread Ray_Net
David E. Ross wrote: On 6/18/11 8:31 PM, Tom Pamin wrote: When I try to access Hotmail with 2.014, I get the following message: "XML Parsing Error: not well-formed Location: http://sn123w.snt123.mail.live.com/default.aspx?n=2043128623&wa=wsignin1.0 Line Number 65, Column 1075:" Does anyone know

Re: Browsing History and Password Manager(2.1)

2011-06-19 Thread paladinsama
Oh, I see. So it seems I will have to make a choice of keep using the old version that works the way I like but will have vulnerabilities that won't be fixed or start using Internet Explorer and Microsoft Outlook. Great... David E. Ross wrote: On 6/14/11 6:15 PM, paladinsama wrote: The Bro

Re: PHP 5

2011-06-19 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Ken Rudolph wrote: > Uh, oh, I just realized that several of my web pages were made by > automatically converting MS Excel 2003 files using the "Save as html" > command within Excel. Is that were deadly PHP4 "scripts" can occur? Nope. Excel would generate *HTML* (as you said), not PHP, and like

Re: PHP 5

2011-06-19 Thread PhillipJones
Ken Rudolph wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site using the Netscape & Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that som

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread Jens Hatlak
Philip Chee wrote: "InvisibleSmiley has started maintaining a list. He'll create a wiki page and post a newsgroup message regarding this." Can't find the wiki page. Umm, yeah, because I didn't have the time and feared t

SM 2.1 much faster on old PC

2011-06-19 Thread Zanqeutil
I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM 2.1 for about a week now. SM 2.0.14 sometimes crashed, SM 2.1 did not, so far. To my surprise S

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

2011-06-19 Thread Rufus
Keith Whaley wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: Rufus wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote: I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set "as implemented" within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine, but for a *new* product what we

Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility

2011-06-19 Thread Philip Chee
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:57:50 +0800, Philip Chee wrote: > > > "InvisibleSmiley has started maintaining a list. He'll create a wiki > page and post a newsgroup message regarding this." > > Can't find the wiki page. Please add

Re: PDF problems and jokulsarlon - open with?

2011-06-19 Thread JeffM
Francesco Presel wrote: >[...]where does it get the information from, >about what program it should use (I'm using linux)? > The builder of the site specifies the MIME type. http://google.com/search?tbs=dfn:1&q=MIME-type A lot of people who build sites are idiots and do it wrong. (Kinda like the id

Re: PHP 5

2011-06-19 Thread Ken Rudolph
Ken Rudolph wrote: I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site using the Netscape & Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that some "scripts" (I have

Re: PHP 5

2011-06-19 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Ken Rudolph wrote: > I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site > using the Netscape & Seamonkey composer which automatically formats > the html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is > eliminating PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that some > "script

PDF problems and jokulsarlon - open with?

2011-06-19 Thread Francesco Presel
Is it possible to choose the program I want to use to open a file I've just downloaded with jokulsarlon? Moreover, where does it get the information from, about what program it should use (I'm using linux)? I've noticed that, even though I have set the preferences for PDFs to use okular (both in

PHP 5

2011-06-19 Thread Ken Rudolph
I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site using the Netscape & Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that some "scripts" (I have no idea what th

Re: Bookmarks manager in 2.1

2011-06-19 Thread Daniel
Jane-Galt wrote: I keep getting messages that Bookmarks Manager is preventing Win 7 from shutting down. Is that a bug that needs fixing? Jane, how long after closing SM are you trying to shut down Win7?? -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Never Mind.. Re: Add-ons Manager Never Loads

2011-06-19 Thread JD
JD wrote: Tools, Add-ons Manager, Get Add-ons just says Loading. It never loads anything. Plugins doesn't show anything. Extensions and Appearance do work. Have I broken something? If it ain't broke, well then it starts working again. Go figure. -- JD.. __

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

2011-06-19 Thread Keith Whaley
Keith Whaley wrote: Nice analogy, MC... keith whaley MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world: No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big, subtle difference i

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

2011-06-19 Thread Keith Whaley
Keith Whaley wrote: Rufus wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote: I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set "as implemented" within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine, but for a *new* product what we are talking about is