On 6/18/11 8:31 PM, Tom Pamin wrote:
When I try to access Hotmail with 2.014, I get the following message:
XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location:
http://sn123w.snt123.mail.live.com/default.aspx?n=2043128623wa=wsignin1.0
Line Number 65, Column 1075:
Does anyone know what is going on?
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/19/2011 12:00 AM, Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new*
Keith Whaley wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is
Keith Whaley wrote:
Nice analogy, MC...
keith whaley
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference
JD wrote:
Tools, Add-ons Manager, Get Add-ons just says Loading. It never loads
anything. Plugins doesn't show anything. Extensions and Appearance do
work. Have I broken something?
If it ain't broke, well then it starts working again. Go figure.
--
JD..
Jane-Galt wrote:
I keep getting messages that Bookmarks Manager is preventing Win 7 from
shutting down. Is that a bug that needs fixing?
Jane, how long after closing SM are you trying to shut down Win7??
--
Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site
using the Netscape Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the
html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating
PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that some scripts (I have no
idea what
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site
using the Netscape Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the
html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating
PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that some scripts (I have
Keith Whaley wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as
implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new* product what we
I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder
Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was
there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM 2.1 for about
a week now. SM 2.0.14 sometimes crashed, SM 2.1 did not, so far.
To my surprise
Philip Chee wrote:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2011-06-14#Follow-ups
InvisibleSmiley has started maintaining a list. He'll create a wiki
page and post a newsgroup message regarding this.
Can't find the wiki page.
Umm, yeah, because I didn't have the time and feared the
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site
using the Netscape Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the
html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating
PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Uh, oh, I just realized that several of my web pages were made by
automatically converting MS Excel 2003 files using the Save as html
command within Excel. Is that were deadly PHP4 scripts can occur?
Nope. Excel would generate *HTML* (as you said), not PHP, and likely in
Oh, I see.
So it seems I will have to make a choice of keep using the old version
that works the way I like but will have vulnerabilities that won't be
fixed or start using Internet Explorer and Microsoft Outlook. Great...
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/14/11 6:15 PM, paladinsama wrote:
The
David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/18/11 8:31 PM, Tom Pamin wrote:
When I try to access Hotmail with 2.014, I get the following message:
XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location:
http://sn123w.snt123.mail.live.com/default.aspx?n=2043128623wa=wsignin1.0
Line Number 65, Column 1075:
Does anyone know
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site
using the Netscape Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the
html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating
PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that
On 6/19/2011 11:55 AM PT, Zanqeutil typed:
I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder
Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was
there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM 2.1 for about a
week now. SM 2.0.14 sometimes crashed,
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:20:40 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/2.1/AddonCompat
Preserve Download Modification Timestamp
https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/preserve-download-modification is
compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1.
--
Stanimir
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:20:40 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/2.1/AddonCompat
Preserve Download Modification Timestamp
https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/preserve-download-modification is
compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1.
Thanks, added. But, you
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:59:04 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:20:40 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/2.1/AddonCompat
Preserve Download Modification Timestamp
https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/preserve-download-modification is
compatible
On 06/19/11 01:20 pm, Jens Hatlak wrote:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/2.1/AddonCompat
As you can see, it's not pretty and has low usability.
(that's what AMO is for!)
Right - so what's this wiki page for, exactly?
___
support-seamonkey
PhillipJones wrote:
Not likely. The only other way you could write PHP as described in
other threads is use a Application such as DreamWeaver or RapidWeaver
to do so,
Since neither of those applications has any way to 'compose' intricate
functions and routines, it would be nearly pointless to
On 6/19/2011 3:08 PM PT, User typed:
I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder
Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was
there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM 2.1 for
about a
week now. SM 2.0.14 sometimes crashed, SM 2.1
On 6/19/11 2:53 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:20:40 +0200, /Jens Hatlak/:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/2.1/AddonCompat
Preserve Download Modification Timestamp
https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/preserve-download-modification is
compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1.
Francesco Presel schrieb:
Is it possible to choose the program I want to use to open a file I've
just downloaded with jokulsarlon?
Moreover, where does it get the information from, about what program it
should use (I'm using linux)?
It uses what the normal internal download manager uses as
On 06/19/11 04:50 pm, David E. Ross wrote:
Preserve Download Modification Timestamp
https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/preserve-download-modification is
compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1.
That extension is compatible only if you tweak the maxVersion in file
install.rdf.
??? Works with:
Why doesn't SM 2.0.14 list SM 2.1 as an update?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 6/19/2011 9:37 PM, Jim wrote:
Why doesn't SM 2.0.14 list SM 2.1 as an update?
Because we don't have MU (Major Update) Offers setup yet.
Those require a bit more intensive testing as they follow a slightly
different update path.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
On 6/19/11 6:04 PM, Steve Wendt wrote:
On 06/19/11 04:50 pm, David E. Ross wrote:
Preserve Download Modification Timestamp
https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/preserve-download-modification is
compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1.
That extension is compatible only if you tweak the maxVersion in
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/19/2011 9:37 PM, Jim wrote:
Why doesn't SM 2.0.14 list SM 2.1 as an update?
Because we don't have MU (Major Update) Offers setup yet.
Those require a bit more intensive testing as they follow a slightly
different update path.
Ok.
So when do you expect the
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm finding irritating with the new version.
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm finding irritating with the
On 6/19/2011 10:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/19/11 6:04 PM, Steve Wendt wrote:
On 06/19/11 04:50 pm, David E. Ross wrote:
Preserve Download Modification Timestamp
https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/preserve-download-modification is
compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1.
That extension is
On 6/19/2011 10:18 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/19/2011 9:37 PM, Jim wrote:
Why doesn't SM 2.0.14 list SM 2.1 as an update?
Because we don't have MU (Major Update) Offers setup yet.
Those require a bit more intensive testing as they follow a slightly
On 6/19/11 7:53 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/19/2011 10:13 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 6/19/11 6:04 PM, Steve Wendt wrote:
On 06/19/11 04:50 pm, David E. Ross wrote:
Preserve Download Modification Timestamp
https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/preserve-download-modification is
Ken Rudolph wrote:
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site
using the Netscape Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the
html pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating
PHP 4 and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that
On 6/19/11 7:40 PM, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm
PhillipJones wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm
Ken Rudolph wrote:
I know zero about html. For 10 years I've been writing my web site using
the Netscape Seamonkey composer which automatically formats the html
pages. However, I've been notified that my web host is eliminating PHP 4
and changing over to PHP 5.2 and that some scripts (I have no
Currently SM 2.0.14.
I want to be able to read the articles in a thread in their threaded
order. How do I need to set my various options in 'view' so that I
can do it?
Right now I have 'view' options set for:
Layout: classic, thread pane, folder pane
sort by: order received, ascending,
Sridhar Ayengar schrieb:
Second, I don't like the new scrolling tab bar. I prefer the old
behavior where the tabs just become unreadably small. I tend not to pay
attention to what the tabs read. Rather, I memorize the *order* of my
tabs. In this case, being able to see, at a glance, *how many*
Interviewed by CNN on 19/06/2011 19:51, Ant told the world:
On 6/19/2011 3:08 PM PT, User typed:
I installed Seamonkey 2.1 (on top) Seamonkey 2.0.14 in the same folder
Everything works without flaws, bookmarks, email, passwords, all was
there and works fine, without a glitch. I have tested SM
42 matches
Mail list logo
