Re: No v. 2.1 yet?

On 7/3/2011 3:51 PM, JD wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Help | Check for updates: "There are no updates available. SeaMonkey will check periodically for updates." Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 I installed 2.1 ov

Re: Publish Feature

John wrote: In article, WLS wrote: Looked for FireFTP on AMO, but couldn't find it. The one I did find was incompatible with SM 2.2, so didn't recommend it. Philip's installed with no problem. Completely forgot about FileZilla. Still won't touch Composer with a 100 mile pole. Not for Ma

Re: can't access Lotus Notes web mail

On 07/05/2011 07:19 PM, Lee wrote: > Remote XUL Perhaps this will work? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/remote-xul-manager/ Added ref:

Re: can't access Lotus Notes web mail

On 7/5/11, Jim wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> ... >> Can you access it from Firefox? And if so what version (try FF 3.x and >> 5.0)? >> >> >> > I don't have FF on my home nor work PC, and don't intend to try to > install them. Thanks for the suggestion, though. I asked about FF & iNotes at work. Dunno

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst complainers ever

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 05/07/2011 14:44, J. Weaver Jr. told the world: Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for And it's outside the

Re: Publish Feature

In article , Philip Chee wrote: > > Completely forgot about FileZilla. > > > > Still won't touch Composer with a 100 mile pole. > > To be able to wield a 100 mile pole, you'd have to be Son Goku! > > Phil Komposer has a few features SeaMonkey does not, such as CSS. -- Are there errors in th

Problem with Flash Document?

Linux - Seamonkey 2.0.14 - Shockwave Flash 10.2 d151 Anyone able to see why the Flash document here just cycles and never loads, please? http://ehbcstatesboro.blogspot.com/p/netma.html -- Thanks! & 73, KD4E David Colburn http://kd4e.com Have an http://ultrafidian.com day I don't google I SEAR

Re: Publish Feature

In article , WLS wrote: > > Looked for FireFTP on AMO, but couldn't find it. The one I did find was > incompatible with SM 2.2, so didn't recommend it. Philip's installed > with no problem. > > Completely forgot about FileZilla. > > Still won't touch Composer with a 100 mile pole. Not for

Re: Publish Feature

In article , MCBastos wrote: > FireFTP is an extension to add richer FTP functionality to Firefox. > Philip Chee has a version ported to Seamonkey (including 2.1): > > http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html#fireftp Thats not Mac compatible -- Are there errors in the Bible? Is Jesus Chri

Re: Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/5/2011 4:46 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: I'm using SM 2.0.14 . For this account according to the account settings: - I am connecting to pop.att.yahoo.net:995 . - The outgoing server (SMTP) is urj...@bellsouth.net - smtp.att.y... (I'm guessing that's smtp.att.yah

Re: Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

S Slicer wrote: Lee wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Recently my system has begun to issue the following error when I try to send out emails on this account: "Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server smtp.att.yahoo.com. It does not support

Re: is it possible ...

Michael Gordon wrote: km wrote: ... in mail mofe to havs 'sm' automaticall print out ur name, taken from the user profile [or wherever]at the top of each letter.??? km KM, It is possible from the Print Set-up Menu. Open File/Print Set-up. Select one of the margin positions and select "Custom

Re: Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

On 7/5/2011 4:46 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: I'm using SM 2.0.14 . For this account according to the account settings: - I am connecting to pop.att.yahoo.net:995 . - The outgoing server (SMTP) is urj...@bellsouth.net - smtp.att.y... (I'm guessing that's smtp.att.yahoo.net . But the box for ente

Re: Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

I have AT&T Uverse, and I also get that msg. once in a while. I also got that when I used Comcast cable years ago. My impression is that the msg. is triggered whenever your carrier has the e-mail system offline for periodic maintenance. Lee wrote: Hi, same here, also can save it as a draft

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst complainers ever

Interviewed by CNN on 05/07/2011 14:44, J. Weaver Jr. told the world: > Rufus wrote: >> Robert Kaiser wrote: >>> Rufus schrieb: I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for >>> >>> And it's outside the a

Re: Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

Hi, same here, also can save it as a draft and it will usually go out with no problems. Also I have security and authentication block checked and it works for me most of the time and if I have a problem I un check it and try to send with negative results and then put it back to checked and it w

Re: A js-based PDF reader

cmcadams wrote: JD wrote: cmcadams wrote: As referenced on slashdot: http://andreasgal.github.com/pdf.js/multi_page_viewer.html#1 Article here: http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2011/07/03/pdf-js-first-milestone/ It sort-of works on SM 2.1. Not perfect, but still remarkable. Or: http://get.

Re: is it possible ...

km wrote: ... in mail mofe to havs 'sm' automaticall print out ur name, taken from the user profile [or wherever]at the top of each letter.??? km KM, It is possible from the Print Set-up Menu. Open File/Print Set-up. Select one of the margin positions and select "Custom". Michael G _

Re: Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

I Agree, it has been doing this exact thing to me on three different computers with three different email addresses on att.net for several months. No one seems concerned. Sometimes I have to send as many as seven times before it finally is accepted. ATT/Yahoo is no help, either. Jay

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

Bill Davidsen wrote: chicagofan wrote: James E. Morrow wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on, see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla - which now m

is it possible ...

... in mail mofe to havs 'sm' automaticall print out ur name, taken from the user profile [or wherever]at the top of each letter.??? km ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-sea

Re: Skipping version 2.1

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 22:46:32 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/5/2011 12:35 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: So. Under the new accelerated version release schedule, When should we expect SM 2.3 ? :) :) :) Between 6 and 6.5 weeks from "today" So we need

Re: Skipping version 2.1

On 7/5/2011 4:46 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/5/2011 12:35 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing

Re: can't access Lotus Notes web mail

NoOp wrote: ... Can you access it from Firefox? And if so what version (try FF 3.x and 5.0)? I don't have FF on my home nor work PC, and don't intend to try to install them. Thanks for the suggestion, though. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list sup

Re: Skipping version 2.1

Ray_Net wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/5/2011 12:35 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing 2.2 within the next f

Re: Skipping version 2.1

Tue, 05 Jul 2011 22:46:32 +0200, /Ray_Net/: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/5/2011 12:35 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: So. Under the new accelerated version release schedule, When should we expect SM 2.3 ? :) :) :) Between 6 and 6.5 weeks from "today" So we need to install a new version e

Re: Some of topic: Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

PhillipJones wrote: Rufus wrote: Actually, 2.3 might be something I could be interested in. Maybe. Too many things are changing in the Mac world at once... My big fear remains the Lion OS, it's "iOS-like" full screen app implementation (which I hope I can turn off, or find a hack to turn off)

Unable to authenticate to SMTP ?? #@?

I'm using SM 2.0.14 . For this account according to the account settings: - I am connecting to pop.att.yahoo.net:995 . - The outgoing server (SMTP) is urj...@bellsouth.net - smtp.att.y... (I'm guessing that's smtp.att.yahoo.net . But the box for entering the entry doesn't scroll. So I can not v

Re: Skipping version 2.1

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/5/2011 12:35 AM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/4/2011 7:12 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2? No worries there, but we'll be releasing 2.2 within the next few days (max --

Some of topic: Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

Rufus wrote: Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: ...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't believe that. And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring XUL for our current code and not being able to

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: ...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't believe that. And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the w

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: ...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't believe that. And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on something else

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst complainers ever

J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a non-Mozilla-based app, so ple

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst complainers ever

Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let this

Re: Publish Feature

On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 10:17:28 -0400, WLS wrote: > MCBastos wrote: >> Interviewed by CNN on 05/07/2011 09:08, WLS told the world: >> >>> You could always use a separate FTP program. I use gFTP on my openSUSE >>> 11.3 Linux. >>> >>> There used to be free version of WS_FTP, but you might want to take a

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let this thread end. Rober

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus schrieb: ...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't believe that. And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on something else due to resourc

Re: A js-based PDF reader

cmcadams wrote: MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 14:57, cmcadams told the world: As referenced on slashdot: http://andreasgal.github.com/pdf.js/multi_page_viewer.html#1 Article here: http://blog.mozilla.com/cjones/2011/07/03/pdf-js-first-milestone/ It sort-of works on SM 2.1

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

Rufus schrieb: ...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't believe that. And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on something else due to resource constraints (and j

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 --> worst version ever

Rufus schrieb: I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let this thread end. Robert Kaiser -- Note th

Re: Publish Feature

MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 05/07/2011 09:08, WLS told the world: You could always use a separate FTP program. I use gFTP on my openSUSE 11.3 Linux. There used to be free version of WS_FTP, but you might want to take a look at the Pro version. It has a 30 day free trial. http://www.

Re: Publish Feature

Interviewed by CNN on 05/07/2011 09:08, WLS told the world: > You could always use a separate FTP program. I use gFTP on my openSUSE > 11.3 Linux. > > There used to be free version of WS_FTP, but you might want to take a > look at the Pro version. It has a 30 day free trial. > > http://www.ips

Re: Publish Feature

John wrote: In article, WLS wrote: John wrote: I use the Sea monkey Composer but when I click on the Publish to Server option, there is no way to select or browse the folder directories on the remote server, or am I missing something? John Not missing anything. It publishes the file an

Re: Seamonkey2 - themes issues

Bret Busby schreef: My unbuntu 8.04 on my old(ish) laptop computer has just upgraded the Seamonkey to version 2. It has changed the appearance of Seamonkey, to some silly looking theme, that is listed as the "default theme". It appears that software developers design software for their own plea

Re: Publish Feature

In article , WLS wrote: > John wrote: > > I use the Sea monkey Composer but when I click on the Publish to Server > > option, there is no way to select or browse the folder directories on > > the remote server, or am I missing something? > > > > > > John > > Not missing anything. > > It publis