Re: Yay... I can add e'mail accounts again... :(

Daniel wrote: On 7/01/2017 3:45 AM, sean wrote: The earlier version of the Linux 64 bit nightly from January 3rd I was using was not allowing me to add new e'mail accounts... happily the January 6th nightly is allowing new e'mail account creation. love that it's spiffy and fast as all get out.

Re: Having a Problem with Google Search but only with SeaMonkey

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Daniel wrote: On 20/04/2017 6:45 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Actually, I didn't. You should have deleted that attribution line when you deleted my text, to make it clear you were quoting Daniel. Yeap!! Long time ago, I came across the saying

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

David E. Ross wrote: Baja Fresh at . The "Contact Us" page does not show a Send button with SeaMonkey. While spoofing Firefox, it only shows a thin red rectangle. I sent a plain E-mail message to their customer service. They replied: We use Windows 10 and Google

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

I just wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Baja Fresh at . The "Contact Us" page does not show a Send button with SeaMonkey. While spoofing Firefox, it only shows a thin red rectangle. I sent a plain E-mail message to their customer service. They replied: We use

Re: bajafresh.com feedback form (was: What if all Mozilla browsers would...)

EE composed on 2017-04-20 12:20 (UTC-0700): > I do not even see a form on the contact page, so what use would a submit > button be? I tried with 3 different browsers. Which 3, with which installed extensions? I tried http://www.bajafresh.com/corpfeedback.php with 3 profiles, one Firefox, one

Development of SeaMonkey and blind users

Hi all, I-m I'm sorry that I didn't respond last year, but I don't know if someone can create an EMail list for seamonkey for blind people? Since the developer I say development is too technical and visual for a blind people, can o say, I don't know what happen to the Seamonkey developer

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

EE wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Earlier this evening, I wrote: On my machine, the page shows a Captcha at bottom, and below that what appears to be the top edge of their red "Submit" button (cf. ), but

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Earlier this evening, I wrote: On my machine, the page shows a Captcha at bottom, and below that what appears to be the top edge of their red "Submit" button (cf. ), but not enough

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

David E. Ross wrote: Baja Fresh at . The "Contact Us" page does not show a Send button with SeaMonkey. While spoofing Firefox, it only shows a thin red rectangle. I sent a plain E-mail message to their customer service. They replied: > We use Windows 10 and Google

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

On 4/20/17 3:20 PM, EE wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Baja Fresh at . The "Contact Us" page does not show a Send button with SeaMonkey. While spoofing Firefox, it only shows a thin red rectangle. I sent a plain E-mail message to their customer service. They replied:

Re: URL with punycode = easy phishing

On 4/20/17, Gabriel wrote: > Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 15/04/17 20:05: >> The current "patch" is just a flipped pref which you can flip yourself in >> about:config >> >> Set network.IDN_show_punycode to true. >> Other than setting this as the default I do not know how this

Re: URL with punycode = easy phishing

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 15/04/17 20:05: The current "patch" is just a flipped pref which you can flip yourself in about:config Set network.IDN_show_punycode to true. Other than setting this as the default I do not know how this could be fixed differently by anyone. Maybe putting an icon or

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

David E. Ross wrote: On 4/19/2017 8:55 PM, NFN Smith wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Is not "Advertise Firefox compatibility" not working for you? In any case, merely having Gecko will not suffice. I just encountered a Web site that works completely only with Chrome. what site? Smith

Re: Having a Problem with Google Search but only with SeaMonkey

Danny Kile wrote: Daniel wrote: On 20/04/2017 6:45 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Actually, I didn't. You should have deleted that attribution line when you deleted my text, to make it clear you were quoting Daniel. Yeap!! Long time ago, I came across the saying "When you do something, do

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

David E. Ross wrote: On 4/19/2017 8:55 PM, NFN Smith wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Is not "Advertise Firefox compatibility" not working for you? In any case, merely having Gecko will not suffice. I just encountered a Web site that works completely only with Chrome. what site? Smith

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

Ray_Net wrote: David E. Ross wrote on 20-04-17 07:27: Baja Fresh at . The "Contact Us" page does not show a Send button with SeaMonkey. While spoofing Firefox, it only shows a thin red rectangle. I sent a plain E-mail message to their customer service. They

Re: Having a Problem with Google Search but only with SeaMonkey

Daniel wrote: On 20/04/2017 6:45 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Yeap!! Long time ago, I came across the saying "When you do something, do it once, do it well, and move on!" Sort of been my motto! If web sites were correctly coded, or sniffed correctly, these problems would not be a bother. So

Re: AOL Sending (Again) Challenges SM 2.46 Win 10 Pro

On 04/20/2017 12:41 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: bo1953 wrote: Hello all, Back with similar challenge as per my earlier post about AOL mail... I now receive the following message: The message could not be sent because the connection to Outgoing server (SMTP) smtp.aol.com was lost in the

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

On 20/04/2017 3:27 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 4/19/2017 8:55 PM, NFN Smith wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Is not "Advertise Firefox compatibility" not working for you? In any case, merely having Gecko will not suffice. I just encountered a Web site that works completely only with Chrome.

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

On 20/04/2017 8:05 AM, WaltS48 wrote: On 4/19/17 5:39 PM, Dirk Munk wrote: There are a lot of Mozilla based browsers around, waht if all of them would just use Gecko -nn- in the user agent string? Now we have to disguise SeaMonkey as Firefox to get certain web sites as Google to work

Re: Having a Problem with Google Search but only with SeaMonkey

On 20/04/2017 6:45 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Yes this their fault - a great number of webmasters are doing the same fault. It is faster and easier to change the default UA string to FireFox than convincing ALL webmasters to change their coding. But most of the time, they

Re: Having a Problem with Google Search but only with SeaMonkey

On 20/04/2017 2:26 AM, Ray_Net wrote: Richmond wrote on 19-04-17 10:58: Ray_Net wrote: Danny Kile wrote on 18-04-17 17:37: J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Google is doing incorrect user agent sniffing. If you user prefbar or another user agent switcher and change the user

Re: Having a Problem with Google Search but only with SeaMonkey

Ray_Net wrote: Yes this their fault - a great number of webmasters are doing the same fault. It is faster and easier to change the default UA string to FireFox than convincing ALL webmasters to change their coding. But most of the time, they don't want to change their coding and more ... they

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

David E. Ross wrote on 20-04-17 07:27: On 4/19/2017 8:55 PM, NFN Smith wrote: David E. Ross wrote: Is not "Advertise Firefox compatibility" not working for you? In any case, merely having Gecko will not suffice. I just encountered a Web site that works completely only with Chrome. what

Re: Having a Problem with Google Search but only with SeaMonkey

Richmond wrote on 19-04-17 20:14: Ray_Net wrote: I disagree with that, because it would not be correctly identifying the browser. Who's care ? Nobody knows SeaMonkey - and they don't want to know Tell me WHY SM must identify itself as SM ? .. when a lot of SM people change the UA

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

Earlier this evening, I wrote: On my machine, the page shows a Captcha at bottom, and below that what appears to be the top edge of their red "Submit" button (cf. ), but not enough of it that it's clickable

Re: What if all Mozilla browsers would just use Gecko in the user agent string?

David E. Ross wrote: Baja Fresh at . The "Contact Us" page does not show a Send button with SeaMonkey. While spoofing Firefox, it only shows a thin red rectangle. On my machine, the page shows a Captcha at bottom, and