Bzzz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:04:57 -0800
NoOpgl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid wrote:
In a comparison of Opera SM 2.7.1 in opening
http://television.telerama.fr/tele/grille.php the result are the same:
13 seconds (from a low speed California US connection).
I wasn't talking about
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Bzzz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:43 -0500
Chris Iliasn...@ilias.ca wrote:
Snip
It still
offers what I want in terms of browser and IMAP integration,
but the look and feel is nowhere near as attractive as it
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Sigh . . . The Cookie Safe page says Not available for SM 2.7.1.
Sigh... You didn't even *try* to click the button (and then Install
Anyway). Else you would have found that this add-on works with *any*
version of SM since 2.1. Have a little faith. I didn't
Larry S. wrote:
However, CS is now installed, but I still don't see the feature I was
looking for, that is, a list of all the domains in one place so I can
edit out individual or groups of domains with a single click to simplify
my list.
Right click the cookie icon at the right hand of the
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
However, CS is now installed, but I still don't see the feature I was
looking for, that is, a list of all the domains in one place so I can
edit out individual or groups of domains with a single click to simplify
my list.
Right click the cookie icon at the
On 02/14/2012 10:43 PM, Bzzz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:04:57 -0800
NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid wrote:
In a comparison of Opera SM 2.7.1 in opening
http://television.telerama.fr/tele/grille.php the result are the same:
13 seconds (from a low speed California US connection).
I
Hi,
I'm using Iceape, which is the SM port under Debian Linux;
2 days ago it was upgraded to 2.7.1.
From this upgrade, I noticed several *very* disagreeable things:
* SM became bloated with pages using many JS (which I block w/
NoScript), exactly as FireFox did some weeks ago.
Even not
Bzzz wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Iceape, which is the SM port under Debian Linux;
2 days ago it was upgraded to 2.7.1.
From this upgrade, I noticed several *very* disagreeable things:
* SM became bloated with pages using many JS (which I block w/
NoScript), exactly as FireFox did some weeks ago.
Ray_Net wrote:
Bzzz wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Iceape, which is the SM port under Debian Linux;
2 days ago it was upgraded to 2.7.1.
From this upgrade, I noticed several *very* disagreeable things:
* SM became bloated with pages using many JS (which I block w/
NoScript), exactly as FireFox did
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:12:58 +0100
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
Because the developpers knows better than you what is good for you :-(
Yeah, that was my first thought (same as for gnome3:(
Too bad, I liked it until this release - I'm gonna try Opera
to see if it fits my
Bzzz wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Iceape, which is the SM port under Debian Linux;
2 days ago it was upgraded to 2.7.1.
From this upgrade, I noticed several *very* disagreeable things:
* SM became bloated with pages using many JS (which I block w/
NoScript), exactly as FireFox did some weeks ago.
On 2/14/2012 8:11 AM, Bzzz wrote:
Please, tell me why a good browser is turning to a piece of shit?
Because Fire Fox is turning into a piece of shit (don't get me started
on how many sites are no broken with the 10. numbering - and I'm getting
sick of the pass the blame game), and the SM team
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:15:36 +0100
Ray_Net tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
I have also to add that they need votes for solving a bug, but they
don't need votes for a change.
I was responsible of a 4GL suite .. and we do the exact inverse !
Yep, me too: users are dictating the
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:23:03 -0500
chicagofan m...@privacy.net wrote:
However, I'm one of those who just wants the basics and for them to be
easily accessible, and realize many others want much more. I just wish
the basics could be left alone, like passwords, downloads, font sizes,
etc.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:23:03 -0500, chicagofan wrote:
Can anyone tell me why, if they had to fool with passwords, they didn't
give us the option of *always* showing passwords... in a password file? ;)
bj
Here is a workaround for the new and improved password manager. There
is no guarantee
Kevin L. Hill wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:23:03 -0500, chicagofan wrote:
Can anyone tell me why, if they had to fool with passwords, they didn't
give us the option of *always* showing passwords... in a password file? ;)
bj
Here is a workaround for the new and improved password manager.
Kevin L. Hill wrote:
Here is a workaround for the new and improved password manager. There
is no guarantee how long the code will be kept in future versions. Here is a
way to use the old password manager.
Copy the following address into the browser:
Kevin L. Hill wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:23:03 -0500, chicagofan wrote:
Can anyone tell me why, if they had to fool with passwords, they didn't
give us the option of *always* showing passwords... in a password file? ;)
bj
Here is a workaround for the new and improved password manager.
Larry S. wrote:
Kevin L. Hill wrote:
Copy the following address into the browser:
chrome://passwordmgr/content/passwordManager.xul
Do you know of anything similar for cookies?
chrome://communicator/content/permissions/cookieViewer.xul?cookieManager
This may have issues and stop working in
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
Kevin L. Hill wrote:
Copy the following address into the browser:
chrome://passwordmgr/content/passwordManager.xul
Do you know of anything similar for cookies?
chrome://communicator/content/permissions/cookieViewer.xul?cookieManager
This may have issues
Bzzz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:23:03 -0500
chicagofanm...@privacy.net wrote:
However, I'm one of those who just wants the basics and for them to be
easily accessible, and realize many others want much more. I just wish
the basics could be left alone, like passwords, downloads, font
On 12-02-14 8:11 AM, _Bzzz_ spoke thusly:
I'm using Iceape, which is the SM port under Debian Linux;
2 days ago it was upgraded to 2.7.1.
From this upgrade, I noticed several *very* disagreeable things:
* SM became bloated with pages using many JS (which I block w/
NoScript), exactly as
Bzzz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:12:58 +0100
Ray_Nettbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be wrote:
Because the developpers knows better than you what is good for you :-(
Yeah, that was my first thought (same as for gnome3:(
Too bad, I liked it until this release - I'm gonna try Opera
to see
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:43 -0500
Chris Ilias n...@ilias.ca wrote:
I don't know what you mean by became bloat. If you're having problems
Yes, I didn't used the right expression.
For example, to answer your post I selected the SM window where such
a site is opened
Larry S. wrote:
Sigh . . . The Cookie Safe page says Not available for SM 2.7.1.
Sigh... You didn't even *try* to click the button (and then Install
Anyway). Else you would have found that this add-on works with *any*
version of SM since 2.1. Have a little faith. I didn't recommend some
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:56:29 -0500
chicagofan m...@privacy.net wrote:
I downloaded Opera yesterday and it solved my biggest problem of NOT
being able to see websites in full screen. In SM 2.7, I get everything
in a column with wide blank borders on each side. :(
This is also my choice,
Bzzz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:43 -0500
Chris Iliasn...@ilias.ca wrote:
I don't know what you mean by became bloat. If you're having problems
Yes, I didn't used the right expression.
For example, to answer your post I selected the SM window where such
a site is opened
Bzzz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:56:29 -0500
chicagofanm...@privacy.net wrote:
I downloaded Opera yesterday and it solved my biggest problem of NOT
being able to see websites in full screen. In SM 2.7, I get everything
in a column with wide blank borders on each side. :(
This is also
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Larry S. wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727228
Guess I'll try the Chrome approach.
Whatever makes you happy...
Thanks anyway--you are a very helpful and much appreciated resource in
this group.
Thanks for noticing. ;-)
HTH
Jens
Sorry, this
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:56:29 -0500
chicagofan m...@privacy.net wrote:
I downloaded Opera yesterday and it solved my biggest problem of NOT
being able to see websites in full screen. In SM 2.7, I get everything
in a column with wide blank borders on each side. :(
Downloaded installed
On 02/14/2012 01:14 PM, Bzzz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:43 -0500
Chris Ilias n...@ilias.ca wrote:
I don't know what you mean by became bloat. If you're having problems
Yes, I didn't used the right expression.
For example, to answer your post I selected the SM window where such
a
On 12-02-14 4:14 PM, _Bzzz_ spoke thusly:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:43 -0500
Chris Iliasn...@ilias.ca wrote:
I don't know what you mean by became bloat. If you're having problems
Yes, I didn't used the right expression.
For example, to answer your post I selected the SM window where such
a
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:04:57 -0800
NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid wrote:
In a comparison of Opera SM 2.7.1 in opening
http://television.telerama.fr/tele/grille.php the result are the same:
13 seconds (from a low speed California US connection).
I wasn't talking about opening, just
33 matches
Mail list logo
