Re: out of date?

On 3/13/2017 2:11 PM, TCW wrote: On 3/13/2017 2:08 PM, Ronnie wrote: why is seamonkey saying it's 'out of date' when 2.46 was just recently released? Because yes, it is out of date. I have seen some attempts to build 2.49 on the Mozilla site, t seems to be failing to build for Win32/64

Re: email sub-folders disappeared

On 3/13/2017 2:14 PM, Pat Connors wrote: My sub-folders, usually on the left of the regular email screen disappeared. I used to file some of my email in those folders. No folder for deleted email either. I am using Adrian's 248 and had not problems with this versions till this happened.

Re: out of date?

On 3/13/2017 2:08 PM, Ronnie wrote: why is seamonkey saying it's 'out of date' when 2.46 was just recently released? Because yes, it is out of date. I have seen some attempts to build 2.49 on the Mozilla site, t seems to be failing to build for Win32/64 as it was previously. You should run

PING akalla

Planning on building a 2.49 or waiting on 52.0.1? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: W3C compliance: a novel response

On 3/11/2017 2:04 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: When I complained about bad browser sniffing at one of my favorite websites: I've never understood why web designers prefer to waste time writing several custom versions of their code for several different browsers instead of just writing one

Re: Should SM 2.46 Takes 15 Seconds to Start POP3 Email Download?

On 3/9/2017 8:58 AM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: TCW wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:57:36 -0500, Arnie Goetchius <arnie.goetchius@invalid.domain> wrote: TCW wrote: On 3/8/2017 3:47 PM, njoracle wrote: TCW wrote: On 3/8/2017 1:12 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: For the last several months, retr

Re: Should SM 2.46 Takes 15 Seconds to Start POP3 Email Download?

On 3/8/2017 3:47 PM, njoracle wrote: TCW wrote: On 3/8/2017 1:12 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: For the last several months, retrieving email has slowed down for me in SM. What I mean is that when I click on “Get All New Messages”, it takes 15 seconds before it starts to download any messages from

Re: Should SM 2.46 Takes 15 Seconds to Start POP3 Email Download?

On 3/8/2017 1:12 PM, Arnie Goetchius wrote: For the last several months, retrieving email has slowed down for me in SM. What I mean is that when I click on “Get All New Messages”, it takes 15 seconds before it starts to download any messages from the server. If there are no new messages, it

Re: Email stopped receiving or sending. Will not allow passwords. Thus nothing. Pages details are missing, what steps do I take. Would be great x to explain to living person via phone. Have being a Se

On 2/23/2017 9:40 AM, Chris Ilias wrote: On 23/02/2017 9:37 AM, TCW wrote: On 2/23/2017 8:00 AM, Chris Ilias wrote: First try going into the password manager and removing the stored password for that account. If that doesn't work, are there any error messages? If so, what do they say? I

Re: Email stopped receiving or sending. Will not allow passwords. Thus nothing. Pages details are missing, what steps do I take. Would be great x to explain to living person via phone. Have being a Se

On 2/23/2017 8:00 AM, Chris Ilias wrote: On 22/02/2017 8:53 AM, Stephen King wrote: Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network. First try going into the password manager and removing the stored password for that account. If that doesn't work, are there any error

Re: SM 2.46 Win 10Pro 64B Backup Question

On 2/15/2017 6:21 PM, SamuelS wrote: Hello all, I have a new laptop with the above specs. I have backed up my SM using MozBackUp, the twist is my old laptop was 32B, I think I know the answer, but could be incorrect I cannot move the MBU file to restore my current SM to the new laptop

Re: How to unclock Hangouts plugin with SM 2.40

On 2/13/2017 4:23 PM, Francois LE COAT wrote: Hi, Francois LE COAT writes: I'm using SeaMonkey 2.40 under Mac OS X 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) and I've installed the Hangouts plugin "GoogleVoiceAndVideoSetup.dmg" v.5.38.6. The problem is the plugin is currently locked by SeaMonkey, and I don't know

Re: new 2.48 available

On 1/30/2017 11:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote: Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit. While I am asking questions, does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version. change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit. It's basically Firefox

Re: new 2.48 available

On 1/30/2017 10:25 AM, Pat Connors wrote: I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no problems with my 2.47? I think you

Re: Unable to start this video

On 1/19/2017 6:03 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Unable to start this video http://www.ultimedia.com/deliver/generic/iframe/mdtk/01590560/src/880q3u/zone/1/showtitle/1/ With media.autoplay.enabled with value = false. User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0

Re: Crashes

On 1/19/2017 8:54 AM, JAS wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 1/18/2017 6:16 AM, TCW wrote [in part]: Also, one of the crashing DLLs I noticed was Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit. I don't know if there's a newer version of this app but if so, see if updating it will help. Also, try running in Safe Mode

Re: Crashes

On 1/18/2017 5:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 1/18/2017 6:16 AM, TCW wrote [in part]: Also, one of the crashing DLLs I noticed was Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit. I don't know if there's a newer version of this app but if so, see if updating it will help. Also, try running in Safe Mode and see

Re: Crashes

On 1/17/2017 8:40 PM, JAS wrote: TCW wrote: On 1/16/2017 11:08 AM, JAS wrote: I have had several crashes lately and wonder if someone can decipher the crash reports? Using SM 2.48 on Win 7 Pro Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/51.0 SeaMonkey/2.48 - Build ID

Re: Crashes

On 1/16/2017 11:08 AM, JAS wrote: I have had several crashes lately and wonder if someone can decipher the crash reports? Using SM 2.48 on Win 7 Pro Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/51.0 SeaMonkey/2.48 - Build ID: 20161208025245

Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released

On 12/22/2016 4:13 AM, Edmund Wong wrote: Yes... BELIEVE IT.. It's out! After so many months.. it's out!!! Reading back on 2.40's post, I wrote it was a 'difficult release'... man.. little DID I know. Erm.. oh wait. the formal post... After so long a delay, for which we apologize, the

Re: New 2.46 Windows release candidates

On 12/7/2016 2:59 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Ewong just built new Windows 2.46 en-US and de release candidates with the 0-day fix incorporated: https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/candidates/2.46-candidates/build6/unsigned/ Chatzilla, DOMi and Lightning are not in the package because

Re: source code patch for cve-2016-9079 svg zero day?

On 12/7/2016 1:59 PM, Mason83 wrote: On 07/12/2016 20:37, TCW wrote: On 12/7/2016 1:04 PM, Mason83 wrote: On 07/12/2016 19:04, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If you have a working build environment save yourself the trouble and just build from comm-release. 2.47 is stable but requires VS2015

Re: source code patch for cve-2016-9079 svg zero day?

On 12/7/2016 1:04 PM, Mason83 wrote: On 07/12/2016 19:04, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: If you have a working build environment save yourself the trouble and just build from comm-release. 2.47 is stable but requires VS2015 Update 3. Full build will take around 3h to 5h on my Thinkpad X200s and 30

Re: source code patch for cve-2016-9079 svg zero day?

On 12/7/2016 9:13 AM, Richmond wrote: Here is the patch from firefox 50.0.2. The file is identical in seamonkey so I should just be able to apply this and compile. Unfortunately my laptop may never finish compiling. Why am I doing this? I have no idea really. diff -e

Re: 64-bit versions of SeaMonkey

On 12/6/2016 9:55 PM, Dennis Langton wrote: Dennis Langton wrote: On 12/6/2016 2:05 PM, TCW wrote: On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:15:30 -0600, S Slicer <s...@noreply.net> wrote: TCW wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 18:12:33 -0600, S Slicer <s...@noreply.net> wrote: I had been using SeaM

Re: source code patch for cve-2016-9079 svg zero day?

On 12/6/2016 8:09 AM, Richmond wrote: Is there a source code patch for cve-2016-9079 svg zero day which I can apply to seamonkey 2.40? Whether it be to fix it, or cause it to crash safely. No there is not. It is built into Adrian's 2.47 build. Adrian is one of the Mozilla team who has been

Re: Refresh in 2.47

On 12/5/2016 10:47 AM, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Is anyone else having a problem with Reload in 2.47? _None_ of the various ways to activate it (toolbar icon, View/Reload, Ctrl-R, Ctrl-Shift-R, F5, or Ctrl-F5) seem to do anything at all. -JW No problems here. Have you tried Safe Mode as well? I'm

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 and SVG exploit

On 12/5/2016 9:58 AM, Ray_Net wrote: TCW wrote on 04-12-16 23:19: On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 23:05:25 +0100, Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote: Lee wrote on 04-12-16 19:16: On 12/4/16, Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote: Lee wrote on 04-12-16 17:18:

Re: Google Earth's Time Lapse fails to work correctly in SeaMonkey v2.40?

On 12/1/2016 9:07 PM, Ant wrote: https://earthengine.google.com/timelapse/ Or just in mine? 64-bit W7 HPE SP1's IE11 web browser worked though. What about the rest of you? Thank you in advance. :) No problems here but I am on Adrian's 2.47 x64 build from 12/1.

Re: [Ping Adrian - 2.47 Windows Builds] Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 12:29 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/1/2016 10:23 AM, TCW wrote: On 12/1/2016 12:12 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/01/2016 08:40 AM, Lee wrote: On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execut

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 12:02 PM, Chris Ilias wrote: On 01/12/2016 12:52 PM, TCW wrote: I was *told* to not post long URLs before by Chris I and someone else. Short URLs is the preferred method is what I was told. I never said that. I told you not to refer to contributor builds as official releases

Re: [Ping Adrian - 2.47 Windows Builds] Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 12:12 PM, NoOp wrote: On 12/01/2016 08:40 AM, Lee wrote: On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and poss

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 12/1/2016 10:40 AM, Lee wrote: On 12/1/16, TCW <"."> wrote: On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox br

Re: 0day exploit - Security update for SeaMonkey needed?

On 11/30/2016 8:06 AM, WaltS48 wrote: There's a zero-day exploit in the wild that's being used to execute malicious code on the computers of people using Tor and possibly other users of the Firefox browser, officials of the anonymity service confirmed Tuesday. The versions span from 41 to

Re: Seamonkey

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:47:13 -0500, W3BNR <w3...@verizon.net> wrote: >On 11/14/16 9:15 AM, TCW wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 00:19:17 +0100, Mason83 <root@dom.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 12/11/2016 10:06, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >>> >>>> I

Re: Seamonkey

On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:26:10 +0100, Michael Ströder wrote: >Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote: >> El 12/11/16 a las 10:06, Frank-Rainer Grahl escribió: >>> >>> Worst case the bundled extensions aka. Chatzilla, DOM Inspector and >>> Lightning would need to be unbundled from

Re: Seamonkey

On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 00:19:17 +0100, Mason83 wrote: >On 12/11/2016 10:06, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: > >> I would either grab the 2.46 en-US release candidate or use one of >> Adrians unofficial versions till the official shows up. There are all >> great compared to 2.40. > >I

Re: Seamonkey

On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:40:35 +0100, Ricardo Palomares Martí­nez wrote: >El 12/11/16 a las 10:06, Frank-Rainer Grahl escribió: >> >> Worst case the bundled extensions aka. Chatzilla, DOM Inspector and >> Lightning would need to be unbundled from the installer. >> > >

Re: Win 10 x64 English stable version link for downloaded needed for 2.46 or later

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 08:05:25 +0200, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >bwitzed wrote: >> Hi. I have installed 2.46 as I was told that it most stable. The only >> problem is that the only language choice is German and I cannot understand >> the menus. Would someone please provide me

Re: Video visible with IE and not with my SM 2.40

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:19:00 +0200, Ray_Net wrote: >How can I view this video with my: >SM 2.40 ? (Who works correctly in IE) >User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 >Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 >

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 (latest stable) uses NSS 3.20.1 - possible security vulnerability

On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:59:19 +0200, Ray_Net wrote: >Lee wrote on 16/10/2016 17:45: >> On 10/16/16, Ray_Net wrote: >>> seemonkey12...@gmail.com wrote on 13/10/2016 08:06: There's at least one security vulnerability that

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 (latest stable) uses NSS 3.20.1 - possible security vulnerability

On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey12...@gmail.com wrote: >There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS >version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950 > >There was a bugfix in NSS

Re: No images display in 2.40 email

On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 19:30:40 +0300, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: >Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:16:41 +0200, /Frank-Rainer Grahl/: > >>> SeaMonkey has electrolysis stuff? >> >> No and it's unlikely this will happen in the near future. Not only >> SeaMonkey would need code changes but also

Re: SeaMonkey v2.46 status updates in blog...

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:33:30 -0700, Ant wrote: >https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/2016/09/28/2-46/ You can use the 2.46 build in akalla's space. More than stable enough for a daily driver. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: SeaMonkey features re (HTML4 &/or HTML5)?

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:10:31 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: >That's an imperfect subject line to say the least. >Does SeaMonkey have a specification more detailed than the >"Feature List" at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/features ? > >The "World Wide Web Consortium"

Re: Sea Monkey browser

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 10:30:08 -0700, Pat Connors wrote: >I recently bought a new Windows 10, 64 and it took me a while to get >SeaMonkey up and running. Yesterday, I was on a Reddit website where >one can click on an up or down arrow to show whether you liked or >dislike

Re: No images display in 2.40 email

doing parallel builds a few months ago. > >Personally until a new official release arrives use Adrians comm-release >builds. 2.46 has almost a 100 fixes in the SeaMonkey code alone compared >to 2.40. Bug reports against Adrians builds are accepted. > >FRG > > >WaltS48 wrote: >

Re: No images display in 2.40 email

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:10:31 -0700 (PDT), bwit...@gmail.com wrote: >Yes but apparently the problem was in privacy so it is working now. What more >does this new version give me? > >And how do Ifind my old profiles? What is the file or file extension I am >looking for? > >And more thoughts on

Re: Adblock Plus Not Stopping Ads

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:58:54 +0100, Michael <no...@here.com> wrote: >On 22/09/2016 18:45, TCW wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:19:38 +0100, Michael <no...@here.com> wrote: >> >>> On 22/09/2016 18:03, Michael wrote: >>>> I wrote a few days ago

Re: Adblock Plus Not Stopping Ads

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:19:38 +0100, Michael wrote: >On 22/09/2016 18:03, Michael wrote: >> I wrote a few days ago about adblock plus not stopping ads all the time, >> unless the page is refreshed. >> >> Someone asked me for an example so here is one >>

Re: No images display in 2.40 email

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:37:41 -0700 (PDT), techfor...@tucsonhappens.org wrote: >I am very frustrated that now that I have installed seamonkey 2.40, though it >has solved the problem of continuous crashing, I can no longer see ANY images >in my email, though the preferences have nothing blocked.

Re: SeaMonkey on Win 10 is terrible

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:47:41 -0700, Mozillian wrote: > >Constantly "Not Responding" or very sluggish. > >I do not see any thing that might cause this. > >Four different providers and same thing with all three. > >Even when just composing a post. > >Four different providers

Re: Firebug when Passing from SM 2.38 to SM 2.40

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:35:23 +1000, Daniel wrote: >On 20/09/2016 7:29 PM, Ray_Net wrote: >> I just prepared to de-install SM 2.38 and install SM 2.40 the Released >> version ... >> All the files I need now are on my local disk. >> >> When I have been on the FireBug

Re: Seamonkey release?

On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:18:59 +0200, Stephan Thiele <100.59...@germanynet.de> wrote: >Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why there >still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March, almost half a >year ago. >I am quite confused that there a nightlies

Re: Message sort problem with v.2.39 and Yahoo e-mail

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:32:29 -0400, Henrik37 wrote: >For reasons that I can not fathom, SM 2.39 e-mail is no longer sorting >incoming Yahoo e-mail messages in the requested 'order received' manner. > It is putting new e-mails in all sort of strange order. Other e-mail

Re: Seamonkey Advanced Search FAILS !

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:50:24 -0700, Mozillian wrote: >I did Properties on a newsgroup on AIOE. >I Synchronized, Download Now >and watched 1400 files supposedly download. > >I did an Avanced search on Messages In: >With Operation on Local System. > >Parameters: >

REPORTING SPAM ABUSE FROM 94.61.247.128

Send abuse reports to abuse...@vodafone.com. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM Version 2.45 and Lightning

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:34:18 +1000, Daniel wrote: >As I understand things, it is intended that when SM 2.45 is released, it >will include the Lightning/Calendar function as standard. > >Will it be included just as the Browser and Mail & News functions are >included

SM 2.46 perf boost

I was just messing with the 2.46 beta from https://goo.gl/qcDsWv after testing the 2.45 build from the same place. I did a Speed Battle test with both. 2.45 scored, on average, around 850 on my lowly Latitude E6410 i5 M560 with 8GB RAM. 2.46 scores, on average, 1225. If my math is right, that's a

SPAM ABUSE FROM 85.242.159.65

Send abuse reports originating from 85.242.159.65 to ab...@mail.telepac.pt ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Shutterfly.com

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 12:46:48 -0700, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: >On 7/28/2016 10:40 AM, TCW wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:28:38 -0700, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: >> >>> On 7/28/2016 10:13 AM, TCW wrote: >>>> On Thu, 28 Jul 20

Re: Shutterfly.com

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:28:38 -0700, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: >On 7/28/2016 10:13 AM, TCW wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:04:45 -0700, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote: >> >>> Does anyone else have problems with this web site like accessing its >>>

Re: Shutterfly.com

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:04:45 -0700, Ant wrote: >Does anyone else have problems with this web site like accessing its >feedback, photobooks (unsupported web browser, but SM v2.40 uses newer >Firefox version at v43 that is way higher than v28), etc.? > >Thank you in advance.

REPORTING SPAM ABUSE from 88.26.243.237

You can report the spammer to neme...@telefonica.es ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.39 Mail account not updating with new mail

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 07:17:41 -0700 (PDT), piglet...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 2:25:45 PM UTC-4, TCW wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:26:00 -0700 (PDT), pigletoid wrote: >> >> >On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 12:54:27 PM UTC-4, TCW wrote: >> >>

Re: SM 2.39 Mail account not updating with new mail

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:42:45 -0700 (PDT), piglet...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 3:37:15 PM UTC-4, TCW wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:07:51 -0700 (PDT), pigletoid wrote: >> >> >On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 2:25:45 PM UTC-4, TCW wrote: >> >>

Re: SM 2.39 Mail account not updating with new mail

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:07:51 -0700 (PDT), piglet...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 2:25:45 PM UTC-4, TCW wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:26:00 -0700 (PDT), pigletoid wrote: >> >> >On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 12:54:27 PM UTC-4, TCW wrote: >> >>

Re: SM 2.39 Mail account not updating with new mail

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:26:00 -0700 (PDT), piglet...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 12:54:27 PM UTC-4, TCW wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:29:23 -0700 (PDT), pigletoid wrote: >> >> >On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 9:05:26 AM UTC-4, TCW wrote: >> >>

Re: SM 2.39 Mail account not updating with new mail

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:29:23 -0700 (PDT), piglet...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 9:05:26 AM UTC-4, TCW wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:07:41 -0700 (PDT), pigletoid wrote: >> >> >My exchange server was just updated from exchange.XXX.com to >> >

Re: SM 2.39 Mail account not updating with new mail

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:07:41 -0700 (PDT), piglet...@gmail.com wrote: >My exchange server was just updated from exchange.XXX.com to >outlook.office365.com. I changed the server settings in SM as recommended, and >the account appears functional. However, it no longer updates the mail in the

Re: unhosted web apps not working in SeaMonkey 2.4* but work in Firefox 49

On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 21:51:10 -0700 (PDT), Reuben Pinder <reubenpin...@gmail.com> wrote: >TCW! I am extremely HAPPY to report: The apps work in SeaMonkey Nightly 2.44! > >And am looking forward to it's Beta release in the near future. > >THANK YOU SO MUCH for that simple sug

Re: unhosted web apps not working in SeaMonkey 2.4* but work in Firefox 49

On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:16:54 -0700 (PDT), Reuben Pinder wrote: >Hi guys, > >I ( as perhaps many of you ) am a fan of the unhosted web apps concept >https://unhosted.org/ > >And have downloaded a number of these apps >https://unhosted.org/apps/ > >Notably: >Laverna -->

Re: Using Windows 7 with SM v3.40 what's the point in switching to W10?

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:48:01 -0700, cqbrodie wrote: >Are there any worthwhile points/advantages to switch from Windows 7 to >Windows 10? > >I realize that MS will not support Windows 7 beyond some close date, >but what else is there to W10 that is worthwhile? > >Thanks

Re: Is it me or is SeaMonkey getting slower these days?

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:10:45 -0700, Ant wrote: >Hello. > >Is it because of the web sites are more complex, bloated, etc.? I >noticed my old SM v2.40 likes to hog RAM and CPU a lot more like years >ago on my ancient, updated 32-bit Windows XP Pro SP3 machine (2.5 GB of >RAM

Re: Win32 nightlies

ate >mozilla-release branch. It's a one liner. > >2.45 could be build with VS2015 but FF 48 won't be as far as I know. > >2.46+ are VS2015 for sure. > >Update 3 is being tested and should be in place when 2.46 hits the street. > >FRG > >On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:43

Re: Win32 nightlies

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:43:21 +0800, Edmund Wong wrote: >Hi, > >Just wanted to mention that after figuring out bug 1271903 (reason: >PEBCAK! PEBCAK! PEBCAK! "kinda"), I've re-enabled to nightlies >for trunk and aurora. (Until the next bustage... :P ) > >Now the update here

<    1   2