Sorry I phrased my question poorly.
Does anyone have an example on OSM of parking tagged with parking fees that
vary over time? So I can see the tags used.
Thanks
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Clifford Snow
Sent: 23 March 2018 21:21
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Can anyone point me in the direction of a car park example with a parking fee
that is time dependant, such as first three hours free then next hour £2 ..
Thanks
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
That's right Dave. There are quite a few historical differences between a
Carpenter, Joiner or Cabinet Maker
Carpenters do the “rough” stuff of putting up timber for house construction,
typically “first fix” stuff.
Joiners are called in for any complex joints or for making window frames, door
it as Permissive currently.
Jonathan
bigfatfrog67
From: Richard Fairhurst
Sent: Tuesday, 9 February 2016 11:25
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Hi all,
An important part of the Pacific Coast Bicycle Route now requires
cyclists to get a permit:
http
thoughts?
Thanks
Jonathan
--
http://bigfatfrog67.me
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Thanks Heiko, I've changed it as per your suggestion, seems the most
elegant way of doing it.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 07/12/2015 14:56, Heiko Eckenreiter wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
A road that part way down has a no entry sign (excepting bicycles), I
would have expected the road
+1 Frederik
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 14/11/2015 18:35, Frederik Ramm wrote:
André,
OSM is not a place for condolences in note tags.
I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but sticking to facts is what keeps most
conflicts out of OSM - if something is observable on the ground, we map
it, and if
Yes
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: John Eldredge
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August 2015 22:30
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Some of the Sherlock Holmes stories make reference to a type of weapon
called a life preserver, what an American would call
I agree with Volker. To me designated meant “what it is says on the roadside
signage”. Usually seen where there are unique or special circumstances
restricting access.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Warin
Sent: Friday, 24 July 2015 13:50
To: Tag discussion
I would say it depends if the untouched land is still in its original use or
not. If it is then mark it as planned, if it’s cordoned off waiting for the
construction to get there then I would mark it as under construction.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: johnw
Sent: Thursday
planning discussions and are awaiting construction, which can
sometimes be many months or years, but will happen, short of a political change
of heart.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Volker Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2015 18:38
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
+1
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
Sent: Friday, 15 May 2015 10:41
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
2015-05-15 1:27 GMT+02:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
to me a pub is a shop/building .. sells stuff
why would you not just use the access tag to define who can use the entrance?
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: John Willis
Sent: Monday, 6 April 2015 02:50
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Tl;dr: suggesting:
Entrance= student
Jan,
That has certainly addressed everyone concerns that I can see.
Thank you.
Hopefully it fits your requirements and original desires.
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jan van Bekkum
Sent: Sunday, 29 March 2015 21:47
To: Tag discussion
+1
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Pieren
Sent: Friday, 27 March 2015 10:48
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:
We can use tourism=camp_site:non_designated for all cases
Looks fun, but how did you know you could stay there? Or did you just ask?
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jan van Bekkum
Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015 08:10
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
To give you a better impression
other than as a car park or layby using existing tags.
Wildcamping is a very specific activity and shouldn’t made official.
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jan van Bekkum
Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015 10:56
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related
” about
it.
All of these examples can be covered by existing tags.
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jan van Bekkum
Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015 12:36
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Non-designated is not necessarily
Examples of Wildcamping:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/487310@N25/pool/
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jonathan H
Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015 13:17
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
If it's there for years
Those look fantastic, would you want to tag those as Wildcamping?
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jan van Bekkum
Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015 14:11
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Fortunately we had those as well:
https://plus.google.com/photos
of something.
Stick to defining organised campsites, do not try to bring order to something
that by it's very nature is disk-organised.
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Jan van Bekkum
Sent: Tuesday, 24 March 2015 07:39
To: Tag discussion, strategy
=official?
Where’s the problem you're trying to fix?
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Janko Mihelić
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2015 11:30
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
2015-03-18 12:15 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre
What Forum?
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Andreas Goss
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2015 20:19
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
It is amazing to see how few people participate in this discussion and
vote compared to the number
Not sure what you mean by “Private Objects”, anything in the DB is capable of
being displayed, depending on whether the Renderer wants to. Nothing is
Private in OSM.
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: John F. Eldredge
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March 2015
in OSM is visible to all Renderer's to display or not display aas
they choose.
The OSM database is not the place for private individuals or organisations to
store private data.
Hope this helps to clarify things.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: John F. Eldredge
Sent: Tuesday
+1
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Kotya Karapetyan
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March 2015 14:04
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Dear all,
I think we deviated from the original question quite a bit. The point was that
the current number of votes proposed
I disagree, it's perfectly possible to make a decision on a vote by reading
other people’s comments/concerns and if not properly address then vote against.
Likewise, you can vote for a proposal even without being party to the
discussion.
Jonathan
---
http
officially designated campsites, mainly privately run, should be
mapped, I feel.
Jonathan
---
http://bigfatfrog67.me
From: Dave Swarthout
Sent: Friday, 13 March 2015 14:47
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
There is no mention of one very common
Scene 7. Ext. Prehistoric Planet
FORD:
You don’t seem to understand…
MAN IN CROWD:
No, no, no I just -
MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT:
It’s a simple matter! It’s a procedural matter! That’s the point!
CAPTAIN:
Alright, alright, alright, alright!
CHAIRMAN:
I’d like to call this meeting to some sort of
On 23/01/2015 20:53, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
+1 to all of that
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
But how can a tag that tells you to follow official designation signs be
meaningless unless what you mean is that such a definition is implicit
on all ways?
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 13/04/2014 12:29, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 11/apr/2014 um 19:02 schrieb Matthijs Melissen i
+1
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 11/04/2014 18:07, Tod Fitch wrote:
On Apr 11, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 17:28 +0100, SomeoneElse wrote:
Currently, there are 41,000 things tagged access=designated (1). I can
understand what =designated means for a specifc
I definitely think there is a need for this, I can think of many places
around the UK this could apply to.
landuse=events is better than leisure=*
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 09/03/2014 21:31, Tod Fitch wrote:
It seems to me that landuse=events is reasonable. Most of the places
:-) Touché
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 24/01/2014 10:30, Simone Saviolo wrote:
2014/1/24 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
Am 24/gen/2014 um 07:46 schrieb Kytömaa Lauri
lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi mailto:lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi:
It's then
Very important that we can mark roads that are officially designated as
unsuitable for certain vehicles. Don't see a problem with this use of
this tag?
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 08/01/2014 17:44, Philip Barnes wrote:
These examples are not far from home so I can get some copyright
=gate etc, however, could be
elsewhere on the site, particularly in the example of a Foreman's Office
or Site Office in the construction industry.
Any thoughts, is it worth a wiki page or subpage of building?
Jonathan
--
http://bigfatfrog67.me
Wikipedia suggests a gatehouse as a medieval construction:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatehouse
building=gatehouse has been used 19 times, but in what context I don't know.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 08/12/2013 15:39, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 15:28 +, Jonathan
:-)
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 06/12/2013 12:32, nounours wrote:
I think we should tag private backyards with surveillance=yes, even
if surveillance is executed by a satellite et not a surveillance camera.
:-) nounours77
Am 05.12.2013 um 18:46 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2013/12/5
+1
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 03/12/2013 10:56, Pieren wrote:
So I would prefer amenity=changing_table as an isolated feature or
changing_table=yes when attached to something else (like
amenity=toilets). Something similar is proposed here:
, not what they do.
Walkers cross lawns wherever they want if that's a shortcut and rules
against that aren't enforced strictly, but we don't map any possible
shortcut.
regards
Peter
Am 01.12.2013 22:47, schrieb Jonathan:
:-) This whole discussion assumes cyclists obey traffic rules! In the
UK
Thankfully I don't live in Germany :-)
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 22:58, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote:
Am 01.12.2013 um 22:47 schrieb Jonathan bigfatfro...@gmail.com:
:-) This whole discussion assumes cyclists obey traffic rules! In the UK
cyclists ride where they like
Yes!
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 14:28, Peter Wendorff wrote:
2) I would use url instead of contact, if it should refer to where the
webcams output can be seen, whcih would lead to webcam:url=*
___
Tagging mailing list
I would agree, the contact key has not taken off and may fit for phone
or fax (although the old way is still more popular) the use for webcam
is back to front. Was the original intention to cover video calls like
skype?
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 17:11, Peter Wendorff
be grateful there is just one way of spotting them on
a map.
Jonathan
p.s. Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not out
to get you! ;-)
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 02:07, John F. Eldredge wrote:
On 11/30/2013 11:22 AM, Jonathan wrote:
I don't care if it's
Or this is how you contact someone via webcam such as with skype (BTW I
realise that's not a webcam is but some people call it that)
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 21:39, John F. Eldredge wrote:
On 12/01/2013 03:33 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
I think, contact should be restricted to ways
:-) This whole discussion assumes cyclists obey traffic rules! In the
UK cyclists ride where they like! :-)
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 21:38, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 1 December 2013 10:04, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean that bicycle=no bans
of URL. Let's not re-invent the wheel just
because we need a bigger cart.
A camera recording a public space is performing surveillance over that
space, be it a webcam, police cam, traffic cam or nature cam. It's a
camera.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 29/11/2013 22:54, nounours wrote
I don't care if it's publicly available or not. Even if it is for the
personal and private use of some person somewhere (makes it even more
creepy). Surveillance is surveillance, doesn't matter why, where it
goes and who has it.
It should be tagged accordingly.
Jonathan
http
of that effects the
question of webcams.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 30/11/2013 11:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
what is the logics behind this? We use man_made for technical
installations/facilities/structures/devices, a camera is a technical
device, restaurants aren't (maybe the kitchen would
I agree, contact doesn't make sense.
webcam:url=http://... is better
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 30/11/2013 23:44, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote:
Am 30.11.2013 um 18:40 schrieb Egil Hjelmeland pri...@egil-hjelmeland.no:
contact:webcam=url is fine, that tell we have a webcam. Do we
You mean the cycle lane is only oneway and so bicycle=no on the road
stops bikes both way?
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 01/12/2013 00:15, Martin Koppenhöfer wrote:
Am 30.11.2013 um 21:25 schrieb Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
Cyclists shall be required to use the track if the
who is watching just that if they're watching with a camera then it's
surveillance.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 29/11/2013 08:15, Martin Vonwald wrote:
Have a look at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:Surveillance
man_made=surveillance
surveillance=webcam
+1
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 29/11/2013 13:18, Zecke wrote:
Am 29.11.2013 13:03, schrieb Egil Hjelmeland:
I think we live in different universes. This is the kind of stuff I
am interested in:
http://webcam.svorka.net/bollen/
http://webcam.sollia.net/image.jpg
A webcam is a webcam. This
there is no control on who sees it and what they use it
for, so you can't say it isn't surveillance because that's what it is.
This is in keeping with current usage and allows current renderers to
capture any newly added webcams without recoding.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 29/11/2013 13:24
+1
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 28/11/2013 15:32, nounours wrote:
Dear André,
Also being new to OSM and new to the tagging mailing list, I
completely understand your frustration. And I also believe that a lot
of people left OSM because even if they try hard, the don't get it right.
On the
Wow, a very well documented RFC! Thanks in advance for your time and
effort on this. Will read it and comment where appropriate.
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 03/11/2013 12:10, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Dear all,
Based on your input during the pre-proposal phase, I have come up with
a feature
to
these lists.
If anybody wants to see OSM flourish and bring in new participants from
other walks of life and grow to be a well respected global organisation
then think again, some may need to leave before others feel they may
want to join.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 03/11/2013 19:55
country
lanes, they are definitely not high performance and I don't feel they
should be Trunk roads, I feel they should be Primary roads.
Where do we draw the line? (No pun intended)
Thoughts?
Jonathan
--
http://bigfatfrog67.me
___
Tagging mailing
but minus the padding or cafe. The tage of indoor_play needs
to be the umbrella tag.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 24/10/2013 12:13, Dominic Hosler wrote:
Thanks, I feel a bit silly now, I didn't look hard enough.
New page is at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features
On 23/10/2013 12:27, pmsg wrote:
Generally, I think it is a good idea to map access restrictions related
to dresscode.
Similar kinds of access restrictions are: No knife, no camera, no
backpack, no cellphone, no food/drinks etc.
What about not being allowed in a bikeshed unless you have a
On 23/10/2013 12:55, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
I think the proposal would benefit from a more precise definition.
Or you could just tag the ones you find using this perfectly sensible
tag and not worry about it.
In the UK a Soft Play is a well-recognised and well-defined concept. If
that
On 22/10/2013 16:43, Dominic Hosler wrote:
I have just proposed a tag to use for soft play centres.
Looks absolutely fine. There are times when I'd use it on a node when
the soft play is just one part of a larger building, but that's pretty
much standard OSM practice anyway.
Don't worry
On 23/10/2013 14:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Would they qualify as soft play?
No, that's a bouncy castle. Soft play is padding, not inflatables.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I agree
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 23/10/2013 17:00, John F. Eldredge wrote:
I think a better approach is to have a tag that links to the venue's
web site, which we already have tags defined for.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Gives you a good idea what they are:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=softplayclient=firefox-ahs=U7Prls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialsource=lnmstbm=ischsa=Xei=CSBoUpT_B4S57AbYy4Aoved=0CAkQ_AUoAQbiw=1366bih=589
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 23/10/2013 14:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote
? Softplay is just one bit.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 23/10/2013 17:47, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
Instead of soft play, what about indoor play (or indoor play
area/centre)?
1) it seems to be used as a catch all sometimes, even in the UK (ie -
http://www.timeout.com/london/events/indoor-play
Sorry Dan, but bicycle=no means no cycling, pushing a bike is OK. We
don't have any way of saying you cannot push a bike except by banning
pedestrians as well.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 16/10/2013 10:29, Dan S wrote:
Martin, your statement here is the same as the one which fly used
Stephen for the heads up on such tough restrictions on bike
users in the UK, have never seen anything so extreme. But then I've not
been to Oxford for about 20 years!
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 14/10/2013 13:23, Stephen Gower wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Robert
No, we don't map what is there, we map the implications of what is
there. We don't map every speed limit sign or no-entry sign, we map the
result of those signs. The signs are there for humans in the real world,
we are representing the real world to computers.
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On
http://img.ct24.cz/multimedia/videos/image/646/medium/193542.jpg
This example, is clearly a legal statement, however, if you wish to map
that then modify the access tag for each section that cycling is not
allowed. Although, in this case I can't see how that works, as a
pedestrian how do you
+1 Totally agree, thanks Robert for a sensible summary.
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 11/10/2013 11:53, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
On 10 October 2013 15:28, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1 for a separate tag and deprecating bicycle=dismount
To make the case for this clearer,
where a bicycle can't even
be pushed, which I'm unaware of in the UK, then the access tag needs to
be extended to include a no pushed bicycles option. In those
circumstances can you push a wheelchair or pram or a luggage trolley but
not push a bike?
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 10/10
for safety reasons.
This is already covered by existing tags and methods.
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 10/10/2013 19:03, Mike N wrote:
On 10/10/2013 1:55 PM, Jonathan wrote:
The only way to tag the effect that the sign has is to change the access
tag to exclude bicycles.
What about
If you can't cycle on a way then it isn't a cycleway!
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 10/10/2013 19:10, SomeoneElse wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
I don't see any point in the bicycle=dismount tag, when there is a
change in speed limit we don't tag car=slowdown! The only way to tag
the effect
Nope, the only difference is a way changes from a way that can contain
cycles to a route that can't, it's an access issue.
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 10/10/2013 19:18, Mike N wrote:
On 10/10/2013 2:13 PM, fly wrote:
What about hints to the router that it's OK to send cyclists on this
route
the Netherlands, is understandable).
Again: this really is not what bicycle=dismount is about.
- Original Message - From: Jonathan bigfatfro...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Usefulness of bicycle=dismount on ways
On 10.10.2013 20:10, SomeoneElse wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
I don't see any point in the bicycle=dismount tag, when there is a
change in speed limit we don't tag car=slowdown! The only way to tag
the effect that the sign has is to change the access tag to exclude
bicycles. As I see it it's that simple
On 18/09/2013 18:15, Lukas Hornby wrote:
HI,
Having studied all of the comments, we seem to agree that a tag is
needed, that it is worth tagging. However the ambiguity over plot (which
was the word I used in my proposal and lot (which has been read into
plot) seems to be a sticking point.
On 18/04/2013 16:22, Steve Bennett wrote:
Disadvantages
- tag clashes, particularly name= - is this the name of the bike path,
or of the former train line?
The bike path, as per On The Ground. The path is a *former* railway
line, so it no longer has the railway as its *current* name.
On 07/02/2013 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
but: there are antennas where the whole structure acts as antenna
(mast=antenna). Maybe this is an example:
Yes, but unless you can explain, unambiguously how you identify those
vs. other types of mask, you're going to hit a verifiability problem.
On 06/02/2013 00:50, Greg Troxel wrote:
(I
am also curious if a British railroad geek could explain if the OSM
terms seem right to the railfan community.)
There was this discussion on talk-gb recently:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2013-January/014376.html
On 20/12/2012 12:10, Stephen Gower wrote:
blazon=barry gules and argent
Barry Gules and Argent? Didn't they split up in 1974?
runs away
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 10/09/2012 12:36, te...@free.fr wrote:
I would like to store information about the legality of fishing a lake, a
river, etc.
Is there already any tag with such a meaning?
fishing=yes/no ?
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Tagging mailing list
On 16/07/2012 10:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I find that surprising because it seems that sports_centre is even
more ambiguous or misunderstood - at least if someone tells me he's
going to the gym I know what they mean.
It isn't to a British person (probably). Most towns of any size have a
to turn
in. Were you to map that as highway=turning_circle width=10m (say), a
7.5m truck, which would be able to turn in a 10m unobstructed turning
circle (eventually), would get stuck trying to make it around that loop.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett
On 13/03/2012 11:57, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
The same is true for overhanging branches and such. You can't rely on
tags to know if an oversize vehicle can turn around.
Overhanging branches are not a physical property of the road in the same
way the central island is.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett
or cobblestones, perhaps over 50cm.
In summary: I believe the three classes to be separate and
non-overlapping. So I disagree with the wiki edit made, but do think
surface=sett is a sensible, verifiable tag.
Jonathan.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging
On 29/06/2011 14:19, Mike N wrote:
I don't see these edits as out of line or unusual. It's not so
different from the dozens of other projects to create more unified
tags so that data consumers have a chance of using the right tag.
I suspect the tags you're talking about in other projects
On 13/07/2010 07:37, char...@cferrero.net wrote:
How might I go about tagging the often quite extensive green stretches
of land to the side of larger roads here in Abu Dhabi (and indeed in
many parts of the world)? Sometimes this is just grass (in which case
landuse=grass kind of makes
On 13/07/2010 11:32, John Smith wrote:
On 13 July 2010 20:28, Jonathan Bennettopenstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk wrote:
gardens (and landuse=grass is just wrong. You're using the land *for* grass?
What does that mean?)
Turf farm?
landuse=agriculture
crop=grass or crop=turf
Nice try, though
On 18/05/2010 21:56, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote:
maybe even landuse=allotments if anyone wants to tag each property
separately.
Nope. That would be allotment=plot or something. Each plot is not a
separate garden, but just the parcel of land allocated to a tenant.
--
Jonathan (allotment
it sells...
To be consistent, your example above should really be:
what is it... a shop
what sort of shop... food shop...
what sort of food...
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
or not it sells any one particular kind of water-borne animal.
It's certainly the generic term for such a shop in the UK.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
a slight advantage in that it translates into French as
Poissionerie, German as Fischhändler, Italian as Pescivendolo, and so on.
Also, we have shop=butcher, not shop=meat.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Excellent work. For most of the recorded playgrounds in my area I have recorded
the information of what equipment exists in order to save a re-visit. Hopefully
with this that data will actually be worthwhile.
___
Tagging mailing list
did know it was going to break something, I
would indeed let people know before I did it.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
to.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
...
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
removed from the current OSM dataset.
For a bus route (or any feature replaced by an equivalent), something
like superseded_by=* with a reference to the new route would probably be
more succinct.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Tagging mailing list
running that renderer to add support
for it.
Jonathan
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
