staff!
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Josh Kennedy via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 7:33 AM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
But for those who cannot
Tuesday, September 12, 2017 7:33 AM
> To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Cc: Josh Kennedy
> Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
>
> But for those who cannot afford Jaws they are left out. That is why FS
> should make a low cost jaws rental program for maybe the price of a netflix
y, September 11, 2017 3:09 AM
> To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Cc: David
> Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
>
> You know, I too am tempted to believe, NVDA will take over some screen
> reader users. For one thing, as NVDA becomes yet more powerful, and
> widely know
route mouse to object, insert shift m.
read the current line, numPad 8, or capslock shift period.
On 9/12/2017 5:51 PM, BK via Talk wrote:
David, please let me know what the NVDA keyboard command is to route the
mouse to the focused object is, and also the command to read the line
under the
David, please let me know what the NVDA keyboard command is to route the
mouse to the focused object is, and also the command to read the line
under the mouse? thank you much.
Butch
--
BK
___
Any views or opinions presented in
: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
But for those who cannot afford Jaws they are left out. That is why FS should
make a low cost jaws rental program for maybe the price of a netflix
subscription, and the more you pay then you can add friends onto your jaws
account and let close
insecure. IE 11, should only be used if it is an emergency!
Have a great one!
David Moore
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: David via Talk
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 6:29 PM
To: mcommerf...@comcast.net; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: David
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
Could
time moves on, we likely will
>> slide in the background. Tomorrow's user, likely won't need Jaws, and
>> can enjoy a heavy good load of donuts and coffee, for the 1200 saved. :)
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 9/11/2017 12:54 AM, Loy via Talk wro
: David via Talk
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 3:09 AM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: David
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
You know, I too am tempted to believe, NVDA will take over some screen
reader users. For one thing, as NVDA becomes yet more powerful, and
widely known
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: David via Talk
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 6:29 PM
To: mcommerf...@comcast.net; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: David
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
Could be a number of reasons, why the one screen reader works better
than the other, in a given
won't need Jaws, and
>> can enjoy a heavy good load of donuts and coffee, for the 1200 saved. :)
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 9/11/2017 12:54 AM, Loy via Talk wrote:
>>> NVDA is not far from being as good as JAWS and I can see it
happening that p
PM
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
Why couldn't it happen?
On 9/10/2017 3:47 PM, Dennis Long via Talk wrote:
> I don't see that happening.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Talk
[mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On
+steve.jacobson=visi@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Josh Kennedy via Talk
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 9:41 AM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Cc: Josh Kennedy <joshuakennedy...@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
let me correct myself her
I think a FS thinks they are above the rules. lol
-Original Message-
From: Sky Mundell via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 10:51 PM
To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Cc: Sky Mundell
Subject: RE: window-eyes open source?
The problem is that FS has too much of a monopoly
.
-Original Message- From: Josh Kennedy via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 5:05 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
yes, and as far as donating I would rather donate my money to the NVDA
project rather than giving it to VFO and spend
.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Josh Kennedy via Talk
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 7:42 AM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
NVDA works with dragon naturally
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
yes, and as far as donating I would rather donate my money to the NVDA
project rather than giving it to VFO and spend money on tons of jaws
bells and whistles I'll mostly never use.
On 9/10/2017 6:54 PM, Loy via
Agree with you!
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Marvin Commerford via Talk
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 8:59 AM
To: Josh Kennedy via Talk
Cc: Marvin Commerford
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
Big
David, right on the money if I dare say so! How I wish NVDA would PUSH
something to Android! It would certainly give Voice Views, Voice Assistant,
ShinePlus and Talkback an interesting challenge and may be help those who
already use it bring their own screen reader of choice to Android land!
Big surprise! You've clearly demonstrated over time that you want
something for nothing. Harping on WE becoming open source has as much
chance of being successful as all of us getting sight. This nagging
behavior sometimes works for children with exhausted parents but this
case is much
: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
NVDA works with dragon naturally speaking, and windows speech recognition,
and it does it for free, with an addon called dictation bridge. with jaws
you have to pay an extra $400 or so for that functionality.
On 9/10/2017 11:51 PM, Sky Mundell via
lk-bounces+aistech=ameritech@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Singing Sparrow via Talk
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 6:05 AM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Singing Sparrow
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
To Be honest with you nvda has a place for people wherejaws will not be
ab
alk
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
Why couldn't it happen?
On 9/10/2017 3:47 PM, Dennis Long via Talk wrote:
> I don't see that happening.
>
> -Orig
: window-eyes open source?
It is far from being as good as jaws!
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Loy via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 6:55 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Loy
Subject: Re: window-eyes
via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 6:55 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Loy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
NVDA is not far from being as good as JAWS and I can see it happening that
people will download the free program instead of paying hundreds of dollars
for a very similar
=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Loy via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 6:55 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Loy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
NVDA is not far from being as good as JAWS and I can see it happening that
people will download the free program
isl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf
> Of Josh Kennedy via Talk
>> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:08 PM
>> To: David; Window-Eyes Discussion List
>> Cc: Josh Kennedy
>> Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
>>
>> I wonde
Iagree.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Nick Sarames via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 11:54 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Nick Sarames
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
Just because
es+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
> Behalf Of Dennis Long via Talk
> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 8:51 PM
> To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
> Cc: Dennis Long
> Subject: RE: window-eyes open source?
>
> It is far from being as good as jaws!
>
> -Original
'
Cc: Dennis Long
Subject: RE: window-eyes open source?
It is far from being as good as jaws!
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Loy via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 6:55 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc
It is far from being as good as jaws!
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Loy via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 6:55 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Loy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
NVDA
When did you hear this and where is the proof that VFO wants to buy NVDA?
On 9/10/2017 7:06 PM, Josh Kennedy via Talk wrote:
where did you hear that from? and how can they purchase an open source
product under the gpl?
On 9/10/2017 7:15 PM, ratshtron via Talk wrote:
don't push it! i have
where did you hear that from? and how can they purchase an open source
product under the gpl?
On 9/10/2017 7:15 PM, ratshtron via Talk wrote:
don't push it! i have heard that they are wanting to purchase nvda and
thus killing it as well.
Legend has it that on Sunday 9/10/2017 12:07 PM,
edy via Talk
> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:08 PM
> To: David; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Cc: Josh Kennedy
> Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
>
> I wonder what VFO would do if NVDA starting eating into their business
profits? If free open source NVDA woul
Kennedy via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:08 PM
To: David; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
I wonder what VFO would do if NVDA starting eating into their business
profits? If free open source NVDA would become way more popular than
jaws
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
I wonder what VFO would do if NVDA starting eating into their business
profits? If free open source NVDA would become way more popular than
jaws and would still be open source?
On 9/10/2017 2:54 AM, David wrote:
Matter of fact, this question was raised
don't push it! i have heard that they are wanting
to purchase nvda and thus killing it as well.
Legend has it that on Sunday 9/10/2017 12:07 PM, Josh Kennedy via Talk said:
I wonder what VFO would do if NVDA starting
eating into their business profits?
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
Why couldn't it happen?
On 9/10/2017 3:47 PM, Dennis Long via Talk wrote:
> I don't see that happening.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Talk
[mailto:talk-bounces+denni
--
>> From: Talk
>> [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On
>> Behalf Of Josh Kennedy via Talk
>> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:08 PM
>> To: David; Window-Eyes Discussion List
>> Cc: Josh Kennedy
>> Subject: Re: window
; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
I wonder what VFO would do if NVDA starting eating into their business profits?
If free open source NVDA would become way more popular than jaws and would
still be open source?
On 9/10/2017 2:54 AM, David
NVDA doesn't have to market its product very much these days, social
media and things like that probably get the product out there.
On 9/10/2017 2:38 PM, Nick Sarames wrote:
That's a lot to ask of a non-profit making institution which likely does
not have the budget to market its product.
Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
then how does NVDA work the way it does? and how is it so successful?
On 9/9/2017 9:37 PM, Tom Kingston via Talk wrote:
> Your board of directors would not allow you to spend a pile of money
> to purchase your comp
I don't see that happening.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Josh Kennedy via Talk
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:08 PM
To: David; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open
That's a lot to ask of a non-profit making institution which likely does
not have the budget to market its product.
On 9/10/2017 1:07 PM, Josh Kennedy via Talk wrote:
> I wonder what VFO would do if NVDA starting eating into their business
> profits? If free open source NVDA would become way
I wonder what VFO would do if NVDA starting eating into their business
profits? If free open source NVDA would become way more popular than
jaws and would still be open source?
On 9/10/2017 2:54 AM, David wrote:
Matter of fact, this question was raised a couple of days after the
: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
if I no longer cared about the product then yes I probably would turn
around and just open source it. if the product was no longer supported
by my business I'd just tell people do what you want with it, we moved
on. take it apart, open source
Original Message- From: Josh Kennedy via Talk
> Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2017 9:40 PM
> To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Cc: Josh Kennedy
> Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
>
> then how does NVDA work the way it does? and how is it so successful?
>
>
>
Matter of fact, this question was raised a couple of days after the
anouncement of the discontinued development of WinEyes. I will get back
to what Doug said back then. First of all, let's take a quick look at facts.
Had it been as easy as WinEyes would have been a stand-alone software,
with
What about termites that live in the court room? is that what you said?
I guess termites could live in courtrooms, couldn't they?
On 9/9/2017 10:37 PM, Josh Kennedy via Talk wrote:
NVDA is fine to use. I like its business model better than VFO's
business model.
On 9/9/2017 10:14 PM, mr.
NVDA is fine to use. I like its business model better than VFO's
business model.
On 9/9/2017 10:14 PM, mr. Chikodinaka Nickarandidum Oguledo via Talk wrote:
your brakeing the law! you court room jude judy or juje patricia
dimigao in the court room
On 9/9/17, Tom Kingston via Talk
your brakeing the law! you court room jude judy or juje patricia
dimigao in the court room
On 9/9/17, Tom Kingston via Talk wrote:
> Your question makes absolutely no sense in the context of this
> discussion. NVDA's business model has no correlation to VFO's
Your question makes absolutely no sense in the context of this
discussion. NVDA's business model has no correlation to VFO's ownership
of Window-Eyes.
On 9/9/2017 9:40 PM, Josh Kennedy wrote:
then how does NVDA work the way it does? and how is it so successful?
On 9/9/2017 9:37 PM, Tom
It didn't start out with the same business model as window eyes did. Pam.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Kennedy via Talk
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2017 9:40 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
then how does NVDA work the way
that you would spend the money on it, then give it away? Pam.-Original
Message-
From: Josh Kennedy via Talk
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2017 9:19 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
if I no longer cared about the product then yes I
then how does NVDA work the way it does? and how is it so successful?
On 9/9/2017 9:37 PM, Tom Kingston via Talk wrote:
Your board of directors would not allow you to spend a pile of money
to purchase your competitor and then allow you to put that competitor
right back in business against
Your board of directors would not allow you to spend a pile of money to
purchase your competitor and then allow you to put that competitor right
back in business against you. And no business owner with a drop of sense
would want to do it anyway. Businesses like Apple, google, and Microsoft
buy
if I no longer cared about the product then yes I probably would turn
around and just open source it. if the product was no longer supported
by my business I'd just tell people do what you want with it, we moved
on. take it apart, open source it, whatever. we do not care.
On 9/9/2017 9:14
No. Think about it. If you were in business and bought your number one
competitor would you turn around and give it away for someone else to
continue its development?
On 9/9/2017 9:01 PM, Josh Kennedy via Talk wrote:
hi
Is there any possibility since window eyes is no longer supported to
hi
Is there any possibility since window eyes is no longer supported to get
the window-eyes source code make it open source and put it up on the
github website? then other developers could keep developing window eyes.
--
sent with mozilla thunderbird
59 matches
Mail list logo