Eugene - not Feb 28
Michael Cole - March 14
Maning - changed to March 14
IanLopez - March 7 or 14
Anybody else? I have 2 gps units (1 from the gostogo) I can share.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not? We could rent a horse. ;)
On Thu,
Don't know about JOSM, but in Merkaartor, we have such things as templates.
You could tweak the default templates (xml files) to add a constant tag
source=OSM
WikiProject Gaza for each (or some) features you add.
- Chris -
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:14 PM, LeedsTracker
2009/2/24 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
On Monday 23 February 2009 19:52:37 LeedsTracker wrote:
E.g. I take a photo of a level crossing, locate in in Google Maps,
upload and tag it in WikiMedia Commons - no problem it seems.
Is this different from using the same method to adjust the
2009/2/24 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
On Monday 23 February 2009 19:52:37 LeedsTracker wrote:
E.g. I take a photo of a level crossing, locate in in Google Maps,
upload and tag it in WikiMedia Commons - no problem it seems.
Is this different from using the same method to adjust the
2009/2/23 Guenther Meyer d@sordidmusic.com:
Am Montag 23 Februar 2009 schrieb Dave Stubbs:
2009/2/22 Guenther Meyer d@sordidmusic.com:
Am Sonntag 22 Februar 2009 schrieb Dave Stubbs:
You could just /not/ run a bot on it. Seriously, these tag correcting
bots can be really annoying.
2009/2/23 Yann Coupin y...@coupin.net:
Le 23 févr. 09 à 11:26, Dave Stubbs a écrit :
So my question is this: given that there /are/ two tags in use, why go
to all the effort to change it? Document both and be done with it.
And this is helping the data not to turn into a pile of grey goo,
The tag page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot
refers to the
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
page that you mentioned.
This then would seem to make foot=yes unavailable as a description of the
physical nature of the way and to duplicate foot=designated. What would we
Hi
Just replied to Someoneelse's posting and copied it to you as well as to the
list ... The 'Essex Way' waymarks are a good example of Type 2 (see my
earlier posting); the yellow and blue ones are consistent with the Type 1
waymarking colour scheme. A 'byway' may be a BOAT or a RB and thus red
2009/2/23 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:46:09 +0100, Guenther Meyer d@sordidmusic.com
wrote:
because...
1. ... every application trying to use the data has to deal with several
taggings for the same thing. that's an unnecessary waste of resources.
a script
... I can relate to that really well! But when it comes to bull=yes you
should (a) make sure that you can run faster than the bull, and then (b)
report it to the Highway Authority - unless the bull in question is either
under ten months old or of a recognised dairy breed and at large with cows
or
2009/2/24 Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk:
2009/2/24 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org:
On Monday 23 February 2009 19:52:37 LeedsTracker wrote:
E.g. I take a photo of a level crossing, locate in in Google Maps,
upload and tag it in WikiMedia Commons - no problem it seems.
Is this
Hi,
Dave Stubbs wrote:
What you want is this: a validation tool so that users with a brain
can figure it out for themselves.
I think that the tagging view in the OSM Inspector
(http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/) is already quite a good start for such
a validation tool. The OSMI is based on the
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:14:53 +
LeedsTracker leedstrac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
When adding roads, I default to highway=road and source=OSM
WikiProject Gaza
- I think source is useful for future reference when adding from
satellite imagery (inc Yahoo's).
I could do with a
Please don't use Google Maps when doing OSM. It's just not worth the risk.
I understand that this is a safe and wise rule, but as Wikimedia
Commons' site suggests (and Nic's reply, commenting on talk-legal
discussions), there may be a fair use (or fair dealing) for rectifying
the location of an
On 24/02/2009 09:58, LeedsTracker wrote:
Please don't use Google Maps when doing OSM. It's just not worth the risk.
I understand that this is a safe and wise rule, but as Wikimedia
Commons' site suggests (and Nic's reply, commenting on talk-legal
discussions), there may be a fair use (or
Hi all,The CanVec2osm Beta version 0.01 is now available for review.
(if you are interested in helping edit the script, i can place it in the
SVN, so for now it's read-only as to avoid confusion)
http://www.acrosscanadatrails.com/Home/canvec2osm0_01.zip
Please do NOT upload any data, as its still
Dave Stubbs schrieb:
2. ... it is easier for new mappers to have one documented tag for one
feature, instead of having to choose...
Fine, no problem. I said document both, not recommend both.
document both IS recommend both!
ULFL - who thinks that having already hundreds (literally!)
Jordan S Hatcher wrote:
I know everyone really wants to see the latest draft and have
an opportunity to discuss it. If you can just give me a bit of
time, I'll have something for you next week.
Any news? Not meant as a nag, we're just all in an eager state of
anticipation. :)
cheers
This then would seem to make foot=yes unavailable as a description of the
physical nature of the way and to duplicate foot=designated.
The Key:access wiki uses the word preferred when describing
designated. I can see the point with regard to e.g. truck routes, but
less so for English and
2009/2/24 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Dave Stubbs schrieb:
2. ... it is easier for new mappers to have one documented tag for one
feature, instead of having to choose...
Fine, no problem. I said document both, not recommend both.
document both IS recommend both!
Hi
The Key:access wiki uses the word preferred when describing designated.
I can see the point with regard to e.g. truck routes, but less so for
English and Welsh footpaths. The case for =designated as opposed to =yes is
probably best made by one of the proponents of that tag (I think that
mess for someone who wants to use our data. Can't hear that argument
'let the application developers decide what they want' any longer!
Looks like an holy war is gone start. Let's try however to keep it low. But
I'm a part of that war against duplicates tags.
Quoting Dave : Handeling
Hi,
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
I can't rembember how many (oneway='yes' or oneway='true' or oneway='1')
there
are in the mapnik style's sheets I use.
not talking about tunnel='yes', bridge='yes', and of course the later
amenity='doctor(s)'
We could also create a preprocessor that
Dave Stubbs schrieb:
2009/2/24 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Dave Stubbs schrieb:
2. ... it is easier for new mappers to have one documented tag for one
feature, instead of having to choose...
Fine, no problem. I said document both, not recommend both.
document both IS recommend
2009/2/24 sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org:
mess for someone who wants to use our data. Can't hear that argument
'let the application developers decide what they want' any longer!
Looks like an holy war is gone start. Let's try however to keep it low. But
I'm a part of that war against
We could also create a preprocessor that unifies OSM data.
I've been thinkink a lot about an osm pré-processor, but not to solve the
problem you mentionned.
The main problem, to my point of vue, in the duplicates tag case, is not at
developper/renderer side, but at begginers learning to
I'd document both
for a while,
ha ? then why ? If we don't start by a little effort of at least stopping to
mentionned them, we will never go forward, don't you think ?
Document rather than recommend. The point being that if someone is
asking the question, what is amenity=doctor? they should
a) that's not a quote, it's a paraphrase.
b) you're taking it out of context.
Sorry for that, but that wasn't a paraphrase either, that was the way I
understood it.
weren't there. That doesn't mean we run a bot.
Totally agreed, I didn't mentionned we should (or at worst not before a
2009/2/24 sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org:
We could also create a preprocessor that unifies OSM data.
I've been thinkink a lot about an osm pré-processor, but not to solve the
problem you mentionned.
The main problem, to my point of vue, in the duplicates tag case, is not at
document both IS recommend both!
amenity=doctors - A doctor's surgery. smallerNote: people have also
used amenity=doctor for this./smaller
Wow. Hard.
Hmmm. And that is more helpful for anyone going to use this tag (mapping or
rendering or ...) than simply saying:
amenity=doctors - A
Dave quoted sly:
I'm in favor of disussion, describing only one, removing the
others from any
documentation, removing slowly support in renderers and
slowly, replace old
values by new values.
And replied:
That sounds like a more sensible way of handling it. I'd
document both
for a
I now see that
yes/true/1/no/false/0/-1 are all listed.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features#Restrictions
I feel that this is a mistake and that yes/no/-1 should be put back
in the value column so that maplint *will* highlight the ways using
the old accepted values so that
Actually that raises another issue (notwithstanding the point below) -
in cases where the legal status is only available on either a copyright
map (either bought or on the wall at the local council) - it's sometimes
not possible to know what the legal status of all traffic on e.g. a
former
Dave says:
I wrote it to do some more complex duplicate removal for the cycle map (as a
pre-processor before osm2pgsql). The key one being highway=path, bicycle=yes
which as far as I can tell is a duplicate of highway=cycleway. It's not
actually rolled out yet though I keep meaning to do the
I just deleted a way when I was trying to delete a node (using Potlatch). I
tried the undo button but undid the addition of a postbox node rather than the
deletion of the way. How can I find the way to get it back?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.505937lon=-0.026913zoom=18layers=B000FTF
Sorry, belated reply to this, didn't realise the thread was about this
topic. I guess I'm the oldest of the OSM countryside mappers, having
been involved in open countryside mapping since Mar 2004 (via my own
Freemap project, now using OSM data) and OSM since a year later, so...
As what might
This then would seem to make foot=yes unavailable as a description of the
physical nature of the way and to duplicate foot=designated. What would
we
then use to describe the physical nature? Similarly if bicycle=yes (even
if
we already have an option of bicycle=designated) means that bicycles
I asked:
How can I find the way to get it back?
A wiki search found the answer in the Potlatch Primer: U. All
sorted (and the postbox re-added), I think.
Ed
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/2/24 Donald Allwright donald_allwri...@yahoo.com:
Please don't use Google Maps when doing OSM. It's just not worth the
risk.
I understand that this is a safe and wise rule, but as Wikimedia
Commons' site suggests (and Nic's reply, commenting on talk-legal
discussions), there may be a fair
2009/2/23 Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com:
I'm thinking that it would be helpful if people who are working on
bulk imports could tell people that such things might happen. A
mapper in the Boston area asked me if water features in the Boston
area are going to be imported. If not, he'll work on
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p09_fair_use
I'm guessing that the spelling mistake on the front page (Devirative
works) is an Easter Egg to stop anyone copying it...
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Hi
Fwiw - I hold the view that the OS cannot own the status in any way as it is
the Highway Authority that decides / maintains the status. The only way the
OS even know about the status is by the Highway Authority telling them - as
they do (and a few years later the OS *might* amend their
Nick
Yes - I think we are basically in agreement. You were there already - I am
fast getting there, in part with the assistance of this dialogue via the
list. (Btw - you are of course right about bridleway tagging if =designated
is to be used then it should be used both for foot= and horse= - my
Nick
Again I find myself in almost complete agreement with you. I found
highway=cycleway a particularly difficult concept given that bicycle rights
are somewhat ill-defined in rights-of-way lore (notwithstanding the 1968
Countryside Act). I would have wanted to use it only for cycle lanes beside
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com wrote:
Nick
Again I find myself in almost complete agreement with you. I found
highway=cycleway a particularly difficult concept given that bicycle rights
are somewhat ill-defined in rights-of-way lore (notwithstanding the
LeedsTracker wrote:
I do. To be clear, I'm not advocating using Gmaps/G-earth for OSM, I
was just puzzled by the (apparently unproblematic) use of it in
Wikimedia and wondered if a parallel use was justifiable.
Put yourself in the shoes of Google's lawyers - and, more significantly,
those of
Am Dienstag 24 Februar 2009 schrieb Dave Stubbs:
1. ... every application trying to use the data has to deal with several
taggings for the same thing. that's an unnecessary waste of resources.
a script running on the database can minimize this waste, and
furthermore, can fix typos in tags,
On 24/02/2009 17:02, Mike Harris wrote:
Fwiw - I hold the view that the OS cannot own the status in any way as it is
the Highway Authority that decides / maintains the status. The only way the
OS even know about the status is by the Highway Authority telling them - as
they do (and a few years
I have to say i'm siding with those in favour of validation as well.
Not for everything, but at the very least some kind of spell
checking utility when uploading from the editors. I've seen a number
of spelling mistakes when residential was clearly the intended tag
value. I have nearly uploaded
Guenther Meyer wrote:
it may be trivial, but when you have to do this for every possible
tag with some variations, it's a waste of time, that should not
be necessary. parsing the osm xml files is already a ressource
consuming task; every unnecessary work should be omitted.
Maybe, but you
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 04:00:22PM +, LeedsTracker wrote:
The concept of fair use is something which differs from one jurisdiction to
another. [snip]
I know, though the principle is in UK law:
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p09_fair_use
That page is a little misleading.
Am Dienstag 24 Februar 2009 schrieb Richard Fairhurst:
Guenther Meyer wrote:
it may be trivial, but when you have to do this for every possible
tag with some variations, it's a waste of time, that should not
be necessary. parsing the osm xml files is already a ressource
consuming task;
Not quite the case ... Are the grid references derived by the Highway
Authority from the OS maps or from their own GPS surveys that they (the
Highway Authority) carry out themselves on every right of way? Pre-GPS you
might have a point - but with the use of GPS technology, not only by us but
also
... fair comment ... the English/Welsh system is indeed pretty much unique -
so the two level key is not a bad idea - apart from the large number of
paths already tagged! (:)
Mike Harris
_
From: Gustav Foseid [mailto:gust...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 February 2009 17:41
To: osm
Subject:
Hi all,
i'm working from the 11 wiki charts, and have most of it done, but i
feel i need at least 1 person to varify that they approve each of the
sugested tag(s).
I will make an extra column in each chart for this. (i think it will help)
Cheers,
Sam
hier werkt het wel.. (met firefox)
Groeten
Rob
Op 23 februari 2009 23:07 schreef ivom ivo.vdmaagdenb...@pandora.be het
volgende:
Kan het zijn dat ik iets heb gemist en dat de fietskaart tegenwoordig
ergens anders te vinden is? Of gaat er iets fout met de server waar de
data vandaan moet
Het is werkt weer. Door een update van cherokee en iets met python was een van
de env variabele die gebruikt werd niet meer beschikbaar.
Nu werkt alles weer... als het goed is :P
--Roeland
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 13:44:22 Rob wrote:
hier werkt het wel.. (met firefox)
Groeten
Rob
Op 23
Ok,
ik was even een beetje bezorgd dat die prima fietskaartpagina of zijn
makers de geest hadden gegeven.
Het werkt inderdaad weer naar behoren. Ik heb net het resultaat van het
toevoegen van mijn fietsroute kunnen quality checken: handig die
overlays!
Dank voor het goede werk!
On Tue, 24
The data will be tagged as reviewed=no to indicate that a person has no
confirmed
that it is 'correct'.
In the case if the Suburb boundaries I doubt it is actually possible to
confirm the majority
of the data 'on the ground' as their is no magical line on the ground.
The data that will be
Hi!
Karl Eichwalder schrieb:
Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de writes:
Mit Hilfe von crschmidt auf dem Openlayers IRC-Channel hab ichs hinbekommen:
http://geggus.net/gmaps/ka-hd.html
Wie bei mir funktioniert auch da der Permalink nicht (mehr) wirklich.
Die Werte werden zwar in
Jens Müller schrieb:
Was gibt es dadran zu erfinden? Muß ja ein ziemlich einfältiger Mensch
sein, dieser Sean Phelan.
Bei einem erteilten Patent hat der zuständige Prüfer des Patentamtes
entschieden, ob das Patent die nötige Erfindungshöhe hat, ob es schon
vorher eine solche Erfindung gegeben
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 24. Februar 2009 00:09 schrieb Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
Der motorisierte Verkehrsteilnehmer sieht den Ausbau des Weges und
erkennt ohne das Schild nciht, dass es eigenltich nur (nach
Verkehrsrecht) ein Radweg ist.
und so geht es
Hallo,
hier in Berlin sind mehrere Sportanlagen gemappt, welche von Mapnik schlecht
gerendert werden weil immer zum schluß
der leisure=stadium oder leisure=sports_centre über alles rüber gerendert wird,
kann man da nicht mal was ändern?
Also errechnest Du zu jeder Abweichung den Gewichtungsfaktor zum
Mittelwert?
Nein, bisher bilde ich nur den Mittelwert, als nächstes schaue ich mir
nochmal die Seite mit den Infos zu den GPS-Meßfehlern an und versuche dann
jedem Trackpunkt einen statistischen Fehler zuzuweisen in Abhängigkeit
Hallo,
auch auf die Gefahr hin, dass Du es schon längst wusstest: Hier gibts
alle GPS-Traces mit dem Tag aachen:
wußte ich nicht. Werde ich mir holen, aber trotzdem sind mir Traces mit den
Zusatzinfos noch lieber.
Dimitri
___
Talk-de mailing list
Hi !
ich habe mir eine Vorlage etwas abgewandelt für die Darstellung von
Geschwindigkeitsangaben.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:L%C3%BCbeck/Kosmos-rules-MaxSpeed
Kann mir einer von Euch sagen, warum z.b. maxspeed=30 jetzt nicht mehr
grün dargestellt wird.
Irgendetwas muss ich
Hallo Holger,
erste Grundlagen für OpenLayers sind u.a. hier zu finden
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Germany/Workshops/Baukasten_Webanwendungen
gruß Jan :-)
Holger Schrader schrieb:
Hallo Liste,
Ich habe da so eine Idee für eine SlippyMap, habe aber absolut Null
Ahnung wie
Hallo,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/traces/tag/aachen
Toll, und wie lade ich die? Es sind 202 Seiten mit 20 Traces/Seite also etwa
4000, die möchte ich ungerne einzeln per Hand laden. Ich vermute die
Standardantwort ist php o.ä. aber damit kenne ich mich zu wenig aus.
Dimitri
Dimitri Junker wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/traces/tag/aachen
Toll, und wie lade ich die? Es sind 202 Seiten mit 20 Traces/Seite also etwa
4000, die möchte ich ungerne einzeln per Hand laden. Ich vermute die
Standardantwort ist php o.ä. aber damit kenne ich mich zu wenig aus.
Einige Feldwege weiter war der Ausgang versperrt mit einem Erdwall von
etwa 3m Breite, 1m Tiefe und 50cm Höhe.
Das klingt fuer micht jetzt erstmal so, als ob der Weg da unterbrochen
werden sollte. Das wuerde bedeuten, dass man (mit Fahrzeug) da also gar
nicht mehr lang darf/soll, die
Hallo,
Über die Lokalisierungsvorschläge des Namefinders auf openstreetmap.org ist
ja schon hier und da gemöppert worden.
Ich habe mir das Frankfurt-Ergebnis von Heute nochmal anschaut:
Results from OpenStreetMap Namefinder
-City, about 9km north-west of Offenbach
-Town Frankfurt, less than
Hallo.
Am Montag, 23. Februar 2009 schrieb Torsten Leistikow:
Das klingt fuer micht jetzt erstmal so, als ob der Weg da unterbrochen
werden sollte. Das wuerde bedeuten, dass man (mit Fahrzeug) da also gar
nicht mehr lang darf/soll, die zustaendige Stelle lediglich die Kosten
fuer einen
Am 24.02.2009 16:24, Johann H. Addicks:
Hallo,
Über die Lokalisierungsvorschläge des Namefinders auf openstreetmap.org ist
ja schon hier und da gemöppert worden.
Ich habe mir das Frankfurt-Ergebnis von Heute nochmal anschaut:
Results from OpenStreetMap Namefinder
-City, about 9km
Ich wollt mich hier eigentlich nicht einschalten, aber ein paar Anmerkungen
müssen jetzt doch sein. :)
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:30:31 +0100, Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de wrote:
Ein ganz normale Rad-Straße ohne Einschränkung ist auch am Besten als
Radweg in den Karten verzeichnet, weil
Claudius Henrichs schrieb:
Deine Verbesserungsvorschläge sind jederzeit willkommen. Du musst es ja
nicht gleich implementieren. Aber wenn es dich so abschreckt kannst du
dir ja mal ein paar Nachmittage Gedanken machen.
Ich verfolge z.B. seit einiger Zeit Abkürzungen für den Namefinder.
Robert Joop schrieb:
ich hab mir grad mal drei fahrradstraßen hier angeguckt: weder in mapnik,
osmarender oder cycle map ist eine von ihnen erkennbar!
Hm, ja und? Ist halt ein Fehler in der Anwendung ... kommt vor.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Thomas Drebert schrieb:
hier in Berlin sind mehrere Sportanlagen gemappt, welche von
Mapnik schlecht gerendert werden weil immer zum schluß
der leisure=stadium oder leisure=sports_centre über alles rüber
gerendert wird, kann man da nicht mal was ändern?
Na klar:
Thomas Drebert dreb...@web.de wrote:
hier in Berlin sind mehrere Sportanlagen gemappt, welche von Mapnik schlecht
gerendert werden weil immer zum schluß
der leisure=stadium oder leisure=sports_centre über alles rüber gerendert
wird, kann man da nicht mal was ändern?
Hallo,
Da fällt mir ein: Die API macht es Dir sogar noch einfacher:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.5#Retrievin
g_GPS_tracks
Leider enthalten diese Fies nur 2D-Koordinaten, sonst nichts
___
Talk-de mailing list
Dimitri Junker schrieb:
Da fällt mir ein: Die API macht es Dir sogar noch einfacher:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.5#Retrievin
g_GPS_tracks
Leider enthalten diese Fies nur 2D-Koordinaten, sonst nichts
Die Original-GPX-Dateien enthalten jedoch
Hi Mario.
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:03:19 +0100, Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de wrote:
http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.27369lon=10.52957zoom=17layers=B000FTF
Gegenfrage: Wie würdest du einen ausgeschilderten Radweg mit der
Zusatzbeschilderung Anlieger frei taggen?
Je nach Beschaffenheit.
Dimitri Junker schrieb:
Toll, und wie lade ich die? Es sind 202 Seiten mit 20 Traces/Seite also etwa
4000, die möchte ich ungerne einzeln per Hand laden. Ich vermute die
Standardantwort ist php o.ä. aber damit kenne ich mich zu wenig aus.
There you are:
Hallo Dimitri,
falls Du Probleme mit dem Downloaden der einzelnen Dateien bekommst,
habe ich Dir hier ein fertiges Päckchen zusammengeschnürrt:
http://www.file-upload.net/download-1481299/GPX_Aachen.zip.html
1. Eine große GPX-Datei, in der alle kleinen drin sind.
2. Die einzelnen GPX-Dateien,
Florian Lohoff f...@rfc822.org writes:
Das Thema permalink hacken auch alle leute anders zurecht - ich habe bei
einigen gesehen das sie es mit Server Side Includes machen d.h. der web
server aendern den JavaScript code - alles reichlich gruselig bis
unverstaendlich ...
Ich habe es so
Hallo,
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:L%C3%BCbeck/Kosmos-rules-MaxSpeed
Kann mir einer von Euch sagen, warum z.b. maxspeed=30 jetzt nicht mehr
grün dargestellt wird.
Irgendetwas muss ich verstellt haben !
Am 23.02.2009 um 00:33 schrieb Stephan Wolff:
Wenn das korrekt ist, wäre highway=cycleway nicht richtig und
highway = residential
maxspeed = 30
bicycle=designated
motor_vehicle=yes
Wie wär's mit motor_vehicle=permissive?
Das ist doch so im Sinne von nicht dafür gedacht, sagt aber keiner
Am 24. Februar 2009 21:03 schrieb Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
Eine residential (und alle anderen normalen Straßen) impliziereren aber
ein motorcar=designated (es sei denn es ist explizit untersagt) und das
macht dieses Value für Radstraßen unbrauchbar, da falsche Begebenheiten
Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 08:31:55AM +0100, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
Wie bei mir funktioniert auch da der Permalink nicht (mehr) wirklich.
Die Werte werden zwar in die URL geschrieben, aber letztlich zentriert
er wieder auf die Ausgangsposition.
Das Thema permalink hacken
Bernd Wurst schrieb:
Also die von Johann genannten ca. 20cm sperren keinen mir bekannten Traktor
aus. Sogar LKW (eventuell Langholz-Laster oder sowas) die den Weg benutzen
dürfen, kommen da locker drüber weg.
Ich hatte in der Mail 2 Sperren:
a) die Betonblöcke am Boden in der Fahrbahnmitte
Johannes Hüsing schrieb:
Nein, da viele Orte auch Start und Ziel von Verkehrsbewegungen sind.
Extremfälle sind Orte auf Halbinseln oder in Tälern, nach denen nicht
Rechtes mehr kommt.
Baden-Baden wäre für mich ein Beispiel, bei dem ich glaube, dass
nach Süden raus nur aus Prinzip eine
Simon Kokolakis schrieb:
Tobias Wendorff schrieb:
- eine Landesstraße (durch den Ort mit 50 km/h, tertiary)
- eine Hauptverkehrsstraße (verbindet die eine Bundesstraße
mit der Landesstraße mit 50 km/h, viel Verkehr, tertiary)
Aber dann noch eine Hauptverkehrsstraße, durch die
Hallo Mario.
Erstens: Bitte kein TOFU!
Mario Salvini wrote:
aber wir sind uns schon einig, dass auf einer Rad-Straße
bicycle=designated herrscht und alle anderen Teilnehmer standardmäßig
...=no und unter Ausnahme maximal ein ...=yes meistens aber eher
...=destination oder andere
Garry wrote:
Simon Kokolakis schrieb:
Landestraßen würde ich generell als secondary taggen. Ebenso
Lande-Strassen tage ich als runway ;-)
Ist Strassen der verschollen geglaubte Plural von Strass
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strass)?
*duck*
Gerrit
Gerrit Lammert schrieb:
Hallo Mario.
Erstens: Bitte kein TOFU!
Mario Salvini wrote:
aber wir sind uns schon einig, dass auf einer Rad-Straße
bicycle=designated herrscht und alle anderen Teilnehmer standardmäßig
...=no und unter Ausnahme maximal ein ...=yes meistens aber eher
2009/2/24 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
Torniamo all'esempio fatto poco sopra: supponiamo che una legge
stabilisca che il nuovo limite di velocità in città è 30 e non più 50.
Ri-etichettiamo tutte le way d'Italia?
si certo, ma non è molto probabile.
Martin
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 04:27:10PM +0100, Niccolo Rigacci wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:13:02PM +0100, f.pelu...@libero.it wrote:
consideriamo il fatto che i satelliti orbitano (a grande distanza, e' vero;
pero' orbitano), il numero massimo di satelliti sopra l'orizzonte è al
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Luigi Toscano lto...@yahoo.it wrote:
In realtà con *un* cartello inizia e finisce sempre la stessa cosa, a
seconda del lato da cui lo guardi.
Ma la strada ha una direzione, si possono considerare il finisce e
inizia come in qualche modo collegati a tale
-Original Message-
From: talk-it-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-it-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Luigi Toscano
Sent: martedì 24 febbraio 2009 9.51
To: openstreetmap list - italiano
Subject: Re: [Talk-it] Limiti di velocità in aree urbane
Federico Cozzi ha scritto:
On
--- Mar 24/2/09, Carlo Stemberger carlo.stember...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Anch'io sono contrario alla 2 (che è una non-informazione), mentre sulla
1 secondo me si potrebbe fare, in questo modo il navigatore, se si trova
all'interno dell'area, sa che di default la velocità massima è 50km/h.
2009/2/24 iiizio equer...@yahoo.com:
Il quartiere in questione si troverebbe mappato come extraurbano, cosa
che invece non è: il navigatore penserebbe che il limite sia 90km/h,
dove invece il limite è 50km/h.
Basta aggiungere qualche punto al perimetro dell'area anche se non c'è una
strada
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
