Hi,
One week to go for the Marikina Mapping Party. For those interested,
please confirm here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Philippines/Mapping_Party/Marikina
or here
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=325986027476#!/event.php?eid=325986027476ref=ts
I need a list of
Ah very nice page design.
Does OSM not have some kind of standard pamphlet for an intro to OSM and
mapping using JOSM or potchlatch?
I might go if I'm available that day and maybe we can get our docs
agreed upon and signed there. Will bring car and Blackberry GPS+Laptop
if ever :)
Andre
- Will we be needing walking papers? Is anyone going to print them all,
should we bring a printer perhaps or print them beforehand :)
- If we print walking papers will someone have a scanner? :) Or do we
use a digicam haha
- Will there be banners for the cars, and information sheets incase
Does anyone here use MapZen by CloudMade for mapping or has tried the
IPhone POI Collector? My wife has a IPhone 2G so I'm gonna try it out
and hope it works without GPS :)
http://mapzen.cloudmade.com/mapzen-poi-collector
Would be cool if we could use that to collect POI info during the
Hi all,
I may have the opportunity to contribute to OSM in a pretty extensive way
but i'm not sure if it is doable or usefull.
We are a delivery company and we have distribution rounds but they are
stricly abstract; no mapping is involved, just lists of streets. We want to
import these round
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Ben Abelshausen
ben.abelshau...@gmail.com wrote:
- How is the map evolving (specifically in the area of flanders). Are there
lots of mappers? How accurate are the maps already?
I'm not very knowledgeable, being from the Netherlands myself, but I
would say:
Ben Abelshausen wrote:
- How is the map evolving (specifically in the area of flanders). Are there
lots of mappers? How accurate are the maps already?
Depends of course. Some cities like Antwerp are almost complete, but if you
look to neighbouring municipalities it's not difficult to find
All,
Dirk (the current JOSM maintainer) has just announced on josm-dev
that JOSM will move to Java6 around the end of this month. This means
that anyone who does not have Java6 may continue to work with the
current JOSM release but will not be able to use the new builds from
April on.
For one of OSM GSoC'10 projects I would like to suggest unofficial
guide for mapping. We all know that there is a little haos in tagging
(some says it's good, some says it bad), but so far biggest confusion
comes from not how to tag things, but how to tag complex situations or
how to even map
That is a great idea.
What about making video as well, on how to use OSM/JOSM/Potlatch how to get
started. Video Screencasts?
mike
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.comwrote:
For one of OSM GSoC'10 projects I would like to suggest unofficial
guide for mapping. We
Frederik Ramm wrote:
If you are in the unfortunate situation of having willfully
chained yourself to one Hardware/OS supplier and that
supplier is unwilling to release Java6 for your platform,
it may be time to finally ditch
...JOSM in anticipation of imminent Potlatch 2 wondrousness.
On Thursday 11 Mar 2010 3:42:47 pm jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
That is a great idea.
What about making video as well, on how to use OSM/JOSM/Potlatch how to get
started. Video Screencasts?
actually Gsoc is meant for developing the application as such (as in writing
code), not
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
The world doesn't require Potlatch 2 wondrousness. The world would
already sigh with relief if Potlatch could be made to not break
relation ordering when a way is split ;-)
Has the world lodged a trac ticket?
I'm not sure; my guess is that the world is silently
Steve Bennett wrote:
Sweet. How hard can ActionScript be, really? (I've done plenty of C,
Delphi, Java etc in the distant past, usually the difficulty is not
the language, it's learning the codebase.)
Exactly. If you know Java then you shouldn't find AS3 much of a
stretch at all - think of
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
The world doesn't require Potlatch 2 wondrousness. The world would
already sigh with relief if Potlatch could be made to not break
relation ordering when a way is split ;-)
Has the world
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'm not sure; my guess is that the world is silently waiting for
Potlatch 2 to be released and will *then* complain about everything
that *still* doesn't work.
(My info comes from several mentions on, you guessed it, talk-de.)
Oh, I'd guessed that much. No-one outside
On Thursday 11 Mar 2010 4:02:22 pm you wrote:
actually Gsoc is meant for developing the application as such (as in
writing code), not working on end user documentation and tools.
Not only, I know several projects where user manuals and documentation
where created during GSoC. There was one
GSoc
student pool is a very talented one - it would be good to use them for more
critical things. Of course, OSM unlike other projects is basically a
collection of tools maintained by various people, so difficult to achieve a
consensus.
Having one place of knowhow of mapping is quite
Hello everyone,
Thanks for the responses on this. What I would like to do this year is
really try to bring together everyone on the list who is interested in
developing OSM software (both web and mobile) for walkers (hikers) so that
we can make a good go of exchanging ideas and developing
lets put it in a different perspective :
Make the documentation as part of the program!
I would like to see for example a help system that is integrated to the
wiki,
Click on a tag, have it pull up the wiki entry, be able to add new unknown
tags or rename them.
We could even have an OWL Ontology
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
...
I think a more useful criticism would include some specific ideas...
Well, if we are throwing around random ideas, I might as well chime in
too...
To state it upfront, I am not involved in any of the parts suggested, so
I can neither fully judge
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
How hard can ActionScript be, really?
If I can do it, anyone can.
Cheers,
Andy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:30, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Java6 has been around for more than three years now (and other OSM
software, e.g. Osmosis, already depends on it) so if you are still using
an older version it might be time to upgrade. (If you are in the
unfortunate
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:38, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
Sweet. How hard can ActionScript be, really? (I've done plenty of C,
Delphi, Java etc in the distant past, usually the difficulty is not
the language, it's learning the codebase.)
Exactly. If
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Is it worse or better than the PL1 codebase ?:)
Do you want a serious answer to that? :)
The codebase is a lot more proper: there's packages and
private/protected variables and all of that. You could probably write
unit tests for it if you like that sort of
I suggest that API 0.8 would specify that any values in the database be
stored in some appropriate canonical form, with a flag to say if it is
naturally imperial or naturally metric. So heights and widths would be
stored (say) in integer millimetres or integer inches with a one-bit
flag to
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Lars Francke lars.fran...@gmail.comwrote:
I suggest that API 0.8 would specify that any values in the database be
stored in some appropriate canonical form, with a flag to say if it is
naturally imperial or naturally metric. So heights and widths would be
El día Thursday 11 March 2010 11:40:56, Frederik Ramm dijo:
I'm not sure; my guess is that the world is silently waiting for
Potlatch 2 to be released and will *then* complain about everything that
*still* doesn't work.
The world is trying to *preemptively* ban potlatch 2 :-P
--
Iván Sánchez
(since we got rid of the segments)
From 8.2 GB to 8.1 GB:
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 11 March 2010 15:50, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
(since we got rid of the segments)
From 8.2 GB to 8.1 GB:
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
Interesting...
There has been a change to the dumping script since the previous week:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20396
But more
lots of dupe node removal?
On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Nic Roets wrote:
(since we got rid of the segments)
From 8.2 GB to 8.1 GB:
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
No.
From 8.2 GB to 8.1 GB:
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
planet-091007.osm.bz2 09-Oct-2009 03:37 7.4G
planet-091014.osm.bz2 14-Oct-2009 20:35 7.2G
And I'm sure it has happened before.
What exactly were you trying to tell us? :)
On 11 March 2010 16:03, Lars Francke lars.fran...@gmail.com wrote:
planet-091007.osm.bz2 09-Oct-2009 03:37 7.4G
planet-091014.osm.bz2 14-Oct-2009 20:35 7.2G
I tweaked the bz2 compression block size around then, which would
account for that size
Halloechen!
Das ganze hier gehoert noch zu den FOSSGIS-Nachwehen und ist für
Leute, die nicht dabei waren vielleicht nicht so interessant bzw.
verständlich.
Ich habe eben mal kurz die Seite der Strato-Server im Wiki[1]
erweitert um zu sehen welche Projekte welche Resourcen nutzen. Ich bin
mir
grin :D
Any clues or teasers as to what this might contain?
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM will move to Java6
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:23:00 -0800 (PST)
Frederik Ramm wrote:
If you
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
multiple snips
...JOSM in anticipation of imminent Potlatch 2 wondrousness.
How can potlatch be respectable if it is based on non-free software?
(non-free flash, and you can't touch their source code!) You can run
JOSM using only libre and/or open source software. Not
2010/3/11 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
El día Thursday 11 March 2010 11:40:56, Frederik Ramm dijo:
I'm not sure; my guess is that the world is silently waiting for
Potlatch 2 to be released and will *then* complain about everything that
*still* doesn't work.
The world is trying
Hi,
Niklas Cholmkvist wrote:
How can potlatch be respectable if it is based on non-free software?
(non-free flash, and you can't touch their source code!) You can run
JOSM using only libre and/or open source software. Not only JOSM,
there's much more software that can be run on fully free
Hi,
I agree that improving documentation would be a really useful contribution
to OSM, but Google are quite explicit that this is outside of the scope of
GSoC (
http://socghop.appspot.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2010/faqs#doc_proposals
).
A project along the lines of 'context
Description :
Integration of the java swoop ontology editor into JOSM. A JOSM ontology
plugin.
Work :
1. create a live mapping from OSM into RDF , so that the swoop can access
the data in OSM without conversion.
2. be able to have the changes in the rdf be reflected back into the OSM.
4.
Mike,
I have not the faintest idea what that means, but it sounds impressive!
Please add it to the list, but it would be nice to define some of the terms
and abbreviations to help the ignorant like me!
Thanks
Graham.
On 11 March 2010 22:39, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
Will to tomorrow,
chk out swoop
http://www.mindswap.org/2004/SWOOP/
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Graham Jones
grahamjones...@googlemail.com wrote:
Mike,
I have not the faintest idea what that means, but it sounds impressive!
Please add it to the list, but it would be nice to define some
Hi,
4. conversion of the wiki into OWL, so that the rules and relations
of the OSM are documented formally.
see also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Machine-readable_Map_Feature_list/OWL_Semantic_Wiki_and_more
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Machine-readable_Map_Feature_list
an
On 11/03/10 22:50, Graham Jones wrote:
I have not the faintest idea what that means, but it sounds impressive!
Please add it to the list, but it would be nice to define some of the
terms and abbreviations to help the ignorant like me!
Sounding impressive is not a valid reason to consider
I know it sounds shocking but you can make you ontology as simple as you
want,
and you can have as many as you want.
There does not need to be only one set of rules,
I can defined them for my own little bit of the map and others can use them.
the point is that you can define your terms formally
I think the semantic mediawiki extension would be a great start,
another would be integration of the tagwatch into the wiki,
definition of data collection from the data set into the wiki (deduction)
and
validation and generation of new tags (induction)
mikw
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Karl
I'm very much in favour of improving both the quality of hiking data,
and its representation (particularly outside Europe). But do make an
effort to consolidate the existing material rather than just adding
another layer of paint over the top.
Exactly - I'm just at the point where I need a
Walking isn't just about long-distance stuff.
Being able to say: x is my starting point and I have [10|30|60mins|...] and
I am [slow as a snail|average|running from mad mappers], please take me on a
circular route that avoids busy roads, goes through nice parks, maybe goes
to places people marked
(And similarly, how to distinguish between a bike path and a mountain
bike track).
I added mtb:scale to mountain bike tracks. But around here, even the
steepest, roughest terrain is only 1 or 2 out of a scale of 5. I think
mtb:scale=3 is something like leaping off 1 meter boulders g
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
.. I'm still unclear how one is supposed to
distinguish between a smooth, wide urban footpath and a hiking trail.
For smoothness, use surface=*
For width, use width=*
(And similarly, how to distinguish between a bike
Tom,
Sounding impressive is not a valid reason to consider something a good
idea... Basically he's suggesting replacing our current freeform tagging
with some complicated system of rules and ontologies.
But being rude and oversimplifying is valid? As already mentioned, it
does not have to be
So mtb:scale=5 would be a vertical cliff?
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to
think at all. -- Hypatia of Alexandria
-Original Message-
From: Mike N. nice...@att.net
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:51:00
To:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Al Haraka alhar...@gmail.com wrote:
It's completely not the osm way *as I interpret it* and isn't going to
fly *as long as I am around*.
I think that is going to far, my point here is not to be negative, but to
contribute something.
I can imagine that people
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Niklas Cholmkvist wrote:
How can potlatch be respectable if it is based on non-free
software? (non-free flash, and you can't touch their source
code!)
Personally? I don't give a shit about free software. Or
Hi,
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
If all the code and all the tools we used were to be licensed costly
software, who would pay for OSM?
We'd all use Google Map Maker then. Under Safari ;-)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
On 12 March 2010 17:50, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
If all the code and all the tools we used were to be licensed costly
software, who would pay for OSM?
We'd all use Google Map Maker then. Under Safari ;-)
What about Mapzen under IE?
Op 09-03-10 11:02, Lennard schreef:
Ldp != Floris (mocht ik willen!)
En toch stel ik voor dat degene die hem gesloopt heeft, hem ook weer fixt.
:-)
PS: Dat was ik dus niet. Ik kom er nu ook even niet aan toe.
Gezien Rubke vroeg naar bed moest. En ik al de hele week loop te zeuren
ben ik
Hey, niet aleen voor mij.
Voor een ieder die niet graag afscheid neemt
van z'n strippenkaart.
De OV bedrijven hebben de kaart al van hun site gehaald.
Wij zijn krek de enigste die em nog voeren nu.
Zegt the voort.
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: talk-nl-boun...@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 11 March 2010 05:40, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
http://billiau.net/zoph/photo.php?photo_id=5505
Thanks for saving me the trip, so on their signs it looks like 'st.george'
I wouldn't promise that I have tagged that branch correctly
--
English
Have been anticipating this for a few weeks and finally it has arrived.
Nearmap imagery now covers a fair portion of Northern Victoria.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On a recent trip, I twice came across roads marked No Road. Anyone
know what this means? I rode down both of them, and was rewarded by
really interesting, very rough tracks that fortunately did connect up
with the road network again. Are they former roads, no longer publicly
maintained? How would
Hi,
I use to tag traffic signals at the intersect of the roads, however
with NearMap I can see that for complex intersections this does not
work as well as I would like, three things I can see to do are:-
1. tag at the intersecttion of roads
2. tag at the location of the signals
3. either (1) or
Personally, since NearMap became available, i've been placing traffic light
tags at every thick white stop line at the intersection, which means for a
standard intersection, there are 4 traffic light nodes.
On 11/03/2010, at 11:50 PM, Franc Carter wrote:
Hi,
I use to tag traffic signals at
On 11/03/10 23:55, Luke Woolley wrote:
Personally, since NearMap became available, i've been placing traffic light
tags at every thick white stop line at the intersection, which means for a
standard intersection, there are 4 traffic light nodes.
This is exactly what I've been doing too,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Luke Woolley lswool...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, since NearMap became available, i've been placing traffic light
tags at every thick white stop line at the intersection, which means for a
standard intersection, there are 4 traffic light nodes.
What's the
On 12/03/10 08:39, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Luke Woolleylswool...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, since NearMap became available, i've been placing traffic light
tags at every thick white stop line at the intersection, which means for a
standard intersection,
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:50 +1100, Franc Carter wrote:
Hi,
I use to tag traffic signals at the intersect of the roads, however
with NearMap I can see that for complex intersections this does not
work as well as I would like, three things I can see to do are:-
1. tag at the intersecttion
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:09 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
The benefit is in greater accuracy and completeness. If we can do
better than commercial street directories, then why not?
At the cost of managing that extra information. So far, I haven't seen
much evidence that we have
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 09:52 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
Put it this way: how would you render a single circle for any
intersection that has a traffic light? That is, if there are traffic
light nodes at one intersection, you still only want to render one
circle. It's a pretty obvious use case.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:43 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
From a routing perspective, its more useful to have the information on
the road intersection. While it might render nicer if you put objects
geographically where they are (separated from the road), from a routing
On 12/03/10 09:52, Steve Bennett wrote:
At the cost of managing that extra information. So far, I haven't seen
much evidence that we have ways of aggregating excess information into
more manageable chunks.
Put it this way: how would you render a single circle for any
intersection that has a
Hi all,
I notice that we have some national park boundaries, but not all.
Anyone know where they come from? Are there any usable sources of
data? I can't see that attempting to find the boundaries by
driving/walking around the park would be very fruitful.
Steve
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:21 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
Other than de-cluttering (which tends to be done automatically anyway)
I'm not sure why you'd want to render only one set of lights if there
were more than that.
Well, because to most people a set of lights covers a whole
Yeah, it's been available for a couple of weeks now - plenty of work
for us to do. Pity there's such a large gap between Bendigo and
Geelong - that's one of my favourite areas of Victoria.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Craig Feuerherdt
craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Have been anticipating
try http://www.protectedplanet.net/
as a place to start...
jim
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I notice that we have some national park boundaries, but not all.
Anyone know where they come from? Are there any usable sources of
data? I can't
I created a stub wiki entry on this topic.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Invalid_Abbreviation_Expansion
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
... So far, I haven't seen
much evidence that we have ways of aggregating excess information into
more manageable chunks.
As others have already suggested: we need relations.
There's already proposals semi-underway
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jim Croft jim.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
try http://www.protectedplanet.net/
as a place to start...
I couldn't find any statement about licensing there. To clarify, my
question is not how do I find NP boundaries - that's easy, there are
maps on parkweb.vic.gov.au
National and state park boundaries for Victoria (from the Department
of Sustainability and Environment's Vicmap Lite package) were released
under a CC - Attribution 2.5 Australia licence earlier this year. You
can download the polygon data as a KMZ file here:
Eu estou criando relations para TODAS as rodovias federais e estaduais
do Rio Grande do Sul (as que já não existem, claro). As relations ajudam
bastante na verificação. Alguns trachos de rodovias pertencem a quas
rotas (Ex: BR-116 e BR-290 entre a ponte do Guaíba e a saída para
Canoas, em
Os relations tambem ajudar no routing, alem voce entrar no BR-101 no
São Paulo viendo para Salvador, voce vai o maioridad do distanca no
BR-101 (ou pegando BR-116 em caso este e mais rapido), e nao vai sair
pela rodovias menor para courtar alguns quilometres.
Tambem poder ser usado no render para
A ideia é a mesma das fronteiras: linhas com muitos pontos (quantos
mesmo?) são desencorajadas; aconselha-se dividi-las em segmentos de
alguns quilômetros e juntá-las com relations.
[]s
Em 11 de março de 2010 08:54, Flavio Bello Fialho
be...@cnpuv.embrapa.br escreveu:
Eu estou criando relations
E além disso, se uma rua ou rio define a fronteira de alguma cidade (ou
bairro, etc), para evitar termos dois caminhos sobrepostos, o que é
desencorajado também, temos que usar relations.
Em 11 de março de 2010 10:26, Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org escreveu:
Arlindo: linhas com mais que 500
Hi,
Chris-Hein Lunkhusen wrote:
Komisch bei mir kommts einmal mit den Punkten, auf dem anderen Rechner
mit A, S, K, I und M. Gleiche 2564-tested-windows-exe-Version auf
Windows XP.
Das wird mit den installierten Schriften und DPI Einstellungen
zu tun haben, also ein typisches GUI
Hallo!
Nachdem jetzt ein paar Tage verstrichen sind ein Rückblick über die
FOSSGIS und wie es in Zukunft weitergehen könnte.
Zum klassischen Teil
Es hing ein Plakat über die Zusammensetzung der FOSSGIS 2009 Teilnehmer
aus, die ich sehr aufschlußreich fand. Letztes Jahr kamen über 80% der
Hallo zusammen,
ich kann OpenRouteService [1] seit gestern nicht mehr erreichen.
Gleiches gilt auch für OSM-WMS.
Hab' ich was verpasst, sollte das so sein, gibt's neue Adressen?
MfG, Chris
[1] http://data.giub.uni-bonn.de/openrouteservice
[2] http://www.osm-wms.de/
Am Donnerstag 11 März 2010 08:05:51 schrieb Andre Joost:
Das funktioniert doch schon mit der alten tested 2564. Hätte man das
damals [tm] schon freigeschaltet/veröffentlicht, wäre der beta-test
längst gelaufen.
Hallo zusammen,
ich lese hier öfter mal das [tm]. Was heißt das? Das Trademark
Hi,
Christian Knorr schrieb:
Hallo zusammen,
ich kann OpenRouteService [1] seit gestern nicht mehr erreichen.
Gleiches gilt auch für OSM-WMS.
Hab' ich was verpasst, sollte das so sein, gibt's neue Adressen?
MfG, Chris
[1] http://data.giub.uni-bonn.de/openrouteservice
[2]
Hallo Ulf,
Ulf Lamping wrote:
A) Man macht die FOSSGIS 2011 so wie dieses Jahr, klassischen und OSM
Teil hintereinander.
B) Auf der FOSSGIS 2011 sollen die Themen stärker zusammenwachsen, also
verzahnt sich das Programm zeitlich stärker.
C) Man zieht sowas wie eine deutsche SOTM auf, die
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Chris-Hein Lunkhusen wrote:
Komisch bei mir kommts einmal mit den Punkten, auf dem anderen Rechner
mit A, S, K, I und M. Gleiche 2564-tested-windows-exe-Version auf
Windows XP.
Das wird mit den installierten Schriften und DPI Einstellungen
zu tun haben, also
Am Donnerstag 11 März 2010 09:46:33 schrieb Christian Knorr:
ich lese hier öfter mal das [tm]. Was heißt das? Das Trademark bekomm' ich
da irgendwie nicht reininterpretiert.
Das ist schon das trademark und hat (IMHO) zwei maßgebliche
Anwendungsgebiete:
Einerseits spielt man damit auf die
Am 11.03.2010 09:46, Christian Knorr:
Am Donnerstag 11 März 2010 08:05:51 schrieb Andre Joost:
Das funktioniert doch schon mit der alten tested 2564. Hätte man das
damals [tm] schon freigeschaltet/veröffentlicht, wäre der beta-test
längst gelaufen.
Hallo zusammen,
ich lese hier öfter mal das
Am 11.03.2010 10:41, schrieb Sebastian Klein:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Chris-Hein Lunkhusen wrote:
Komisch bei mir kommts einmal mit den Punkten, auf dem anderen Rechner
mit A, S, K, I und M. Gleiche 2564-tested-windows-exe-Version auf
Windows XP.
Das wird mit den installierten Schriften
Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
habe mir das einmal gezogen - sieht nach dem start aber wirklich nur aus
wie eine 3085 release-version von josm !
Ach ja, im linken Bereich auf den Knopf mit dem + klicken, dann öffnet
sich der Dialog...
__
Sebastian
___
Am 11. März 2010 10:41 schrieb Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com:
Ein neues Design für das Filter-Gedoens ist in der Entwicklung, hier
schon mal eine Vorschau zum ausprobieren:
Kommentare willkommen!
Das sieht doch gar nocht schlecht aus.
Ein paar Kommentare:
Beim ursprünglichen
Am Donnerstag 11 März 2010 09:46:12 schrieb Pascal Neis:
Christian Knorr schrieb:
Hallo zusammen,
ich kann OpenRouteService [1] seit gestern nicht mehr erreichen.
die Server ziehen gerade um.
Temporär ist die Webseite von ORS über
http://szipf03.geog.uni-heidelberg.de/openrouteservice/
Hi,
Christian Knorr schrieb:
Am Donnerstag 11 März 2010 09:46:12 schrieb Pascal Neis:
Christian Knorr schrieb:
Hallo zusammen,
ich kann OpenRouteService [1] seit gestern nicht mehr erreichen.
die Server ziehen gerade um.
Temporär ist die Webseite von ORS über
Hallo,
kann keine NaviPOWM-Karten laden.
Server meldet sich nicht.
Gruß
Dieter Jasper
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Christian Knorr schrieb:
Am Donnerstag 11 März 2010 08:05:51 schrieb Andre Joost:
Das funktioniert doch schon mit der alten tested 2564. Hätte man das
damals [tm] schon freigeschaltet/veröffentlicht, wäre der beta-test
längst gelaufen.
Hallo zusammen,
ich lese hier öfter mal das [tm]. Was
Zitat Frederik Ramm:
[...]- es braucht wohl echte Profis, um so abstrakte Ideen wie dieses
Filter-Gedoens in brauchbare Icons umzusetzen.
Gibt es eine Aufstellung, fuer welche Funktionen Icons benoetigt werden?
Man kann es ja mal versuchen ;-)
--
Michael
1 - 100 of 287 matches
Mail list logo
