Yes, I feel the same. One of the definitions of a motorway is that it
does not cross at level with any road, railway or tramway track, or
footpath (according to wikipedia) so if this road does, then it's
definitely not a motorway.
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
I'm inclined to think that this is
That's a very good definition ... I agree it is *not* a motorway. That
highway was made so that it serves as a bypass road for the towns of
Orion, Pilar, Abucay, Balanga, etc to go straight to Mariveles. I passed
this road several times before when I was mapping POIs at Mariveles and I
really
I passed
this road several times before when I was mapping POIs at Mariveles and I
really wondered why it was ever classified as a motorway.
Excellent! Verified info from a person who actually saw the road condition!
Demoted to trunk then.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5057906
May pause video din :)
Pwede rin IRC, pero madami options dyan like yahoo group chat or another IM.
Andre
maning sambale wrote:
We could also try IRC. It's a low-bandwidth option. But only for mostly
textual discussion. :-)
I'm OK with IRC, perhaps we can open an osm-ph channel in
Forwarding this reply to the mailing list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jun Martin jun.mar...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] motorways leading to nowhere?
To: Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
I think this road is named ROMAN HIGHWAY.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:16 AM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Get 1 second recorded tracks from Garmin Nuvi Series using wNutrak
For some reason upload was unsuccessful. New video link here:
http://vimeo.com/12810817
--
cheers,
maning
Hello everybody,
I am still concerned that some business users cannot make use of
OpenStreetMap data because of the Share-Alike-rule as they don't want or
cannot share proprietary data. Personally, I am a big fan of the
Share-Alike-rule but I think there should be some exceptions.
I have the
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:27:27 -0400, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
Hello people,
does someone know the reasoning behind:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:highwaydiff=490719oldid=485601
?
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:08 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
Hello people,
does someone know the reasoning behind:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:highwaydiff=490719oldid=485601
?
It changed the meaning of almost all highway=*_link present
David Paleino wrote:
[...] it seems like that was a unilateral decision made by Richard.
[...] Richard says I think the wiki may be wrong
[...] Richard, please don't take this as a personal attack :)
For the avoidance of doubt I should perhaps point out that this is another
Richard.
cheers
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:56:29 +0100, Andy Allan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:08 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
Hello people,
does someone know the reasoning behind:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:highwaydiff=490719oldid=485601
?
Andy Allan gravitystorm at gmail.com writes:
Don't worry, it hasn't actually changed the meaning of anything - it's
just that the wiki is now wrong.
Maybe we need some place to document the meaning of tags other than the
(clearly unreliable) wiki?
Either that or accept that the meaning is not
On 23/06/10 12:14, David Paleino wrote:
I'm not going to start an edit-war, I'd prefer someone with the proper rights
to revert that edit. Then we can start discussing the matter, and file bugs
where needed.
What are these proper rights to which you refer? The page isn't locked
so any wiki
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Andy Allan gravitystorm at gmail.com writes:
Don't worry, it hasn't actually changed the meaning of anything - it's
just that the wiki is now wrong.
Maybe we need some place to document the meaning of tags other than the
On 23 June 2010 21:29, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
I'm not going to start an edit-war, I'd prefer someone with the proper rights
to revert that edit. Then we can start discussing the matter, and file bugs
where needed.
What are these proper rights to which you refer? The page isn't
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:35:46 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 23 June 2010 21:29, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
I'm not going to start an edit-war, I'd prefer someone with the proper
rights to revert that edit. Then we can start discussing the matter, and
file bugs where needed.
What
Having a wiki is great but the 'anyone can edit' model is not good for pages
that are meant to be authoritative, documenting the meaning of tags in use,
or giving best practice for new editors. Allowing instant changes to
specification documents by any user makes about as much sense as allowing
Ed,
Ed Avis wrote:
Having a wiki is great but the 'anyone can edit' model is not good for pages
that are meant to be authoritative,
Luckily we don't have authoritative pages in OSM.
So maybe the current somewhat chaotic situation is the best we can hope for.
Yes, the solution is encouraging
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Instead of trying to create authoritative wiki pages, we must make it
clear to everyone that these pages are *not* authoritative.
Not more neither less than Potlatch and JOSM presets...
Pieren
Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org writes:
Instead of trying to create authoritative wiki pages, we must make it
clear to everyone that these pages are *not* authoritative.
Right. This is the alternative I alluded to: accept that the meaning of tags
is not reliably documented anywhere.
To
Matt Williams wrote:
On 22 June 2010 17:44, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 22/06/10 17:35, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
You may have used questions and answers sites such as Stack Overflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/) or its siblings - I like them a lot. There
is a proposal for such a site
Having a wiki is great but the 'anyone can edit' model is not good for
pages
that are meant to be authoritative,
Luckily we don't have authoritative pages in OSM.
I don't know about luckily, but yeah. For data to be maximally useful, it
needs to be well-defined.
Instead of trying to
On 23/06/2010, at 8:56 PM, Andy Allan wrote:
Don't worry, it hasn't actually changed the meaning of anything - it's
just that the wiki is now wrong. The easy way to fix the situation is
to correct the wiki - it's as straightforward as that.
You could argue the wiki is now wrong, but you could
On 23/06/10 13:56, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Matt Williams wrote:
Especially with things like Shapado (http://shapado.com and
http://gitorious.org/shapado) allowing you to set up our own site
Shapado on an OpenStreetMap-controlled host sounds good to me, and it
seems to me that there is user
2010/6/23 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I figured it would be footway=* (a la cycleway=*), but apparently that was
proposed years ago and never adopted
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Footway).
do you suggest to set it to abandoned? Features in OSM are (mostly)
not introduced
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/06/10 13:56, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Matt Williams wrote:
Especially with things like Shapado (http://shapado.com and
http://gitorious.org/shapado) allowing you to set up our own site
Shapado on an OpenStreetMap-controlled host sounds good to me, and it
seems to me
IMHO the tag should contain information from what to what the link is
(like between redidential and secondary, fron tertiary to primary, etc
...), so renderers can properly decide how much important the link to
primary is - it is probably more impornant if it connects to another
primary than case
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:16 AM, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.comwrote:
I, and from what I see in use where I live quite a few other too, have
always used xxx_link tags to join a highway=xxx with a higher one, because
we think what was documented on the wiki (xxx_link joins highway=xxx
On 23/06/10 14:28, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
osqa or shapado... Both seem very nice. I'll be happy with either one.
Any wiki page somewhere with a list of what remains to be done for this
project to take off ?
It's not like there's some massive to do list - it just needs me to
decide which
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:29 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/6/23 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I figured it would be footway=* (a la cycleway=*), but apparently that
was
proposed years ago and never adopted
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:29 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/23 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I figured it would be footway=* (a la cycleway=*), but apparently that
was
proposed years ago and never
On 24 June 2010 00:13, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Without attempting to express much of an interest in tagging
discussions, it would be great if you were to use the word sidewalk
to describe the paths-along-the-edge-of-roads. The word footway might
footpath=* :)
Hi,
Would anyone recommend a good book on GIS/Geodesy/etc that could be used to
understand the underlying concepts behind most GIS applications ?
I am not looking for 100% theory full of mathematical formulae, but ideally,
something that explains the main idea behind the concepts (projections,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:16 PM, James Livingston
li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
You could argue that it's wikifiddling in an attempt to influence how people
map, or that it's documenting how a lot of people already map. It's all a
matter of perspective.
If it was documenting how a lot of
I recently read and enjoyed A Primer of GIS: Fundamental Geographic
and Cartographic Concepts when I was looking for the same sort of
thing:
http://www.amazon.com/Primer-GIS-Fundamental-Geographic-Cartographic/dp/1593855656
That said, I chose this after some online research haven't read very
Randy,
You might want to take a look at 'Desktop GIS - The Book':
http://desktopgisbook.com/
I haven't read it, but it has good reviews from people that I respect.
One cool aspect of the book is that utilizes OpenSource software, so
you can work through the examples and lessons without having
On 6/23/10, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
highway=path wouldn't work if the way is already tagged with
highway=secondary.
I was thinking something like highway=secondary, footway=both (a la
highway=secondary,
2010/6/23 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
The alternative would be to have three different ways.
Neither solution is particularly nice, though. I'm actually hoping someone
will come up with something better :).
use three ways and connect them with area relations ;-)
cheers,
Martin
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/6/23 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
The alternative would be to have three different ways.
Neither solution is particularly nice, though. I'm actually hoping someone
will come up with something better :).
use three ways and connect them with area
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On 6/23/10, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Without attempting to express much of an interest in tagging
discussions, it would be great if you were to use the word sidewalk
to describe the paths-along-the-edge-of-roads.
Hi,
Looking for data sources on Kyrgyzstan, I came across soviet military
topographic maps. This is for Osh for example :
http://en.poehali.org/maps/100k--k43-122.html
According to Wikipedia, it is in the Public domain :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Maps/Source_materials
Replying to myself, these maps are out of copyright according to our wiki :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Out-of-copyright_maps#Old_maps_found_elsewhere_on_the_web
Frédéric
Le 23 juin 2010 21:47, Frédéric Bonifas fredericboni...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
Looking for data sources on
Oliver (skobbler) wrote:
Let's assume that a business user has a database of non-publicly accessible
objects (e.g. a subsurface cable network for demonstration purposes). If the
user installs its own instance of an OpenStreetMap server and draws the
non-publicly accessible subsurface cable
Ok so it has to be removed from the Out-of-copyright maps page of
the wiki right ?
Frédéric
Le 23 juin 2010 22:12, Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com a écrit :
No, they are not out of copyright. All the rights of USSR were
transfered to Russian Federation. Neither USSR, nor Russian
Interesting. A while I ago I did some work on generating relief contours
from Viewfinder's DEM data, basis of which are old Soviet military maps:
http://igorbrejc.net/openstreetmap/viewfinders-dem-data-comparison-with-srtm
Someone then warned me that some of the Viewfinder data stems from Soviet
This one is a bit technical, but it's a great resource book:
http://www.spatialanalysisonline.com/
There's even a free Web version, although I recommend buying a printed
version for anyone into GIS
Igor
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:33 PM, sko...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Would anyone recommend a good
No, they are not out of copyright. All the rights of USSR were
transfered to Russian Federation. Neither USSR, nor Russian Federation
ever transferred those maps to public domain or in any other way
allowed free use of them. Most of that maps were stolen from exUSSR
military bases in republics,
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:11:31 +0200, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
Had ik gedaan, geen resultaat,
Op de wiki zoeken op busroute en dan is de tweede optie de pagina NL-OV
waar beide links in staan.
http://xn--pnvkarte-m4a.de/ (vreemd trucje gebeurt hier
Is het mogelijk een lijst van alle straatnamen in een gemeente te
genereren uit de OSM-data?
Ik heb van een gemeente de lijst met correct gespelde straatnamen en wil
die vergelijken met de straatnamen in OSM. Dat is handmatig (pannen op
de kaart en opzoeken op de lijst) nogal veel werk. Het
Dat is zeker mogelijk door middel van een querie op de database.
Over welke gemeente gaat het dan zal ik een lijstje voor je uitdraaien.
Groet,
--Roeland
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 08:46:38 Raymond Nijssen wrote:
Is het mogelijk een lijst van alle straatnamen in een gemeente te
genereren uit de
Dit doen ze in Duitsland ook al een tijd. Hier bijvoorbeeld Essen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Essen/Status/Straßenabgleich
Kunnen wij ons voordeel mee doen wat betreft de aanpak?
Martijn
--
Martijn van Exel
Senior Researcher / Software Engineer
-
ik zou meteen html uitdraaien zodat de weg ook klikbaar is ;)
Rob
Op 23 juni 2010 09:29 schreef Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com het volgende:
Dat is zeker mogelijk door middel van een querie op de database.
Over welke gemeente gaat het dan zal ik een lijstje voor je uitdraaien.
Groet,
Laat ik dat dan maar meteen even code :)
Groet,
--Roeland
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 11:19:32 Rob wrote:
ik zou meteen html uitdraaien zodat de weg ook klikbaar is ;)
Rob
Op 23 juni 2010 09:29 schreef Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com het volgende:
Dat is zeker mogelijk door middel van een
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 23-06-10 12:05, Roeland Douma schreef:
Laat ik dat dan maar meteen even code :)
Haal het gewoon uit 6pp ;)
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
Het ging volgens mij om de straatnamen in OSM ;)
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 12:14:28 Stefan de Konink wrote:
Op 23-06-10 12:05, Roeland Douma schreef:
Laat ik dat dan maar meteen even code :)
Haal het gewoon uit 6pp ;)
Stefan
___
Talk-nl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 23-06-10 12:17, Roeland Douma schreef:
Het ging volgens mij om de straatnamen in OSM ;)
Ohja goed punt ;)
Zolang we maar geen edits wars krijgen over afkortingen.
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
On 23-6-2010 6:53, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Maar het *netwerk* heeft dat knooppunt maar 1 keer, dus waarom zou het
meerdere keren toegevoegd moeten worden aan de netwerkrelatie?
Omdat de WIKI dat expliciet zegt.
Dan vraag ik me serieus af waar je dat leest, en wat
On 23-6-2010 11:17, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Dit doen ze in Duitsland ook al een tijd. Hier bijvoorbeeld Essen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Essen/Status/Straßenabgleich
Kunnen wij ons voordeel mee doen wat betreft de aanpak?
En in België:
Z'n lijstje vind ik ook erg handig! Die zou ik in een 'fake data'
project goed kunnen gebruiken :).
Ik ben ook erg benieuwd naar de code die je ervoor gebruikt! Zou je
die beschikbaar willen stellen?
Groet,
Daniel
Op 23 jun 2010, om 12:05 heeft Roeland Douma het volgende geschreven:
Laat
Raymon heeft het al in zijn mailbox gehad maar nu mijndev weer online is kan
ik het ook hier delen.
Een lijst van straatnamen per gemeente in te vinden op [1].
En zoals gevraagd ook de source [2], dit maakt gebruikt van de database
gegenereerd door osm2pgsql.
Groet,
--Roeland
[1]
Ik ben overigerens van plan dit scriptje elke dag (ergens midden in de nacht
ofzo) te draaien dus je zou je edits elke morgen terug moeten zien.
Groet,
--Roeland
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 20:43:51 Roeland Douma wrote:
Raymon heeft het al in zijn mailbox gehad maar nu mijndev weer online is
2010/6/23 Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Raymon heeft het al in zijn mailbox gehad maar nu mijndev weer online is kan
ik het ook hier delen.
Een lijst van straatnamen per gemeente in te vinden op [1].
Hij houdt zo te zien op bij Schiedam (de overige gemeenten staan er
wel, maar zonder wegen)
2010/6/23 Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Een lijst van straatnamen per gemeente in te vinden op [1].
Nice script!
Maar, ik loop net wat wegen te editten in JOSM, krijg ik een melding:
Communication with the OSM server 'http://openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/'
timed out, Please retry later.
Toch
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 21:11:44 Christ van Willegen wrote:
2010/6/23 Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Een lijst van straatnamen per gemeente in te vinden op [1].
Nice script!
Maar, ik loop net wat wegen te editten in JOSM, krijg ik een melding:
Communication with the OSM server
2010/6/23 Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Er was even geen ruimte op de partitie meer. Het scriptje draait nogmaals en
over ongeveer 15 minuten zou alles erop moeten staan.
Bedankt; ik ben gestart met het vergelijken van de lijst van
's-Hertogenbosch met de lijst bij de kaart op de website van
On 19/06/2010 10:20 PM, John Smith wrote:
A little birdy tells me that they think the GA data may suffer similar
problems to the SRTM data, in any case will have to look into the
licensing, it may not be favourable even if the data isn't being
uploaded to OSM.
Basically the only options for
On 23 June 2010 19:39, Tom Brennan webs...@ozultimate.com wrote:
The best work on the SRTM data is probably by Sean Williams (Dooghan) on
gpsaustralia.net. He has created Garmin IMG files with 5m contours,
though with 90m data, 5m is pretty optimistic. Looks nice though.
I've just updated the wiki and the data file on the server to include
operator=mainroads.qld.gov.au this way we can track the number km of
roads that are state or local for statistical purposes.
I also updated the wiki and the data file yesterday after getting
advice on proper attribution.
Le 23/06/2010 06:47, Samuel Vale a écrit :
Há um deslocamento nos tiles que inviabiliza utilizá-lo para traçar
mapas. Imagino que seja alguma opção de projeção que eu não tenha
utilizado. Se alguém identificar uma solução, corrijo a base e faço
upload. O Openlayers abre por default com o
Em 23 de junho de 2010 05:30, Jean-Guilhem Cailton j...@arkemie.comescreveu:
In JOSM, they can still be used, shifting them
interactively, locally adjusting the WMS layer to GPS tracks and
existing OSM data.
Sorry about the noob question, but how can I shift the WMS layer in JOSM?
--
Activate the WMS Layer and click on the shift icon (a box with four
arrows inside) on the left button column
(Tem um ícone apropriado na barra lateral esquerda)
2010/6/23 Rodrigo Avila rodr...@avila.net.br:
Em 23 de junho de 2010 05:30, Jean-Guilhem Cailton j...@arkemie.com
escreveu:
This is the aswers of Julio Dalge, chief of DPI .
Jean-Guilhem, the projection and datum are OK, but the images are not
georreferenced. We'll need to do this manually.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Julio Dalge ju...@dpi.inpe.br
Date: 2010/6/23
Subject: Imagens HRC
To:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Atendimento aos Usuarios do CDSR a...@dgi.inpe.br
Date: 2010/6/23
Subject: Re: Imagens deslocadas
To: Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com
Prezado Sr. Vitor George
Referente ao seu e-mail,informamos que as imagens do catálogo têm apenas
correção
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thiago Avila tjtav...@gmail.com
Date: 2010/6/23
Subject: Mapas das cidades devastadas em PDF
To: Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com, guilhermelame...@gmail.com
Cc: qsilv...@uol.com.br, Esdras Andrade esdras.andr...@ima.al.gov.br,
candido...@gmail.com,
Pessoal, boa noite!
Recorro novamente à lista para reiterar meu pedido: há alguma ferramenta que
auxilie no automação do merge de vias, dado um arquivo osm (ou shp) ?
É que os dados das vias da Prefeitura de Goiânia são segmentados, ou seja,
uma única via pode estar dividida em 'n' segmentos. Se
Am 22.06.10 21:50, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
wie in einem Posting oben richtig vermutet ist oder war der Eigentümer
das besagte Unternehmen.
Nach meiner unmaßgeblichen Erfahrung sind diese Wege dann aber
höchstwahrscheinlich *nicht* öffentlich.
Bei städtischen Kleingartenanlagen ist nur das
Moin !
wie der eine oder andere von Euch kümmere ich mich seid längerem auch um
das Thema Stolpersteine kümmere.
In der ML von MV wurde nun angemerkt das die verwendeten Tags,
inbesondere historic=memorial zu einer Überladung der Karten führt diese
teilweise nicht mehr brauchbar sind.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:10:59PM +0200, o...@tappenbeck.net wrote:
ich möchte einmal folgendes zur Diskussion stellen:
Vor ca. einer Woche habe ich einen Weg durch einen Kleingartenverein
aufgemessen - Am Wegeanfang war ein Tor aber mir ist kein Verbotsschild
aufgefallen.
Ein
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 06:55:00AM +0200, Bernd Wurst wrote:
Wenn man es nutzt ist das ja gut.
Leider gibt es recht viele Leute die nur Wege mappen, ohne sich auf solche
nebensächlichen Eigenschaften wie Nutzungsrechte ein zu lassen.
Und leider gibt es reichlich mapper die einem schild
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
Ein Kleingartengebiet ist Privatgelände (gehört typischerweise der Gemeinde
oder vielfach der Bahn oder dergl.), allerdings ist es verpachtet an den
Kleingartenverein. Der hat also das Recht festzulegen, wer da rein darf und
Walter Nordmann schrieb:
wie aktuell sind denn die daten und wieoft werden die aktualisiert, falls
sie nicht direkt aus der db kommen?
1-2 Minuten hinter der Haupt-DB
Lg, Peter
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
On 23.06.2010 09:25, Jochen Topf wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:10:59PM +0200, o...@tappenbeck.net wrote:
ich möchte einmal folgendes zur Diskussion stellen:
Vor ca. einer Woche habe ich einen Weg durch einen Kleingartenverein
aufgemessen - Am Wegeanfang war ein Tor aber mir ist kein
Moin,
Meiner Meinung nach sollte jede legal per Auto ansteuerbare
Adresse über das Highway-Netz exclusive Tracks erreichbar
sein. Der Trend geht aber eher in die Richtung, alles
was halbwegs nach Landwirtschaft riecht als Track zu mappen.
Beispiel:
Albertushof St.Leon ist nur über Tracks
Am 23.06.10 09:49, schrieb Florian Lohoff:
Sagt Landesverband Westfalen und Lippe der Kleingärtner e.V.
Nur gehört die Bahnlandwirtschaft m.W. nicht dazu. Man fühlt sich wohl
eher bei
http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bkleingg/__1.html
$1 (2) 3. aufgehoben. Auch wenn es heute keinen
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
Ein Kleingartengebiet ist Privatgelände (gehört typischerweise der Gemeinde
oder vielfach der Bahn oder dergl.), allerdings ist es verpachtet an den
SB79 schrieb:
BTW: Der Parcel Pickup Layer (wird wahrscheinlich der Layer für die
Packstationen werden) scheint noch nicht so zu funktionieren. Ich
bekomme da noch keine Kreise für Köln oder Bonn.
Ouuu das Tagging ist da echt eklig.. Habe es jetzt so umgebaut dass alle
vending angezeigt
Hallo,
heute ist nun nach langer Zeit wieder eine neue Version meiner
OpenLinkMap fertig geworden.
Die Neuerungen:
* Bugfix: Beim Schließen eines Popups werden nicht mehr alle Popups
geschlossen
* Einbindung des JOSM Remote Plugins
* Einbindung eines Editlinks für Potlatch
* Ein Permalink für
Am 22. Juni 2010 22:23 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
So hier nun als World-Wide Online-Version
http://toolserver.org/~mazder/pboxguesstimator/?zoom=13lat=49.44072lon=7.7624layers=BTT
Ist bei leibe nicht perfekt - es werden pro request max. 1000 Objekte
zurückgegeben. Falls
Hallo,
1.
ein Track ist im Wiki definiert als :
Ein Weg im Wald oder Feld, der hauptsächlich für die
Land-/Forstwirtschaft angelegt wurde und für zweispurige Fahrzeuge
geeignet ist.
2.
Jedes Grundstueck in Deutschland hat eigentlich einen Anschluss an eine
Strasse.
3.
Im Wiki zu highway:
Moin
Albertushof St.Leon ist nur über Tracks erreichbar:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.25lon=8.63567zoom=16
Der von Nord-Ost kommende Track ist ohne Zeichen 260
versehen und mit einem weißen Schild Zufahrt Albertushof.
Da darf also jedermann fahren, auch wer nicht zum Hof will,
Falk Zscheile schrieb:
Ist es möglich noch einen Schalter einzubauen, mit dem man nach
verschiedenen Betreibern unterscheiden kann. Sonst sieht es an manchen
Stellen nach einer hohen Abdeckung aus, tatsächlich stehen dort aber
zwei Briefkästen von privaten Postzustellern und jener der
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Peter,
offensichtlich wird amenity=post_office nicht ausgewertet. Ich würde davon
ausgehen, daß es bei jeder Postfiliale auch einen Briefkasten gibt. Ansonsten
wäre das als zusätzliche Ebene sinnvoll.
Möglicherweise ist es ein Fehler im
Am 23. Juni 2010 10:29 schrieb Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
Falk Zscheile schrieb:
Ist es möglich noch einen Schalter einzubauen, mit dem man nach
verschiedenen Betreibern unterscheiden kann. Sonst sieht es an manchen
Stellen nach einer hohen Abdeckung aus, tatsächlich stehen dort
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:55:55AM +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Unternehmen habe keine Privatssphäre ?? Hört sich nach starkem Tobak an,
die Diskussion gehört aber vermutlich nicht hierher,
Schau Dir http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatsphäre an, da gehts um drei Punkte
bei der Privatspähre:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:55:55AM +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Grundsätzlich würde ich mal davon ausgehen, dass man öffentlich bekannte
Fakten auch mappen darf. Also wenn man auf das Grundstück selbst darf oder
auf einem öffentlich erreichbaren Luftbild was erkennen kann oder von einem
Bodo Meissner schrieb:
offensichtlich wird amenity=post_office nicht ausgewertet.
Danke dir, jetzt schon.
Lg, Peter
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am 22. Juni 2010 21:49 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net:
das habe ich dem Herren ja auch versucht klar zu machen - kein Einsehen.
Alles Web schlecht aus seiner Sicht!
solche Leute gibt es, ich würde die einfach ignorieren.
Gruß Martin
Am 23.06.2010 10:03, schrieb Chris66:
Moin,
Meiner Meinung nach sollte jede legal per Auto ansteuerbare
Adresse über das Highway-Netz exclusive Tracks erreichbar
sein. Der Trend geht aber eher in die Richtung, alles
was halbwegs nach Landwirtschaft riecht als Track zu mappen.
Beispiel:
On 23.06.2010 10:37, Jochen Topf wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:55:55AM +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Grundsätzlich würde ich mal davon ausgehen, dass man öffentlich bekannte
Fakten auch mappen darf. Also wenn man auf das Grundstück selbst darf oder
auf einem öffentlich erreichbaren
Am 23.06.2010 08:24, schrieb André Joost:
Insgesamt also so ähnlich wie Friedhöfe (oder ne Vorstufe davon ;-)...
Gruß,
André Joost
+1
Gruß
Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
1 - 100 of 392 matches
Mail list logo
