On 11.02.23 18:41 Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
I propose to replace following surface tags by doing an automated edit
I wholeheartedly support this proposal, thank you for your work!
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 29.11.22 16:38 Dave F wrote:
If it's a licence change by OSM then how can a maintainer of a database
possibly account for a future, unspecified change who's implementation
was out of their control?
Yes, it's about a license change by OSM.
I don't think it's outlandish to assume that at
On 29.11.22 08:14 Simon Poole wrote:
The main question is what "expect it to survive a hypothetical license
change" implies. My expectation is that because of practical
considerations any future licence would require downstream attribution
of OSM so that the OSMF can continue to offer third
On 29.11.22 03:57 Minh Nguyen wrote:
Could you clarify the "perhaps" here? If something has been explicitly
dedicated to the public domain via CC0, a similar statement, or a
relevant law, should it not survive any relicensing attempt? Or is this
just about the editorial decision of whether to
the column would be mostly about whether this legal text or something
equivalent has been signed or not (+ perhaps public domain/CC0 data that
has the ability to survive a license change by default could also check
the box).
Tobias
¹ The wording is my fault and, iirc, was inspired by the c
On 13.10.22 11:47 Martin Fischer wrote:
I wrote two small MediaWiki extensions for wiki.openstreetmap.org: one
to let you log in via your OSM account and one to provide an easy to use
in-wiki GUI for proposal voting.
Awesome work, I like both of these and hope they make it onto the OSM
wiki!
überlebt eine automatische Übersetzung einigermaßen heil :)). Ich stehe
euch aber auch hier auf der Liste gern Rede und Antwort!
Viele Grüße,
Tobias
PS: Ich möchte euch bei dieser Gelegenheit die zusammen mit den Wahlen
stattfindenden Abstimmungen über eine Ausweitung der Beitragsbefreiung
für
nd of course, the offer to submit questions by direct message still stands:
On 29.10.20 22:58, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> * Spanholz, the user who has been most active in organizing this AMA,
> has already offered to post questions on behalf of other people. So
> you can send in your questions witho
I've been considering the downsides of using a proprietary channel when
I was invited to participate. My thinking is:
* The questions and answers are publicly visible. (Yes, Reddit may nag
you sign up or install their app – close that noise.)
* Spanholz, the user who has been most active in
n helping with that, there's a lot to do.
Creating models, helping with coding (gltf support would be nice, for
example), and there's even data we're permitted to import into 3DMR that
hasn't been uploaded simply due to lack of time for converting/cleaning
up the models.
Your
On 25.07.20 18:14, pangoSE wrote:
> Recently it was discussed whether to have signposts in route relations.
> I suggest we delete them from all relations by running a script.
> I se no loss of information
It loses the information whether or not a route is signed at a
particular signpost. Because,
solution.
But even if this immediate JS/usability problem can be fixed there are
still so many smaller annoyances that before long we should still look
into migrating the site to a newer software.
cheers,
Tobias
Am 05.07.2020 um 10:16 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk:
Thanks to entire Ops
On 12.06.20 13:00, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I wonder if it would be feasible or desirable for editors to warn users
> if they are at risk of creating country/world-spanning changesets.
It would certainly be a improvement for day-to-day work.
The root of the issue, though, is that bounding boxes
On 22.05.20 15:15, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Ich persoenlich setze routinemaessig oneway=no um anzuzeigen, dass ich
> geprueft habe, dass die Strasse keine Einbahnstrasse ist. In Verbindung mit
> dem Aenderungsdatum ist das nuetzlich in Gegenden, wo Strassenrichtungen
> haeufig von den Behoerden
e old site in a
read only state and start a new site from zero. We could still link to
answers on the archived site. Of course I'd welcomed if there was a
reasonably fast way of moving and migrating all the old Q
Tobias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstr
and lasting soon.
Tobias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
side? Can we involve any of the OSM organizations to
find, maybe pay, someone? Does the community even find it worthwhile
keeping the site?
cheers,
Tobias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 05.05.20 22:24, Jack Armstrong wrote:
> man_made=construction
> construction=bridge
> layer=1
The =construction + construction= tagging is only really
common for highway, building and railway tags (where it sticks around
for historic reasons, in my impression).
Other tags are more likely to
oes it
mean that we will not act more decisively in the future. Visible
attribution is a key requirement of our license, and not optional.
Tobias
¹ https://github.com/grischard/osm-lacking-attribution
___
talk mailing list
talk@open
Viele OSM-Stammtische finden derzeit wegen der Corona-Pandemie nicht
statt. Es gibt aber Alternativen! Einige Gruppen haben schon erste
virtuelle Treffen erfolgreich durchgeführt.
Wer noch auf der Suche nach geeigneten Diensten dafür ist, findet hier
ein paar von uns getestete Vorschläge:
*
On 17.04.20 15:33, Mario Frasca wrote:
> On 17/04/2020 04:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> What about removing [the trailing "contributors" from the ©
>> attribution], so that the required credit becomes "© OpenStreetMap"
>> (it could also be © OpenStreetMapFoundation, but maybe "©
>>
before it can be
accepted, your suggestion was popular in past discussions (e.g. in
August²), so there's a good chance it will become reality.
Tobias
¹
https://wiki.osm.org/Legal_FAQ#3a._I_would_like_to_use_OpenStreetMap_maps._How_should_I_credit_you.3F
² https://lists.openstreetmap.org/piperm
before it can be
accepted, your suggestion was popular in past discussions (e.g. in
August²), so there's a good chance it will become reality.
Tobias
¹
https://wiki.osm.org/Legal_FAQ#3a._I_would_like_to_use_OpenStreetMap_maps._How_should_I_credit_you.3F
² https://lists.openstreetmap.org/piperm
On 26.03.20 14:45, Christine Karch wrote:
> the deadline ended a month ago. At the moment it is not planned to call
> for additional submissions.
SotM usually offers numerous slots for Lightning Talks. Will that be the
case with this virtual conference as well? Spontaneous LT submissions
might be
ive editing, not
data distribution. But surely, with a decent implementation of
compatible data layers tracked in some central repository, authoritative
data could be used *with* OSM without being *in* OSM.
Tobias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.
nclude 3D
terrain. But the goal is to eventually get there, so if you see
potential synergies, please reach out!
Tobias
¹ https://wiki.osm.org/OSM2World/WebGL_client
²
https://wiki.osm.org/Blender#blender-osm:_OpenStreetMap_and_Terrain_for_Blender
__
If you need a quick refresher, the blog post is a good starting point:
https://blog.osm.org/2020/02/17/call-for-microgrants-committee/
Tobias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 06.03.20 12:42, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 11:30:53AM +0100, Otto Dassau wrote:
>> * Könnten/Dürften die Daten NRW genutzt werden, um die OSM Daten
>> flächendeckend z.B. für NRW zu optimieren?
>
> Am Ende nein. Gucken darfst du, aber übernehmen nicht.
Vor ein paar
ontact for that idea.
Note that Google hasn't decided on a list of mentoring organizations
yet, so it's not guaranteed that OSM will be involved in GSoC this year.
(But we hope so, of course!)
Yours,
Tobias
¹ https://wiki.osm.org/Google_Summer_of_Code/2019/Project_Ideas
² https://wiki.o
verwiesen wie von der französichen Instanz.
beste Grüße
Tobias
Am 15.06.2019 um 11:46 schrieb lars lingner:
Hallo zusammen,
hiermit möchte ich auf die deutsche uMap-Instanz unter der URL
https://umap.openstreetmap.de aufmerksam machen.
Mit uMap können interaktive Karten auf einfache Art und Weise
On 18.08.19 18:44, dcapillae wrote:
> I would like to change the name of the wiki pages related to the Germany
> mapping project to remove the "Wikiproject" prefix according to the
> pages name conventions [1].
Sure, I'd be happy to see the pages renamed. Thanks for all the time you
spend on wiki
Because OpenStreetMap is its contributors, you may omit the word
> "contributors" if space is limited
So aside from making it much less awkward to attribute OSM in
non-English or multilingual contexts, this change would also simplify
the rules a bit and remove o
aps, but e.g. allows downloading map
data for offline use? Would it be acceptable to make the license
information part of the download process, or is it still required that
attribution is visible on-screen during use?
Tobias
___
talk mailing list
talk@ope
es, so we decided to
forward these to the appropriate parties.
A second, more recent survey was directed to working groups. This effort
is still ongoing – not all groups have responded so far, and I believe
we haven't evaluated the responses in detail yet.
Yours,
g/wiki/Talk:Wiki_organisation#Page_Name_conventions.2Fguidelines
Interesting background, thanks! This kind of history isn't always easy
to find if you're not aware of it.
Tobias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 04.07.19 05:53, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> 2 Verifiability (+Map what's on the ground, Don't map: historic
> events, temporary features, local legislation etc)
In my opinion, the practices that you've turned into subheadings of the
verifiability section are not merely special cases of
ntributor's edit
was probably premature.
Of course, though, the current situation with content duplicated between
data items and wiki pages isn't really ideal. But there's probably still
some work left until data items can fully replace the existing systems
(updating data consumers, plus working o
some photos?
See this GitHub issue here for more information:
https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/1407
Cheers
Tobias
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
On 21.04.19 07:44, Yves wrote:
> Is there a way to decrease the rank of some pages in the search results
> in MediaWiki?
The possibility of increasing/decreasing the priority of certain search
results based on templates is being discussed at the moment as part of
this topic:
ks on key/tag pages back to the proposal),
they can still be found reliably.
The main benefit, though, is the ability for others to easily revert
this kind of change. It's easier to be bold in cleaning up the wiki when
you know that that others can quickly undo any edits they dislike.
Tobias
_
ry.
Martin already commented on de:Stolpersteine.
The adding of nl:Toeristisch Overstappunt has been questioned on the
tagging list (starting with messages
and
) but with no
apparent outcome. I agree with you, in my opinion they are still dead wrong.
Tobias
richtig
ausgezeichnet).
Tobias
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
on iD
pflegt, sähe das schon ganz anders aus.
Viele Grüße,
Tobias
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
also involves some
feedback from people with OSM experience before the survey is sent out.
Tobias
¹ https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/party
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 15.03.19 21:13, Simon Poole wrote:
> Why would we want to create new versions of objects just to remove a tag
> that is not hurting anybody in any way?
Mostly for the reason which Mateusz has mentioned in his response:
Keeping obsolete tagging around for years or decades adds to the burden
of
ing
outline."¹
In diesem Beispiel ist die Relation übrigens auch für 3D eigentlich
nicht notwendig: Sämtliche Gebäudeteile liegen innerhalb des Umrisses
und es gibt keine Überlappungen/Mehrdeutigkeiten mit anderen Gebäuden.
Tobias
¹ https://wiki.osm.or
h screen – I
believe we should not insist on the corner placement.
Tobias
¹ the rest of the thread is split off due to happening in a different
month: https://lists.osm.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2012-December/007363.html
² My intention isn't to single out Mapbox here, that's simply the
exampl
Hallo,
ich kenn das an Bahnhöfen als Kiss & Ride. Kurze Suche auf OSM zeigt,
dass das sehr oft einfach als name=kiss and ride an Straßen, parking
aisles, localities etc getaggt ist. K: Kraut und Rüben könnte man sagen.
Tobi
___
Talk-de mailing
On 24.02.19 20:18, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> I mainly wanted to make everyone who is not active on the wiki aware of
> this.
For the benefit of people who don't know the background, it's worth
mentioning that these bot edits did not distort the actual meaning of
the wiki pages, but were purely
täglich von 10:00 bis 01:00 Uhr
Donnerstags Ruhetag
Tool 1: Mo-Su 10:00-01:00
Tool 2: Mo-Su 10:00-01:00; Th off
Und damit kommen beide Tools komplett durcheinander:
Montag Ruhetag
Dienstag - Samstag
17:00 - Open End
Sonn. und Feiertags
12:00 - 14:30 Uhr &
17:00 - Open End
beste Grüße
To
On 19.02.19 09:24, Stefan Keller wrote:
> Fernziel ist u.a., den Tag "opening_hours:url" zu verwenden, um den
> dort verlinkten Webinhalt in opening_hours zu wandeln.
Finde ich eine spannende Vision, denn so könnten Änderungen bei den
Öffnungszeiten viel schneller entdeckt werden. Für OSM ist
Man kann sicher eine menge von den fragen anderer lernen
Originalnachricht
Von: Pierre Goldenbogen
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2019 17:41
An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Antwort an: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Mitbetreuer für die Chemnitzer Linux-Tage
Hi,
Auch wenn es wohl umsonst ist - mein kostenloser Tipp für dich im
Umgang mit open source Projekten/communities: achte an mehr auf den
Umgangston :-) eine ML oder ein forum ist sicherlich auch kein Raum in
dem jeder ohne konsequenzen alles sagen kann was er will .
Gruß
+1
Originalnachricht
Von: mmd
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2018 21:37
An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Antwort an: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Höhenbeschränkungen und ihre (fehlende) Darstellung
Am 25.12.18 um 16:55 schrieb sepp1...@posteo.de:
Dank
der fleißigen
Mitgliederwerbung von Nakaner aber bereits Gesprächsthema ist, wollte
ich den sprichwörtlichen Hut schon einmal in den Ring werfen. Und
natürlich dürft ihr mich auch jetzt schon mit Vorschlägen, Kritik und
Fragen löchern!
Viele Grüße,
Tobias
( Crossposting von https://forum.osm.org
Das kann man alles so stehen lassen
Generell würde ich mir wünschen dass wir die Möglichkeit beizutragen
nich unotig komplizieren... Ein paar verklebte Flächen können wir
sicher hinnehmen wenn wir dadurch einen neuen mapper gewinnen
können.
Originalnachricht
Von: Volker
h schon im
Proposal) beziehen sich die wenigsten Beispiele auf Autos. In den
beiden höchsten Klassen sind Autos noch nicht mal erwähnt.
Tobias
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Hoert sich intersant an was arbeitest du da?
Originalnachricht
Von: Andre Hinrichs
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018 21:38
An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Antwort an: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch
Betreff: [Talk-de] Suche C-Routine für Berechnung einer Peilung
Hallo OSM-DE-Liste,
Am 05.10.2018 um 12:43 schrieb sepp1...@posteo.de:
In D werden Brückenhöhen i.d.R. durch Zeichen 265 ab einer
Durchfahrtshöhe von 4,20m gekennzeichnet, im Einzelfall auch ab einer
höheren möglichen Durchfahrtshöhe, je nach (regelmäßiger)
Straßennutzung durch Sondertransporte. Auch auf
Am 02.10.2018 um 16:09 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:29:51PM +0200, Tobias Wrede wrote:
D.h. evtl. Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen müssen nach der Kurve neu gesetzt
werden?
Dieser Punkt ist unter Juristen tatsächlich umstritten, genauer die Frage,
ob Strecken-Beschränkungen
Am 02.10.2018 um 12:52 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
sent from a phone
On 2. Oct 2018, at 12:29, Tobias Wrede wrote:
Dieser Punkt ist unter Juristen tatsächlich umstritten, genauer die
Frage, ob Strecken-Beschränkungen weiter gelten, ist umstritten.
unumstritten ist eigentlich nur, dass
Hi Martin,
Am 02.10.2018 um 12:11 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Und auch für den rechtlichen Vorgang ist es - in Deutschland - immer
noch ein Abbiegen. Mit all den Konsequenzen, die ein Abbiegen hat
ein wenig sollte ich meine Aussage vielleicht relativieren. Die Regeln
dazu sind nämlich
Hallo in die Runde,
Am 01.10.2018 um 15:49 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 09:06:07PM +0200, Andreas Schmidt wrote:
Wenn man abbiegt, biegt man ab.
Ob die Vorfahrtsstraße mit abbiegt oder geradeaus geht, ist für die
Frage des Abbiegens irrelevant.
Für den
Again, the max weight is not the same as the max allowable weight. Using
maxweight in this context is wrong.
See the Key:hgv wiki page where I added an explanation and examples.
Am 27. September 2018 11:25:11 MESZ schrieb Ed Loach :
>Tobias asked:
>
>> In United Kingdom, how do y
if the proposal is unchanged)
Greetings
Tobias
On 26/09/2018 13:35, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> Hey there
>
> I can't believe this didn't come up before - or maybe it did but was not
> documented in the wiki.
>
> In United Kingdom, how do you tag roads signed with
explicitly on the
sign, which is apparently always the case for any HGV-access-restriction
sign in the UK.
In other words, you will never find a sign like this in the UK:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nederlands_verkeersbord_C7.svg
Greetings
Tobias
P.S: GVM is gross vehicle mass
https
Vänern i Mapfactor Navigator syns inte. Fel på sjön eller appen?
___
Talk-se mailing list
Talk-se@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se
On 23.09.2018 17:07, Christoph Hormann wrote:
> If you'd now impose
> technical constraints preventing mappers from documenting things that
> do not match a certain ideal of structure would you would effectively
> make the wiki unsuitable for its primary application and mappers would
> need to
On 23.09.2018 14:05, Michael Reichert wrote:
> Currently, the search of the wiki is not really useful any more.
Indeed, the search field is pretty much broken at the moment.
However, this has been brought up on the wiki talk page, and Yuri said
he was looking for a fix. So I think it's safe to
Am 18.09.2018, 16:21, schrieb Benedikt Bastin:
> Gibt es abseits des Zugehörigkeitsproblems noch weitere Sachen, die gegen
> eine solche Relation sprechen?
Im Allgemeinen tendiert der Konsens in der Community dahin, Relationen
nur dort zu verwenden, wo sie notwendig sind.
Aus diesem Grund ist
Hello Vasu,
thank you for your interest in participating in Google Summer of Code at
OpenStreetMap!
On 13.09.2018 20:30, vasu dev Singh wrote:
> I want
> to do a project with OpenStreetMap but I don’t know how to start.
One trait we're looking for in GSoC students is familiarity with the OSM
onach Markus gefragt hat.
>Tobias, ist das eine Implementierung von Skoda selbst oder von dir
>selbst?
Das ist ein Bordmittel von Skoda; "GreenScore" ist da IIRC das Stichwort.
-towo
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
___
On August 27, 2018 8:47:05 AM GMT+02:00, Markus wrote:
>Wie heisst die entsprechende Funktion?
>(sowas wie "Dominanz" bei Gebirgen)
In der Graphentheorie nennen wir das einfach nur "kürzester Pfad/Weg"-Probleme,
aber das ist in der Umgangssprache etwas misverständlich, da das "kürzeste"
sich
On 15.08.2018 20:49, Tomasz Wójcik wrote:
> Currently, barrier=block is not allowed to be mapped as an area. As
> blocks can be big enough to map them as areas, I think it should be
> allowed, the same as in barrier=wall or barrier=hedge.
For routing purposes, barriers are usually connected to
On 08.08.2018 12:49, Tomasz Wójcik wrote:
> Due to our rules, that we shouldn't have 2 active tagging
> schemes for the same feature
These tagging schemes are for 2 different real-world features:
* roads/paths (i.e. linear features with a direction)
* plazas/squares (i.e. open areas where people
On 22.07.2018 17:00, Frederik Ramm wrote:> wenn man building:levels
erfasst - das ist ja doch ein bisschen
> einfacher als eine echte Höhenmessung - macht es ja einen ziemlichen
> Unterschied, ob man es mit einem Altbau-Stadthaus mit 3,50m hohen
> Stockwerken zu tun hat oder mit einem Neubau mit
of amenities/shops etc.
Cheers
Tobias
On 12/07/2018 20:33, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> Hey there
>
> Since early 2017 till now, users of my app StreetComplete have been
> adding house numbers to buildings.
> Should I disable this functionality for Italy?
>
> For build
adds them again, and so on.
So, you have to weigh the these up against each other and decide.
Anyway, thank you for the praise :-)
Tobias
On 13/07/2018 10:55, mbranco wrote:
> I think that it should be fine if your app could put a node inside the
> building (at the center?) with the housen
hots/screenshot8.png
This pin is shown to every user of the app, until it is solved. To solve
it, the user taps on the pin and can input the housenumber for the
building in the form that pops up then. The user can also answer that
the building has no housenumber, in which case the app tags
On 03.07.2018 10:28, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Don't forget that new FIXMEs will continue to appear all the time.
They will, but at a lower rate. Mappers often look at existing tagging
to find out how things should be tagged. This is further reinforced by
tools such as JOSM's autocompletion. Thus, I
itt, ein nicht mehr vorhandenes und
inzwischen überbautes Objekt sollte gar nicht in der Karte auftauchen,
kann man das ganze sicherlich auch in place=locality ändern.
Tobias
Am 17.06.2018 um 17:19 schrieb Manuel Reimer:
Hallo,
da bei uns recht ordentlich erfasst ist, habe ich direkt am Wohnort
On 08.06.2018 19:19, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> building=building is an unexpected way to mark building without
> specifying its type and therefore retagging this duplicate to
> building=yes would improve tagging without any information loss.
I'm in favour of proceeding with the proposed
Hi Tim,
On 16.05.2018 10:16, Tim Frey wrote:
> I like the Wikipedia and in special the Wikivoyage direction also. Does
> somebody know the best touchpoints to get in contact with the community
> there?
I'm not familiar enough with their communities to give a recommendation.
However, Commons does
r platform's
existing social features, though.
Tobias
¹ Typically one of the open CC licenses: CC0, CC-BY or CC-BY-SA.
² Using http://wiki.osm.org/Key:image
or http://wiki.osm.org/Key:wikimedia_commons
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetm
of the area. You can manually
invalidate the cache in the settings.
For more information, see here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#How_does_the_app_handle_uploads.3F
Cheers
Tobias
On 02/05/2018 13:58, Philip Barnes wrote:
> Tobias
> A quick question on speedlimit
*
taggings in themselves are consistent (in that they use the terms from
the UK legislation), that's fine, I guess. Otherwise, we should perhaps
look for a more fitting name before I cast it into code.
Tobias
On 01/05/2018 20:19, Jason Cunningham wrote:
> I had a bit of an interest in tagging speed
200, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>> Does the "there are no repeater signs" rule only apply for the
>> default
>> 30 mph limit (and the 20 mph zones)? Or in other words, if there is
>> an
>> explicit different limit posted, let's say 40 mph, does it have to be
>
Does the "there are no repeater signs" rule only apply for the default
30 mph limit (and the 20 mph zones)? Or in other words, if there is an
explicit different limit posted, let's say 40 mph, does it have to be
repeated at each intersection and feed roads?
Tobias
On 01/05/2018 16:
eople who seem not to notice
> changeset comments.
>
> On 01/05/18 10:41, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>> I am quite sure that this problem can lead to wrong tagging,
>> specifically that normal urban roads, even residential ones, are tagged
>> with "maxspeed:type=nsl_single" w
mentioned "maxspeed:type=GB:zone30" in my original
post. Remember that OSM is a worldwide project, as long as something is
not the same in the whole world, it is not "normal".
Tobias
On 01/05/2018 11:16, Philip Barnes wrote:
> I wouldn't invent a type tag, it's maxspeed = 20 mph be
in Britain, it is not enough to tell the user to
look for a sign at the start of the road, but to, well, what exactly?
This is where I need your help. How should the dialog be changed (in GB)
to not create any misunderstandings here?
Tobias
On 30/04/2018 19:41, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> Hi there
t can be split at the appropriate points.
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
>
>
> On 30 April 2018 18:41:26 BST, Tobias Zwick <o...@westnordost.de> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> On tagging implicit speed limits in the United Kingdom, the wiki lists
> the foll
I apologize for the misunderstanding, this is about implicit speed
limits when there is *no sign* that ordains another speed limit, of course.
Cheers
Tobias
On 30/04/2018 20:50, Brian Prangle wrote:
> You can't make that assumption of an implicit 30mph limit. Major roads
> in in built up
peed limit for built-up
areas applies?
The question is motivated by an issue report for StreetComplete [2]
Cheers
Tobias
[1]
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Speed_limits#Country_code.2Fcategory_conversion_table
[2] https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/i
On 25.04.2018 15:23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Unisex=yes is defined as a shortcut for male=yes + female=yes
This may be a stupid question, but where are you all getting this
definition from?
I assumed the key already had the meaning that Rory is suggesting here.
And at least on the
On 24.04.2018 02:17, Clifford Snow wrote:
> But if you want
> someone to use the data, then map it as separate ways.
That's not the case, and it's a bit frustrating to read this just after
I wrote a mail explaining this point. To reiterate:
* With separate ways, we don't know which road section
On 24.04.2018 19:23, Paul Norman wrote:
> It is sometimes recommended that when you add a name in another language
> you also indicate the name in the local language by adding a suitable
> name:* tag at the same time. For example, if adding "name:fr=Londres" to
> London, you would also add
Why do you think it necessary to map at all if any particular toilet is
segregated or not beyond whether I can go there as a man/woman? What is
the application?
On 24/04/2018 18:27, Rory McCann wrote:
> Hi all,
> Let's have a wee talk about how should one map gender neutral (and
> gender
On 18.04.2018 05:03, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> highway, surface, maxspeed, maxweight, maxheight, width, oneway, access,
> lanes, turn:lanes, lit, parking:lane:left, parking:lane:right,
> parking:condition:left, parking:condition:right,parking:lane:left:type,
> parking:lane:right:type, etc.
The
t, for any piece of software
- and needs to be updated for any tagging scheme that comes up.
If I were to name the biggest challenge for us, it would be the
maintainability of the map data, a topic that he never mentions directly.
Tobias
On 17.2.2018 10:56 AM, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
> This article
1 - 100 of 4822 matches
Mail list logo
