Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Sauf qu'un noeud isolé n'a pas de côte droite ou gauche (et Nominatim le trouvera par exemple dans une commune mais pas dans l'autre). La meilleure solution est de créer deux noeuds très très proches, de chaque côté de la frontière, ce qui permet alors de leur affecter leur FANTOIR respectif et à

[Talk-cz] UHUL ortofoto

Ahoj, nemáte někdo prosím zazálhovanou celou UHUL mapu? Pavel Machek říkal, že si jí od něho někdo stahoval. Rád bych ji nabídnul jako "zajímavý basemap" na osmap.cz, případně i pro iD editor, neb to je ve vegetačním půstu. Dík Pavel ___ Talk-cz

Re: [Talk-cz] wikipedia:cs=* -> wikipedia=cs:*

Možná že by mohlo stačit stáhnout si kategorie jednou a pak vědět že image je vždycky P18. Nevím, tipuju.. P. Dne 16. února 2016 8:14 Marián Kyral napsal(a): > Asi jsem blbý, ale jak z wikidat získám jednu konkrétní kategorii bez > toho, abych stahoval všechny? Ono je totiž

Re: [Talk-cz] [FreeGeoCZ] FOSS4G-CZ/SK

Ahoj, mě se to líbí. Má někdo alternativní návrh? Někomu se to principiálně nelíbí? J po 15. 2. 2016 v 9:57 odesílatel Rostislav Nétek napsal: > Kolegové, Jáchyme, rovnou dávám k dispozici termín pátek 21.10.2016 v > Olomouci, místo Katedra geoinformatiky UP (cca 10min od

Re: [OSRM-talk] About Indoor Routing

Hi C.C.Tang, You will almost certainly need to modify the foot.lua profile. I have not really looked at the indoor tagging before, but it seems like there are lots of tags that will be used that the current foot profile does not know about. For (1), I mean that there is no support for

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing through access=delivery

Hi Markus, access=destination doesn't mean that residents cannot reach their home, my understanding is that access=delivery means you have to deliver something to a location at that road to be allowed to use that road. So it means access=no for anybody else, doesn't it ? I am sure that some

Re: [OSRM-talk] About Indoor Routing

Hi Daniel, Many thanks for your reply. I am going to try and see if it works. But I come up with several new questions after reading your response: 1. >> like "take the stairs" and "take the elevator to the Nth floor". Do you mean I need to work around it by tagging staris and elevator

[talk-ph] 7500 and counting.

MANILA, Philippines -The Philippines is now officially a +7,500 islands after the National Mapping and Resource Information Authority discovered 400 more islets in a series of mapping research.

Re: [OSRM-talk] About Indoor Routing

Hi, While it can work in theory, OSRM is missing some of the indoor-specific guidance that you will need for changing levels, like "take the stairs" and "take the elevator to the Nth floor". We are working on a big refactor at the moment that might improve this, but I don't know if anyone

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing through access=delivery

Hi Gerd, Am 15.02.16, 21:29:59 CET schrieb Gerd Petermann: > Hi Markus, > > I agree that forestry should be handled like agricultural, I'll > try to create a patch for that. Thank you. > Reg. delivery I am a bit unsure because it seems that this this > value is very often used in invalid

[OSRM-talk] About Indoor Routing

Dear List Moderator, Please kindly ignore my previous post having the same mail subject. I sent it with wrong From address. Hi all, I am doing a project that require (multi floor/level) indoor routing capability. I was wondering if OSRM supports processing indoor related tags and suggest route

Re: [Talk-se] Funderingar runt indoor mapping

Allmän handling och offentlighetsprincipen har tyvärr ingenting alls med upphovsrätten att göra. Upphovsrätten är separat även om viss data från myndigheter, som exvis statistik från SCB, är fri från upphovsrätt. Minns jag rätt finns det dock tyvärr ett explicit undantag för kartor. Har inte

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

C'était un smiley semi-sérieux. Dans certains cas, c'est la solution la plus simple (et pas incorrect genre "tagguer pour BANO", mais ça ne marche pas partout. Le 15 février 2016 à 23:45, a écrit : > Les ref:FR:FANTOIR multiples, pourquoi pas, mais au niveau

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Les ref:FR:FANTOIR multiples, pourquoi pas, mais au niveau OSM ça ne résoudra pas la problématique multi-commune au niveau de la recherche. La seule solution que je vois c'est de mettre là non un nœud mais un polygone comme place=. Des objections ? Des alternatives à part is_in= ? ;-) Selon la

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Le 15 février 2016 à 23:02, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit : > > Le 15/02/2016 22:45, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : > >> >> Le 15 février 2016 à 21:32, Christian Quest > > a écrit : >> >> Dans ces cas, mettez de

Re: [OSRM-talk] RunQuery Output

James, There's an updated example client here: https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/blob/develop/example/ If you look inside the "route_summary" member of the JSON response, you'll find both the "total_time"

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Le 15/02/2016 22:45, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : Le 15 février 2016 à 21:32, Christian Quest > a écrit : Dans ces cas, mettez de node place sur le chemin qui sépare les deux communes ;) Le plus important dans le message de

Re: [Talk-at] office=government / administrative

On 27.10.2014 14:35, Markus Mayr wrote: > Ich habe mir das tag "amenity=public_building" > (http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_building) in Wien genauer > angesehen und musste feststellen, dass dieses doch noch oft verwendet > wird, obwohl davon abgeraten wird. > Manche Bezirksämter

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Le 15 février 2016 à 21:32, Christian Quest a écrit : > Dans ces cas, mettez de node place sur le chemin qui sépare les deux > communes ;) > > Il sera détecté par BANO des deux côtés et sans besoin de ref:FR:FANTOIR > C'est une solution pour BANO mais pas pour OSM à mon

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing through access=delivery

Hi Markus, I agree that forestry should be handled like agricultural, I'll try to create a patch for that. Reg. delivery I am a bit unsure because it seems that this this value is very often used in invalid combinations, e.g. highway=residential + access=delivery without further access tags. In

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing through access=delivery

Am 15.02.16, 07:57:26 CET schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:13:45 +0100 > Markus Heidelberg wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > last week after missing the exit on a highway=motorway, a Garmin Nüvi > > 300 with a Lambertus map tried to turn through a service

[Talk-cz] Nedávné změny v trasách KČT

Dal jsem na wiki nedávné změny v trasách KČT http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Chyb%C4%9Bj%C3%ADc%C3%AD_Trasy_K%C4%8CT#Zm.C4.9Bny_v_tras.C3.A1ch změnu v Brně jsem aplikoval. Jinde to neznám, tak to nechám na někom jiném. Až to zanesete do mapy tak prosím příslušný záznam smažte. Zdroj:

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing through access=delivery

Hi Gerd Am 15.02.16, 01:24:31 CET schrieb Gerd Petermann: > If I got that right you talk about this way: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10521868 Yes. > whch is tagged > description=Zufahrt Hockenheimring > highway=service > motor_vehicle=delivery > > I agree that routing software for cars

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Dans ces cas, mettez de node place sur le chemin qui sépare les deux communes ;) Il sera détecté par BANO des deux côtés et sans besoin de ref:FR:FANTOIR Le 15 février 2016 à 15:41, a écrit : > Ajoutons Saint-Antoine sur Kervignac et Hennebont. >

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare una malga

Il 15/02/2016 12:58, Dario Zontini ha scritto: > riusciamo a trovare una soluzione condivisa sulle malghe? oggi ho > trovato alcuni tag place = locality modificati in place=farm > > vorrei procedere a passi altrimenti rischiamo di restare a metà: usiamo > place = locality oppure in alternativa

Re: [Talk-it] Pista automodellismo

Il 15/02/2016 20:21, Gianluca Boero ha scritto: > quella classica dove il giudice di gara ed eventuali ispettori osservano > dall'alto. Non ci sono posti a sedere > Forse: building=roof roof:shape=flat sul bordo, eventuale barrier=fence +fence_type* o quel che lè e forse leisure di qualche

Re: [Talk-GB] Geovation - Location information innovation grants - now open for applications

I hadn't even thought of the travel side tbh! Faily glaring when its pointed out! This type of competition for a grant or similar has become increasingly common. I think Nottingham spent £500,000 to try & win a slot as a venue for England's wonderfully successful World Cup bid, and the local

Re: [Talk-GB] Geovation - Location information innovation grants - now open for applications

I think you are quite right Jerry, looks like participants are expected to travel to London?!? Thats one way to keep the numbers down and limit it to the South East England area! On Monday 15 February 2016 17:23:37 SK53 wrote: > I think most folk on this list are fairly familiar with these:

Re: [Talk-it] Pista automodellismo

quella classica dove il giudice di gara ed eventuali ispettori osservano dall'alto. Non ci sono posti a sedere Il 15/02/2016 20:17, girarsi_liste ha scritto: Il 15/02/2016 20:12, Gianluca Boero ha scritto: e la tribunetta rialzata posta alla linea di traguardo come la si identifica? Grazie.

Re: [Talk-it] Pista automodellismo

Il 15/02/2016 20:12, Gianluca Boero ha scritto: > e la tribunetta rialzata posta alla linea di traguardo come la si > identifica? > > Grazie. > Com'è, un semplice palco, con delle sedie/panche, o una scala a sedere o cosa? -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GPS à correction d'erreur / RTK GPS / RTKlib

Il existe des 'Y' pour faire ça. Si tu fais une recherche gnss antenna splitter, tu en trouveras. Par contre, et sans en être certain, il est probable que tu perdes un peu de gain, et je pense aussi qu'il faut faire attention à la bande passante du splitter afin que les signaux de toutes les

Re: [Talk-it] Pista automodellismo

e la tribunetta rialzata posta alla linea di traguardo come la si identifica? Grazie. Il 14/02/2016 16:09, girarsi_liste ha scritto: Il 14/02/2016 15:57, girarsi_liste ha scritto: Il 14/02/2016 15:34, demon.box ha scritto: ciao, come si tagga una pista per automodellismo, cioè dove girano

Re: [Talk-it] tag per percorso vita

Trovato: leisure=fitness_station -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/tag-per-percorso-vita-tp5867826p5867833.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list

Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

Hi Many thanks for this. I take your point about the use of an OS specific term. It would be good to have a consensus on a suitable designation tag and an addition to the wiki on UK rights of way to cover its use. As suggested, I will try and contact the highways department to see if they

Re: [Talk-se] Djupkartor, tipps

För inspiration om djuplinjer/kurvor tyckte jag att denna var riktigt snygg: https://www.mapbox.com/blog/ski-mapbox-studio/ Lycka till, /Jan Erik 2016-02-15 18:46 GMT+01:00 Peter Magnusson : > Tack för tipsen, turf.js såg intressant ut. Får läsa på lite > > Den 15 feb.

Re: [Talk-cz] wikipedia:cs=* -> wikipedia=cs:*

Díky za reakci. Všiml jsem si, že wikipedia plugin v JOSM ten wikidata tag přidává sam. Zároveň jsem se ale na wiki dočetl, že argument proti použití tagu wikidata je to, že ten kód není jednoduše vizuálně kontrolovatelný. Tady by se asi musela nejprve doprogramovat podpora v editorech.

Re: [OSM-talk] Change in line barrier rendering coming up

sent from a phone > Am 14.02.2016 um 23:06 schrieb nebulon42 : > > This change (in the same way as other catch-all removals some time ago) is > intended to improve tagging quality and reduce tagging for the renderer. The > particular list is of course open to continuous

[Talk-ko] 베이스맵 tms주소 설정 질문입니다.

한국지도 만들기 베이스맵 tms 주소는 더이상 사용할 수 없더군요. 국가지리정보원 브이월드에서 제공하는 tms/wms는 JOSM에서 적용시키려고 하니 인식이 전혀 되지 않구요. 베이스맵 tms나 wms가 있어야 편집이 가능할듯 한데... 도움 부탁드립니다. ___ Talk-ko mailing list Talk-ko@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ko

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] GPS à correction d'erreur / RTK GPS / RTKlib

Une nouvelle question : Chaque récepteur u-blox ne peut acquérie que deux constellations de satellite en même temps. J'aimerai connecter une antenne à 2 récepteurs u-blox pour avoir le GPS+Galileo, Glonass et Beidu. Comment procéder ? Est-ce qu'il existe un amplificateur de signal GPS avec 2

[Talk-it] tag per percorso vita

Ciao scusate come taggo i vari attrezzi per esercizi fisici lungo un percorso vita? Cioè asse di equilibrio, scala orizzontale, ecc. Grazie. --enrico -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/tag-per-percorso-vita-tp5867826.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list

Re: [Talk-GB] Geovation - Location information innovation grants - now open for applications

I think most folk on this list are fairly familiar with these: they've been running for quite a few years. I think CycleStreets participated in one of them a while back. My general impression is that the cost of participating is often non-trivial in comparison with the potential reward. Jerry On

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

>> Bath has not lost it's city status, unlike Rochester, so the designation >> is correct. > Absolutely, I was questioning the "arbitrary population limit", not the > city status. Sorry if I wasn't clear. I was just indicating that while the population is less than 100k, it's status as a city is

Re: [Talk-cz] wikipedia:cs=* -> wikipedia=cs:*

Mírně vykostěná reakce Blahmy (dorazí-li někdo na ten jejich sraz , snáz se bude lámat na odběr tohoto mailingu): [citace] Dnes by

Re: [OSM-co] OpenData day

Hola Arttesano, Con respecto a lo del OpenData day, primero quisiera saber si hay interesados de la comunidad de OSM-co en participar.Yo también hago parte de las comunidad de BigData Colombia y OpenData co, y estoy hablando con ellos para organizar algo informal ese día.BigData Colombia es una

[Talk-GB] Geovation - Location information innovation grants - now open for applications

Just in case anyone is interested and had not heard of it yet: 10-20k GBP grants for location based products/services. "Think of the Programme as an ideas incubator. Whether you’re a developer, innovator or entrepreneur it’s the perfect funded start-up accelerator if you want to create a

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

On 2016-02-15 16:46, Lester Caine wrote: > On 15/02/16 14:15, Colin Smale wrote: On 2016-02-15 13:42, Lester Caine wrote: > > So Bath is also a > city despite being below some arbitrary population limit. Bath has around > 100k inhabitants, not exactly a hamlet... But it doesn't > have a city

[OSM-talk-be] Another missing maps mapathon in Antwerp

Hi all, Since we didn't destroy their library last time, we are welcome at IPIS research again for a Missing Maps Mapathon. That's Wednesday March 23rd, 17:30pm, at the Italielei in the center of Antwerp. We do need volunteers, especially for one on one help with new mappers. If you're up for

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

On 15/02/16 14:15, Colin Smale wrote: > On 2016-02-15 13:42, Lester Caine wrote: > >> So Bath is also a >> city despite being below some arbitrary population limit. >> > Bath has around 100k inhabitants, not exactly a hamlet... But it doesn't > have a city council, only Charter Trustees. Bath

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

How is that similar circumstances? The current council (Medway Council) hasn't tried to get Rochester's city status back. --colin On 2016-02-15 16:32, paul.bivand wrote: > Bath is still a city with Charter Trustees. > > In similar circumstances Rochester lost its city status on local

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

Bath is still a city with Charter Trustees. In similar circumstances Rochester lost its city status on local authority merger because they didn't appoint charter trustees.  The city status would have applied to the former boundary. The successor council has failed repeatedly at getting city

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

On 15-Feb-16 13:48, Colin Smale wrote: And would this mean that St Davids is place=town, place:designation=city or the other way round? I have no axe to grind here (the city I live near has a population >100,000 anyway), but if the former, I suspect the residents of St David's would not be

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Ajoutons Saint-Antoine sur Kervignac et Hennebont. http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/~cquest/leaflet/bano.html#18/47.79504/-3.25697 Précisons que certains services (ou sévices c'est selon) ne connaissent Saint-Antoine que sur Hennebont. D'où l'intérêt de la BAN pour que les habitants puissent dire

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

On 2016-02-15 13:42, Lester Caine wrote: > So Bath is also a > city despite being below some arbitrary population limit. Bath has around 100k inhabitants, not exactly a hamlet... But it doesn't have a city council, only Charter Trustees. > If we know the > population then it should be

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

It might not have gone actually, my e-mailing doesn't always do the right thing for the lists. I quoted it in my last e-mail though. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-February/018474.html On 15 February 2016 at 13:48, Colin Smale wrote: > I can't

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare una malga

+1 per place=locality, perché nessuno risiede in un alpeggio/malga. Buon mapping. gm Il giorno 15 febbraio 2016 12:58, Dario Zontini ha scritto: > riusciamo a trovare una soluzione condivisa sulle malghe? oggi > ho trovato alcuni tag place = locality modificati in

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

I can't find Gregory's suggestion in my mailbox... did it go to the list? Is the suggestion to put place:designation=city on the place node? Or on an admin boundary, or on a landuse=residential or what? Why is place:designation needed, and not simply designation? And would this mean that St

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

On 15/02/2016 12:35, Gregory wrote: What did people think of my place:designation=* suggestion? That would make sense, yes. Mark -- http://www.markgoodge.com ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau francilien: STIF, RATP et SNCF

Le 15 février 2016 à 11:59, HELFER Denis (SNCF RESEAU / SIEGE SNCF RESEAU / DT ALCA APPUI PERFORMANCE) a écrit : > RFF n’existe plus. Suite à la réforme ferroviaire de 2015, il faut parler > de SNCF Réseau. > Merci pour la correction, j'avais survolé l'article

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

On 15/02/2016 12:35, Gregory wrote: What did people think of my place:designation=* suggestion? Sounds good to me. No uses yet (obviously), but would allow a more sane "place" tagging for e.g. St David's, which isn't a really city in any normal sense. Cheers, Andy

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

On 12/02/2016 17:10, Philip Barnes wrote: The original node, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3216768/history http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=3216768 Thanks. So mostly city, but it did spend a couple of years as a town and a couple of shorter periods as village. Cheers, Andy

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Du même tonneau il y également Brignoud a cheval sur villard bonnot et froges, ou encore Pont-Réan sur Bruz et Guichen > Le 15 févr. 2016 à 13:05, Vincent de Château-Thierry a > écrit : > > Bonjour, > > Le 15/02/2016 12:23, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : >> J'ai trouvé un cas

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Disons dans ce cas que c'est une suggestion pour OSM car le séparateur en valeurs multiples est bien le point-vigule. Voir les autres schémas possibles en cas de valeur multiple Tous les mécanismes peuvent être utilisé

[Talk-cz] Tagování wikpedie vs prvky OSM

Ahoj, vzhledem k tomu že osm.cz je konečně mapa která nějak používá tagy wikipedie, pustil jsem se do namátkového tagování wikipedie v Brně a okolí. Přišel jsem přitom na dvě nejasnosti, kde by bylo prima se nějak sjednotit... 1) Místa - města, čtvrti, vesnice atd. Vždy existuje uzel

Re: [Talk-es] Descarga de CSV

Hi, --drop-relations --drop-ways, when drop is taking them, they do not appear ___

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

On 15/02/16 11:08, Mark Goodge wrote: > The only way to reconcile this, in the long run, is to have two separate > tags for populated places, one describing the size according to global > OSM guidelines, and one describing the legal status according to local law. Since there is a 'Should

Re: [OSM-ja] インターナショナルオープンデータデイｉｎ尼について

muramotoです。 テストとして授乳室マップをumapで作ってみましたが、良いアイコンがなかったので、あまりそれっぽくなりませんでした。(独自ファイルサーバーを持ってればカスタムアイコンが使えたのですが。) https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/ja/map/map_71318 XAPI Viewerだとアイコンはそれっぽくなりました。

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

What did people think of my place:designation=* suggestion? >From the "historic cathedral city of Durham", Gregory. >Should place:designation=* be a thing, so that we can save the legal definition somewhere. > >You could then say we are tagging place=* for the renderer. But population is not

[Talk-us] San Jose GIS data license

Has anyone checked out the GIS data for San Jose: https://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=3308 The data seem fairly comprehensive: - City Council Districts - Parcels, Single Street Centerlines and Divided Street Centerlines - Address Points, Air Parcels, Building Footprints, Condo Points,

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

Agreed... FWIW I have been using council_style=city or council_style=town on admin boundary relations (mostly civil parishes) to indicate non-default situations. This works where the status is held by a local authority, but where Charter Trustees are involved I don't have a solution in mind

Re: [Talk-es] Descarga de CSV

Hola, No estoy familiarizado con esos programas, pero creo que estas quedándote con las etiquetas addr:* que se utilizan para indicar direcciones, y es posible que en Andorra, aunque estén las calles con nombre no haya muchas casas con la dirección completa. Para sacar el nombre de las calles

Re: [Talk-se] Djupkartor, tipps

Det här kanske kan vara en ingång http://geoexamples.blogspot.se/2013/08/creating-vectorial-isobands-with-python.html?m=1 Mvh Henrik Den 15 feb 2016 11:41 fm skrev "Peter Magnusson" : > Hej listan, > > Jag sitter här på min kammare och drömmer om att kunna rendera

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Bonjour, Le 15/02/2016 12:23, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : J'ai trouvé un cas (je pense que c'est loin d'être le seul) de lieudit à cheval sur deux communes. Comment peut-on traiter ça au niveau de Bano. Je serai assez d'avis de mettre les deux Fantoir avec un séparateur name=La Gabardelière

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare una malga

riusciamo a trovare una soluzione condivisa sulle malghe? oggi ho trovato alcuni tag place = locality modificati in place=farm vorrei procedere a passi altrimenti rischiamo di restare a metà: usiamo place = locality oppure in alternativa place=isolated_dwelling? io sono per place =

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare una Calchèra infossata.

2016-02-15 9:25 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt : > Il taggare come tower non mi piace tanto - non sono ciminiere, sono forni: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lime_kiln > Per me è una categoria a parte. +1, man_made=kiln e tag height ? Ciao, Martin

[OSM-talk-fr] [Bano] Un lieudit pour deux communes

Bonjour, J'ai trouvé un cas (je pense que c'est loin d'être le seul) de lieudit à cheval sur deux communes. Comment peut-on traiter ça au niveau de Bano. Je serai assez d'avis de mettre les deux Fantoir avec un séparateur name=La Gabardelière ref:FR:FANTOIR=17142B061A;17059B007C @Vincent:

Re: [OSM-ja] 変なリレーション?

hayashiです。 編集途中のリレーションをアップして、そのまま放置してしまっているようですね。 リレーション＆メンバーWAYを削除してかまわないと思います。 ちなみに、リレーションだけ削除すると、メンバーWAYが「タグなしWAY」になってしまって警告が出ると思います。 2016年2月14日 23:21 ribbon : > 場所は > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/38.9812/141.6927 > > あたりです。 住宅地を表すリレーションなんですが、 > なんか変です。 > >

Re: [Talk-GB] place=village/town/city

On 12/02/2016 17:18, Colin Smale wrote: Several attempts have been made to "correct" the tagging from city to village/town... each time it was changed back to city... This, I think, illustrates why we really could do with a "legal_status" tag or similar for populated places. People,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau francilien: STIF, RATP et SNCF

RFF n’existe plus. Suite à la réforme ferroviaire de 2015, il faut parler de SNCF Réseau. De : Éric Gillet [mailto:gill3t.3ric+...@gmail.com] Envoyé : lundi 15 février 2016 11:39 À : Discussions sur OSM en français Objet : Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau francilien: STIF, RATP et SNCF Le 15 février

Re: [Talk-de] Solingen

Hallo Simon, Ich habe einen Kontakt. via legal-questi...@osmfoundation.org, mit jemand von "Vermessung und Kataster" der Stadt Solingen, der uns anscheinend diverse Strassen(um)benennungen mitteilen will. Der nächstgelegene tatsächlich aktive Stammtisch ist Düsseldorf. In der Umgebung, in

Re: [Talk-it] filtro x scaricare su josm solo la parte di dati che serono dal server OSM

2016-02-15 11:24 GMT+01:00 Paolo Monegato : > Chiaro. Infatti, a mio avviso, se devi anche spostare un po' la via (o > addirittura crearne una di nuova), e non solo modificare dei tag, allora è > necessario scaricarsi pure l'area in questione. > > Il trucco proposto, in

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau francilien: STIF, RATP et SNCF

Le 15 février 2016 à 10:34, dHuy Pierre a écrit : > Oui mais du coup le tag network=RATP est incorrect? On devrait mettre > network=STIF. Et comment considérer les réseau comme la ligne H? Ou les > réseau de banlieue (par exemple Tice pour Evry). > Et enfin en dehors de Paris,

[Talk-se] Djupkartor, tipps

Hej listan, Jag sitter här på min kammare och drömmer om att kunna rendera djupkartor för sjöarna i grannskapet på något sätt. Det jag har gjort så här långt är att skriva ihop en modul för node.js (och start även go-lang) som kan läsa loggarna från mitt lowrance-ekolod så att jag kan få ut

Re: [Talk-it] Inserire uso del suolo e indici di vegetazione

Consiglio di usare il plugin SimplifyArea, che fa la stessa cosa ma è configurabile direttamente dentro osm. Il 12/feb/2016 22:20, "Marco_T" ha scritto: > Paola Capone wrote > > Una volta riportate in JOSM ottengo le stesse isoipse ma con un infinità > > di > > nodi. > > Se

Re: [Talk-it] filtro x scaricare su josm solo la parte di dati che serono dal server OSM

Il 12/02/2016 13:22, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: 2016-02-09 18:55 GMT+01:00 Paolo Monegato >: +1, anche secondo me è vivamente sconsigliato un approccio del genere. Quoto. Ma si può sempre scaricare i dati

[Talk-de] Abstimmung jewellery vs jewelry

Hi, bis zum 22.2. kann noch über die Änderung der Schreibweise bei Juwelieren abgestimmt werden. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Jewellery_shop Grüße Chris ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau francilien: STIF, RATP et SNCF

Oui mais du coup le tag network=RATP est incorrect? On devrait mettre network=STIF. Et comment considérer les réseau comme la ligne H? Ou les réseau de banlieue (par exemple Tice pour Evry).Et enfin en dehors de Paris, une grande ligne ne devrait-elle pas faire partie du network SNCF? Le

Re: [Talk-cz] Fotky rozcestniku na osmap.cz

-- Původní zpráva -- Od: Michal Grézl Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 12. 2. 2016 9:50:47 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Fotky rozcestniku na osmap.cz "2016-02-10 21:36 GMT+01:00 Tom Ka : >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau francilien: STIF, RATP et SNCF

Pour les réseaux ferrés du STIF, effectivement c'est réparti entre SNCF et RATP... par contre pour les bus, il y en a un sacré paquet !!! En principe le pass Navigo est valable sur tout le réseau du STIF: ferré, tram, bus. Il existe toujours des forfaits 2 zones (donc les tags des zones STIF

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Réseau francilien: STIF, RATP et SNCF

En effet, mais ma question est plutôt des choix à faire comme nom. Je me rappelle quand j'étais jeune contributeur et que cquest m'avait tiré les oreilles :pDonc la question est clairement que mettre comme valeur pour les réseaux parisiens de manière large. :)En pratique et sauf

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare una Calchèra infossata.

dieterdreist wrote > se sono ciminiere, man_made=chimney in effetti anch'io a questo punto direi: man_made=chimney e poi historic=yes + ruins=yes oppure historic=ruins troppo? oppure ancora disused=yes visto che non sono esattamente ruderi ma sono soltanto abbandonate ma ancora

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare una Calchèra infossata.

Il taggare come tower non mi piace tanto - non sono ciminiere, sono forni: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lime_kiln Per me è una categoria a parte. Io ne ho mappate alcune: - alcuni come historic=lime_kiln - altri come man_made=kiln (manca il product=quicklime), ma penso che è meno adatto

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing through access=delivery

Sorry, I posted this reply as a PM instead of replying to the list: Hi Markus, If I got that right you talk about this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10521868 whch is tagged description=Zufahrt Hockenheimring highway=service motor_vehicle=delivery I agree that routing software for cars

[Talk-de] Solingen

Ich habe einen Kontakt. via legal-questi...@osmfoundation.org, mit jemand von "Vermessung und Kataster" der Stadt Solingen, der uns anscheinend diverse Strassen(um)benennungen mitteilen will. Fühlt sich jemand für Solingen zuständig oder gibt es eine geeignete regionale Maillingliste auf die ich

[Talk-cz] tracer LPIS neořezává zbytky

Přetrasovával jsem pole LPIS v okolí Nové Paky a všiml jsem si, že tracer nechává neořezané zbytky bv případě, že nově trasovaný polygon LPIS má tagy landuse forest - viz polygon číslo LPIS 18004677 nechal jsem zatím u tohoto polygomu neořezané zbytky Pražák