Hello,
Before pre-betas To, CC, BCC fields acted like most of the default OS text
fields - when you select the text in then rightclick and choose recipient
from favorite contacts selected text got deleted and new recipient inserted.
Now it is ADDED no matter select you old text
Hello Konstantin,
A reminder of what Konstantin Zhilenko typed on:
April 27, 2005 at 15:38:38 GMT +0300
KZ Before pre-betas To, CC, BCC fields acted like most of the default OS text
KZ fields - when you select the text in then rightclick and choose recipient
KZ from favorite contacts
Hello, Stuart,
Wednesday, April 27, 2005, you wrote:
KZ Before pre-betas To, CC, BCC fields acted like most of the default OS text
KZ fields - when you select the text in then rightclick and choose recipient
KZ from favorite contacts selected text got deleted and new recipient
inserted.
KZ Now
Hello Stuart,
Wednesday, April 27, 2005, 9:52:44 AM, you wrote:
SC Hello Konstantin,
SC A reminder of what Konstantin Zhilenko typed on:
SC April 27, 2005 at 15:38:38 GMT +0300
KZ Before pre-betas To, CC, BCC fields acted like most of the default OS text
KZ fields - when you select
On Sunday, November 7, 2004, 06:18, Avi Yashar wrote:
10-12 addresses - yes, it works as you describe. 30-40 addresses,
and TB's radar starts to unravel. 60-70 addresses, and TB is banging
into walls. Test it again, and I am sure you will see what I mean.
Now I can confirm. I added some 150
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:53:03 +0100, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Now I can confirm. I added some 150 addresses by opening the address
picker at the right of the to: field. When closing and trying to
navigate, TB! behaved very strange.
Thanks, Marcus. I have submitted the bug on BT:
On Sunday, November 7, 2004, 12:29, Avi Yashar wrote:
Now I can confirm. I added some 150 addresses by opening the
address picker at the right of the to: field. When closing and
trying to navigate, TB! behaved very strange.
Thanks, Marcus. I have submitted the bug on BT:
Hello Avi,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:09:04 +0200 GMT (05/11/2004, 18:09 +0700 GMT),
Avi Yashar wrote:
AY I pasted a long series of comma-separated email addresses into the CC
AY field. The strange thing is that whenever I click my mouse into that
AY field with the purpose of editing the addresses,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:52:45 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AY It is very difficult to get to the beginning if I want to make a
AY change there.
I do not confirm the difficulty. I click somewhere in that line and
hit home. Then I'm at the beginning of the line. That's the same in
many apps,
Hello Avi,
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 19:05:34 +0200 GMT (07/11/2004, 00:05 +0700 GMT),
Avi Yashar wrote:
AY Thomas, hitting Home does not work for me. It only gets me to the
AY beginning of the visible line. To go before that, I must use the left
AY arrow or some sort of mouse selection process that is
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 00:33:57 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AY Thomas, hitting Home does not work for me. It only gets me to the
AY beginning of the visible line. To go before that, I must use the left
AY arrow or some sort of mouse selection process that is very fidgety.
Oh, that's
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 23:39, Avi Yashar wrote:
Oh, that's different here. Home gets me to the beginning of the
entire line.
Of course, this could be because of different operating systems.
Perhaps you would like to try Windows XP Pro SP2, because I don't
think that I will be able
Hello MAU,
Friday, November 5, 2004, 11:13:20 AM, MAU wrote:
Outlook has never been installed on my systems.
ROFLMAO!
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta
Hello Greg,
ROFLMAO!
Shouldn't it be ROFL MAU? ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Current beta is 3.0.2.5 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello MAU,
Saturday, November 6, 2004, 8:03:17 PM, MAU wrote:
ROFLMAO!
Shouldn't it be ROFL MAU? ;-)
For you yes!
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta
Hello MAU!
On Saturday, November 06, 2004, 8:03 PM, you wrote:
GS ROFLMAO!
MAU Shouldn't it be rofl MAU? ;-)
:rofl2: , Miguel!
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.5 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 3.0.2.5
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 23:53:18 +0100, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
On Saturday, November 6, 2004, 23:39, Avi Yashar wrote:
Oh, that's different here. Home gets me to the beginning of the
entire line.
Of course, this could be because of different operating systems.
Perhaps you would like to
Hello Avi,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 05:57:43 +0200 GMT (07/11/2004, 10:57 +0700 GMT),
Avi Yashar wrote:
AY Well, Marcus, I just tested this on another workstation running
AY Windows XP Pro SP2, and I got the same behavior that I reported. To
AY see this you cannot just use 10 or 12 addresses. You need
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 11:36:24 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I have XP Pro SP2 in the office. While I'm pretty sure the behaviour
is as I describe - not as you experience - I am not sure I have done
that with more than 10 or 12 addresses. If I don't forget it, I will
try 30 or 40 addresses
This strange behavior might have existed for a while, but I only
noticed it today (in 3.0.2.4).
I pasted a long series of comma-separated email addresses into the CC
field. The strange thing is that whenever I click my mouse into that
field with the purpose of editing the addresses, TB always
Hello Avi
I find the same behavior in the To and BCC fields as well.
Can anyone confirm?
Yes I can - it is standard behaviour - and it is irritating. I'd like to see the
whole addressing / address editing issue re-engineered as a coordinated beta program
--
regards,
Graham
Using
Hello Graham,
I find the same behavior in the To and BCC fields as well.
Can anyone confirm?
Yes I can - it is standard behaviour - and it is irritating. I'd
like to see the whole addressing / address editing issue re-engineered
as a coordinated beta program
This is a long standing issue
Hello MAU
This is a long standing issue but, on the other hand, there is an
alternative that many people forget about.
No we don't - but this mechanism is also flawed in that:-
- You cannot paste addresses separated with newlines
- you cannot move /copy LDAP searched for entries into you
Hello Graham,
This is a long standing issue but, on the other hand, there is an
alternative that many people forget about.
No we don't - but this mechanism is also flawed in that:-
- You cannot paste addresses separated with newlines
- you cannot move /copy LDAP searched for entries into
24 matches
Mail list logo
