-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there Leif,
Just ONE little clarification.
On 23:22 08.03.2004, you [Leif Gregory] wrote...
provided your From address is set to that which you have subscribed to
the TB list, your message will post to the list and in doing so get
posted to Gmane.
Please
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t 2) TB releases are less worthy of upgrading to than other software updates.
Why would you think that?
The posts since my last message show a small part of the reason.
P.S. You're not dirty pixels bill are you? :-0
--
kaishaku.reply-to = [EMAIL PROTECTED
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stuart-
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 1:11:16 AM, you wrote:
SH I know how to get hold of support; I wanted RitLabs to know that
SH their website had a duff address on it.
...so why not just email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and let them know?
That has stopped working
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo tb,
tko Since there is so little programmatic possibility regarding data stored
tko in TB messages, I think it should be possible to make a selection of
tko messages in the message listview and to copy the row/column values to
tko the clipboard in some text
though), but with all these active people on the
list one will spot the new version sooner or later ;-).
There are so many gray areas with regard to this list, TB affiliation
and TB releases, that I have always considered the following true :
1) These lists are more affiliated than people
Since there is so little programmatic possibility regarding data stored
in TB messages, I think it should be possible to make a selection of
messages in the message listview and to copy the row/column values to
the clipboard in some text format, possibly just simple CSV.
This way, I can filter
Hello Maurice,
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, at 02:34:05 [GMT +0100] (which was 01:34 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
MS On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 at 01:07 (which was Wednesday,
MS February 18, 2004 at 2:07 where I am) Tb [T] wrote:
T And where would I set these options? I have looked in Transport
Hello Maurice,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, at 15:15:29 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:15 in my
TimeZone) you wrote
MS Yes it does. The Bat! supports both SMTP and POP3 over SSL and does so
MS both to specific ports as well as by using the so called 'STARTTLS'
MS methods available for both protocols.
And
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi TBUDL,
I wonder if TB can ever cause (or be related
to some other software that causes) recurrent BSODs
(Blue Screen of Deaths). It seems to cause BSODs here.
They happen, if I'm trying to work, every 2-5 minutes.
Previously I had a very stable SuperMicro
Terminal.
SF one of the MS System fonts should be on any Windows machine.
Interesting...
The first place I tried that font (since I was already in email) was
TB! but (though that font seems to be on my system) it is not
available in applications!
It is, but the application needs to allow you
statements go to msg
# Pyx evaluates a python expression, result to msg
# Python env is global and includes auto-imported tb module
# Python Exceptions and others go to msg with a stacktrace
%Exec(uptime)
%Py(
tb.set('from','[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
print tb.get('from')
print tb.get('215')
)
%Py(
tb.set
and Pyx because
I thought those were a lot more beautiful actually...
Py is obvious, Pyx is Python eXpression, akin to the Win32
convention of appending Ex to new or revised API functions.
I wrote this because I've never used TB macros and templates.
I will start using templates now, via Pyxie
I am just wondering if this list removes my Reply-To.
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
# Py executes python code, print statements go to msg
# Pyx evaluates a python expression, result to msg
I'd suggest to rename the macros to %Python and %PythonEval. Isn't
that a lot more beautiful? :-)
# Python env is global and includes auto-imported tb module
Fine. Again, I
remember
all the specifics but I think I was able to get my old mail moved over.
It was a bit annoying though, and on many occasions I wish we had more
access to the format TB uses for data files. Indeed, one 3rd party
developer has been able to reverse engineer this stuff in a commercial
application
**2: 50
2*(5**25) : 596046447753906250L
2*(5**2) : 50
25**.5: 5.0
import math
math.sqrt(25) : 5.0
address = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
user,domain = address.split('@')
user : 'tb'
domain: 'kaishaku.org'
You can probably do just about anything you want
-- Tuesday, February 3, 2004, 7:10:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo tb,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:06:19 -0600GMT (3-2-04, 2:06 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
If you can direct the output to disk, you can import the text with
%include.
tko Would that allow me to set one of the messages
-- Tuesday, February 3, 2004, 12:46:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo tb,
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:23:05 -0600GMT (3-2-04, 19:23 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
tko With that possible is there any way to execute the program which
tko generates this included file just before the macro
I had a malformed cut line pointed out to me and began to wonder...
tko --
tko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Malformed cut-line.. g
I type it manually because I dislike automated signatures.
TB removes excess whitespace from the ends of lines, so if I do not go
back and add a space there immediately
-- Tuesday, February 3, 2004, 3:38:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Malformed cut-line.. g
T I type it manually because I dislike automated signatures.
Not relevant, because it's the rules here that you have one. Search
the list archive if you want to know why we don't put the cut mark
in
-- Tuesday, February 3, 2004, 4:28:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
May I ask why you use this list's e-mail address as if it was yours?
Is that a configuration problem on your side or something else?
It is most likely a configuration
-- Tuesday, February 3, 2004, 2:30:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a malformed cut line pointed out to me and began to wonder...
tko --
tko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Malformed cut-line.. g
I type it manually because I dislike automated signatures.
TB removes excess whitespace from the ends
, because I figured TB was
stripping excess whitespace on the ends of lines.
That said, I type dashdashspacereturn[EMAIL PROTECTED],
then I position the cursor after -- and hit ctrl-enter.
This results in a malformed cut-line I am told.
tko If I don't use signatures here, will I be told I need
to me, because I figured TB was
stripping excess whitespace on the ends of lines.
That said, I type dashdashspacereturn[EMAIL PROTECTED],
then I position the cursor after -- and hit ctrl-enter.
This works :
dashdashspacereturn[EMAIL PROTECTED]ctrl-enter
This does
line will result in an apparently
malformed cut-line. This made sense to me, because I figured TB was
stripping excess whitespace on the ends of lines.
That said, I type dashdashspacereturn[EMAIL PROTECTED],
then I position the cursor after -- and hit ctrl-enter.
This works
Is there any existing macro which will allow me to retrieve
the stdout of an executed commandline application?
-*-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-- Monday, February 2, 2004, 12:47:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo tb,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:51:07 -0600GMT (2-2-04, 17:51 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
tko Is there any existing macro which will allow me to retrieve
tko the stdout of an executed commandline application?
If you
-- Thursday, January 29, 2004, 11:27:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello tb,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:37:40 -0600 GMT (29/01/2004, 04:37 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At one point, I seem to recall having changed the From
column in the message list listview so that it did
I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided
to write a spam plugin today. Where's the SDK?
And, why is the SDK download so well hidden?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
At one point, I seem to recall having changed the From
column in the message list listview so that it did not
display anything but [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I do this, or is my memory mistaking another client?
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using
Aside from using BCC, which is stripped by the server, in what other
instances might there be no To: header in a delivered e-mail message?
Can anyone think of anything?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL
-- Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 3:11:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello tb,
Wednesday, January 28, 2004, 2:08:00 PM, you wrote:
tko I'm fed up with all the crap and have decided to write a spam
tko plugin today. Where's the SDK?
Don't any of the existing solutions work for you?
Almost
message?
[snip]
I could send you a message without a To: header and it'll still be
delivered. Nor would I need a CC or a BCC, I couldn't do it with TB,
but that's not the issue here.
Ok, I'd like that actually...
Telnet to port 25, or whatever you like, and send me a message without a
To/CC
and was
then accused of not having licensed TB, when I have in fact over-licensed.
Now my bug reports receive no replies. Everything changed after TB 2.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com
-- Monday, January 12, 2004, 8:29:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to manage a mailing list and downloaded BatPost, RitLabs
email server.
tb I manage some lists with The Bat and ADR, Advanced Direct Remailer.
tb I don't know of anything better for my uses, but that's just me.
As I
-- Saturday, January 10, 2004, 7:19:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello fellow TB_Listers,
I intend to manage a mailing list and downloaded BatPost, RitLabs
email server.
Has anyone here used it?
What are it's strengths and limitations?
Will it handle subscription and do archives? If
, The Bat has mouse/menu interaction as well.
A typical consumer/customer could be confused by the options in TB,
but they simply do not have to worry about the keyboard shortcuts.
The big thing about Poco, to me, a developer, and possibly others, is...
What the is this interface? That's
it was fixed in v2,
but it was not. I work around the problem by making TB much less useful.
Forever means... since 1.x something.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
! or Pocomail?
tko I'd recommend checking out Becky as an alternative to The Bat.
tko For me, that is the product which comes closest to replacing TB.
tko I must say I don't get Pocomail. Then again, I don't get XP.
I'm always willing to try alternative programs even for the ones when I'm
entrenched
': The Bat! or Pocomail?
I'd recommend checking out Becky as an alternative to The Bat.
For me, that is the product which comes closest to replacing TB.
I must say I don't get Pocomail. Then again, I don't get XP.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version
When I send mail, it goes to my outbox, gets delivered, etc.
Can I force it to sit in the outbox before being delivered
for some configurable amount of time, like 2 minutes?
Can I have a mail sent at some date in the future?
What are the possibilities here?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
not suppress the standard X-Mailer, define a
User-Agent header and fill it with whatever you like?
Wouldn't this make TB an attractive tool to spammers? I don't mind the
suppression part, but the ability to make it look like it came from
any other mail client would be troublesome.
Umm, spammers don't
-- Friday, November 21, 2003, 10:45:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TheBat-users,
Is there no support from Ritlabs for paid users?
I sent them an e-mail but have received no reply.
Same here, when 2.0 was officially released all support stopped.
That, coupled with the reality of what 2.0
to perform.
Set the folder to 'no threading' and sort on creation date
Select all messages older then 30 days
Move them with Ctrl-V
3 Give each of your filters it's own shortcut ('Options' tab)
Pick your choice, this all TB can do for you. (And that I can think
of, but then I should be in bed
-- Saturday, November 15, 2003, 10:08:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tko move the messages into a subfolder called old if they are
tko older than 30 days without conflicting with each other.
I was just hoping for something better.
There is the global Deletion action to allow you to move
it, or the server just doesn't return it.
However the emails are still there. That is until you run an EXPUNGE
of the folder. To do that, you select the folder, and go to Folder,
Purge+Compress, and it should be done.
Very illuminating.
As a matter of reference, does TB allow me to use IMAP
-- Friday, November 14, 2003, 3:36:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello MAU,
Not perfect but good enough for me so far.
And I forgot to say something. With this method I can write or assign as
many memos as I may need to a single message (not just one) and the date
and time of each one
-- Friday, November 14, 2003, 9:38:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who does the mail really go To: ?
Nobody. I just put it in the Outbox and from the Outbox, without
actually sending it, I move it to the appropriate folder.
So you Queue in Outbox or Save Draft ?
I think I'll just hope/wish
on next loading, or that is how I've
seen it working.
I think IMAP allows, and perhaps even a TB option implements this
(or maybe it was Becky), the contents of the mail to be sync'ed
without a human actually clicking the mail, ie. when the head is
sync'ed. ie. along with the head. ie. fetch all
-- Wednesday, November 12, 2003, 8:21:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, I also like option #2. Maybe you can write a plugin for this ;-)
I wish that was possible with TB. I would do it immediately.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version
I know you can do this, but my situation is problematic. I have 4 mailing
lists, I want to filter them manually from time to time so that mail older
than 30 days is moved to a subfolder called 'old'.
I tried this and forgot that every filter I created for each subfolder
actually runs on every
-- Thursday, November 13, 2003, 6:55:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
tko Does anyone use this?
Yes, I do. And I like your suggestions.
But, also be aware of the following:
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0001866
Ouch, well I hope to
-- Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 10:45:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 9:31:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't even bother answering, I'm already done trying to use IMAP (again).
I'd rather build a web interface to a local TB installation and until then
I
Does anyone use this? I find something similar very useful in Becky.
Unfortunately I registered and greatly prefer The Bat. In TB the Memo
Autoview doesn't minimize with TB. It's fairly useless like that. I am
forced to close it when I minimize TB. Then re-open it explicitly.
It would be much
How do I delete messages from the IMAP server?
As a matter of reference, does TB allow me to use IMAP in a manner which
is similar to POP saving all mail locally and deleting it from the server.
Conversely, does TB allow me to use IMAP and store every message on the
server, never locally
-- Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 9:25:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I delete messages from the IMAP server?
As a matter of reference, does TB allow me to use IMAP in a manner which
is similar to POP saving all mail locally and deleting it from the server.
Conversely, does TB allow me
-- Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 9:31:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 9:25:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I delete messages from the IMAP server?
As a matter of reference, does TB allow me to use IMAP in a manner which
is similar to POP saving all mail
First, Is TB IMAP known to be buggy? I've done a small amount of
testing and there has been erratic behaviour, TB freezing and confusion.
I want to check my mail at a remote location and achieve the following :
* Messages and my replies to them end up at my primary non-remote machine
* My
Where is the junk folder? Or, what is a junk folder?
Will it be created automatically by a spam plugin like BayesIt?
Can it exist as a Common Folder? Can it have any name I choose?
Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22.08.2003, 05:34:32:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, Nick OHare wrote...
Hi All,
Just today got over 10 megs of the lastest and greatest.
I tried to set up a filter to delete the following
Hello Mike,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, at 10:16:00 [GMT -0400] (which was 15:16 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
MA //HTML//
MA Here's a fairly wide-reaching net. It looks first for HTML in
MA kluges, or in Alternatives for multipart/alternative which is how
MA most unwanted commercial spam is
Hello ,
Just a quick Question,
I have to deal with a Company whose reply templates are like this:
NEW MESSAGE
Original Message Follows.
-
ORIGINAL MESSAGE
Now as you are aware, TB will take the first -- and cut it as the
signature because of the QT I have
Hello Tom,
Wednesday, July 12, 2000, you wrote:
One of the IMAP bugs does have this effect. I reported it a couple of
years ago now.
TB's IMAP often hangs, especially on a slower/busier client.
Apparently marking the messages "read" is done before the transfer is
started (likely it's done by
63 matches
Mail list logo
