Re: 1.41 Hangs System, Too 8-(

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:01:48 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Monday, March 13, 2000, 2:01:48 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hi tracer, On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:47:55 +0700GMT (13/03/2000, 14:47 +0800GMT), tracer wrote: I don't have IE

Re: Cannot send messages with The Bat! v.1.39

) 429-11-99 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.tpg.pl Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational -

left overfiles

Monday, March 13, 2000 Hello Bat-users, I seem inthe attachment directrory get many files like 1.msg, 2.msg, 3.msg etc I wouldnt mind NOT getting them . -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.41 NO MICROSOFT VIRUS INFECTIONS mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] using FireTalk: 321338

Re: left overfiles

wouldnt mind NOT getting them . These files seem to be MIME forwarded messages sent to or by yourself. You may set "Use MIME standard for forwarding" option in Account properties for Reply template to activate MIME forwarding. I hardly ever forward mail Best regards, tracer

Re: FTP

, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational -- -- View the TBUDL

Re: 1.41 Hangs System, Too 8-(

Hello Florian Effenberger, On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 14:18:22 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, March 12, 2000, 8:18:22 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Florian Effenberger wrote: Hello Tracer, Imanaged to get it while sending an email from the editor and pressing another thing in the bat

Re: 1.41 Hangs System, Too 8-(

in the bat. So it doesnt require another external program Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

Re: 1.41 Hangs System, Too 8-(

Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:52:09 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Monday, March 13, 2000, 12:52:09 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hi tracer, On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 07:32:29 +0700GMT (13/03/2000, 08:32 +0800GMT), tracer wrote: I you were the only

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

esponsible for call outs where email doesn't work any longer because one of your customers has blocked their email client from accessing their ISP's server. An absolute @Guard favourite! Happened lots of times. yes(g) but you better localise your smtp server with zone alarm... Best regards, tracer

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

that down for me. I donot think so, but in your case many problems are likely just caused by hard disk space and the best way to keep that under control is not installing new software... Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk

Re: OT: AtGuard (was:Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze)

to build 11 of the latest version in the last week. Anyone wants them, ask me offline. Douglas Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website

Re: DEAD HORSE (was Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze)

but the bat with another action in the bat If correct its a bug in the BAT! So is the original deep freeze still alive or burried with the dead horse?? Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website

Re: OT: AtGuard

3.2.11 or whatever the latest official released version was... Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

...ask me off line!! Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

Re: 1.41 .exe size

is trouble if they try to simultaneously start. As I managed to hang the Bat with another button in the Bat maybe its a bug in the BAT or Delphi. Question of interest here, I seem to remember that they changed versionof Delphi used. Did this bug appear since that time??? -tom! Best regards, tracer

Re: TBUDL used for spamming

spamming the list is illegal and that they agree that if they do that they performed an illegal act etc?? In addition they likely sucked all our emails from the list Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

: run regscan and pick up a clean registry. This means the file loading the virus doesnt get loaded at windows startup... Donot let a virus cleaner immunize or delete files as if it does likely part of windows doesnt work... Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

I am sorry to say. Zone alarm is free and not bad Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now o

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

upgrade ie's in windows. if you get a corrupted system you cannot uninstall the thing and on installing from DOS out of windows you are guaranteed sure to get registry corruptions/confusion Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

Hello Justin D. Paine, On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 03:23:23 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 6:23:23 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Justin D. Paine wrote: Hello tracer, You are advising someone to not upgrade? You would prefer to have all sorts of security problems, bugs

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

Hello Allie Martin, On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:18:08 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 7:18:08 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Allie Martin wrote: On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:40:21 +0700, tracer wrote: you should never upgrade ie's in windows. Hmmm. I've never had

Re: (Now a bit OT) Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

for a certain system the best order is, It depends on how you install your system and likely on a clean install you do things in a specific order which somehow seems to work better. So do I. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

Hello Simon, On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:50:19 + GMT your local time, which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 7:50:19 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Simon wrote: How-do-you-do, Tracer, tracer, tracer! What ARE you talking about? First, not one IE5 upgrade that I have installed has ever knackered

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

Hello Douglas Hinds, On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:14:13 -0600 GMT your local time, which was Friday, March 10, 2000, 10:14:13 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Douglas Hinds wrote: Tracer kindly and unselfishly helped me retrieve a good part of my email out of Calypso. Also, since the fools at Calypso

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

Hello Januk Aggarwal, On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 19:09:26 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 10:09:26 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Januk Aggarwal wrote: Hello tracer, On Tuesday, March 07, 2000 at 07:32:48 GMT +0700 (which was 4:32 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

Hello Douglas Hinds, On Wed, 08 Mar 2000 00:40:41 -0600 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, March 08, 2000, 1:40:41 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Douglas Hinds wrote: Hello tracer all fellow TBUDL members, Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 6:32:48 PM, tracer wrote: t Openning another program

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

in this problem? May very well be, but there again... I am running TB! on Windows 98 SE 4.10 A. What about the rest of you? same Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website

Re: OT: some programs, emailers as well use buildin spy modules....

/VCS/CSI/ICSA/ISSA/HTCIA/HTCN President Net-Defender, Inc. Seabrook, TX 77586 281-532-1488 http://www.net-defender.net EOQ Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website

Re: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

ost warnings without checking if the warnings are correct? (g) Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers

Re: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

Hello Stefan Tanurkov, On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:50:50 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 6:50:50 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: Hello tracer, t But I thought that Steve posted this as coming from a respected t security mailing list t You mean

Re: Patch against X-BAT-FILES?

Hello Stefan Tanurkov, On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 15:18:47 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Tuesday, March 07, 2000, 8:18:47 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: Hello tracer, I would not post such a message without being sure that I know what I am talking about. This only can

Re: The Bat! Deep Freeze

this problem? Openning another program while The Bat is opening will kill my system. Sure... Its easy to do as well or to forget it and then nothing helps except a restart Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/5 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ

Re: SMTP Authentication

, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational -- -- View the TBUDL

Re: OT: some programs, emailers as well use buildin spy modules....

). I work in security myself so I know all about fake warnings. But also the lack of certain warnings and the rigidity of some armchair experts. And no, that doesnt mean you (g) Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk

Re: OT: some programs, emailers as well use buildin spy modules....

sitting there! In case anyone runs 256 colours, he got the most fantastic small and fast and assembler written screen savers or graphical trick programs you can imagine. Also special scsi drivers, the analysing stuff for click of death zips/Jazz drives. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT

Re: OT: some programs, emailers as well use buildin spy modules....

Hello Steve Lamb, On Wed, 1 Mar 2000 18:43:13 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, March 02, 2000, 9:43:13 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 09:21:13AM +0700, tracer wrote: I donot mind that but you should be TOLD. So you have a choice

OT: some programs, emailers as well use buildin spy modules....

Wednesday, March 01, 2000 Hello Bat-users, http://www.angelfire.com/rock/fangthane/index.html if you like your privacy worth reading and following whats happening... -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 NO MICROSOFT VIRUS INFECTIONS mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] using

Re: OT: some programs, emailers as well use buildin spy modules....

Hello Steve Lamb, On Wed, 1 Mar 2000 09:10:55 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, March 02, 2000, 12:10:55 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: Wednesday, March 01, 2000, 8:53:28 AM, tracer wrote: http://www.angelfire.com/rock/fangthane/index.html if you like your

Re: OT: some programs, emailers as well use buildin spy modules....

Hello Tom Plunket, On Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:11:21 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, March 02, 2000, 1:11:21 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Tom Plunket wrote: tracer wrote: t Wednesday, March 01, 2000 t Hello Bat-users, t http://www.angelfire.com/rock/fangthane/index.html t

Re: OT: some programs, emailers as well use buildin spy modules....

instead of the original which just zapped. Afterall I can hardly post his password protected site here on the net... As said renaming files is better as some programs insist on them being present, dialer 2000 being one of them. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98

Re: OT: some programs, emailers as well use buildin spy modules....

an unauthorised hole in my system and that can be misused. Leif Gregory Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now

Re: Drag mail to the desktop perhaps?

in the past. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

Re: Moving The Bat

t this out??? When you moved the message bases, these lines were not changed. The only way of getting the files back into these messages is to have the original file path structure (and drive letter) available to the message in its' new location. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT

Re: Moving The Bat

it. Anyway, I have my email always on e: so never tested what a change would do but it really should be something one could change via the program... Or maybe some addon utility. Hope this helps. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am

Re: The Bat! Windows 2000 professional

Hello Allie Martin, On Sat, 19 Feb 2000 08:23:56 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, February 19, 2000, 8:23:56 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Allie Martin wrote: On Sat, 19 Feb 2000 16:14:04 +0700, tracer wrote: I wonder if the new message windows tendency to open

Re: The Bat! Windows 2000 professional

Hello Allie Martin, On Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:44:13 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, February 19, 2000, 12:44:13 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Allie Martin wrote: On Fri, 18 Feb 2000 23:16:37 +0700, tracer wrote: Is there any problem of compatibility or is The Bat! totally Win2K

Re: Possible Bug / problem Reply 3

it out at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/index.html | under Windows 98 4.10 Build A | on an AMD K6-II 380 Mhz _ Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request

Re: Filtering Spam?

use Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

Re: Filtering Spam?

around to hitting specifics, most have already been killed... In one case I had a problem and the sender changed the header so I could detect it as mail, not spam... -tom! Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338

Re: Filtering Spam?

Hello Steve Lamb, On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:30:35 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 7:30:35 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: Monday, February 14, 2000, 10:33:01 PM, tracer wrote: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is EXACTLY

Re: Transfering to new computer?

on before, no problem, just reinstall over where you copied it, same accounts as before. But in that first case, registry pointing to E and files sitting on F, you get a big mess, missing boxes etc... Thats what happened to me Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows

Re: Filtering Spam?

of anything by sorting, this is the most efficient way. Possibly it's because it entails an indirect way of achieving the effect, and furthermore it entails creating other filters when a single filter could be used instead. However there is no single filter that will catch all spam. As tracer

Re: Filtering Spam?

Hello John De Hoog, On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:36:35 +0900 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 7:36:35 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, John De Hoog wrote: Hello, Batmen and women, tracer wrote... John, but its a total waste of time trying to hit this kind of address one

Re: Filtering Spam?

that sender=receiver, one needs exactly one kill filter Note that a Kill filter actually prevents a message from being downloaded; it cannot, by definition, be applied after the fact. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am

Re: Filtering Spam?

that filter I can almost guarantee that the address in question was nuked and, thus, would never send messages to you ever again. Not always, I have seen one guy using the same one all the time but filtering like this is the wrong way to kill them! Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3

Re: Filtering Spam?

What am I doing wrong? Nick Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/m

Re: Filtering Spam?

and correctly and use the system to save youself work. Hope that helps and I'd be willing to go in more detail if you like. :) try finding a way ti kill all those senders=receivers (g) That grabs all of them changed or not. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail

Re: Why not highlight the newest message in the folder ?

... Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

Re: Why not highlight the newest message in the folder ?

years that I need to ask technical support a question why one screen was behaving so odd that my editor kept moving around as it never had done before... Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request

Re: Why not highlighting the newest message in the folder ?

of an international keyboard based entirely on software? This is exactly the case with Russian. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting

(No Subject)

Monday, February 14, 2000 Hello Bat-users, Is there any easy way to print the log out??? -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 NO MICROSOFT VIRUS INFECTIONS mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] using FireTalk: 321338

Re: Why not highlight the newest message in the folder ?

Hello Allie Martin, On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:25:58 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Monday, February 14, 2000, 9:25:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Allie Martin wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:54:25 +0700, tracer wrote: Well, if you know that the scroll-lock key works then there's

Re: The Bat! - bug report

problem could be even in Windows in that one of their routines used doesnt work as well as the other one does. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website

Re: Why not highlighting the newest message in the folder ?

works properly and if as I do myself mail is stored in received order per folder, the whole problem is les important as where I was and/or want to be very likely is in either the last read msg or the one above and to me that difference/one keystroke is ignorable... Best regards, tracer -- Using

Re: Why not highlighting the newest message in the folder ?

Hello John De Hoog, On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:22:22 +0900 GMT your local time, which was Monday, February 14, 2000, 7:22:22 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, John De Hoog wrote: Hello, tracer, On Monday, February 14, 2000, you wrote: t But if you mail houskeeping works properly and if as I do

Re: NOMAIL command for temporary unsubscribe ???

as : [EMAIL PROTECTED] First, I was wondering about one of these statements and the need for it. Now that I'm seeing two per message I have to mention it now I see one... Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk

Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

Hello Syafril Hermansyah, On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 13:01:03 +0700 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 1:01:03 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: Hello tracer, ok, understood, I did the same after he mailed me telling him that the easy way was probably

Re: Kill filter help requested

Hello Istvn Szendr, On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 18:29:14 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, February 10, 2000, 12:29:14 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Istvn Szendr wrote: Hello tracer, Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 2:36:45 AM, you wrote: t You want to kill filter spam?? t Agreed, I like

Re: Kill filter help requested

Hello Istvn Szendr, On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:32:10 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, February 10, 2000, 1:32:10 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Istvn Szendr wrote: Hello tracer, Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 7:05:33 PM, you wrote: t The problem is that what you want to do, ie

Re: Filtering not working for only one sender - the rest is OK, how come ?

of these by way of version 2. In the meantime, with all the bugs, I do get my moneys worth out of using it. That's why I bought it and would by it again if needed. :) Its the first emailer I bought and I used many Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows 98 mail

Re: Filtering not working for only one sender - the rest is OK, how come ?

--- Hello Nick, NR Great programme, but if the bugs don't get fixed, whats the point NR of paying for it? So you didn't buy windows? grin Do you really want an answer from everyone on the list??? To be honest I didnt but I was given one free Best regards, tracer -- Using

Re: Kill filter help requested

obviously not being myself Thank you. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers

Re: The Bat! - suggestions : Priority Level

to a wrong place, here is Totem Technology Co., Ltd. -- a Maker for PC Mother Boards. Jimmy Tong REPLY, Original message follows Date: Wednesday, 09-Feb-00 08:34 AM From: tracer \ Internet:([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To: Allie Martin

Re: Dialup woes

confirm some behaviour like this, if its 100% the same, no idea. As a result, I'm back to Datula at this location. :-( (But at least that gives me real Japanese support and automatic news group checking to boot.) Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows 98 mail

Re: Filtering not working for only one sender - the rest is OK, how come ?

easy way is to remove the part between quotes and just use the email address. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/m

Re: Outlook -- The Bat

the files. 98 SR may do it, no idea. Please help me, thanks in advance, Sebastian. Webmaster of Goddess - The Asia Argento Shrine mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.goddess.de Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41

Re: Outlook -- The Bat

Hello Mark Aston, On Sun, 6 Feb 2000 13:15:55 + GMT your local time, which was Sunday, February 06, 2000, 8:15:55 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Mark Aston wrote: Hi tracer, Sunday, February 06, 2000, 12:53:36 PM, you wrote: t He was using the backup format I think, no idea which outlook

Re: Bugs bugs, squishing bugs

wnload all mail on the server and during the last few weeks I found myself wondering why I was already ay 100% while it clearly wasnt finished yet. maybe they changed that code??? Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk:

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

a photo? http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/rogues.shtml Enjoy! I wouldn't mind seeing some more faces there. Tracer needs to get a new photo. He's all stretched out there. Dennis' is hopeless. :) I have a better one... But believe me, it's a real eye opener, especially when some realize

Re: Message autoview window (was Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here)

Hello Marck D. Pearlstone, On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 11:54:26 + GMT your local time, which was Friday, February 04, 2000, 6:54:26 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: AM Tracer needs to get a new photo. He's all stretched out there. It looks better. Resize tracer's photo

Re: Anybody else notice?

address (which he changed during the "discussion"), you see this: 1l2i3h4P56d7a8B Remove numbers: 1ihP daB Reverse line: Bad Phil Don't ask me why I noticed that!?!? because the numbers are sequential... Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98 mail t

Re: OT: Mailers that support MIME digests [Was: Re: Digest Set-up]

sending. no idea how it would arive/ I run 98 v2 Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

OT:NT Sendmail: anyway to make it require login?

Friday, February 04, 2000 Hello Bat-users, any idea how under NT server one can force log-in to smtp with password? The Bat supports sending with password, I just need to know what sits on the other side which does it.. -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1

Re: Anybody else notice?

ow" EVERYone, so I prefer to use my longtime nickname. Its a nice one so who minds(g). I was given mine way before there was an internet. Loads of people know me by that nick and even good friends CALL me by it. Its like a second name after all these years Best regards, tracer -- U

Re: Ignore thread feature (was: Anybody else notice?)

you think this would be a good feature to add to The Bat! as well? It's much easier than trying to get everybody to change their behavior. That has never worked and will never work. I support that idea, is it in v2 Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows

Re: If I was creative there would be a good subject here

out is a pain. A better way would be useful Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

Re: (No Subject)

ons ? you are correct! It interferes with emailers/ftp and other programs Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com Our special website hosting/mailservers are now o

Re: Anybody else notice?

,,, I have seen the questions and the answers so just because it isnt about the bat it doesnt mean we donot read or answer you. Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.41 / Beta1 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website

Re: Usenet - Batology

my filter lists. I havent had a 'send me $5' for years For the rest Agent works nice but its a matter of fine tuning the filters and that depends on using it long enough. For me it works reasonably ok... Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: and the appropriate encoding for tbudl international mailing list is

and a 14. Should you not be able to use all the fonts and sizes that are available to Windows? I just tried it all the way up to size 72 and my preview pane was 37 screens wide :-) 9 and 14 is all I get and its a nice font so how to get a 12??? Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39

Re: New user's questions

PGP Keys available == End of original message text = ... how do the other The Bat! friends think ? regards Wieland mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Keys available Best reg

Re: OT: Old folks (was:Re: HTML)

whether AOL can be pop-checked with non-AOL mailers, such us Netscape? you can go to the web in AOL and after that you can get mail from anywhere with any program Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ

Re: OT: Mailers that support MIME digests [Was: Re: Digest Set-up]

regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send

Re: and the appropriate encoding for tbudl international mailing list is

if the japanese and Rusian now in Ascii is unreadable.(g) A real sore point.. Whatever, how do I get size 12 of that font? Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com

Re: Red folders.

... Just what is the purpose of message priority anyway? They all have the same chance of reaching their destination and all get read. No idea, my now expartner sends any mail as high priority and the only thing it does is make me ignore it till I want to see it... Best regards, tracer

Re: New user's questions

Hello John De Hoog, On Wed, 02 Feb 2000 13:06:55 +0900 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, February 02, 2000, 11:06:55 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, John De Hoog wrote: Hello, Batmen and women, tracer wrote... I had recently due to a clean install and hard disk reorganisation a similar

Re: Fwd: More The Bat! features [sic]

full of dead horses(g). Let them add their own... Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ: on request Website: www.phuketcomputers.com -- -- View the TBUDL

Re: and the appropriate encoding for tbudl international mailing list is

Hello Jast, On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:12:19 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, February 03, 2000, 12:12:19 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Jast wrote: Morning tracer, Well, typing it in works for me even in the WPC font, although all sizes aren't shown. But what about reading

Re: Fwd: More The Bat! features [sic]

/sore toes and Canadian/USA jokes are a nuisance on many newsgroups as they in general arent funny, just rude ones... Added Corel isnt a second MS, they are a heck of a lot better Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using FireTalk: 321338 ICQ:

Re: OT: Mailers that support MIME digests [Was: Re: Digest Set-up]

MIME": WOW Thanx for this swallow of fresh air!;-) I've been waiting for this fix literally _for_years_! So this mean you register??? Sure you can send them a suitcase of kopeken(g) Best regards, tracer -- Using theBAT 1.39 with Windows 98 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >