Hello Trash,
A reminder of what Trash typed on:
Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 09:58:23 GMT +0100
T> There is a major bug involved with Virtual folders filters and color groups.
T> If I create a Virtual Folder that selects items based on color group
T> (in fact one of 5 colors), then
There is a major bug involved with Virtual folders filters and color groups.
If I create a Virtual Folder that selects items based on color group
(in fact one of 5 colors), then within a few usages each group in the
filter spontaneously changes to generic Group (drawing in every email)
Makes
02 June 2014
I am using 5.8.10 and it's working great. My only real annoyance is if if
I have view modes set to show unread messages and I am reading one in
the preview pane, and a new mail arrives, the focus is lost and the
message disappears, marked as read. It's not a show stopper but gets
02 November 2013
I have found what I belive is a bug in 5.8.8 Home Edition
Set up message list tabs for All (default, automatically created).
Today, This Week and Unread. Go to a folder using the Unread tab, and
read messages until all are read. Now click on This Week or any tab
OTHER than
Hi
On Thursday 8 November 2012 at 12:28:49 PM, in
, Mark Partous wrote:
> I haven't checked wether you are on TBBeta,
I'm not.
> but if
> you are you could have read that it "crashed" without
> the possibility/means to restore.
> You have to signup again and re-introduce your issue if
>
Hello MFPA,
Thursday, November 8, 2012, 12:57:50 PM, you wrote:
M> Is the tracker closed down, or simply not working?
I haven't checked wether you are on TBBeta, but if you are you could have read
that it "crashed" without the possibility/means to restore.
You have to signup again and re-int
Hi
Anybody know what has happened to the RitLabs issue tracker?
I noticed the last email update to any of the bugs/wishes I was
following was in January 2012.
I tried logging in at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/login_page.php
but my details are no longer recognised.
I also tried going to sever
Hello Thomas,
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011 you wrote:
TF> Hello Akebono,
TF> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:50:03 +0100 GMT (11/Feb/11, 16:50 PM +0700 GMT),
TF> Akebono Translation Service wrote:
ATS>> It seems The Bat converts the combination of "y&m" to µ in IE's web
ATS>> address bar if this combin
Hello Akebono,
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:50:03 +0100 GMT (11/Feb/11, 16:50 PM +0700 GMT),
Akebono Translation Service wrote:
ATS> It seems The Bat converts the combination of "y&m" to µ in IE's web
ATS> address bar if this combination is found within a link in an HTML
ATS> e-mail (if the format is p
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 19:41:20, Jonathan Bayer wrote:
> You aren't seeing the escapes behind the scene. While you may see that
> in your browser, if you look at the source you will see & instead of
> the ampersand.
It really depends - some of Google's URLs use & and others use
just &.
omething like href="http://www.example.com/foo?bar=y&m=baz";> that's
> illegal HTML,
Which suggests a bug in whatever software created the HTML email
message in question, rather than in TB! as the receiving mail app.
--
Best regards
MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail
On 2/11/11 12:42 PM, Jeff Gaines wrote:
Hello Jernej
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 4:55:16 PM, you wrote:
No,& should always be escaped in HTML - URLs are no exception.
But Google search uses for example:
http://www.google.com/search?q=ampersand&hl=en&num=10&lr=lang_en&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&
Hello Jernej
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 4:55:16 PM, you wrote:
> No, & should always be escaped in HTML - URLs are no exception.
But Google search uses for example:
http://www.google.com/search?q=ampersand&hl=en&num=10&lr=lang_en&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs=lr%3Alang_1en
--
Jeff Gaines
__
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 15:58:53, Sam Brown wrote:
> That's accurate except in this case. The reason the & character shouldn't be
> used in HTML is because it's a key element in the parsing of URLs (the &
> character separates parameters in the URL). So in this case, where the &
> character
- Original Message
> From: Jernej Simončič
> If the source says something like href="http://www.example.com/foo?bar=y&m=baz";>
> that's illegal HTML, and the result is not surprising. All &
> characters in HTML must be written as &. If a bare & appears in
> source, different HTML pars
Dear Jernej,
> All &
> characters in HTML must be written as &.
That explains a lot and solved my issue. Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Loek van Kooten
=
Please subscribe to our newsletter for updates about our agency (holidays,
address changes, etc.). It is sent once or twice a year and c
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 10:56:56, Akebono Translation Service wrote:
> P.S. The mail is encoded in utf-8 and the source clearly says y&m, not µ
If the source says something like http://www.example.com/foo?bar=y&m=baz";>
that's illegal HTML, and the result is not surprising. All &
characters
Dear all,
> It seems The Bat converts the combination of "y&m" to µ in IE's web
> address bar if this combination is found within a link in an HTML
> e-mail (if the format is plain text, this does not happen).
P.S. The mail is encoded in utf-8 and the source clearly says y&m, not µ
Best regards,
me=heµaster=1
in IE
Is this a known bug? It seems pretty serious to me!
Best regards,
Loek van Kooten
=
Please subscribe to our newsletter for updates about our agency (holidays,
address changes, etc.). It is sent once or twice a year and contains
important information only -- no s
Hello Thomas,
TF> Hello Jack,
TF> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:56:22 -0600 GMT (21/Dec/09, 20:56 PM +0700 GMT),
TF> Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
TF>>> Of course it is so. They cannot fix bugs retrospectively, it's fixed
TF>>> in the next beta version, which I did download to verify. It will be
TF>>> fixed in
Hello Jack,
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:56:22 -0600 GMT (21/Dec/09, 20:56 PM +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
TF>> Of course it is so. They cannot fix bugs retrospectively, it's fixed
TF>> in the next beta version, which I did download to verify. It will be
TF>> fixed in the next release version.
J
Hello Thomas,
TF> Hello Jack,
TF> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:47:35 -0600 GMT (18/Dec/09, 22:47 PM +0700 GMT),
TF> Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL>> Can someone tell me what this means?
JSL>> The following issue has been RESOLVED.
JSL>> =
Hello Jack,
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:47:35 -0600 GMT (18/Dec/09, 22:47 PM +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL> Can someone tell me what this means?
JSL> The following issue has been RESOLVED.
JSL> ==
JSL> https://www.ritlabs.com
Hi
On Saturday 19 December 2009 at 3:40:12 PM, in
, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> I trust you interpreted my previous
> message as being posted with tongue being firmly
> planted in cheek?
Of course (-;
--
Best regards
MFPA
The truth is rarely pure and never simple
k of when I can
M> upgrade.
Actually, the incomplete rendering of those particular HTML images has
little consequence for me also. I brought it up merely as an
indication of an error which may have been propagated through all
subsequent upgrades and if so, would require attention. It would be
di
Hi
On Friday 18 December 2009 at 6:17:56 PM, in
, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> I may be old and senile
You *may* be but I have no reason to believe one way or the other (-;
> but I'm not senile enough to expect my current version
> to be magically upgraded.
Sorry, I just couldn't resist inter
Hello MFPA,
M> Hi
M> On Friday 18 December 2009 at 3:47:35 PM, in
M> , Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
>> Fellow list members,
>> Can someone tell me what this means?
>> The following issue has been RESOLVED.
>> ==
>> https://www.ritla
Hi
On Friday 18 December 2009 at 3:47:35 PM, in
, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> Fellow list members,
> Can someone tell me what this means?
> The following issue has been RESOLVED.
> ==
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7775
On Friday, December 18, 2009, 10:44:48 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
> Yes. Bug fixes are never implemented in abandoned versions.
installing a bug fix would be an upgrade.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at h
Hallo Jack,
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:47:35 -0600GMT (18-12-2009, 16:47 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
JSL> Since I am *NOT* running the latest and greatest version of TB! does
JSL> this mean that at some point I'll have to upgrade to see the results
JSL> of this fix?
Yes. Bug f
Fellow list members,
Can someone tell me what this means?
The following issue has been RESOLVED.
==
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7775
==
It says tha
; option) the specific setting for Standard toolbar still remains set to
> menu icons. There is no bug.
I applied the change globally. Standard toobar was using normal toolbar icons
and not menu icons. So its not like it reverted to my previous setting to a
specific toolbar. That is why I called
Hello Mean,
> I am using 4.0.34 and in Toolbar customisation, Options tab, selected
> to use Menu icons for all toolbars. This as expected made the icons
> small sized, using the menu icons. Though the setting is fine, the
> problem is that unchecking this selection does not restore the icon
> set
On Saturday, September 13, 2008, 2:25:20 PM, Maggie Meister wrote:
> Can no longer make out
> the toolbar without my glasses.
I have the same problem with the phone book.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
Hello Maggie,
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:25:20 -0400 GMT (14/09/2008, 02:25 +0700 GMT),
Maggie Meister wrote:
MM> No solution, just a confirmation - here, too. Can no longer make out
MM> the toolbar without my glasses.
I cannot confirm that it gets better after a few glasses of beer.
--
Cheers
MD>> Any solutions?
MM> No solution, just a confirmation - here, too. Can no longer make out
MM> the toolbar without my glasses.
No problem here ... but then again, I always wear glasses.
--
Code 2 :canadaflag: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! version 4.0.34 on Windows XP Service Pack 3
C
Hi Mean,
On Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 2:51:46 AM you wrote:
MD> Any solutions?
No solution, just a confirmation - here, too. Can no longer make out
the toolbar without my glasses.
--
Regards,
Maggie
"When ever presidents are going to get us in trouble they always evo
Hello,
I am using 4.0.34 and in Toolbar customisation, Options tab, selected to use
Menu icons for all toolbars. This as expected made the icons small sized, using
the menu icons. Though the setting is fine, the problem is that unchecking this
selection does not restore the icon set to the larg
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:03:06 +0200, Peter Meyns
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's in the registry. In HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat! there
>is a key "Last backup path". It should be safe to change the value and
>restart The Bat!.
Hi,
Hm, when I check that key, it does indeed say my appli
Hi Mr,
on Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:37:06 +1000GMT (23.08.2008, 05:37 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MH> What I need to know - where is The Bat getting this old E drive path
MH> from? It's not from the preferences, that is obvious. It can only be
MH> from the message base that I've had throughout my Bat i
Hi,
With a previous The Bat installation, I had the automatic backup set
to run at 1300 hours and to backup to the E drive. That was quite a
long time ago. Since that time, I have reinstalled Windows and The Bat
a few times, but have always kept the same message base (and I think
this is the cause
Uwe
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, at 23:43:19 [GMT +0100] (09:43:19 27/03/2008
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
> t is a known Firefox issue.
> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Windows_error_opening_Internet_shortcut_or_local_HTML_file_-_Firefox
Thanks.
In my case prolly Google Toolbar.
--
Regards,
John
Hello John,
Wednesday, March 26, 2008, 11:25:33 PM, you wrote:
> This was reported in version 3.xx, and somehow nothing seems to have
> been done.
> Or is it a Firefox issue?
It is a known Firefox issue.
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Windows_error_opening_Internet_shortcut_or_local_HTML_file_-_Fir
Bat 4.0.18 XP Pro SP2 Firefox browser
When clicking to open a URL I always get an error message and tone
as follows:
"http ...(htp goes here)System could not find specified file".
However Firefox lies in the task bar with the URL open.
Of course I have to kill the error message.
This was rep
net and you hit "check amil". Then TB! will
connect (it's DSL over here now) and the bug kicks in.
But you are right, yours is a different problem.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Reality is a crutch for people who can't handle drugs.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage
Hello there,
Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 6:17:53 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF> I believe this refers to
TF> http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3357
I skimmed through this and think I should probably file another
report. I have no dial up and what happens isn't connected to
receiving mail
Hi
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 at 5:06:36 PM, in
, Dwight A Corrin
wrote:
> My buttons behave the same way, so probably not linked to your
> problem.
So do mine.
I do not use powerpro and do not have The Bat! icon in my
systray so cannot comment on the problem you describe.
--
Best regards
On Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 7:31:53 AM, Alexander Cicovic wrote:
> First of all, what I notice in some systems is that when we place
> the mouse over the minimize/maximize/close buttons of TB's main
> window, the buttons get highlighted only for a split second. This is
> not standard window b
Hello Alexander,
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:31:53 +0200 GMT (13/02/2008, 20:31 +0700 GMT),
Alexander Cicovic wrote:
AC> Hello there,
AC> On 29/9/07 I sent an e-mail to this list titled "weird focus issue".
AC> This issue first appeared for me in TB 3.99.24 and made me roll back.
AC> Back then, I g
Hello Alexander,
> If I must report this issue to the bug tracker, please tell me where I
> find it.
I personally think reporting it in BT would be the way to go. Click on
the link for TBUDL info appearing at the end of every message in this
list and on that page you will see the link
his thing
randomly. Do you perhaps use PowerPro or some other launcher? Perhaps
a system tray replacement? Anything else that has to do with the
system tray or window manipulation? Macro programs?
In order to get rid of this, I am willing to help the developers test
if they want to send me test buil
Hello all,
Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote:
> Lately, I have been having issues with TB retrieving e-mail. I can
> retrieve e-mail from Outlook Express but not from TB. This has
> to be some kind of bug in Version 3.99.24. Other versions of TB I
> have not had thi
Hello TBUDL,
Lately, I have been having issues with TB retrieving e-mail. I can
retrieve e-mail from Outlook Express but not from TB. This has
to be some kind of bug in Version 3.99.24. Other versions of TB I
have not had this issue.
--
Best regards,
Tim mailto
Hello all,
Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote:
> I am using antispamservant.tbp not antispsniper are you saying these
> are the same?
sorry, You have right, my mistake, they have similar name...
remove AntispamServant and check if they released new version.
> Also, I noticed you are usi
Hello all,
Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote:
> FYI, This is a message I just received from NOD32 Tech Support. The
> English is not very good but I get the point.
> "This is not a plug-in made it by ESET and is not installed
> automatically with NOD32.
this is right, plugin is created
Hello Marek,
I removed the AntiSpamServant and TB is now retrieving e-mail. Must be
a bug in AntiSpamServant. I will have to inform them of this.
FYI, This is a message I just received from NOD32 Tech Support. The
English is not very good but I get the point.
"This is not a plug-in made
Hi Marek,
on Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:33:11 +0200GMT (17.09.2007, 20:33 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MM> Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote:
>> !9/17/2007, 10:50:42: FETCH - Access violation at address 100053CB in
>> module 'antispamservant.tbp'. Read of address
^^^
Hello Marek,
I am using antispamservant.tbp not antispsniper are you saying these
are the same?
Also, I noticed you are using the NOD32 anti-virus plug-in. I have
NOD32 but where did you get the plug-in? I went to Preferences under
Anti-virus and I see no plug-in.
--
Best regards,
Tim
Hello all,
Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote:
> !9/17/2007, 10:50:42: FETCH - Access violation at address 100053CB in
> module 'antispamservant.tbp'. Read of address
>
remove AntispSniper plugin first, receiving will work I think.
Then check if You have latest version of Antisp
all,
> Monday, September 17, 2007, Tim Hamm wrote:
>> Lately, I have been having issues with TB retrieving e-mail. I can
>> retrieve e-mail from Outlook Express but not from TB. This has
>> to be some kind of bug in Version 3.99.24. Other versions of TB I
>> have not h
ng I need so there is no big need for me to
>> upgrade besides the freeze issue.
MM> I have added note to bugreport.
Do you have an idea in which version the message freezing bug will be fixed?
(I tested up to 3.85.04)
--
Best regards,
Tony
Whenever you set out to do something
Gordon said:
> Using win 98se I fixed the problem by first uninstalling tb (opting
> to retain all settings during the uninstall dialog) and then
> rebooting and finally re installing tb pro 3.85 .03. This works fine
> with clipboard, word, firefox etc. As I lost all the bayesit
> training I've mov
Hello Walt,
Using win 98se I fixed the problem by first uninstalling tb (opting to retain
all settings during the uninstall dialog) and then rebooting and finally re
installing tb pro 3.85 .03. This works fine with clipboard, word, firefox etc.
As I lost all the bayesit training I've moved to a
I know bugs should be reported via the HELP -- feedback interface
but that's currently inoperative due to another bug already in
discussion here. And no, I'm not able to work around it by switching
to IE and back to Firefox: It looks to me like IE thinks it is ALREADY
the default browse
Hello all,
Saturday, March 3, 2007, Tony wrote:
>>> To my best knowledge 3.85.02 is the last version that works correctly for
>>> me.
>>> That version does everything I need so there is no big need for me to
>>> upgrade besides the freeze issue.
MM>> I have added note to bugreport.
> Thanks for
Hello Marek,
Saturday, March 3, 2007, 10:14:48 PM, you wrote:
MM> Hello all,
MM> Saturday, March 3, 2007, Tony wrote:
MM>>> can You be more specific and tell us what setting You have in all fields
in
MM>>> Protection section?
>> Sure.
>> "Display additional alert..." not selected/off
>> "Deny
Hello all,
Saturday, March 3, 2007, Tony wrote:
MM>> can You be more specific and tell us what setting You have in all fields in
MM>> Protection section?
> Sure.
> "Display additional alert..." not selected/off
> "Deny opening these files" Empty
> "Allow opening of..." *.* or default settings
>
Hello Marek,
Saturday, March 3, 2007, 9:21:46 PM, you wrote:
MM> Hello all,
MM> Saturday, March 3, 2007, Tony wrote:
>> Another version and still that irritating bug is there.
>> I can't open any attachment from TB!.
>> I need to first save it so I can run it.
>
Hello all,
Saturday, March 3, 2007, Tony wrote:
> Another version and still that irritating bug is there.
> I can't open any attachment from TB!.
> I need to first save it so I can run it.
> There is nothing wrong with my 'Protection' settings because they work
>
Hello tbudl,
Another version and still that irritating bug is there.
I can't open any attachment from TB!.
I need to first save it so I can run it.
There is nothing wrong with my 'Protection' settings because they work fine on
an older version of tB!.
"Allow files to op
Hello TB User Discussion List,
Searching for all occurrences of (?-i)F(?i)unction, the
Message Finder returns occurrences of function which is not
a match. [Yes, I am selecting "match".]
OTOH, the Find Text dialog works just fine!
--
Best regards,
Bill
TB! Pro 3.96.8 (BETA) AntispamSniper 1.8
Hi
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 at 7:19:32 PM, in
, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
> I get these on exiting:
> ---
> The Bat!
> ---
> Access violation at address 00883959 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address
> .
> ---
Hello Jim,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 you wrote in
JK> I had similar results here (the long shutdown time) and came across an item
JK> in one of the help files that suggested NOT doing "compress on exit"
I never have done. I have maintenance scheduled to run each night at 4am
and I don't empty trash o
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, at 1:32:40 PM, Richard Wakeford wrote:
> No AVs here but, if it's been running for more than a few hours, it
> still takes an absolute age to close down.
I had similar results here (the long shutdown time) and came across an item
in one of the help files that sug
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 you wrote in
PF> I get these on exiting:
No AVs here but, if it's been running for more than a few hours, it
still takes an absolute age to close down.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.85.03 with POP3 account & AntispamSniper 1.6.5
| Windows XP (build 2600) v
TheBat-users,
I get these on exiting:
---
The Bat!
---
Access violation at address 00883959 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address
.
---
OK
---
and
---
The Bat!
-
Hello,
This may interest those Bat users that send non English emails. I
posted a bug report here.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6006
--
Best regards,
Costas
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' informa
Hello all,
Tuesday, May 2, 2006, Marten Gallagher wrote:
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5842
> Bug says 'fixed' but 'verify wait' ???
> Does that mean it's fixed but 'they' are waiting for the original reporter
> to verify that it is *
Hello Marten Gallagher & everyone else,
on 02-Mai-2006 at 19:12 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
> Does that mean it's fixed but 'they' are waiting for the original reporter
> to verify that it is *really* fixed or what?
Yes
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
2 + 2 = 5, for su
In
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5842
Bug says 'fixed' but 'verify wait' ???
Does that mean it's fixed but 'they' are waiting for the original reporter
to verify that it is *really* fixed or what?
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.anne
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, at 12:00:51 [GMT+0200] (which was 20:00:51 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> Either temporarily by right-clicking in the Rich Text Viewer
> window/preview and checking the "Smileys", or permanently in the editor
> prefs, Options / Preferences / Viewer-Editor,
Hello John Phillips & everyone else,
on 30-Apr-2006 at 11:49 you (John Phillips) wrote:
>> TB's program directory should have a subdirectory "images", thats
>> where the smilies go.
> Unfortunately not here. OK to create?
You must have administrative rights to create a new folder in the
%PROGR
Hi Alexander,
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, at 11:34:59 [GMT+0200] (which was 19:34:59 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> TB's program directory should have a subdirectory "images", thats where
> the smilies go.
Unfortunately not here. OK to create?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Ba
Hello John Phillips & everyone else,
on 30-Apr-2006 at 00:58 you (John Phillips) wrote:
>> (which please support)
> How do we do that?
You have to sign in to the Bugtracker at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt
(sign up for a new account). Then log in with your account and add a
note to the entry that
Hello John Phillips & everyone else,
on 30-Apr-2006 at 00:56 you (John Phillips) wrote:
>> You have to install the pcwize smilies.
>> http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php
> Thanks. In which directory should they be installed?
TB's program directory should have a subdirectory "images", t
Hi Mary,
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, at 13:21:19 [GMT-0500] (which was Sun, 4:21:19
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:
> (which please support)
How do we do that?
(Dumbo mood this morning!)
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v3.80.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
C
Hi Alexander,
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, at 15:54:40 [GMT+0200] (which was 23:54:40 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> You have to install the pcwize smilies.
> http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php
Thanks. In which directory should they be installed?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
U
se of truncations and failure to display boxes not
only in the Folder Properties Dialogue Window but also in the Sorting
Office Dialogue window.
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5820
Both bugs have been assigned and may or may not have been fixed. It
doesn't hurt to get further confirmati
Oooh..which thread which thread...
On 4/29/06, Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's a Windows Large Fonts interaction with TB!'s dialogue window code
that is the issue. The BT report (which please support) is at:
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5817
Point of clarification: is the
Hello Robert!
On Saturday, April 29, 2006, 12:33 PM, you wrote:
>> 1024 x 768
> I have switched to 1280 x 1024 and still see #of days OK
> then down to 800 something and OK then back to 1024x768
Not a factor in this bug. That point was already well established
before v. 3.80.03
It is said that John Phillips concocted the following rebuttal :
> 1024 x 768
I have switched to 1280 x 1024 and still see #of days OK
then down to 800 something and OK then back to 1024x768
--
Regards,
Robert D.
:flag-us-ky:
_
The Bat! Version: 3.80.03
Windows ME
FireFo
Hello John,
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:30:04 +1000 GMT (29/04/2006, 20:30 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
JP> 1024 x 768
That's the resolution over here, no problems. I think it is rather the
font size, then.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Was ist das fuer eine Zeitform: "Ich haette kein Kind werden sollen
Hello John!
On Saturday, April 29, 2006, 8:33 AM, you wrote:
> Font size was 120dpi, now 96 dpi, and the problem is solved. Font size or
> screen resolution?
Font size. I opened a BT issue report a few betas back. Then my main
problem of no bottom buttons was fixed.
However, I reopened it when
Hello John Phillips & everyone else,
on 29-Apr-2006 at 15:34 you (John Phillips) wrote:
> So how do I view this? (
You have to install the pcwize smilies.
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/PCWSmileys.php
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
Aim at Heaven and you will get earth th
Hi Ian,
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, at 21:49:38 [GMT+1000] (which was 21:49:38 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> :Australia_Flag:
So how do I view this? (Being a patriotic little digger that I am :-))
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v3.80.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Serv
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, at 20:17:21 [GMT+0700] (which was 23:17:21 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> Ah, another resolution thing. What was your previous resolution, so
> that we can try to verify?
1024 x 768
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v3.80.03 on Windows X
Hi Ian,
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, at 21:49:38 [GMT+1000] (which was 21:49:38 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> This happens with large font. It is something that has to be
> addressed.
Now that you mention itI have also changed the font size in an effort to
correct the problem, which well may
ld for the numbers will be active).
JP> Definite bug.
JP> Changed resolution to 1280 x 1064, now ok.
Ah, another resolution thing. What was your previous resolution, so
that we can try to verify?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
"It's never okay to kiss a boy. They always slobber all over y
gt; folder. Second frame contains four tickboxes, the last two do what you
>> are missing (if ticked, the field for the numbers will be active).
JP> Definite bug.
JP> Changed resolution to 1280 x 1064, now ok.
not confirmed. I changed the resolutions back and forth to your
values,
Hello Robert,
Saturday, April 29, 2006, 2:28:38 PM, you wrote:
> Recently, John Phillips squawked :
>> No place to enter number of messages to keep, or number of days to
>> keep them.
> Not confirmed in my WinME.
> RMB on Folder Name then Properties
> brings up window with usual two Q's a
1 - 100 of 1842 matches
Mail list logo
