Hallo Greg,
Op woensdag 28 december 2011, 1:37:13, schreef Greg Strong:
I have a filter not working when using Folder Re-filter . See
below in quote box.
I altered the target folder and for me the filter functioned properly.
Though at first it didn't because the test message was intercepted
Hello Melissa,
Sorry for my very late reply.
There are two different issues here: the fact that auto-reply is not
sent immediately and the fact that no reply at all is generated.
One more issue to confuse matters...
After several hours (seems quite random), some replies were generated
Hi Miguel,
On Monday, June 21, 2010, at 2:02:55 AM PST, you wrote:
I you are willing to open a bug report, I will add a note with my
findings.
Thank you for your testing and confirmation of the issue. I will open
a bug report today sometime (can't right now, as I'm just about out
the door for
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 16 Jun 2010,
@ @ at 13:41:27 -0700, when Melissa Reese wrote:
Hi,
I've set up an auto-respond filter, but it's not working. Though I set
it to send the reply immediately, in five test attempts, it only
created the reply
Hi Mica,
On Thursday, June 17, 2010, at 12:36:14 AM PST, you wrote:
I have a quite fine idea, but feel it will not be very popular;
namely back to version 2.12. Why changing something that's working
fine.
Now and again, my curiosity demands a bit of attention; hence my
sudden jump from v2 to
Hello Melissa,
I've set up an auto-respond filter, but it's not working. Though I set
it to send the reply immediately, in five test attempts, it only
created the reply message once, and instead of sending it immediately
as specified in the filter, it just put a copy in the Outbox (and
never
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 17 Jun 2010,
@ @ at 02:11:18 -0700, when Melissa Reese wrote:
Now and again, my curiosity demands a bit of attention; hence my
sudden jump from v2 to v4. I do find this new version interesting, so
while an issue like this
Hi MAU,
On Thursday, June 17, 2010, at 2:47:39 AM PST, you wrote:
There are two different issues here: the fact that auto-reply is not
sent immediately and the fact that no reply at all is generated.
One more issue to confuse matters...
After several hours (seems quite random), some replies
Hi,
I've set up an auto-respond filter, but it's not working. Though I set
it to send the reply immediately, in five test attempts, it only
created the reply message once, and instead of sending it immediately
as specified in the filter, it just put a copy in the Outbox (and
never sent).
In the
Hallo Marten,
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:30:45 +0100GMT (11-7-2007, 1:30 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MG Can anyone suggest why it needs to manually triggered, it will never pick
MG up mail as it arrives?
Logic suggests that the message is caught by another filter.
Can't see any reason in
This is the filter:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [AC6EEA40.01C7B408.7F2B6F02.712EB70E]
Name: Survey\20Accumulator
Filter:
{\0D\0A\20`7`Subject`0`Survey\20from\20North\20Devon\20Ferries\20web\20page\0D\0A}
ExportMessage FmtText filename
Hallo Marten,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:10:27 +0100GMT (10-7-2007, 14:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MG Can anyone suggest why it needs to manually triggered, it will never pick
MG up mail as it arrives?
Logic suggests that the message is caught by another filter.
Can't see any reason in this
MG Can anyone suggest why it needs to manually triggered, it will never pick
MG up mail as it arrives?
Logic suggests that the message is caught by another filter.
Can't see any reason in this filter.
Since there are no other filters in that account and none of the common
filters affect that
Since recent version of TB a filter I have had set up seems to not be
working anymore.
I have as part of filter, the content of the message appended to a plain
text file - the contents of which I then process to provide a summary of
online orders.
Now all I am getting is two bytes (looks like a
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 10:19:28 GMT +0100
MG Since recent version of TB a filter I have had set up seems to not be
MG working anymore.
MG I have as part of filter, the content of the message appended to a plain
MG text
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 10:19:28 GMT +0100
MG Since recent version of TB a filter I have had set up seems to not be
MG working anymore.
MG I have as part of filter, the content of the message appended to a plain
MG text
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 13:15:44 GMT +0100
MG Anyone else exporting/appending messages to plain text files?
IMAP or POP3?
MG POP3
I am exporting text files in POP and they seem to be working at the
moment. I am having
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 13:15:44 GMT +0100
MG Anyone else exporting/appending messages to plain text files?
IMAP or POP3?
MG POP3
I am exporting text files in POP and they seem to be working at the
moment. I am
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 14:43:20 GMT +0100
MG No, I don't see that it can be, it's a plain text email - nothing has
MG changed for me except (a suspicion only) that TB version has incremented.
Hmmm.
I made one change to
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 14:43:20 GMT +0100
MG No, I don't see that it can be, it's a plain text email - nothing has
MG changed for me except (a suspicion only) that TB version has incremented.
Hmmm.
I made one change
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 15:34:46 GMT +0100
I made one change to your filter by adding the %Text macro to the
template. Maybe it will help, maybe not.
MG Now I'm confused... From my understanding of it, there isn't a
MG
When you open the Export dialog box and select export format as plain
text there is a template box beside it. If you don't change anything
in there it just takes the default text from the document, but if you
put something in there it uses that as the template for the export. I
added %Text%-
Hello Marten,
A reminder of what Marten Gallagher typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 15:57:41 GMT +0100
MG TB may be full of little quirks - but you are certainly not one of them!
MG Brilliant! Thanks... Works again now.
MG Leaves wondering why it worked before and needed this
RG I have a Revise message filter that has stopped working for some
RG reason! (The Bat! v 2.12)
RG The filter is supposed to be used as follows:
RG Highlight an email mssg that needs to be edited.
RG Press SHIFT-CTRL-ALT-E to invokes the filter that
RG 1) calls a BAT file then
RG 2) imports
Hello Bat-Folk!
I have a Revise message filter that has stopped working for some
reason! (The Bat! v 2.12)
The filter is supposed to be used as follows:
Highlight an email mssg that needs to be edited.
Press SHIFT-CTRL-ALT-E to invokes the filter that
1) calls a BAT file then
2) imports the
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Original message text=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Monday, December 19, 2005, 7:51:09 AM, you wrote:
set a key stroke for the Mark as Spam
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Original message text=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
or customized your tool bar to include the junk/not junk buttons...
--
Scott
Windows 2000
The
Hello Scott,
Tuesday, December 20, 2005, 2:05:15 PM, you wrote:
S =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Original message text=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
S Monday, December 19, 2005, 7:51:09 AM, you wrote:
S set a key stroke for the Mark as Spam
S =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Original message text=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
S or customized your
Hi all.
I´ve the Achim´s Bayes plugin working fine until today, when it doesn't
filtered any mail. I've have two questions now:
1) How can I fix plugin to start working again?
2) How can I re-run the filtering process to send all those spam mails
to the spam folder?
Thanks!
Hello Jorge,
Monday, December 19, 2005, 7:20:18 AM, you wrote:
JAB Hi all.
JAB I´ve the Achim´s Bayes plugin working fine until today, when it doesn't
JAB filtered any mail. I've have two questions now:
JAB 1) How can I fix plugin to start working again?
JAB 2) How can I re-run the filtering
Hi Barry,
Friday, August 19, 2005, 11:22:20 AM, you wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:52:07 -0300, alien wrote:
The BayesIt filter that comes with TB! installation package doesn't
work for me because it doesn't have an email whitelist feature.
I think it does, at least mine has.
You are
Hi TBUDL'ers,
Bayes Filter plugin v2.0.3 has stopped working. It was working fine,
catching pretty much everything (I get like 50 spam msgs/day). After
I edited the Whitelist exclusions list, it stopped and no messages are
sent to the Junk folder now.
I tried uninstall/reinstall (and training)
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:52:07 -0300, alien wrote:
The BayesIt filter that comes with TB! installation package doesn't
work for me because it doesn't have an email whitelist feature.
I think it does, at least mine has.
--
Best regards
Barry
barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk
Using TheBat! version
Hello Batters!
In trying to trash a spate of like minded emails I made a filter that seems
to have no effect but I would think it should.
The text in the body of the email varies slightly from message to message
BUT there are a few words common to all suitable for filtering on.
The offending
Hello rich,
MainSet: 40gov
Should be '30gov'. That is, Location should be Text and not Kludges.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp OFF:
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL
MainSet: 40gov
M Should be '30gov'. That is, Location should be Text and not Kludges.
(I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT (not kludges) FIRST!
(I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT (not kludges) then, once it failed to
work as expected, I think I set the gov string to KLUDGES from TEXT as
Hi Rich,
@7-Jan-2004, 05:27 -0500 (07-Jan 10:27 UK time) rich gregory [RG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
M Should be '30gov'. That is, Location should be Text and not Kludges.
RG (I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT (not kludges) FIRST!
RG (I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT
Hi Rich,
On Wednesday, January 07, 2004 at 9:20 AM, you wrote:
In trying to trash a spate of like minded emails I made a filter that seems
to have no effect but I would think it should.
The text in the body of the email varies slightly from message to message
BUT there are a few words
T ... what appears to be plain text is actually interspersed with bogus html
T tags. So banned is actually bsome html tagannanother html taged.
T The [TB!] filter doesn't ignore these html tags. And since the tags are
T randomly placed and can be made up of anything, it's near to impossible to
T
Hi batters!,
I am referring to a recent thread started by Roman Katzer, because
I have a similar problem.
I have defined several filters that distribute the incoming mail
to different boxes. They work fine. So far so good.
Now I define another similar filter, intended to transfer
Hi Joan,
On Sunday, November 04, 2001 at 10:42:47 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
JJ Now I define another similar filter, intended to transfer messages
JJ from the Outbox to the analogous box in another account, from where
JJ they will be sent. The rule is @ is anywhere. This is the only
JJ filter in
Hallo Joan,
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001 10:42:47 +0100GMT (that's 4-11-01, 10:42 +0100GMT
where I live), you wrote:
JJ Now I define another similar filter, intended to transfer messages
JJ from the Outbox to the analogous box in another account, from
JJ where they will be sent. The rule is @
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 11:58:49 +0100 [ Sun, 4 Nov 2001], Roelof Otten [RO] contributed
this to our collective wisdom:
...
JJ Now I define another similar filter, intended to transfer messages
JJ from the Outbox to the analogous box in another account, from
JJ
I have set up a filter called outblaze to filter out the spam that I get
(outblaze.com is a big spam distributor):
condition:
outblaze is present in kludges - move to folder spam
(regular expressions checked, no other options touched)
now just today I received 3 mails which _weren't_ filtered.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 11:43:37 +0100 [ Sat, 3 Nov 2001], Roman Katzer [RK] contributed
this to our collective wisdom:
...
RK I have set up a filter called outblaze to filter out the spam
RK that I get (outblaze.com is a big spam distributor):
RK condition:
RK outblaze
On Saturday, November 03, 2001, 12:29:56, Allie C Martin wrote:
Since your seem to wish to delete *any* message with 'outblaze'
occurring in the kludges, this filter should be at the top of your
filter list.
Sorry, forgot to mention that: it is!
Roman
--
Hello Roman,
At 5:43 AM on Saturday, November 03, 2001 you wrote the
following on the posted subject 'Filter not working':
Roman [...] condition: outblaze is present in kludges -
Roman move to folder spam (regular expressions checked,
Roman no other options touched) [...]
Why have you
On Saturday, November 03, 2001, 13:47:07, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
Roman [...] condition: outblaze is present in kludges -
Roman move to folder spam (regular expressions checked,
Roman no other options touched) [...]
Why have you activated regular expressions? I would
un-check it leave the
On Monday, November 27, 2000, 9:39:28 PM, net5zero wrote:
I also remember you use the menu command ("Folder | Re-filter")
to re-filter. When you do that, is the TBUDL folder in focus
(selected)?
I believe my cursor is in the message header pane of the TBUDL folder.
Does that count?
It
On Monday, November 27, 2000, 10:50:51 PM, Thomas wrote:
AM As long as it's quite explicit that the option applies to
AM manual filtering then it sounds good.
Tick-box:
[ ] Use currently active folder as source folder,
when manually refiltering
IMO the Sorting Office needs to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Terrance,
On 27 November 2000 at 02:50:32 -0500 (which was 07:50 where I
live) Terrance O'Hearn wrote and made these points:
TF So TB ignores the "Source Folder" instruction in the filter rules.
TF May this be your problem? Try focussing the
On Sunday, November 26, 2000, 10:56:00 PM, net5zero wrote:
Does this little window that pops up when you manually filter
show Number of Messages fitlered: more than zero?
Yes, 4. Moved, 0.
4 is the first number of the small status window, right? It's the
number of messages processed, not
Hi Marck,
Monday, November 27, 2000, 6:14:22 AM, you wrote:
How's this?
You are worried about bandwidth? But you did reply. And you did quote
at length. Jeez ...
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ,
On 27 November 2000 at 08:06:18 -0500 (which was 13:06 where I
live) Terrance O'Hearn wrote and made these points:
TOH How's this?
Much better. Thank you.
TOH You are worried about bandwidth? But you did reply. And you did quote
TOH at
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 15:40:16 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote these
comments:
[..]
TF So TB ignores the "Source Folder" instruction in the filter rules.
When filters are run manually yes.
This is a good thing. It allows you to manually apply the same replied
filter rule on multiple folders.
Hi Allie,
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:47:11 -0500GMT (28/11/2000, 03:47 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
TF So TB ignores the "Source Folder" instruction in the filter rules.
AM When filters are run manually yes.
AM This is a good thing. It allows you to manually apply the same replied
AM
Morning Allie,
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 23:29:19 -0500GMT (28/11/2000, 12:29 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM The source folder setting applies when running the filter automatically.
AM However, when manually filtering, you may use the filter on any folder.
AM A little testing reveals this gem of
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 12:40:51 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote these
words of wisdom:
TF I am not saying that the functionality is bad. What I am saying is
TF that the filter behaves differently, depnding on whether it is used
TF automatically or manually. This is not good.
How else to offer such
On 28-11-2000 at 05:40, Thomas Fernandez kindly wrote:
Allie Martin wrote:
TF it deserves a place in the "interface hall of shame" (I
TF will find the URL and let you knowe tonight).
AM Relax. I have visited the site already.
I find it hilarious. :-)
Please, pretty please, with sugar on
Monday, November 27, 2000, Ming-Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, November 26, 2000, 10:56:00 PM, net5zero wrote:
Does this little window that pops up when you manually filter
show Number of Messages fitlered: more than zero?
Yes, 4. Moved, 0.
4 is the first number of the small
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 06:10:54 +0100, Karin Spaink wrote these
words of wisdom:
TF it deserves a place in the "interface hall of shame" (I
TF will find the URL and let you knowe tonight).
AM Relax. I have visited the site already.
I find it hilarious. :-)
KS Please, pretty please, with sugar
Hi Jane-Marie,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:39:28 -0500GMT (28/11/2000, 13:39 +0800GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nnn So I uncheck Active and checked "Manual only"
As you found out, unchecking Active incapcitates the filter - makes it
"not there". You use this if you want a filter not applied but do
Hi Allie,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:04:21 -0500GMT (28/11/2000, 13:04 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
TF I am not saying that the functionality is bad. What I am saying is
TF that the filter behaves differently, depnding on whether it is used
TF automatically or manually. This is not good.
AM How
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:54:00 +0800, Thomas Fernandez graced us with
these comments:
[..]
AM Oh, dear. That's begging for trouble. Suppose you have 15 filters as I
AM do in the read filter set? A lot of pop-up queries to deal with.
TF OK, so you usually apply filters to folders which are not the
Hi Allie,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 01:38:22 -0500GMT (28/11/2000, 14:38 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
TF OK, so you usually apply filters to folders which are not the
TF declared source folder. How about a tick-box in the filter set-up:
TF "Use active folder as source folder"? Once you've ticked
On 28-11-2000 at 06:42, Allie Martin kindly wrote:
Karin Spaink wrote:
TF it deserves a place in the "interface hall of shame" (I
TF will find the URL and let you knowe tonight).
KS Please, pretty please, with sugar on top, can we have the url?
http://www.iarchitect.com/mshame.htm
Yummie.
Hallo JM (what;'s your name again? Searched my messagebase, but
couldn't find a message where you signed with you name),
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:57:12 -0500 GMT (26/11/2000, 07:57 +0800 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nnn I have a READ filter: Source folder - TheBat. Move to TheBat\Archive.
nnn
Sunday, November 26, 2000, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 18:57:12 -0500 GMT (26/11/2000, 07:57 +0800 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nnn I have a READ filter: Source folder - TheBat. Move to TheBat\Archive.
nnn Strings - TBUDL. Presence - Yes. Rule is
Hallo Jean-Marc,
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 01:56:00 -0500 GMT (27/11/2000, 14:56 +0800 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nnn I have a READ filter: Source folder - TheBat. Move to TheBat\Archive.
nnn Strings - TBUDL. Presence - Yes. Rule is "manual only". Location was
nnn originally set to Sender,
Hi Thomas,
Monday, November 27, 2000, 2:40:16 AM, you wrote:
TF Hallo Jean-Marc,
TF On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 01:56:00 -0500 GMT (27/11/2000, 14:56 +0800 GMT),
TF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nnn I have a READ filter: Source folder - TheBat. Move to TheBat\Archive.
nnn Strings - TBUDL. Presence -
Hi TBUDL,
it seems I have filtering problems gain and can't solve the
problem. I read everything I could find, but nothing seems to
apply.
The strange thing is that the filter used to work, but suddenly
stopped yesterday, even though I haven't changed any settings
or added any new
On Sunday, October 08, 2000, 3:11:11 PM, Susanne wrote:
I have a folder set up for a mailinglist called :personal This
one has a subfolder called : dues. This is the one the filtered
messages are supposed to go to.
My filter settings are:
Dues subject yes
Re: subject no
Hi Ming-Li,
Sunday, October 08, 2000, 4:14:43 PM, you wrote:
This last one looks suspicious. If you want TB to check the
"Reply-To" address in an incoming message, the location to check
should be "Sender" (which also check the "From" field, among
others), not "recipient". When using the
Here is one it missed. Do you see any reason why?
[SA] FIC/DUES: Behind Closed Doors part5/?
It also missed this one:
[SA] Dues very late ones
--
Best regards,
Susannemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Sunday, October 08, 2000, 4:56:10 PM, Susanne wrote:
Here is one it missed. Do you see any reason why?
[SA] FIC/DUES: Behind Closed Doors part5/?
It also missed this one:
[SA] Dues very late ones
Tried both, and both were filtered properly. I noticed you're using
1.46c. You might
Hi Ming-Li,
Sunday, October 08, 2000, 5:17:49 PM, you wrote:
Tried both, and both were filtered properly. I noticed you're using
1.46c. You might want to give the newest official version (1.46d),
or if you're brave, the newest beta 1.47b7, a shot. (I didn't see
any bug fix of this sort
Hello Susanne,
on Monday, October 09, 2000, 02:31, you wrote:
How do I get to the beta version
http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
and is it as easy to install as this version?
Yes.
Would it just install over the old version?
Yes.
--
Best regards,
Jürgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 09 Oct 2000 02:40:28 +0200, Juergen Frisch wrote:
JFon Monday, October 09, 2000, 02:31, you wrote:
How do I get to the beta version
JFhttp://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
and is it as easy to install as this version?
JF
77 matches
Mail list logo
