Hi
On Tuesday 26 February 2019 at 5:19:16 AM, in
, Ian A. White wrote:-
> My question is if the date macro can be used to
> automatically create
> this date tagged backup file? If so (and hoping), any
> tips?
I don't know, but if not you could try using the %date% environment variable in
Luca:
MFPA:
Can you alter the order of the fields exported by your Access Query so
that the string TB! stores in the email address AB field is unique
for each AB record, and the actual email address gets stored in a
different AB field?
Then %ABtoPPP would select the correct AB
Hi
On Thursday 2 October 2014 at 9:59:46 PM, in
mid:4ler2atqqdqqu3m28jal7jtrbq83cbc...@4ax.com, Luca wrote:
MFPA:
%To = %ToName %ABToState
Luca:
Seems not to work ): the variable %TO only adds a
recipient to the To: field, doesn't substitute the
default value that's inevitably formed by
MFPA:
One simple suggestion would be just the one AB entry for each student,
and list the username and password for all courses in the Memo field.
An example AB entry might be:-
Name: John Doe
Email: john@domain.com
Memo: Course: Course0
Username:
Maybe I could build a new query to export a different type of address list,
with memo fields already filled that way, but I guess it would need a lot of
work (-:
I am coming in late on this one but how about address book groups for the
different courses?
Hi
On Monday 29 September 2014 at 8:02:39 AM, in
mid:5510139025.20140929030...@grunwalds.com, Rick wrote:
Maybe I could build a new query to export a different
type of address list, with memo fields already filled
that way, but I guess it would need a lot of work (-:
I am coming in late on
Hi
On Monday 29 September 2014 at 7:48:52 AM, in
mid:9cvh2alt1ait4iq43sf9lbl13052rsp...@4ax.com, Luca wrote:
Maybe I could build a new query to export a different
type of address list, with memo fields already filled
that way, but I guess it would need a lot of work (-:
Can you alter the
MFPA:
Hi
On Monday 29 September 2014 at 8:02:39 AM, in
mid:5510139025.20140929030...@grunwalds.com, Rick wrote:
Maybe I could build a new query to export a different
type of address list, with memo fields already filled
that way, but I guess it would need a lot of work (-:
I am
MFPA:
Can you alter the order of the fields exported by your Access Query so
that the string TB! stores in the email address AB field is unique
for each AB record, and the actual email address gets stored in a
different AB field?
Then %ABtoPPP would select the correct AB entry each time,
,
this way:
Name: John Doe - course 1
Email: john@domain.com
Zip: username1
Country: password1
Name: John Doe - course 2
Email: john@domain.com
Zip: username2
Country: password2
Unfortunately, the to part in the macros %ABtoZip and %ABtoCountry, selects
only
Hi
On Sunday 28 September 2014 at 11:36:09 AM, in
mid:mamf2admh27lk46j97tt54nbffs58em...@4ax.com, Luca wrote:
In short: I guess I need a value for nnn in the
ABnnnPPP macro to pick the whole To: header field
of the message. The to value seems to pick only the
email address, without the
Hello Forums,
I needed to extract a field from the address book when doing a mass
mailing. I could not find anything in the help and fond a tantalising
reference in a forum to address book macros in version 1 (or 2).
In my case I needed Job title field from the address book and using
an index
Hello Tony,
Monday, September 16, 2013, 11:14:39 PM, you wrote:
I needed to extract a field from the address book when doing a mass
mailing. I could not find anything in the help and fond a tantalising
reference in a forum to address book macros in version 1 (or 2).
...
To avoid
Hallo Tony,
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 22:14:39 +0100GMT (16-9-2013, 23:14 , where I
live), you wrote:
TH To avoid the guessing, is there an up to date reference?
All of the address book related macros can be found in the hep file:
Help - Help Topics - Macros - Full alphabetic list of macros
Look
Hello Roelof,
All of the address book related macros can be found in the hep file:
Help - Help Topics - Macros - Full alphabetic list of macros
Look at ABnnnPPP
Thank you. It's right st the beginning. *blush*
Thanks also to Uwe Steinfeld who pointed out the same thing.
RTFM
--
Best
.
What is recommended to try to create more aesthetic templates, or other useful
macros to enliven The Bat!?
Using Windows XP.
Thanks for the guidance.
Regards,
Gary Odom
g...@waterfire.us
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http
Hi
On Wednesday 1 September 2010 at 7:53:05 AM, in
mid:10510101393.20100831235...@waterfire.us, Gary Odom wrote:
What is recommended to try to create more aesthetic
templates,
Not the answer you are looking for, but my recommendation for the most
aesthetically pleasing emails possible:
Hello Robin,
* Does anyone have a working help file for MyMacros v1.11a in English?
You have mail :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.2.10.1
My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com
Current version is
Hi
I was looking at the list of changes in the Christmas release at
https://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/whats_new/detail.php?ID=3052
and I spotted:-
[+] New macros: %SoftwareVersion (same as %TheBatVersion) and
%SoftwareSerialNumber (same as %TheBatSerialNumber)
Why are the additional
Hi
On Friday 11 December 2009 at 9:07:46 PM, in
mid:964479155.20091211210...@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 6:50:01 PM, in
mid:159424778.20090825195...@my_localhost, I wrote:
Now reported at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7699
Since I was not the only
Hi
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 6:50:01 PM, in
mid:159424778.20090825195...@my_localhost, I wrote:
Now reported at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7699
Since I was not the only person to observe this issue, I'm surprised
to find nobody else has added any notes of confirmation to
Hi
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 2:27:42 PM, in
mid:1711693323.20090825082...@jimkyle.com,
Jim Kyle wrote:
So the position of the %SingleRe%- line within the
template IS critical to its operation.
Further investigation reveals an issue that affects a number of other
macros in addition
Hi
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 at 4:25:25 PM, in
mid:1994607676.20090825162...@my_localhost, I wrote:
Further investigation reveals an issue that affects a
number of other macros in addition to %SingleRe.
Now reported at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7699
--
Best regards
MFPA
Hi all
Is there an If..then construct in the macros?
I would like to set up a macro that checks for the account being used in a
new message or a reply and then based on the account include a particular
file. I've tried using the address book but the problem i seems to be that TB
uses the first
Hallo BJH,
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:16:42 GMTGMT (20-2-2007, 15:16 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
B Is there an If..then construct in the macros?
Yes, it's even got an else part.
B I would like to set up a macro that checks for the account being used in a
B new message or a reply
Hello Barry,
Is there an If..then construct in the macros?
Open Help/Macros/Full alphabetical list of macros and look for IF.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.96.9 (BETA)
Current version is 3.95.08
On 20/02/2007 15:12:31, Roelof Otten wrote:
%If:%AccountName=3DBJH:%AttachPath=3D'File1':%AttachPath=3D'File2'%-
Thanks Roelof, just the job!
--
Best regards
Barry
barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk
Using TheBat! version 3.95.06
and AntispamSniper 1.7.0.8
Hi
On Saturday 11 November 2006 at 9:17:28 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
M eg %PUT or %INCLUDE
IIRC Those aren't the same, I thought that %Include interprets the
file as template, %Put as plain text
Thanks. You are, of course correct. The descriptions in the help
file
Hallo MFPA,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:47:25 +GMT (11-11-2006, 1:47 , where I
live), you wrote:
M Where macros are described as having identical functionality, is
M there any reason to choose one over the other?
M eg %PUT or %INCLUDE
IIRC Those aren't the same, I thought that %Include
Hi
Where macros are described as having identical functionality, is
there any reason to choose one over the other?
eg %PUT or %INCLUDE
%QT or %QINCLUDE
Are they really just straight alternatives, or an older version
deprecated in favour of a newer one?
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
On the other issue, it does not seem like a bug that whenever you hit
ctrl-n or the 'create a new message' icon that it always starts with
the cursor at To:
I've brought that up in the past, and it sounded like that was by
design, despite the fact that one might not
Marten Gallagher wrote:
Now comes the bit that always used to work:
For what it's worth, this key bit of information was not present in
earlier messages.
If it is literally the case that it used to work, and then you changed
nothing and now it doesn't work, well, that's not good. Since this
Marten Gallagher wrote:
Marten Gallagher wrote:
Alternatively, you could just set the following in your per-folder
reply templates (but it's more to manage):
%From=Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's what I'm doing - I obviously wasn't clear in my original message.
It doesn't work
the syntax of the %If macro right (mostly due to not having
any else clause), I've never had a problem with it.
%From=Tom Plunket its_like_magic
I do have a couple of per-folder reply macros, but the emails coming
into those folders would get the same generated From: address as the
macro creates, so I
Marten Gallagher wrote:
Now comes the bit that always used to work:
For what it's worth, this key bit of information was not present in
earlier messages.
If it is literally the case that it used to work, and then you changed
nothing and now it doesn't work, well, that's not good. Since
Marten Gallagher wrote:
Marten Gallagher wrote:
Alternatively, you could just set the following in your per-folder
reply templates (but it's more to manage):
%From=Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's what I'm doing - I obviously wasn't clear in my original message.
It doesn't work
Roelof Otten wrote:
But the from identity is always managed by the folder identity, works
fine on all of the TB list for instance.
I have an account-wide reply template that has quite a bit of macro
code to figure out what email address should be stuffed into my From
field.
Yes but does
Hallo Marten,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:38:27 +GMT (18-11-2005, 10:38 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
MG Been there, done that, no diff
Apparently something's gone corrupt in your installation.
Create a full internal backup with TB.
Uninstall TB
Install TB again
Restore your backup.
--
Hallo Marten,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:38:27 +GMT (18-11-2005, 10:38 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
MG Been there, done that, no diff
Apparently something's gone corrupt in your installation.
Create a full internal backup with TB.
Uninstall TB
Install TB again
Restore your backup.
Hallo Marten,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:38:27 +GMT (18-11-2005, 10:38 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
MG Been there, done that, no diff
Apparently something's gone corrupt in your installation.
Create a full internal backup with TB.
Uninstall TB
Install TB again
Restore your backup.
Hallo Marten,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:19:41 +GMT (18-11-2005, 11:19 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
MG Do I need to remove regsitry keys? If yes - where can I find a
MG guide to which ones they are?
When you're running TB from an Windows admin account, TB will strip the
registry during the
On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 4:56:24 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
HOWEVER... at an unspecified time in the not too recent past, this
seems to have changed and the FROM address is always
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and the signature(s) are always that which is
set for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACCOUNT
On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 4:56:24 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
HOWEVER... at an unspecified time in the not too recent past, this
seems to have changed and the FROM address is always
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and the signature(s) are always that which is
set for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACCOUNT
On Friday, November 18, 2005, 6:41:45 AM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
So - just to double-check:
the email was in a COMMON FOLDER which had its own identity?
yes
you created a reply to it?
yes
the created email acquired (before sending) the FROM NAME, FROM
ADDRESS, REPLYTO ADDRESS as set in
On Friday, November 18, 2005, 6:41:45 AM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
yes. A different one than I thought, and the one through which the
message was actually sent. So worked even more like it should have
than I thought.
Hmmm... it is now more mysterious - or perhaps if someine knows what
Hello Tom Plunket everyone else,
on 18-Nov-2005 at 09:22 you (Tom Plunket) wrote:
On the other issue, it does not seem like a bug that whenever you hit
ctrl-n or the 'create a new message' icon that it always starts with the
cursor at To:
I've brought that up in the past, and it sounded
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 18-Nov-2005 at 00:01 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
The ACCOUNT details and SUGNATURE that are used for all emails going out
- whatever templates and identotied are set in COMMON FOLDERS - is the
details and signatures for the ACCOUNT which is
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 18-Nov-2005 at 00:01 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
The ACCOUNT details and SUGNATURE that are used for all emails going out
- whatever templates and identotied are set in COMMON FOLDERS - is the
details and signatures for the ACCOUNT which is
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 18-Nov-2005 at 19:09 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
So I have just spent a whole day chasing this - trying to find what I had
done wrong.
It was not in vain. You found a bug, that happens. TB goes thru heavy
changes underneath the surface currently.
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 18-Nov-2005 at 19:09 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
So I have just spent a whole day chasing this - trying to find what I had
done wrong.
It was not in vain. You found a bug, that happens. TB goes thru heavy
changes underneath the surface
Hallo Marten,
In that case I'm lost. Folder templates work fine over here.
But the from identity is always managed by the folder identity, works
fine on all of the TB list for instance.
Could you please double check?
Does a common folder identity and template work for a NEW message created
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 18-Nov-2005 at 19:41 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
What do you think the chances of this being corrected within a week, say?
Sorry, I really don't know. My crystal ball is defective. :-)
Before going thru the hassle of changing your setup a lot, you
Hallo Marten,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:42:57 +GMT (18-11-2005, 19:42 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
In that case I'm lost. Folder templates work fine over here.
But the from identity is always managed by the folder identity, works
fine on all of the TB list for instance.
MG Could you
Hallo Alexander,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:45:37 +0100GMT (18-11-2005, 19:45 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
ASK Before going thru the hassle of changing your setup a lot, you can revert
ASK to 3.0.1.33 where the functions works (maybe someone else has a more recent
ASK version to check if it
I send mail using the templates I have tried the various macros:
%reply / %replyto / %fromname / %fromaddr etc etc
with the intention of ensuring that the headers actually say:
From Domain Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] or whatever.
They all send and receive through my POP3 account [EMAIL
Hello Admin,
I am webmaster for a number of clients.
For each I use the address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a separate folder for mail in and out for each of those.
snipped quite a bit
Have you tried setting a different Identity in the Properties of each
folder?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello Admin,
I am webmaster for a number of clients.
For each I use the address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a separate folder for mail in and out for each of those.
snipped quite a bit
Have you tried setting a different Identity in the Properties of each
folder?
Yes all those entries
Marten Gallagher wrote:
The templates for each folder (Message / Reply / Forward) are
customised appropriately for each client.
i.e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blah blah
I had the same problem, but somewhat in reverse. I have email coming
into a number of addresses @fancy.org, although I don't even
Hello Admin at AK everyone else,
on 17-Nov-2005 at 15:42 you (Admin at AK) wrote:
However, no matter what combination of macros I use, the outgoing is
still labelled as FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you send one of the templates to the list so we can have a look at
them?
--
Best regards
Marten Gallagher wrote:
Alternatively, you could just set the following in your per-folder
reply templates (but it's more to manage):
%From=Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can also set this line in the New Message template for those
folders, so any time you create a new message when those
Hello Admin at AK everyone else,
on 17-Nov-2005 at 15:42 you (Admin at AK) wrote:
However, no matter what combination of macros I use, the outgoing is
still labelled as FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you send one of the templates to the list so we can have a look at
them
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 17-Nov-2005 at 18:30 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
%FROMNAME=Marten Gallagher
%FROMADDR=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
%REPLYADDR=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think TB will add the information to the headers if you don't clear them
first. Try to first clear the existing
Hallo Marten,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:30:51 +GMT (17-11-2005, 18:30 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
MG %FROMNAME=Marten Gallagher
MG %FROMADDR=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MG %REPLYADDR=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you sure that's how it's supposed to work?
I thought %FromName inserted the From name in the
You don't need to add the Reply-To unless you're inserting your a
Reply-To in your account profile, but when you do so, you need to use
the macro:
%ReplyTo=address
The %ReplyAddr macro inserts something in the body.
OK - so I combined the two theories:
+++
%CURSOR
--
Marten
realised that %CURSOR and the signature is being ignored as well -
the cursor should be in the
body of the message but is in the TO field when I start a new message.
Therefore I
conclude that the template macros are being ignired altogether.
Is there a 'switch' I need to 'switch' or is it just broken
OK I've tried all sorts of simple things and the conclusion is that macros for
folders are
not working here.
This explains why I got confused because I had thought they used to work. I
suspect this
has changed after some upgrade?
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
.
Therefore I
MG conclude that the template macros are being ignired altogether.
What editor are you using? With MicroEd I've got no problems
whatsoever.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Cannot open file E:\Batmail\t-shirt.txt
The Bat! 3.63.2.0 BETA
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server
.
Therefore I
MG conclude that the template macros are being ignired altogether.
What editor are you using? With MicroEd I've got no problems
whatsoever.
MicroEd - as far as I know - it's the in built plain text editor.
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat
Hallo Marten,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:57:45 +GMT (17-11-2005, 20:57 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
MG OK I've tried all sorts of simple things and the conclusion is that macros
for folders are
MG not working here.
MG This explains why I got confused because I had thought they used to work
On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 1:48:36 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
the cursor should be in the body of the message but is in the TO
field when I start a new message.
No, when you start a new message, the cursor should be in the TO:
field, so you can insert an address. You should be able to
Are you sure you're not using AB templates, they have precedence over
folder templates
The only address I have a template set for is tbudl.
Anyway an AB template depends on the TO address doesn't it?
At the stage of testing these templates I'm talking about, there is no TO
address for the
AB
Hello Admin at AK everyone else,
on 17-Nov-2005 at 20:57 you (Admin at AK) wrote:
OK I've tried all sorts of simple things and the conclusion is that
macros for folders are not working here.
This explains why I got confused because I had thought they used to work.
I suspect this has
Hello Dwight,
I created an automatic reply from another account recently as follows:
Mail for my hockey account now comes to me rerouted through my gmail account. I
have sorting rules for subscribe and unsubscribe, and If I get a subscribe
message the sorting office does various things. The
On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 1:48:36 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
the cursor should be in the body of the message but is in the TO
field when I start a new message.
No, when you start a new message, the cursor should be in the TO:
field, so you can insert an address. You should be able
Hello Dwight,
I created an automatic reply from another account recently as follows:
Mail for my hockey account now comes to me rerouted through my gmail account.
I have
sorting rules for subscribe and unsubscribe, and If I get a subscribe message
the
sorting office does various things.
Hallo Marten,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:17:52 +GMT (17-11-2005, 21:17 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
Are you sure you're not using AB templates, they have precedence over
folder templates
MG The only address I have a template set for is tbudl.
okay
MG Anyway an AB template depends on the
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 17-Nov-2005 at 21:36 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
the cursor should be in the body of the message but is in the TO field
when I start a new message.
No, when you start a new message, the cursor should be in the TO: field,
so you can insert an
When I use CTRL+N to start a new message, the folder template is applied,
but the cursor is on the input box for the TO field.
Then I tab down thru the rest of the headers to the body, and only then the
cursor jumps to the position where the %CURSOR macro was placed in the
template.
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 17-Nov-2005 at 21:45 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
folders that are outside an account
You mean common folders?
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
The universe is perfectly harmonious. if we seek to find the source
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 17-Nov-2005 at 21:45 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
folders that are outside an account
You mean common folders?
I have never understood the term 'common folders'.
They are folders I have created using Folder Folder etc
They don't get subfolders
Hello Admin,
OK I've tried all sorts of simple things and the conclusion is that
macros for folders are not working here.
This explains why I got confused because I had thought they used to
work. I suspect this has changed after some upgrade?
I use folder templates quite a bit and they all
Hello Marten Gallagher everyone else,
on 17-Nov-2005 at 22:10 you (Marten Gallagher) wrote:
folders that are outside an account
You mean common folders?
I have never understood the term 'common folders'.
Common means they are not attached to an account. They are shown
outside the account
On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 2:36:09 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
Unless the %CURSOR macro is in the template!
are you saying that presence of the %corsor macro kills the signature?
On the other issue, it does not seem like a bug that whenever you hit
ctrl-n or the 'create a new message'
On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 2:36:09 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
Unless the %CURSOR macro is in the template!
are you saying that presence of the %corsor macro kills the signature?
On the other issue, it does not seem like a bug that whenever you hit
ctrl-n or the 'create a new message'
On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 3:10:42 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
I have never understood the term 'common folders'.
They are folders I have created using Folder Folder etc
They don't get subfolders automatically like account folders do.
They are not virtual folders, they are not the
On Thursday, November 17, 2005, 3:10:42 PM, Marten Gallagher wrote:
If everyone could have the discussion here using terms of art for what
windows they are looking at, what types of messages they are working
with, what kinds of folders they are in, maybe we could all understand
what each
HOWEVER... at an unspecified time in the not too recent past, this seems to
have changed
and the FROM address is always [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the signature(s) are
always that
which is set for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ACCOUNT FOLDER templates.
I have just investigated further:
The ACCOUNT
Hi All,
I noticed that I was getting mail to me but that my name wasn't in
the original TO or was misspelled.
I cam up with this. It makes sure that the sender is consistent, and
that the right alias return address is used.
%FROM='%ABOTOHandle %OTOADDR'
But this led me to these thoughts:
Is
Hello Roelof Otten,
@Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 12:05 you wrote:
Hallo Ralph,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:51:21 +0100GMT (8-11-2004, 11:51 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
R The only problem remaining is, that the %CURSOR macro doesn't
R work anymore. The cursor stays in the To: field in front
Ralph @ 2004-Nov-10 3:24:14 PM
adress book macros mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On new messages with address book (group) templates, the cursor
stays right in front of the adressee. In replies everything works
flawlessly...
Do you mean that it is in the box where you type the e-mail address
Hello Chris,
@Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 23:26 you wrote:
Ralph @ 2004-Nov-10 3:24:14 PM
adress book macros mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On new messages with address book (group) templates, the cursor
stays right in front of the adressee. In replies everything works
flawlessly...
Do you
Hallo Ralph,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 01:46:19 +0100GMT (8-11-2004, 1:46 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
R As far as i understood right now, the sex-field (male, female,
R none) acts as an if-clause, right. and i can use it with
R %ABToGender, got that too.
Yep, that's right.
R but what is the name
Hallo Ralph,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 03:43:36 +0100GMT (8-11-2004, 3:43 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
R Guten Tag %If:%ABToGender=2:Frau :%-
R %If:%ABToGender=1:Herr :%-
R %If:%ABToGender=0::%-%ABToName=%ToName,
That would do fine, two comments though.
With your last check you check whether you
Hello Roelof Otten,
@Montag, 08. November 2004, 10:42 you wrote:
Guten Tag %If:%ABToGender=2:Frau
:%If:%ABToGender=1:Herr :%ABToName=%ToName,
thank you, slowly i get an understanding of what all those expressions
mean and what they do. The above example works great - but the %CURSOR
position
Hello Roelof Otten,
@Montag, 08. November 2004, 10:10 you wrote:
Of course you can use the prefix too. In that case you can use
a wider variety of prefixes: Mr, Miss, Mrs, Prof, Dude, whatever.
As you mentioned before, you'd only like to use it when it's entered
and no extra space, so you'd
Hello Roelof Otten,
@Monday, November 8, 2004, 11:45 you wrote:
Hallo Ralph,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:59:29 +0100GMT (8-11-2004, 10:59 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
%If:%ABToNamePrefix=::%ABToNamePrefix %-
R Thats even more exactly what i needed.
I thought so.
R Do i interpret it
Hallo Ralph,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:51:21 +0100GMT (8-11-2004, 11:51 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
R The only problem remaining is, that the %CURSOR macro doesn't
R work anymore. The cursor stays in the To: field in front of the
R adressee...
Is that on new messages, replies. On messages with
Hello,
i need some help to accomplish the following: i have a certain group
in my adress book, called e.g. A. Most of the entries have first
name and last name but some don't. So the template for this group for
new mails, replies and forwards is %ABTOFIRSTNAME %ABTOLASTNAME. But
like i
Hello,
some time ago i found a nice template for ebay auctions, but i don't
know the link anymore. can someone probably post it again?
--
Regards,
Ralph
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Roelof Otten,
@Sonntag, 07. November 2004, 23:52 you wrote:
Hallo Ralph,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:06:57 +0100GMT (7-11-2004, 12:06 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
R So, is there a way to create an if-macro? I mean, if the
R corresponding fields are filled out correctly
1 - 100 of 512 matches
Mail list logo
