Hello MAU,
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:15:26 +0100 GMT (10/01/2009, 08:15 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M But neither of them is perfect. I'll give you more details
M tomorrow, it's past 2 AM and I'd like to get some sleep now.
Sleep is not approved, the internet is suspended pending your
detailled
Hi
On Monday 12 January 2009 at 11:43:53 AM, in
mid:42289979.20090112124...@rancho-k.com, MAU wrote:
See my note dated 11-may-2006 in this wish list item:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1542
Duly supported, having appreciated a similar feature previously in newsreader
applications
Hello MFPA,
Neat.
From your previous post, I wondered if TB! had an Ignore function I
had not discovered - but you have implemented your own (-:
See my note dated 11-may-2006 in this wish list item:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1542
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
Hi
On Saturday 10 January 2009 at 12:01:51 PM, in
mid:1567108895.20090110130...@rancho-k.com, MAU wrote:
What the 'Ignore' filter does is very simple, it just
looks for certain keywords in the Subject, like for
example IMAP (which I don't use and have nothing to
say about), and if there
Hello MFPA,
I don't actually read everything I get from mailing lists or
newsgroups. I even 'Ignore' complete threads or branches so that any
future messages will not bother me.
How do you achieve that and what does it do?
OK, last night I said:
,- [ ]
| I use two different ways, one
Hello Jens,
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:29:35 +0100 GMT (09/01/2009, 18:29 +0700 GMT),
Jens Franik wrote:
Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you have NOT read?
JF I do this too, because i look over the subjects and if it is a
JF Flame-War i do not read the Messages, i
Samstag, 10. Januar 2009 at 16:27, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Why is that? (Just asking.) Flame-wars are the most entertaining part
of the internet! IMHO, of course, but the popcorn industry depends on
it.
Well :-) Sometimes i read them as well, but the main time i have a lot
of work, which
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 01:48, MFPA wrote:
If not read but just marked as read they are red not bold.
How do you manage to do that? I thought read as opened is the same
as read by CTRL-M.
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue
Hello MFPA,
It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up
the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message
didn't change.
I have never seen such a behaviour. The default behaviour, which has
always (or AFAIR) been like that, is that an 'unread'
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 11:45, MAU wrote:
Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you have NOT read?
I do this too, because i look over the subjects and if it is a
Flame-War i do not read the Messages, i will mark the Folder and
CTRL-M it all read without reading it.
Hello Jens,
Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you have NOT read?
I do this too, because i look over the subjects and if it is a
Flame-War i do not read the Messages, i will mark the Folder and
CTRL-M it all read without reading it.
Of course, we all do that I
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 12:49, MAU wrote:
If not read but just marked as read they are red not bold.
This is a key issue I think. Why and how do you 'mark as read' a
message that you have NOT read?
I may be wrong but I think MFPA is trying to make a distinction between
messages that he
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 10:45:44 AM, in
mid:1117674885.20090109114...@rancho-k.com, MAU wrote:
I have never seen such a behaviour.
Well it has always been the behaviour I have experienced in TB! until
very recently.
The default behaviour, which has always (or AFAIR) been like that,
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:29:35 AM, in
mid:143583429.20090109122...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 11:45, MAU wrote:
Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you
have NOT read?
I do this too, because i look over the subjects
and if it is a
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:49:56 AM, in
mid:1498077832.20090109124...@rancho-k.com, MAU wrote:
I don't actually read everything I get from mailing lists or
newsgroups. I even 'Ignore' complete threads or branches so that any
future messages will not bother me.
How do you achieve that
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:58:33 AM, in
mid:1029693046.20090109125...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
maybe a colorgroup stands for read that later, or something we
will never guess without explanation, so let us drink some coffe
first...
:batcoffee:
Aw! I missed the coffee.
It has
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 8:44:05 AM, in
mid:593253693.20090109094...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 01:48, MFPA wrote:
If not read but just marked as read they are red not
bold.
How do you manage to do that? I thought read as
opened is the same as read by
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 1:39:58 AM, in
mid:1041730292.20090108203...@gmail.com, Rick wrote:
Are we perhaps talking about in a collapsed tree
branch? If so then I never noticed. It would have to
highlight to let you know there was an unread message
in the branch (?)
No we are not,
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 12:48:00 AM, in
mid:1801542263.20090109004...@my_localhost, MFPA wrote:
I think this changed when I upgraded from v4.0.32.4 to
v4.0.38 but it may have been a slightly earlier
upgrade.
It was indeed a slightly earlier upgrade (-;
I have just tested with some
Hello MFPA,
I have never seen such a behaviour.
Well it has always been the behaviour I have experienced in TB! until
very recently.
After reading your mid:988919550.20090109220...@my_localhost I think
you should redefine what you mean by 'always' and 'recently'. ;-)
I think you are
Hello MFPA,
I don't actually read everything I get from mailing lists or
newsgroups. I even 'Ignore' complete threads or branches so that any
future messages will not bother me.
How do you achieve that and what does it do?
I use two different ways, one with and 'Ignore' filter and the other
Hi
A new message at the bottom of a thread previously caused all messages
above it in the thread to show as unread.
I'm not sure when this was changed but it no longer does and I don't
like the new way.
How do I revert to the previous behaviour? I have not managed to find
where to change
Hi
On Thursday 8 January 2009 at 10:52:39 PM, in
mid:1467959260.20090108175...@gmail.com, Rick wrote:
I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread.
It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up
the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:48:00 + GMT (09/01/2009, 07:48 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread.
M It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up
M the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message
M
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:48:00 + GMT (09/01/2009, 07:48 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread.
M It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up
M the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message
M
25 matches
Mail list logo
