-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Friday, March 30, 2001 at 4:22:42 PM you wrote:
> ...and it needs a RegEx in order to recognize your sig-delimiter.
1. I know.
2. For the wish list (we both know, it's already on it): TB! should
recognize the PGP sig delimiter.
>
Hallo Dierk,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 15:03:08 +0200 GMT (30/03/2001, 21:03 +0800 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH> OK, once again: I think it is good to have *every* mail signed (full
DH> stop). And TB! does it for me automatically.
...and it needs a RegEx in order to recognize your sig-delimiter.
DH>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Friday, March 30, 2001 at 11:59:32 AM you wrote:
> Good reason not to PGP-sign messages on a mailing list.
> Very true and important for private mail. Also, for the moderators
> here on this list, so that we know they are they. Pro
Hi David,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:44:05 +0100GMT (30/03/2001, 17:44 +0800GMT),
David Elliott wrote:
>> Why put a PGP signature at the bottom of a mailing to a list,
DE> Because that is where PGP puts it.
He means: why PGP-sign postings to a mailing list.
DE> for the PGP signature. Any lines in
Hello Joan,
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, at 14:26:19 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:26 where I live) you
wrote:
JJ> How can I make TB recognize these keypair?
JJ> Should I uninstall and start everything over?
JJ> Any exit from this labirynth?
JJ> I lifesaver from the experts would be greatly apprecia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear André,
Wednesday, February 28, 2001, 8:33:51 PM, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
> Hello List,
> sorry if this question has been answered before but I couldn't find
> it in the archives and also didn't find any info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 28, 2001, at 10:33:51 AM, André Engelhardt Wrote:
AE> Does anyone happen to know if PGP Freeware 7.0.3. will work with TB!
AE> 1.49 or will I have to stick to 6.5.8 until an update for TB! is
AE> released?
No, as of yet there is no PGP P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi André,
Wednesday, February 28, 2001, 6:33:51 PM, you wrote:
AE> sorry if this question has been answered before but I couldn't find
AE> it in the archives and also didn't find any info about it elsewhere.
AE> Does anyone happen to know if PGP Fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Lija!
On Tuesday, February 20, 2001 at 3:14:20 AM you wrote:
> What is this? Some GNU project?
Yip.
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
The Bat 1.49
Windows 95 4.0 1212 C
Das Gegenteil vo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nick,
On 19 February 2001 at 19:18:06 + (which was 19:18 where I live)
Nick Gordon wrote and made these points:
NG> Those who are waiting for a plug-in might want to note this and
NG> make their dispositions accordingly (i.e. not hold their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander!
On Friday, February 16, 2001 at 5:27:58 AM you wrote:
> Mon ami, I'm using 6.5.8 so what ? It doesn't change my opinion !
Didn't intend to.
> And You don't know of course, about multiply unsuitable things and bugs in
> realizatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:23:05 +0200, Deniz wrote these words of wisdom:
DB> 6.0.2 doesn't seem to work on windows2000... at least I couldn't
DB> make it work and didn't persist on it ;-)
AFAIK, you need version 6.5.3 and later for Win2k.
- --
- Al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Thursday, February 15, 2001 at 5:43:24 PM you wrote:
> I read it has just been published, but didn't read about scrutinized.
> Dunno.
Well, at least not by my favourite group of programmers.
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available
Hallo Wolfgang,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:39:48 +0100 GMT (15/02/2001, 19:39 +0800 GMT),
Wolfgang Kynast wrote:
DH>> And, BTW, as long as the code has not been published and scrutinised
DH>> by different independent people I would not use it for fear of bugs
DH>> and security holes (remember 5.53 a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Wolfgang!
On Thursday, February 15, 2001 at 12:39:48 PM you wrote:
> I'm still using 6.0.2i. Any arguments why I should upgrade?
There have been some security risks and bugs found, details you will
find, I think, on Tom McCunes page http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander!
On Thursday, February 15, 2001 at 11:43:56 AM you wrote:
> I'm sure, that the PGP plug-in is the stupidest part of The Bat !
> And developers know that, but doesn't change anything...
There are plugins that work - up to 6.5.8. And
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Deniz,
On 14 February 2001 at 17:42:55 +0200 (which was 15:42 where I live)
Deniz Baygan wrote and made these points:
DB> I wonder if the last version of TheBat! supports PGP 7.0.3 ?
Not yet. I have downloaded but not yet installed 7.0.3 but w
Hi Deniz,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, at 17:42:55 +0200 you wrote:
> I wonder if the last version of TheBat! supports PGP 7.0.3 ?
No, support for PGP is achieved via a .dll file. You will need an
updated .dll to support PGP 7.0.3 but this is not available yet.
> I'm running 6.5.8 for now, I installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 8, 2001, at 12:33:50 PM, Scott Wright Wrote:
SW> I am new to PGP and new to The Bat!
SW> I have two separate email accounts - when generating my PGP Key Ring I
SW> was asked for my email address, does this mean I need separate Key
SW>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, at 15:33:50 [GMT -0500], Scott Wright wrote:
SW> I am new to PGP and new to The Bat!
SW> I have two separate email accounts - when generating my PGP Key Ring I
SW> was asked for my email address, does this mean I need separate
Hallo Jerry,
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:54:08 -0500 GMT (02/02/2001, 06:54 +0800 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a macro for this mailing list to automaticaly PGP sign the
> message. As I am sending this message from another account, I find
> that I get the same error message -- with the "Ena
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, January 28, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a name in my address book that has a templates with
> %ENCRYPTCOMPLETE %SIGNCOMPLETE macros -- so that the message to this
> person will be automatically signed and encryp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On January 24, 2001, at 9:34:40 AM, Satori Wrote:
S> This was not the Freeware version of PGP. I ordered the upgrade from
S> Mcafee's site (a downloadable zip file). Now I wish I had waited.
You paid for a version of PGP that does *not* offer you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On January 23, 2001, at 10:56:18 PM, Satori Wrote:
S> Oddly enough, there was not an option to install PGPNet. Is there
S> some reason why I would not want to use it?
Many Users have reported problems with PGPNet, and have advised others
to *not* i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, at 19:30:22 [GMT -0800], George F Schoelles wrote:
MY>> I have the batpgp*.dll files in my PGP directory, and that works.
GFS> That's fine for 2 through 6.x because they are in the path. However
GFS> this is not so in 7.x and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gary,
On 24 January 2001 at 19:05:56 -0800 (which was 03:05 where I live)
Gary Blakely wrote and made these points:
GB> I put one message on the bat newsgroup and I am getting emailed
GB> the posting for about everyone who posts to that news
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On January 23, 2001, at 8:45:56 AM, Satori Wrote:
S> None of the options like Tools|PGP|PGP Key Manager work either.
S> What am I missing?
The batpgp65.dll belongs in your main TB Folder only, so you can delete
those other copies you have in other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On January 23, 2001, at 8:45:56 AM, Satori Wrote:
S> None of the options like Tools|PGP|PGP Key Manager work either.
S> What am I missing?
The batpgp65.dll belongs in your main TB Folder only, so you can delete
those other copies you have in other
atori on TBUDL
Subject: Re: PGP 6.5.8 and The Bat! integration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, at 09:45:56 [GMT -0700], Satori wrote:
S> * I have downloaded the PGP dll's for The Bat and have copied
S> batpgp65.dll into the "c:\Program Files\Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, at 09:45:56 [GMT -0700], Satori wrote:
S> * I have downloaded the PGP dll's for The Bat and have copied
S> batpgp65.dll into the "c:\Program Files\The Bat!" directory. (I have
S> also tried the "c:\winnt\system32" directory since
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Satori,
Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 11:45:56 AM, you wrote:
S> None of the options like Tools|PGP|PGP Key Manager work either.
S> What am I missing?
Have you gone into account properties options, and checked enable pgp
also ck sign when compl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On January 23, 2001, at 8:12:51 AM, Brian Clark Wrote:
BC> So... now that we've come full circle again, if we want to keep
BC> this thread going, we can move it over to TBTECH.
Ha ha ha! Yes, we have come full circle with this. :o) The ball now
Hello George,
(GFS == "George F Schoelles") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GFS> That's back to where I said that I thought it was the Plug-in
GFS> causing the problem and I was told it wasn't. Thus was further
GFS> trying to hunt out the culprit.
Yes. That what my original reply to Allie was all
Hello George,
(GFS == "George F Schoelles") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BC>> We just had a long discussion about this on PGP-Basics the other day.
GFS> I just this week went from 6.5.8CKT to 7.0.3 and never had the
GFS> problems you describe. Personally, I think I would un-install PGP
GFS> (sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Brian,
Tuesday, January 23, 2001, 7:03:43 AM, you wrote:
GFS>> What version of PGP are you using?
BC> 6.5.8. Same thing happened with 6.0.2 I believe. You're using 7.x so
BC> you're probably using PGPtray, which doesn't show that information in
BC> the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi solid,
On 19 January 2001 at 05:34:48 +0700 (which was 22:34 where I live)
solid snake wrote and made these points:
>> I would like to invite Solid Snake to discuss this topic (if he is
>> interested and would like to know more about it) to TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On January 19, 2001, at 4:06:35 AM, solid snake Wrote:
ss> What is PGP ?
ss> Why all of you use PGP, that make view so bad..!
ss> And make Email so big,
ss> Why all of you use it ?
We use it in an ongoing effort to increase our On-line security.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas !
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:18:57 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was 19.01.2001, 13:18 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
ss>> Why all of you use it ?
> Those that do, "sign" the message. It's a digital signature, so you
> can be sur
Hi solid,
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:06:35 +0700GMT (19/01/2001, 20:06 +0800GMT),
solid snake wrote:
ss> What is PGP ?
It's "pretty good privacy". Check out www.pgp.com or the international
site at www.pgpi.com
ss> Why all of you use it ?
Those that do, "sign" the message. It's a digital signat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On January 4, 2001, at 1:26:08 PM, Lyle Scully Wrote:
LS> First off, I can sign and encrypt with no problem, although I was
LS> wondering if there is any way to actually put icons in that make it so I
LS> can just click on them instead of having to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Lyle,
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, 14:26:08 h [GMT -0700] (which
was 22:26 h [GMT +0100] where I live) you wrote:
LS> My real questions come when I go to decrypt a message. I
LS> can get it to decrypt, and it creates a new message in
LS> the inbox, wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Lyle,
Wednesday, January 03, 2001, 4:26:08 PM, you wrote:
LS> Finally, is it possible to have multiple accounts with different PGP
LS> keys? I have four accounts and would like two of them to use
LS> separate keys.
That's EASY. Just make multi
Hello Remi,
Monday, January 01, 2001, 3:33:48 AM, you wrote:
RP> That PGP thing looks very unfriendly to me. I would appreciate some help.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
What version of PGP and Windows are you using?
- --
Best regards,
Georgemailto:[EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Remi,
On 01 January 2001 at 13:33:48 +0200 (which was 11:33 where I
live) Remi Pach wrote and made these points:
RP> I am using the internal PGP implementation but I come a cropper
RP> when I try to import a key. I even tried with some messages s
Hello A. Curtis Martin,
(ACM == "A. Curtis Martin") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BC>> Ctrl+Shift+D does nada.. is it something I've done? :-)
ACM> Make sure the message in the message list is in focus when using these
ACM> shortcuts. If the message viewer is in focus they don't work. Another
ACM>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 16:46:27 -0500, Brian Clark wrote these
words of wisdom:
GE>> Ctrl-Shift-D Decrypt and Verify (lookout: the DLL creates a decrypted copy
GE>> of the msg and leaves the encrypted one untouched)
GE>> Ctrl-Shift-C Verify signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Brian Clark !
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 21:34:05 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 25.11.2000, 03:34 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
GE>> If so you go to Tools.PGP.PGPPreferences, there you see several tab
GE>> folders; one should be
Hello Gerd,
(GE == "Gerd Ewald") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GE>>> Sorry, it was a long day.
>> It's getting longer.. Heheh :-)
GE> LOL "Snickers, when it takes longer" Well, it shouldn't take as long as
GE> counting votes manually, haha
OT: Ah, yes. I've never heard /that/ one before. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerd,
On 24 November 2000 at 22:59:06 +0100 (which was 21:59 where I
live) Gerd Ewald wrote and made these points:
>> Is there some place I can get a list of ALL of the shortcuts for TB!?
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/shortcut.eng.txt
GE>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Brian Clark !
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:15:43 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 24.11.2000, 23:15 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
> OK, this must be "Dense Day" for me.. :-)
> There is nothing about Hotkeys in either PGP Preferences or a
Hello Gerd,
(GE == "Gerd Ewald") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GE>>> Ctrl-Shift-C Verify signature
>> Hey hey, this isn't working for me.. :\
>> Ctrl+Shift+D does nada.. is it something I've done? :-)
>> Is there some place I can get a list of ALL of the shortcuts for TB!?
GE> Oh, I forgot to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Brian Clark !
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 16:46:27 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 24.11.2000, 22:46 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
GE>> Ctrl-Shift-C Verify signature
> Hey hey, this isn't working for me.. :\
> Ctrl+Shift+D does nada.. is
Hello Gerd,
(GE == "Gerd Ewald") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Right now, I'm having to go up to Specials and click "PGP Decrypt" in
>> order to decrypt a message -- there isn't even a shortcut (which would
>> suit me just a well).
GE> Ctrl-Shift-D Decrypt and Verify (lookout: the DLL creates a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Brian Clark !
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 14:27:09 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 24.11.2000, 20:27 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
> Has anyone gotten TB!/PGP to automatically decrypt a message when
> opening messages? I have that option c
Hi Marck
Sorry about that. The same thing happened in 1.46d. I only installed
Beta 8 yesterday and haven't got around to subscribing to the list. On
my way
Regards
Kevin
Batting along with 1.48 Beta 8
--
--
View the TBUDL ar
Hi Gerd
Spot on! Works like a dream now. Many thanks.
Regards
Kevin
Batting along with 1.48 Beta 8
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<
Hello Nick,
(NA == "Nick Andriash") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BC>> One problem is that if receive an encrypted message from someone, TB!
BC>> automatically thinks I'm going to want to encrypt my reply (which is a
BC>> reasonable assumption!) -- and of course, when it tries to send it, it
BC>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kevin,
On 22 November 2000 at 17:59:05 GMT (which was 17:59 where I
live) Kevin Tea wrote and made these points:
KT> I cannot PGP because when I try to save or send a message with the
KT> instruction to encrypt the message I get this error messa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 22, 2000, at 11:10:18 AM, Brian Clark Wrote:
BC> I get the exact same thing when I use `Encrypt when completed' But, if
BC> I go down to `PGP -> Encrypt entire text' it works as expected.
BC> One problem is that if receive an encrypted m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Kevin Tea !
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:59:05 GMT GMT your local time,
which was 22.11.2000, 18:59 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
> I cannot PGP because when I try to save or send a message with the
> instruction to encrypt the message I get
Hello Nick,
(NA == "Nick Andriash") [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KT>> I cannot PGP because when I try to save or send a message with the
KT>> instruction to encrypt the message I get this error message:
KT>> Access violation 00509196
KT>> Read of address FFF
KT>> I am using PGP 6.5i and am n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 22, 2000, at 9:59:05 AM, Kevin Tea Wrote:
KT> I cannot PGP because when I try to save or send a message with the
KT> instruction to encrypt the message I get this error message:
KT> Access violation 00509196
KT> Read of address FFF
Hello Nick,
you wrote on Sunday, November 19, 2000 at about 22:27 h
the following about "PGP 7":
NA> Alright, I presume you generated your Key Pair when you were using 6.5.8,
NA> but now you have installed PGP 7.0, is that correct?
Yes
NA> When you installed 7.0, did you first uninstall 6.5.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 19, 2000, at 11:36:21 AM, Kari Jakobi Wrote:
KJ> I do have a Key pair as created by PGP 6.5.8.
Alright, I presume you generated your Key Pair when you were using 6.5.8,
but now you have installed PGP 7.0, is that correct? When you instal
Hello Nick,
you wrote on Sunday, November 19, 2000 at about 20:19 h
the following about "PGP 7":
NA> On November 19, 2000, at 10:55:17 AM, Kari Jakobi Wrote:
NA> Are you using PGP Tray, or are you trying to use the menus in TB! for your
NA> PGP needs? If you have PGP 7.0 installed, you have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 19, 2000, at 10:55:17 AM, Kari Jakobi Wrote:
KJ> As I can see you managed to sign (and even enctypt?) your messages
KJ> with PGP 7... I didn't even manage this to function in TB! How did you
KJ> do it? If I try to sign a message w/ PGP 7
Hello Nick,
you wrote on Sunday, November 19, 2000 at about 19:08 h
the following about "PGP 7":
KJ>> does anybody know when the new PGP Desktop Security 7 will be
KJ>> supported by TB! ? Or do I have to get back to PGP 6.5.8?
NA> I asked Stefan and Max the very same question, and all they tol
Hallo Nick,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:08:03 -0800 GMT (20/11/2000, 02:08 +0800 GMT),
Nick Andriash wrote:
KJ>> does anybody know when the new PGP Desktop Security 7 will be
KJ>> supported by TB! ? Or do I have to get back to PGP 6.5.8?
NA> I asked Stefan and Max the very same question, and all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 19, 2000, at 7:26:47 AM, Kari Jakobi Wrote:
KJ> does anybody know when the new PGP Desktop Security 7 will be
KJ> supported by TB! ? Or do I have to get back to PGP 6.5.8?
I asked Stefan and Max the very same question, and all they told
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 2, 2000, at 3:15:23 AM, Marek Mikus Wrote:
MM> Max working now on S/MIME options and SSL encryption. He told me, then
MM> will be possible to implement PGP/MIME. But I don't know when, because
MM> Max want to implement right OpenPGP stand
Hi there Marek,
Going back 13:12 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts:
> Not yet, wait. We have too many wishes, too many requests and 2
> programmers only. :-))
;)) Allright!
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Die Zukunft wird wegen Mangel
Hi there Marek,
Going back 12:15 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts:
> Max working now on S/MIME options and SSL encryption. He told me, then
> will be possible to implement PGP/MIME. But I don't know when, because
> Max want to implement right OpenPGP standard :-))
I see :) On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Johannes,
On 02 November 2000 at 11:48:02 GMT +0100 (which was 10:48 where I
live) Johannes M. Posel wrote and made these points:
JMP> Do you happen to know if TB 1.47 (Halloween Edition) supports
JMP> PGP/Mime?
Not yet.
- --
Cheers,
.\\arck
_
Hi there Christian,
Going back 11:58 02.11.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts:
> PGP/MIME is not supported by TB at the moment. Thus, do not set this
> option.
*sad* :(
> HTH
Cheers,
Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
A consultant is a person who borr
Johannes M. Posel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you happen to know if TB 1.47 (Halloween Edition) supports
> PGP/Mime? I'm using PGP 6.58, and set in the PGP-Preferences to use
> PGP/Mime. Did I forget something? It doesnt seem to work :/ Thanks
> for any tips!
PGP/MIME is not supported by TB
Juergen Specht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a simple question...how can I automatically include the PGP key
> of my own email address everytime if I send out a PGP encrypted
> mail? [...]
Go to Tools\PGP\Settings\General and mark "Always encrypt to default
key". Your own key must of cours
Hi there Nick,
Going back 18:13 27.10.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts:
> I believe we are talking about two different things here: The fact that
> not all MUA's observe the signature delimiter, so when replying, you would
> have to reply to selected text only (eliminate the PGP sig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick Andriash !
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:13:13 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was 27.10.2000, 18:13 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
> I think what Gerd is referring to, is decrypting an encrypted message and
> not just a PGP signed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On October 27, 2000, at 8:42:46 AM, Johannes M. Posel Wrote:
>> Christian already posted the improved regex. Another way is (although
>> not really a good one) Shift-Ctrl-D which verifies the signed message
>> and produces a "decrypted" version of th
Hi there Gerd,
Going back 16:03 26.10.2000. when you uttered the following thoughts:
> Christian already posted the improved regex. Another way is (although not really
> a good one) Shift-Ctrl-D which verifies the signed message and produces a
> "decrypted" version of the message without any PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This message: 27/10/2000 00:44 GMT.
Hello Wayne,
A reminder of what Wayne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
26 October 2000 at 11:27:05 GMT -0700
WB> I tried this
WB> using a text editor and then found out it needs to be compiled.
You need Hex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gerd!
On Thursday, October 26, 2000 at 4:03:40 PM you wrote:
> Are you sure you have seen a "new" one or did you see a sig in TB! that says
> "Version 6.5.8" like mine ? If so, I changed the DLL with an Hex-editor. So
> there is nothing new h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk Haasis !
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:18:02 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was 25.10.2000, 19:18 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote:
> Haven't called it that. And this doesn't change the problem: Since the
> signature delimiter is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 00:20:24 -0500, Tony A. T. Mendina wrote:
[snip]
TATM> Moral of the story: check all your settings carefully when you
TATM> discover a "bug!"
A very important moral there.
Another is to also carefully check if other applicati
Tony A. T. Mendina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said at 11:57 PM on 10/24/2000:
> This kind of think came up this time last year, and though the
> discussion on how to transliterate Russian names was interesting, I
> couldn't find a solution in the archives. So here I am.
And now I want to post my soluti
Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> This is not a bug. PGP always does this.
> Haven't called it that. And this doesn't change the problem: Since the
> signature delimiter is not recognised the sig can't be stripped
> automatically.
[...]
There's a fine regexp for this:
%QUOTES="%SETPATTREGEXP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Christian!
On Tuesday, October 24, 2000 at 11:22:03 PM you wrote:
> This is not a bug. PGP always does this.
Haven't called it that. And this doesn't change the problem: Since the
signature delimiter is not recognised the sig can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck!
On Wednesday, October 25, 2000 at 12:31:49 PM you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hi Geir,
> On 25 October 2000 at 12:00:59 GMT +0200 (which was 11:00 where I
> live) Geir Bækholt wrote and made these point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 12:00:59 +0200, Geir Bækholt wrote:
[snip]
GB> Is there any way i can read the decrypted message without writing to
GB> disk ?
You need to use PGP Tray.
Go into the PGP preferences and assign a hotkey for decrypting and
verify
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Geir,
On 25 October 2000 at 12:00:59 GMT +0200 (which was 11:00 where I
live) Geir Bækholt wrote and made these points on the subject
of "PGP-decrypts and security. ?":
GB> Is there any way i can read the decrypted message without writing
GB> to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On 24 October 2000 at 21:59:34 GMT +0200 (which was 20:59 where I
live) Dierk Haasis wrote and made these points on the subject
of "PGP requests (was: Meaningful Subjects)":
>> It's more a matter of educating people not to send the origina
Dierk Haasis wrote:
> I just wanted to summarize some of the problems we see with PGP and
> TB!:
> 1. PGP adds "hyphen+space"
This is not a bug. PGP always does this.
> 2. If one uses external PGP To show the right PGP version one has to
> hack the DLL
Yes, it would be better if TB simply (?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thor!
On Thursday, October 19, 2000 at 8:19:39 PM you wrote:
> My problem is that this option is all the time ON, I must at each
> mail
> make OFF this option . what can I do ?
> The problem is appear with the 1.46 version.
Ac
Thor wrote:
[S/MIME]
> My problem is that this option is all the time ON, I must at each
> mail make OFF this option . what can I do ?
Go to Account Properties/Options and turn S/MIME off there.
HTH
--
Christian Gassmann
The Bat! 1.47 Beta/7 under Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack 6, RC 1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Salut Kari,
jeudi 19 octobre 2000, 19:29:30, tu discourais:
KJ> if i use the template option "%signcomplete" i get an error when
KJ> trying to send the message. the error looks like the following
KJ> after confirming my passphrase:
KJ> "there is no
Hi there net5zero,
Am 25.09.2000 so gegen 07:42 meintest Du:
> I have 2 keys -- for different email address. In the past, I recall
> that *sometimes* a dialogbox will pop up and let me select the keys that
> I want to encrypt to. So, how can I get that dialog box to ALWAYS pop
> up before mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Maxim,
On 27 September 2000 at 10:23:04 GMT +0100 (which was 10:23 where I
live) Maxim Kizub wrote and made these points on the subject
of "PGP name lowercasing":
MK> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MK> and when I try to sign a letter, TheBat
MK> rasponses "n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You appear to have the box for PGP AND the box for S/MIME checked. If so, uncheck the
box for S/MIME in Account/Properties/Options.
PGP doesn't use a signing certificate, but S/MIME does, and you get that from a CA
(Certifying Authority) such as T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Aaron,
On 26 September 2000 at 08:02:31 GMT +1000 (which was 23:02 where I
live) Aaron wrote and made these points on the subject
of "PGP and the editor":
A> This morning I accidently discovered that it only does this when I use
A> PGP, how can I
On 27-09-2000 at 00:02, Aaron kindly wrote:
> a few days ago I started wrestling with PGP and was really
> pleased with myself for getting most of it worked out, [...]
> About the same time I started having terrible probs with formatting my
> posts, this has been driving me to tears, and have be
601 - 700 of 858 matches
Mail list logo
