Hello Eddie,
Thanks now it works. My mistake was that when re-filtering I the two
boxes 'read messages' and 'replied messages' under rules had a mark. I
was assuming that I don't need to mark 'incoming mail'.
If as I am assuming you are filtering on mail just arriving from the
internet, I
Hi Christopher,
On Monday, January 21, 2008 at 12:09:16 AM you wrote:
C Thomas Fernandez @ 2008-1-20 7:56:57 PM
C Filter Help mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please post the filters without the at the beginning. The way
you posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
processor, take
Hello Neal,
Tuesday, October 16, 2007, 5:08:56 PM, among other things, you wrote:
If you go into the Sorting Office (Shft+Ctrl+S) and Right Click on the
Selective Download title and then choose New Filter, you will find that at
the bottom of the right hand panel is an item 'Load
Hello Tom,
Monday, March 26, 2007, 1:55:38 PM, among other things, I wrote:
R I will set up some similar filters here and see what happens and report
R back.
I initially set up three filters in the following order:
1. Time of creation 00.00 to 07.59
2. Time of creation 08.00
Hello Tom,
Monday, March 26, 2007, 1:55:38 PM, among other things, you wrote:
Are you quite sure the filters don't overlap? For example, one ending at
08.00 and another starting at 08.00. Just a thought :-)
T While I have indeed the filters overlapping on these, this would only
T
Hello Tom,
Sunday, March 25, 2007, 8:02:19 AM, among other things, you wrote:
T Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:52:05 PM, you wrote:
Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:47:50 PM, you wrote:
for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a
specific account by the time they were
Hello Ian,
Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 6:44:39 AM, among other things, you wrote:
IAW Basically what I want to be able to do is to have a filter that checks
IAW to see if an incoming address is from an address group (any one). If
IAW it is, then I want the filter to automatically move it to a
Hello Roelof,
Thursday, February 8, 2007, 10:27:26 AM, you wrote:
1) Check whether your filters are active (on the options tab), that is
the default, so that shouldn't be the cause.
2) Check whether the message is processed by another filter, filters
are checked top down and a message
Hello,
Friday, February 9, 2007, 1:00:00 PM, you wrote:
As Roelof said - check out the order of the filters in the Sorting
Office again. :-) Make sure that the Known filter (if you have it)
comes *after* the other filters you created.
Try to move one of the filters that should sort
Oy - How odd -- All of a sudden a filter has decided to forget its
hot key trigger and every time I need to use this filter I have to
first open the sorting office and edit the filter to again remember
this key combination as the execute trigger!
CW Odd. Has a newly installed application
Please
I receive so many e-mail, stop your answer.
Best regards
Ariane
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:46:14 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 20:46 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF If I move (instead of copy) to folders in account X, how do I copy
TF back to account A/B/C?
RO With a second
Hello Thomas,
Monday, August 7, 2006, 7:53:29 AM, you wrote:
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF One more thing I want to achieve: Mark the original message as read
TF (but not the copy). I haven't an idea yet how to achieve that.
RO I haven't tested that, but what about first copying it and mark it as
RO
MM The regex is correct, tested, confirmed, works like most
MM skilled...
Oh. :( Now I see that the regex is NOT working.
I did do tests and it worked then BUT real life (non-test) messages
are getting thru.
Below I have copied the filter (with a couple of security edits) as
TB! sees
How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1)
containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
header 2) AND MISSING the correct real name is to be deleted.
MM This regular expression...
MM (?!correct_real_name) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- 8 --- snip, snip --- [edited for brevity]
MM The
DAC On Tuesday, January 24, 2006, 8:51:37 PM, rich gregory wrote:
Well, I'd prefer not to leave spam in the inbox.
DAC I assumed you were going to delete it.
After I sent that mssg I wanted to take it back. I thought my
statement above might come off as rude. Sorry. I have some other
replies
RG I would think that if I need 2 filters I would take *ALL* mail
RG addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and FIRST send it to the spam
RG bucket THEN filter the spam folder for correct_name
RG [EMAIL PROTECTED] and return these to the pending orders
RG folder.
RO This account of yours, is that an
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:12:49 +0100, rich gregory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get hundreds of bogus aliases daily that are all spam. Occasionally
the alias is correct, then it is an order.
Here is the example:
Good: Correct_name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bad : Bogus random name or blank
[EMAIL
NOW I just need to know :
How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1)
containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
header 2) AND MISSING the correct real name is to be deleted.
MM This regular expression...
MM (?!correct_real_name) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MM .should detect the
It's still 2 filters then: 1 to get the junk to the junk and the other
to put the good ones back.
ASK Of course. The spam filter is usually the last filter in the list of
ASK filters, so that it has the lowest priority. First you sort out the good
ASK ones, then the spam filter takes care of
I would think that if I need 2 filters I would take *ALL* mail
addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and FIRST send it to the spam
bucket THEN filter the spam folder for correct_name
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and return these to the pending orders
folder.
DAC you lost me there. filter the mail you want to
I was *hoping* for a magic bullet filter. As _ALL_ the spam
emails DO NOT have 'real_name' in the TO: field. It *sounds* like an
easy filter for someone who hows where/what to click to get the
desired results. (Just that's not me!)
DAC why not filter everything with the RIGHT NAME, then you
Hello Marck,
Monday, January 16, 2006, 7:13:06 AM, you wrote:
RD How do many of you keep track of threads where you have replied and
RD would be looking for another person to reply to you?
I use an About me colour group to colour red all threads I'm
involved in.
Marck, can you elaborate on
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:03:38 +1100 GMT, Chris wrote:
Can someone tell me where to find the filter log (re-filter mail, log
option checked) in v3.64.01?
I guess that the log messages will end up in the log drop-down at
the bottom of the The Bat! main window.
Hm, just looked there, and no,
Hallo Marten,
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:20:36 +0100GMT (27-10-2005, 13:20 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
MG and a command window pops up, then my text editor opens the message. I
alter the subject
MG line and press SAVE.
MG Then what's supposed to happen?
Then you close the text editor and
Hello MAU,
Thursday, May 19, 2005, 6:54:31 PM, you wrote:
I have copied and pasted this filter onto three of my accounts and
attached the same hotkey to all of the three accounts.
And here comes the tricky part, sometimes the hotkey for the filter
on the first account (only this
On Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 9:22:08 PM, you wrote:
Hello Munango-Keewati,
Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 9:10:31 PM, you wrote:
MK Any suggestions on how to make this work?
Do you have this in the Sorting Office under outgoing mail as well as
Incoming Mail. Actually, you don't have to have
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 2:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ But I noticed a symbol beside the K9 filter in the tree view of the
PJ sorting office:
PJ http://www.tangleworld.com/screenshot2.jpg
...
PM I'd describe it as a hand too, indeed. I don't see this here on Win2K,
PM but
Chris and Stuart,
On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 6:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ ...it looks like a little hand to me. Can anyone tell me what it
PJ signifies, and whether it might be the problem with the filter?
CW... signifies that the filter is set for 'manual re-filtering
CW only' which
Hello Luc,
Monday, November 22, 2004, 7:21:49 PM, you wrote:
L But i get a a feeling that in the first scenario a solution isn't
L possible (except maybe with regex but i'm not an expert on it)
This is The Bat! There is always a way :)
Try this:
Header Field To: is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If there
Hi Terry,
On Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 11:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They already go to the folder without a filter but are marked Read.
TGM What is the setting in Account properties options mark messages
TGM as read when being read for? Is this set to 0?
No, it is set to 15
Hello Stuart,
On Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 11:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SC Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 10:41:36 AM, you wrote:
PJ How do I create a filter that sends messages to a common folder
PJ Unread? They already go to the folder without a filter but are marked
PJ Read.
SC How
Hi Chris,
C The account log has some information about what is filtered and where
C it is put. Look at that combo-box at the bottom of your screen for the
C latest message. Or, under the Account menu, select View Log to see the
C full log.
This is ok, but could be better IMO. I was not finding
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Allie posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to filter action not working :
AM snip So it would seem to be that there's a problem with filters being
AM applied when the automatically when the matching criterion is based on
AM colour group. /snip
Ah! Thank you. Finally
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Allie posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
in response to my question re: filter action not working :
I think this also applies to flagging moving so I'm of the
opinion that it's a problem of 2nd level actions all around.
AM To me, the problem is with the matching. If you try
Hello Allie,
Sunday, July 18, 2004, 8:15:38 PM, you wrote:
AM I can't get it to work which makes me wonder that our experiences
AM being the same adds to there being a bug. This shouldn't be a TB!
AM limitation. TB! can be set to apply filters to messages which have
AM been assigned a particular
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Mica posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to filter action not working :
MM If I understand well, you expect that TB deletes messages from
MM server snip If is not, then is word about reader
MM limitation. (: /snip
Thanks for your reply. Still reviewing your extensive
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Roelof posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to filter action not working :
JR I have tried unsuccessfully to get to TB! to take an
JR action I 've
JR tried 3: flag, delete or move on msgs that has been
JR assigned to a
JR color group.
JR Is this not possible to do?
RO It
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Roelof posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to filter action not working :
JR Now have it set to flag msg as action. So far no luck. I'm
JR thinking TB! doesn't respond to 2nd level action. What
JR do you
JR think?
RO Sometimes I had bad luck with filters that moved
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Roelof posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to Filter to delete all msgs assigned to color group not
working :
JR The idea is that certain msgs preceeding the following
JR filter are set to a certain color code. With this filter
JR these
JR msgs are to be deleted.
RO
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Roelof posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to Filter to delete all msgs assigned to color group not
working :
RO snip were you just afraid that you might have overlooked
RO something? /snip
yes
RO When you'rew doubting a 'delete' filter, you can always set it
RO up as
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 5:53:25 PM, you wrote:
RO I don't know the site you saw these filters, but TB allows you to copy
RO and paste filters from the sorting office to a text editor and back.
RO Go to the sorting office
RO Select a filter
RO Press Ctrl-C (don't use the
Hi Jonathan,
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 9:27:20 PM, you wrote:
JA msg-id :) Or more specifically In-Reply-To field. It contains your
JA domain, you could filter on that. For example:
JA [EMAIL PROTECTED]recipient yes
JA In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kludgesyes
JA Regular
Saturday, February 28, 2004, 8:37:10 AM, Greg wrote:
AJ I have one account which receives virtually nothing but spam - it's the
AJ account I use on websites when I have to.
GS You might want to try some Java script for you email for protection.
I actually meant I enter that one at other
MainSet: 40gov
M Should be '30gov'. That is, Location should be Text and not Kludges.
(I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT (not kludges) FIRST!
(I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT (not kludges) then, once it failed to
work as expected, I think I set the gov string to KLUDGES from TEXT as
T ... what appears to be plain text is actually interspersed with bogus html
T tags. So banned is actually bsome html tagannanother html taged.
T The [TB!] filter doesn't ignore these html tags. And since the tags are
T randomly placed and can be made up of anything, it's near to impossible to
T
Marck,
Is there any reason why TB! would not automatically filter a
message (when Manual only is not ticked in the filter rule) but
will do so when asked to Re-filter Messages (Folderright click)?
M Sometimes rules used to get corrupted. I would often have to
M re-create a rule from scratch
Hi Adam
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 5:27:44 PM, you wrote:
V I did look at that but it didn't show any filter activity. Hmmm..looks like the
V filters aren't responsible at all then. I guess I'll figure it out. Thanks.
A Filter processing should appear there, if you scroll to the right. It
A
Hi MAU
Monday, October 13, 2003, 5:14:49 PM, you wrote:
M Account/View log, or Sift+Ctrl+A
I did look at that but it didn't show any filter activity. Hmmm..looks like the
filters aren't responsible at all then. I guess I'll figure it out. Thanks.
Cheers,
--
Vishal
RA (Actually, I am a he, not a she)
Sorry about the gender faux pas! I know only 1 Robin who happens to be female. Sorry
again
I am sure it would work if the batch file did not run the second line
(import) until after the first command was completed (by me saving the
edited email
RO I'm using this batch file and nothing got frozen:
RO c:\windows\command\edit c:\edit.txt
RO c:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe /importu=roelof;F=Inbox;X;R;IN=c:\edit.txt
RO I exported the message (as unix mailbox) to the
RO file c:\edit.txt, the account I was using is called roelof.
RO When I
9/14/2003, 3:14 PM: MAU said in Filter for Outbox move to other outbox for MyGate
M Hello Wilfried,
I use MyGate for News. Works as a glance. But however if I wants to forward a
message to a normal email account the thing cannot sent. Can I setup a rule
that in that case t is moved to
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, at 09:39:05 [GMT +0200] (which was 08:39 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
PP Maybe, only maybe, I'll rewrite the whole stuff one day; chances are I
PP have a little more spare time starting with September. But I guarantee
PP for nothing; neither the program nor the
Hello Jonathan,
I tried to apply an antispam method by applying a filtering with
alternatives on keywords. The problem is that TB sends to the
folder antispam created for that purpose, all the mails, same those
who don't contain the strings, with no exception... In fact, it
seems that all
Hello Jonathan,
Therefore I'm obliged to put at least one string in the rule ?
Not really no, but it depends what you want the filter to do.
yes an antispam filter !
Try putting something in the first page (Rules),
I try
I puted an expression
stings location : presence :
Hello Miguel,
I puted an expression
stings location : presence :
vivivi kludges no
All your messages match this rule because none of them include
vivivi in the headers (kludges)
Ok, I understand :-)
I have a similar filter and I use:
strings location :
Hello Jonathan,
Well this is a start. What I have a feeling is you're adding filter
strings to the alternatives, so that you only have 1 Set in the
alternative rules, instead of multiple sets. This results in the
following effect:
[Filter 1] OR [Filter 2 AND Filter 3 AND Filter 4]
Hello Leif,
Saturday, October 5, 2002, 8:19:49 PM, you wrote:
LG The only issue is trying to keep the messages in the same
LG folder. I still haven't figured out why there isn't a
LG checkbox to disable the Move Message to Folder option. \
ok, I give up, how do you get a global for account
On Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:50:52 PM, Thomas F. wrote:
LG First create a Color Group by clicking Options - Message List and
LG Color Groups. Make sure you check the Strikethrough option.
TF I do not have that option. Under Fonts I have Italics, Bold, and
TF Bold+Italic. No Strikeout. Or
Hello Januk,
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 10:40:45 PM, you wrote:
JA Hello Peter,
JA On Wednesday, July 17, 2002 at 19:34 GMT -0400, Peter Kerekes [PK]
JA pressed random keys until the following was produced:
PK With right click on mouse the window offer all kinds of things,
PK but not paste.
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 2:25:19 AM, you wrote:
PP Hello Ricardo,
PP On Wednesday, July 17, 2002 at 2:31:48 AM you [RMR] wrote (at least in
PP part):
RMR I would like to cut the signatures (everything below the '-- ')
RMR before writing the archive, just like the %QUOTES macro
El miércoles 17 de julio de 2002, 3.25, Peter Palmreuther decía:
PP If you don't already have a regular expression applied to your quotes
PP macro use this as a starting point:
PP %SETPATTREGEXP='(?is)(^-+ eGroups.*~-~.*-*_-$\s+){0,1}%-
PP (^-BEGIN PGP SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?%-
PP
Sunday, July 14, 2002, 2:49:42 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
TF This is absolutely correct. Sorry, I didn't point it out. You need to
TF copy the file account.srx from the account with the filters to the
TF account where you want the filters to be copied to. It is a good idea
TF to back up (rename)
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 8:40:00 PM, you wrote:
JA Hi Lynn,
JA On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:52:49 -0700, you wrote:
In my quest for spam reduction options, I've decided to
filter on the ip's of spam mails which apparently have
forged 'from' addresses. If I make a list of these and use
the 'add'
Hi Lynn,
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:17:43 -0700, you wrote:
I'm not doing them all, but there are a few obvious
troublemakers ..
Most or .kr and those kind of areas? ;)
JA Selective Downloads filter allows you to read a text file if I remember
JA correctly. I've seen some people utilising
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:09:24 PM, you wrote:
JA Hi Thomas,
JA On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:38:56 +0700, you wrote:
..for example copying the account.srx file over. ;-)
JA Wouldn't know what the file was... but I'm sure you're probably right... I would
JA peek, but work is a little far away ;)
Hi Lynn,
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:36:30 -0700, you wrote:
I found it, but it's only 1k ... I have a *lot* of filters
.. would this be it? or .. wait .. in the account folder
there's one that's 44k .. sounds more likely ..?
It is more likely to be the one in the account folder as each account
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 12:18:00 PM, you wrote:
TF Hello Robert,
TF On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:25:02 -0400 GMT (12/07/02, 01:25 +0700 GMT),
TF Robert D. wrote:
Copy everything between beginfilter endfilter
Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V
RD I like this idea ---so
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 6:59:10 AM, you wrote:
G Hi Lynn,
G Copy everything between beginfilter endfilter
G Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V
G You have now copied a filter.
G String1astring2a are AND functions
G String2bstring2b are AND functions
G String1(ab) and
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 7:30:04 AM, you wrote:
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP Hash: SHA1
MDP Hi Lynn,
MDP @11 July 2002, 06:52 -0700 (14:52 UK time) Lynn Turriff [LT] in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
LT If I make a list of these and use the 'add' button to
El domingo 2 de junio de 2002, 15.02, RapidFX decía:
R Hello...
R Yes.
R Sunday, June 2, 2002, 7:26:20 AM, you wrote:
A Could I dictate that filters will only filter Inbox mail? Other
A (IMAP) mailboxes seem parsed.
how is your conversation course going on?
--
Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL
Hallo Roelof,
Op dinsdag 30-04-02 (12:06) schreef je me:
RO I'll give you my filter.
RO There are a few things important for the filter, those are:
RO Source: Your Inbox
RO Target: Your tbudl folder
RO String: Reply-To: tbudl
RO Location: Kludges
RO Presence: Yes
RO Active: Must be checked
Hello Gerard!
On Tuesday 30-04-02 (15:37) you wrote:
G - Put it on top of you incoming mail sort list - Check if it
G is looking in the Kludges - Check presence is YES - Check
G Active Marked - check Manual only Un-Marked
--
In the meantime I had added a second filter (i.e. full
Hello Roelof!
It finally works. I combined your tips with the help of Gerard
and ...filtering is perfect now. I made a filter for outgoing
mail too, 'll see if it works as well.
Read you,
Fré.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello David!
On Saturday 27-04-02 (23:03) you wrote:
DE May be the message is being caught by another filter first ?
--
I typed the wrong item in the 'location' box and will see
what's going to happen with 'kludges' instead ...
Read you,
Fré.
Visit
Hello Roelof,
Op Saturday 27-04-02 (22:54) you wrote:
RO Do these messages trigger another filter first? Unless it's
RO specifically checked, the first matching filter stops
RO comparing messages to the other filters. (See options in
RO the filter properties)
--
I had started (10
This is a forwarded message
From: Fré van Limpt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, April 29, 2002, 7:37:41 PM
Subject: Filter strings
===8==Original message text===
Hello Roelof,
I have just given up 'kludges' as location, I'll see what
Hello David!
On Saturday 27-04-02 (21:25) you wrote:
DE this is a cut of my filter. It works for me.
--
(SOT) My blood must be of bad quality (i ate garlic): bat still
doesn't fly the right direction...
You'll hear from me.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions mailto:[EMAIL
Bonjour,
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:35:22 +0530, Raj wrote:
R Philippe,
R On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, at 13:41:07 [GMT +0200] (which was 5:11 PM where I live) you
R wrote:
PG The fact is that the message corresponding has been downloaded, ...
PG and filtered correctly. Where is the problem ?
R Are
Hello,
Tuesday, February 26, 2002, 1:12:22 AM, you wrote:
JS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JS Hello Peter,
JS On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, at 20:15:51 [GMT -0500] (which was 8:15:51
JS PM in NY, USA) Peter Kerekes wrote:
Peter Kerekes Actually it would be even better, if possible , to use the
Shahar,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, at 07:19:54 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:49 AM where I live) you
wrote:
S I found a working solution, all in one filter and I tested it with
S about 200 messages from 10 different email addresses and it's smooth.
Can you enlighten us on the logic ???
--
Warm
Same problem ...
Sender, reply to and To all have the same format!
For example, I get mail from a mailing list where the sender may be
one of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc
There is no guarantee as to what node it will come from or whether
they'll introduce a
Hello Jan,
Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 8:04:18 PM, you wrote:
Hello Stuart.
At 7:52 PM on Wednesday, February 20, 2002 you wrote
the following about Filter question:
Stuart What I really would like to be able to do is say
Stuart sender: list and xyz.com
Stuart Is there any way to do that
Gerard,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, at 13:28:40 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:58 PM where I live) you
wrote:
GdV It just forwards the email, with no added text.
Have a look into your outbox for the message which has been forwarded. Does
the layout of message look as if it has been created by some
Gerard,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, at 14:03:16 [GMT +0100] (which was 6:33 PM where I live) you
wrote:
GdV Thanks for thinking with me.
,- [GdV ]
| Conclusion: everything was working brilliantly but I was looking in the
|wrong place. Thanks anyhow, I am going to stop working for today
|
Roelof,
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, at 12:40:22 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:10 PM where I live) you
wrote:
RO When I check two Address Book Groups messages are only triggered by
RO Address Book entries that occur in both groups.
Is there a way then to trigger a filter if the message is in either and
David,
Your right, it works. You can copy and paste the filters.
It's just that I never so anyone post a filter.
Thanks for the insight/
Best regards,
Gerard
Finagle's fourth Law - Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it only makes
it worse.
Tuesday, November 13, 2001,
Ah man, the grammar in my first post was atrocious. :/
I did setup the location to be kludges, and even tried the everywhere
option, but, alas, no luck.
I just did a simple test and moved a kludge of 'Subject: Test' to the
trash bin. Worked fine. If i change this to 'Content-Type:
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 1:58:21 AM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
TF Hello Miles,
TF On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:27:27 -0400 GMT (23/09/2001, 10:27 +0800 GMT),
TF Miles Alexander wrote:
MA If an incoming transaction does not match *any*
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 10:42:19 AM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
Thomas,
So, what you are telling me is that the Incoming filters are processed
in a hierarchy and putting my *else* filter at the bottom of that list
(thus the Move Up and Move
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 10:42:19 AM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
Selective downloads:
Yes: this seems to be a very good way to resolve the situation but do
I need to imply (within the window) the following format?:
String: [Person One],
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 12:23:21 PM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
TF No, this won't work. The Selective Download Filter downloads all
TF message headers and then processes only these. The signal string must
TF be matched exactly *in the
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 12:17:37 PM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
TF Hello Miles,
TF On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:07:39 -0400 GMT (23/09/2001, 23:07 +0800 GMT),
TF Miles Alexander wrote:
Drugs may lead to nowhere, but at least it's the scenic
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 2:21:07 PM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
TF Hello Miles,
TF On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:21:13 -0400 GMT (24/09/2001, 02:21 +0800 GMT),
TF Miles Alexander wrote:
MA I will add this to my collection of quotes!
TF Cool. (I
On Monday, July 30, 2001,
CaLViN wrote,
If this is what you are looking for you may want to try the current
beta or wait for the next version...
Yes, It's what I want, but a prefer wait the stable version.
Thanks.
--
Luca Minuti
Using The Bat! v1.53d
--
On Friday, June 08, 2001, 00:03:22, A Curtis Martin wrote:
Are you aware that the filter action to delete the message from the server
isn't immediately executed and is actually carried out during the next
mail check?
I wasn't, but re-checking my mail didn't change anything.
I habe TB check my
Hello Dierk,
On Saturday, May 19, 2001 10:55:27 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Filter problem':
Dierk [...] Main rule (one set): dierkhaasis in Sender Yes AND
Dierk PGP-Baiscs in Subject Yes Alternative rules: Set 1.
Dierk dierkhaasis in Sender Yes AND TBOT in Kludges Yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk,
On Saturday, May 19, 2001 17:46:39 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Filter problem':
Dierk I use Move to Trash for this, it is much safer, since Trash is only
Dierk emptied when I end the session. so if I have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk,
On Saturday, May 19, 2001 19:02:40 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Filter problem':
[...] The common denominator is your sender name
which is why I've filtered on that rather than worrying about
where
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Wednesday, February 21, 2001, Alberto Almagioni wrote to Marek Mikus about
filter by attachment extension...:
As many virus comes with an exe or a pif file I'd like to set a
Is it possible?
not yet.
AA This should be very useful for an office or a smal
Hi Marck,
On Wednesday, January 31, 2001 14:41:33 [ + GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Filter logic':
Marck The only other thing I can think of os that we're talking
Marck about the Alt key on the left of the keyboard and not the
Marck AltGr key. [...]
I'm not sure what you
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
