Hello List and Geoff.
1. What are the mechanics of below procedure? Does incoming mail go via
Norton before reaching me?
2. Isn't it enough to have "Manually configured accounts" ticked in
the E-mail status window?
TIA
--
FAQ on Norton Anti Virus 2001 and TB:
> This tip has
t\F-prot.exe %1 /archive /noboot /nomem /packed /dumb /list
IF ERRORLEVEL 1 GOTO ER1
GOTO END
:ER1
ECHO;
ECHO** WARNING Virus Alert! - Abnormal Termination **
ECHO;
MOVE %1 C:\Windows\Desktop\Virus.txt
ECHO;
GOTO END
:END
--- End ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Tuesday, February 12, 2002
9:43:30 AM
RE: "[OT] free decent virus checker that works with TB?"
Greetings Jernej,
On Monday, February 11, 2002, 8:57:03 AM, you wrote:
Jernej> Hello Dierk,
Jernej> 11. februar 2002, 14:29:22, you wr
Dave,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, at 22:37:03 [GMT +] (which was 4:07 AM where I live) you
wrote:
DC> I had real problems with one of our Win2000 machines grinding almost
DC> to a halt using AVG. Even after uninstalling the thing the improvement
DC> was only slight. Only cure was to reformat and re
Dave,
> I had real problems with one of our Win2000 machines grinding almost
> to a halt using AVG.
Interesting. I've only run it on Win98, and there it has performed
very well. When it is running checks, I can run other tasks with
little or no detectable load on the system. I am planning to ins
Hello Dierk,
11. februar 2002, 13:41:28, you wrote:
DH> No, it doesn't. And it shouldn't, or it would be a bug MS-DOS for
DH> Win98 - which wouldn't surprise me in the least..
Sure it does, copy this to notepad, save as .BAT, and double-click on
the file:
=8<---
Hello Alastair,
Monday, February 11, 2002, 5:43:56 PM, you wrote:
>> Here is my bat file:
>> C:\Progra~1\Norton~1\NAVW32.exe C:\emailatt\*.*
>> Echo y | del C:\emailatt\*.*
>> exit
Hi,
I'm a novice Bat user
May I know what is the folder "C:\emailatt\*.* meant for??
TIA
--
Best regards,
Jas
Hello Jernej!
On Monday, February 11, 2002 at 1:01:07 PM you wrote:
> Try it (not only that it works in BAT files, if any console/DOS
> program clears the screen before terminating, the window will close
> automatically)
No, it doesn't. And it shouldn't, or it would be a bug MS-DOS for
Wi
Hello Mary,
11. februar 2002, 12:37:19, you wrote:
MC> Surely that just clears the DOS screen without exiting the DOS window?
Try it (not only that it works in BAT files, if any console/DOS
program clears the screen before terminating, the window will close
automatically)
--
Jernej Simo
Jernej Simončič wrote:
> SJ> You have to exit the dos window manually. Does anyone
> SJ> know how to do that in the bat file?
> The simplest way is to put CLS at the very end of file.
Surely that just clears the DOS screen without exiting the DOS window?
--
Mary
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Shoebuddy,
11. februar 2002, 9:27:48, you wrote:
SJ> You have to exit the dos window manually. Does anyone
SJ> know how to do that in the bat file?
The simplest way is to put CLS at the very end of file.
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 262664
Monday, February 11, 2002 at 3:25 AM
Yes you can use the information here to scan with
Norton:http://www.guenther-eisele.de/bat/fprot_e.htm
Here is my bat file:
C:\Progra~1\Norton~1\NAVW32.exe C:\emailatt\*.*
Echo y | del C:\emailatt\*.*
exit
You have to exit the dos window manually. Does
Is there a pretty good virus checker that will work with the Bat that
will only operate by checking attachments? If a free is available that
would be great. Maybe I'm just gambling with time, but since I really
only open attachments that I know for a fact I am supposed to receive
(plus I us
Hello Rick Reumann,
On Sunday, February 10 2002 at 04:17 PM PDT, you wrote:
> If I had a virus checker that would only kick into action when it saw
> an attachment, and worked with well with the Bat, I'd be interested.
This Program isn't free... it's not expensive eith
Monday, February 11, 2002 at 2:10 AM
Following the directions located here
http://www.guenther-eisele.de/bat/fprot_e.htm, it
might be possible to have The Bat! launch Norton
to scan the directory for viruses. Does Norton have a
command line to scan a directory? If not, map a
directory to
Hi Raj,
KAV 4 Personal Pro :
ftp://ftp.kaspersky.com/products/release/4.0/English/HomeUser/KAVPersonalPro/kavperspro40eng.exe
--
Regards,
Ericmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/39 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
--
__
Rick,
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, at 19:17:29 [GMT -0500] (which was 5:47 AM where I live) you
wrote:
RR> If I had a virus checker that would only kick into action when it saw
RR> an attachment, and worked with well with the Bat, I'd be interested.
RR> Thanks
Have you checked out http:
At 13:37 21/01/2002, David Denton wrote:
> Mail server: 127.0.0.1
> User: username/mail server info
> Can anyone tell me if this is really working? What are the pros and
> cons of this set up?
If you are still receiving your mail then it is working. In fact, it
works very well. The new
ft of any infected mail has most of its headers removed.
>> I've heard that 2001 can be got to work in XP, so I might give it a
>> try - that worked fine in Windows 2000.
DAC> I just received a message with a virus which was detected by NAV 2002.
DAC> While it didn't give
n be got to work in XP, so I might give it a
> try - that worked fine in Windows 2000.
I just received a message with a virus which was detected by NAV 2002.
While it didn't give me a choice to delete, the easy option was to hit
the quarantine button, which I did. The virus got quarantined
>From conversations with two list members it turns out I'm not seeing
things; PAVPROXY.EXE (the Panda Anti-Virus transparent proxy which
scans emails without need for TB!'s new infrastructure for virus
checkers*) is _still_ misbehaving, crashing and confusing TB! on
download.
Th
ACM> would appear that it stakes out the temp folder and will alert you of
ACM> virus or virus-like presence in the temp folder. No problem. However,
ACM> TB! was in the process of downloading an infected message and as soon
ACM> as NAV2002 detected it in the temp folder it alerted me but
Re the stuff on Norton and XP below: (related to Norton AV 2002 and
the loss of the autodelete function for infected mail after moving
from 2001)
I've found that Norton 2001 works fine (so far!) with the Bat in XP if
the instructions found from the google search below are followed.
Norton were ve
s new system I got came with NAV 2002
installed.. I've been using it and have so far had one bad experience.
I disable the mail checker since I use the system monitor. However, it
would appear that it stakes out the temp folder and will alert you of
virus or virus-like presence in the temp
(apologies if this appears twice)
Re the stuff on Norton and XP below: (related to Norton AV 2002 and
the loss of the autodelete function for infected mail after moving
from 2001)
I've found that Norton 2001 works fine (so far!) with the Bat in XP if
the instructions found from the google search
Hello David!
On 30 Dec 2001 at 12:15:17 you wrote:
> Some virui (is that the plural of Virus?)
No, but it is a tough one.
If you want to be overly correct the plural is "virii" (from Greek via
Latin). In English you can also use "viruses", which is actually the
standar
Hello all,
>> What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
>> can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
>> how I would use it to check my incoming emails.
DT> I've been using AVG (www.grisoft.com) for s
Hi John,
Thanks, I filed the information on using NAV2001 with WinXP just in
case.
Good luck with your inquiry to Symantec. My experience with them is
not great. I get conflicting, and frequently incorrect information
and, like the inquiry quoted, it is the problem of the user, not
Symantec.
Friday, December 28, 2001, 6:45:55 PM, you wrote:
S> John, your observations of NAV2002 seem to be exactly the same as my
S> observations. I think the autodelete function is not there, at least
S> I have not seen the option. Like you, the autorepair does not seem to
S> work.
S> I'd be interes
S>> I have yet to get infected, thanks to stance the_Bat takes. The virus
S>> scan program is very important, maybe not for the_Bat, but for Outlook
S>> Express and Outlook, both of which are on this computer even though they
S>> are only uses sparingly.
> Sure, Sam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:51:42 -0600GMT (which was 19:51 +0100GMT where I live),
Sam thought about "Anti-virus plugins" and wrote:
S> I have yet to get infected, thanks to stance the_Bat takes. The virus
S> scan program is very impo
Hi Peter,
You are correct. The_Bat does a good job on viruses, which seem to be
extremely abundant these days. I have yet to get infected, thanks to
stance the_Bat takes. The virus scan program is very important, maybe
not for the_Bat, but for Outlook Express and Outlook, both of which
are
John, your observations of NAV2002 seem to be exactly the same as my
observations. I think the autodelete function is not there, at least
I have not seen the option. Like you, the autorepair does not seem to
work.
I'd be interested to know whether or not you are successful in using
NAV2001 wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 07:10:41 -0600GMT (which was 14:10 +0100GMT where I live),
Sam thought about "Anti-virus plugins" and wrote:
S> I probably have had warnings on the incoming mail, but the_Bat seems
S> more or less immune to viru
Hi John,
JR> Which version are you using? - I've gone to 2002 because I'm now using
JR> XP and the autodelete function seems not to be present in 2002 -
JR> worked fine in 2000 and 2001 though.
I've got about 1 1/2 months left on my NAV2001. I didn't realize
that the 2002 version was so differe
up to automatically delete infected
DN> attachments. All I see in the left hand frame is a file icon
DN> with some Norton Virus Detected message. I got another
DN> "Badtrans" sent to me yesterday, and Norton and The Bat!
DN> handled it wonderfu
Hi Geoff,
NAV2002 seems to bear little resemblance to NAV2001. It no longer has
an are which tells you what e-mail clients are detected and protected.
Upon installation, The_Bat is detected and will scan the sent e-mail
as well as the received e-mail. It still has the Live Update features
but
It was foretold that on 28/12/2001 @ 08:12:10 GMT-0800 (which was 17:12 where I
live) Don Taylor wrote and spread these wise comments on "Anti-virus plugins":
> I've been using AVG (www.grisoft.com) for several months now, and I
> like it very much. So far, though, they d
> What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
> can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
> how I would use it to check my incoming emails.
I've been using AVG (www.grisoft.com) for several months now, and I
l
Friday, December 28, 2001, 1:56:37 PM, Sam wrote:
> Actually, NAV2002 does not need to be set up manually. Someone
> previously mentioned setting up NAV2001 manually. I had tried that
> some time ago, and didn't think it worked. Someone again mentioned it
> later and I tried it again and I st
Actually, NAV2002 does not need to be set up manually. Someone
previously mentioned setting up NAV2001 manually. I had tried that
some time ago, and didn't think it worked. Someone again mentioned it
later and I tried it again and I still could not get it to work with
the_Bat. Seems like NAV2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
28 Dec 2001 at 14:30:37 ,
Peter Adams wrote the following
on the "Anti-virus plugins" thread:
PA> What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
PA> can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender)
S> Norton AV2002 seems to work with the_Bat. I know it checks the
S> outgoing mail and supposedly checks the incoming mail.
> What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
> can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
&
is don't.
--
Have a great day,
Sammailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"He who can, does. He who cannot, teaches." (George Bernard Shaw)
> tbudl...
> What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
> can I use? I've been using A
tbudl...
What Anti-virus software works with the AV section of The Bat? ie what
can I use? I've been using AVX pro (Dow BitDefender) here and can't see
how I would use it to check my incoming emails.
--
Peter
http://www.escapism.co.uk/praest76/
np: Data Bank A - ...In
Hi Andy,
>> Nothing else. It compresses the database (mail ~) by _real_ deleting
>> messages marked for deletion. That way it decreases the size of
>> message base by _real_ taking out the content, while 'Delete' only
>> sets a flag and does not decrease the (physical) size by one bit.
AS> Is th
> S> What else does compression do?
>
> Nothing else. It compresses the database (mail ~) by _real_ deleting
> messages marked for deletion. That way it decreases the size of
> message base by _real_ taking out the content, while 'Delete' only
> sets a flag and does not decrease the (physical) si
Hello Sebastian,
On 19 Dec 2001 at 21:46:31 you wrote (at least in part):
S> What else does compression do?
Nothing else. It compresses the database (mail ~) by _real_ deleting
messages marked for deletion. That way it decreases the size of
message base by _real_ taking out the content, while '
Wednesday, December 19, 2001, 8:36:01 PM, Sebastian wrote:
> Alright, now I already had trouble with NAV when an incoming mail had
> a virus, so it could not get downloaded into THE BAT - I solved the
> problem with help of you guys, by just dispatching FROM the server.
> Unfort
Alright, now I already had trouble with NAV when an incoming mail had
a virus, so it could not get downloaded into THE BAT - I solved the
problem with help of you guys, by just dispatching FROM the server.
Unfortunately, one second that NAV was NOT running, I downloaded a
virus that some weirdo
Hi Carsten. :)
THANK YOU SO MUCH - worked!
What else does compression do?
Thank you,
Sebastian. :)
CT> Hi Sebastian,
S>> I deleted the file from the mail list AND from the trash, but Norton
S>> CONSTANTLY tells me I got that virus in the corresponding TBB file -
S>> wh
Hi Sebastian,
S> I deleted the file from the mail list AND from the trash, but Norton
S> CONSTANTLY tells me I got that virus in the corresponding TBB file -
S> what now?
Compress your folders via "Folder / Compress All folders". Messages
are only marked as deleted in the
27;t say which version of Norton Antivirus he's using. If
this is NAV 2001 or later, you can manually configure it scan incoming
email and to either quarantine or delete infected attachments. This
allows uninterrupted downloading of mail.
If you configure NAV like this, it replaces ea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sebastian,
On 08 December 2001 at 15:15:28 [GMT+0100] (which was 14:15 where I
live) Sebastian wrote to Roelof Otten and made these points:
RO>> ... Or delete the infected message from your server, the log of
RO>> TB should give you the header-in
- Tab "Advanced"
- "Message has attachments"
- "Size is LARGER than": "30" K bytes
- "Size is SMALLER than": "50" K bytes
- Start searching.
This may find some more messages than the virus containing, but I'm
quite sure the o
8 Dec 2001 14:08:40 +0100GMT (8-12-01, 14:08 +0100GMT, where I
RO> live), you wrote:
S>> The filename that has this virus supposedly in it changes all the
S>> time, and the file itself is never deletable. It's a temporary file,
S>> that has names from BAT44.tmp to BAT9
Hello Sebastian,
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 14:08:40 +0100GMT (8-12-01, 14:08 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
S> The filename that has this virus supposedly in it changes all the
S> time, and the file itself is never deletable. It's a temporary file,
S> that has names from BAT44.tm
Hi Marck.
Wow, you are absolutely right - I just looked at the connection
details of one POP mail account, and it says: "could not store message
batxx.tmp" - how can I get this message?
Thank you,
Sebastian.
--
Archives : http://tbud
Hi Marck. :)
Thank you very much for that input.
I turned the tool off, killed both the program itself-process, as well
as the agent process.
Then I hit the "check mail for all" button but nothing came - am I
doing something wrong?
Please let me know,
thank you very much,
Sebastian. :)
MDP>
ou are using TB, the problem is minor.
> Now, since last nite, my Norton AntiVirus agent detects exactly this
> virus, a [EMAIL PROTECTED] - in my TEMP folder!
> The filename that has this virus supposedly in it changes all the
> time, and the file itself is never deletable. It's a
Okay, sorry, I wanted to say that I expect the virus to be in some BAT
mail - that is the program I am using, not Outlook.
So, whenever BAT is open, NAV detects a virus in my temp folder.
Thank you for your help,
Sebastian. :)
S> Hey there. :)
S> I am new to the group, and I have on
AntiVirus agent detects exactly this
virus, a [EMAIL PROTECTED] - in my TEMP folder!
The filename that has this virus supposedly in it changes all the
time, and the file itself is never deletable. It's a temporary file,
that has names from BAT44.tmp to BAT98.tmp - all that.
What can I d
Hello Jan,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:09:25 -0500 GMT (04/12/2001, 22:09 +0800 GMT),
Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JR> scan engine 5.600-1011
JR> pattern 173
JR> pc cillin program v7.61.0.1421
JR> Any other thoughts on this?
No. Your are using PCC7, I am using PCC6. I cannot imagine that this
is the reaso
01 you wrote the
following on the posted subject 'Virus':
JR>> As a PC-cillin user I have been bombarded recently by
JR>> 40-50 msgs w infected attachments. I rcvd no
JR>> notification from PC-cillin. OTOH, I didn't attempt to
JR>> open any of the attachmen
Hi Raj,
On lundi 3 décembre 2001 at 13:24:17, you wrote :
R> Syafril,
R> Honestly I found this a little tough to configure. A very steep learning curve.
AVP tough to configure ? LOL
R> I likes AVG & Mcafee (with TB) because they do not check for Viruses while
R> downloading (if TB is
side message body.
No. Keep inside body
R> When you say AVP- u mean Anti Virus Programme or any specific package.
I mean a known antivirus program : AntiViral Toolkit Pro (or say KAV, Kaspersky
Anti-Virus).
--
Regards,
Ericmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The B
Hi Jan,
jbc>ok most of us have gotten this msg & probably others like
jbc>it. I have been trying to find a filter that would
jbc>identify msgs
jbc>> Rule Starts <--
jbc>Rule = Move msg to 'Probable Virus'
Hello Thomas.
At 10:54 AM on Monday, December 03, 2001 you wrote the
following on the posted subject 'Virus':
JR>> As a PC-cillin user I have been bombarded recently by
JR>> 40-50 msgs w infected attachments. I rcvd no
JR>> notification from PC-cillin. OTOH, I didn&#
llin. OTOH,
JR> I didn't attempt to open any of the attachments.
Hmmm. Are you sure you have Realtime Check enabled? When mails with
virus attachements are being downloaded, PC-Cillin 6.04 with real time
scan engine 5.600.0.1005 and pattern file 173 notifies me and
quarantines the .tmp file co
n't figure out why.
> Rule Starts <--
Rule = Move msg to 'Probable Virus' folder
Strings = . (any character)
Location = text
Presence = no
Options = Regular Expressions selected
Advanced = message has attachments
-> Rule E
Hello Thomas.
At 2:25 AM on Monday, December 03, 2001 you wrote the
following on the posted subject 'Virus':
JR>> Does this mean that AVP automatically prevented the
JR>> message from downloading to your machine?
Thomas> That's what PC-Cillin did do.
Well,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Syafril!
On 3 Dec 2001 at 13:16:07 you wrote:
> AFAIK AVP from Kaspersky Labs can detect viruses even we set
> attachment inline message body (not in separate directory/folder). My
> Av on Mail Server also using Kaspersky Labs AV E
Syafril,
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, at 19:16:07 [GMT +0700] (which was 5:46 PM where I live) you
wrote:
SH> AFAIK AVP from Kaspersky Labs can detect viruses even we set
SH> attachment inline message body (not in separate directory/folder). My
SH> Av on Mail Server also using Kaspersky Labs A
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 at 17:28:05 GMT +0530 (03/12/2001 18:58 where you
think I live) "Raj"=[R] wrote to Eric Malausséna on tbudl :
R> So my question
R> Have you configured to attachments outside message body.
R> When you say AVP- u mean Anti Virus Programme or any specific p
. and AVP detected it.
I also got the message and AVG did not detect it. However let me add that Ihave
configured TB to keep attachments in the message body and Mcafee also did not
detect.
So my question
Have you configured to attachments outside message body.
When you say AVP- u mean A
This is a forwarded message
***Comment
Aha, I found now.
Well, this virus send directly to original poster not to the list, so
activate Av Engine on the list will not effective.
The only action to protect other member I can think of is unsubscribe
this member ( I just did).
Syafril
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 at 17:37:19 GMT +0800 (03/12/2001 16:37 where you
think I live) "Thomas F"=[TF] wrote to Syafril Hermansyah on TBUDL :
SH>> I just finished checking "warning" message from my AV on MDaemon, I
SH>> didn't find any...can anyone enlig
. I'll bet some of the less vocal members didn't
JA>> get a copy at all and have no idea what we're talking about. :-)
SH> I just finished checking "warning" message from my AV on MDaemon, I
SH> didn't find any...can anyone enlighten at what time the vi
just finished checking "warning" message from my AV on MDaemon, I
didn't find any...can anyone enlighten at what time the virus spread
from the list ?
--
Best regards,
- Syafril - mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 at 16:27:02 GMT +0800 (03/12/2001 15:27 where you
think I live) "Thomas F"=[TF] wrote to Syafril Hermansyah on TBUDL :
TF>>> Syafril, didn't you have an AV programm installed server side?
SH>> I do but on MDaemon, not in Exim/Listar.
TF> Are you planning to do that in Exim/
Hello Thomas,
On Monday, December 3, 2001 at 16:27 GMT +0800, a creature mimicking
Thomas F [TF] wrote:
TF> Are you planning to do that in Exim/Listar to prevent viruses to
TF> spread via this list (and it's many OE users )?
I don't know about yours, but mine didn't come through the list. I'm
Hi Syafril,
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:06:55 +0700GMT (03/12/2001, 16:06 +0800GMT),
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
TF>> Syafril, didn't you have an AV programm installed server side?
SH> I do but on MDaemon, not in Exim/Listar.
Are you planning to do that in Exim/Listar to prevent viruses to
spread via
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 at 15:19:16 GMT +0800 (03/12/2001 14:19 where you
think I live) "Thomas F"=[TF] wrote to Geek on TBUDL :
G>> Well, shortly after my first message to the list I received as a
G>> welcome the latest virus *APPARENTLY* from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G>> (
Hi Jan,
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 17:34:24 -0500GMT (03/12/2001, 06:34 +0800GMT),
Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JR> Does this mean that AVP automatically prevented the
JR> message from downloading to your machine?
That's what PC-Cillin did do.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginne
Hi Kevin,
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:02:05 +GMT (03/12/2001, 04:02 +0800GMT),
Kevin Conlin wrote:
KC> The Virus is the W32.Badtrans Virus, Quite a
KC> Dangerous one which goes through the address book
KC> and Emails all contacts,
Nonsense. This virus requires Micorsoft Outloo
Hi Geek,
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:08:20 +0100GMT (03/12/2001, 03:08 +0800GMT),
Geek wrote:
G> Well, shortly after my first message to the list I received as
G> a welcome the latest virus *APPARENTLY* from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wilhelm Alm).
All of us got it. :-(
Syafril, didn't you
Hi Jan,
On dimanche 2 décembre 2001 at 23:34:24, you wrote :
Eric>> I confirm. With AVP, the message couldn't be
Eric>> downloaded and I had to delete it on the server.
Eric>> It is I.Worm.BadrtransII as registered by AVP.
JR> Does this mean that AVP automatically prevented the
JR> message
Hello Eric,
How did you integrate AVP with TB!?
--
Kelvin Quee
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Ver
2 Dec 2001, Kenneth S. Rhee
In Regards to Virus
KSR> Hello Kevin,
KSR> 2 Dec 2001, 3:02:05 PM, you wrote:
KC>> The Virus is the W32.Badtrans Virus, Quite a
KC>> Dangerous one which goes through the address book
KC>> and Emails all contacts, i belie
Hello Kevin,
2 Dec 2001, 3:02:05 PM, you wrote:
KC> The Virus is the W32.Badtrans Virus, Quite a
KC> Dangerous one which goes through the address book
KC> and Emails all contacts, i believe this is what
KC> has happened.
I'm familiar with it and my NAV 2002 ha
Dear Kenneth,
--->>> Kenneth S. Rhee / Sonntag, 02.12.01, 20:50:36
Virus
> What virus? I don't think I have received such e-mail lately.
It sure must be Be.Trans.B Virus. Its *the common* Virus at the
moment. Have a look at www.f-secure.com/v-descs/badtrs_b.shtml
Sunday, December 02, 2001, Kenneth S. Rhee
In Regards to Virus
KSR> Hello Kevin,
KSR> 2 Dec 2001, 2:40:33 PM, you wrote:
KSR> What virus? I don't think I have received such e-mail lately.
The Virus is the W32.Badtrans Virus, Quite a
Dangerous one which goes throu
Hi Kevin,
On dimanche 2 décembre 2001 at 20:40:33, you wrote :
KC> A User on this email list sent me a Virus W32.Badtrans , im
KC> not saying this was intentional, it was an Off Mailing list
KC> reply to my NAV2002 post. i would just like to inform you
KC> incase you receiv
Hello Kevin,
2 Dec 2001, 2:40:33 PM, you wrote:
What virus? I don't think I have received such e-mail lately.
--
Best regards,
Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Archives :
Hi All Bat Users,
A User on this email list sent me a Virus W32.Badtrans , im
not saying this was intentional, it was an Off Mailing list
reply to my NAV2002 post. i would just like to inform you
incase you receive an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a Subject of "RE:RE:NAV2002&q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:08:20 +0100GMT (which was 20:08 +0100GMT where I
live), Geek thought about "VIRUS as welcome" and wrote:
G> Hello TBUDL,
G> Well, shortly after my first message to the list I received as a welcome
G&g
Hello TBUDL,
Well, shortly after my first message to the list I received as
a welcome the latest virus *APPARENTLY* from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wilhelm Alm).
Thanks to the Bat it din't go off
automatically as it might have with Outlook in Preview mode.
I guess I need to destroy this emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi -=ToÑo.!=-,
On Saturday, December 01, 2001, -=ToÑo.!=- wrote:
T> ...and erase your windows\temp directoy
You really don't have to.
As soon as the AVS shout "VIRUS ALERT" just select "delete file", and
problem solve
México lindo), Marcel en el mensaje con tema: "Virus On Mail
Check" comento (por lo menos en parte y quiza acotado por mi):
M> So Markus was right.
M> After you've found out that an infected message is sent, delete it
M> from the server manually, either by webmail, or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
I wasn't completely right in my last message.
I thought I got a lot of infected mail, but it seems that whenever
The
Bat is unable to access it's temp file, it leaves the original on the
server. Great work in fact, this way you'll never l
801 - 900 of 1143 matches
Mail list logo
