On Sun 23-Oct-05 12:02pm -0500, MAU wrote:
With the latest build I can neither add watches or remove
existing watches. My watch folder is not being recognized -
the only choice from Specials is to create a new watch
folder :-(
You are using a beta. You should report this in the TBBeta list
Hello TB User Discussion List,
With the latest build I can neither add watches or remove
existing watches. My watch folder is not being recognized -
the only choice from Specials is to create a new watch
folder :-(
--
Best regards,
Bill
TB! Pro :beta: 3.61.14 Echo (Beta) BayesIt! 0.8.4 X-Ray
Hello Bill,
With the latest build I can neither add watches or remove
existing watches. My watch folder is not being recognized -
the only choice from Specials is to create a new watch
folder :-(
You are using a beta. You should report this in the TBBeta list and
perhaps open a BT report
Hello TB User Discussion List,
This feature appears to be not working in 3.5.
I had a watched folder. However, when I attempted to
watch a message, the only choice I had was to create a
new folder. I played along and added a new folder with
the same name as the old folder - that gave me two
Hello Bill,
Is this feature working for anyone? If so, what's the
trick?
Please see bug report https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3932 and
the note I have just added to it.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5
Hi
Sunday, July 18, 2004, 11:19:53 PM, Zeynel A. Öztürk wrote:
ZAÖ Hello Bill,
ZAÖ Monday, July 19, 2004, 12:47:12 AM, you wrote:
ZAÖ snip
BM Is there any way to turn that chat feature off? I've tried with and
BM without the chat folder checked under the main window's Special/Watch.
BM
On Sun 25-Jul-04 8:10am -0400, Mike email (The Bat!) wrote:
Is watch a new feature in 2.12.00?
The closest I can find in the main window's Special menu is watch replies
in... but clicking that does nothing except make the menu disappear. :-(
It's fairly simple to set up, but I don't think
On Sunday, July 25, 2004 @ 11:12:28 PM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
[snips]
Bill It's fairly simple to set up, but I don't think there are any
Bill directions in the help file.
Making it a rare beast indeed...
--
cheers, Mic (reply address works)
I think Superman should go on the Larry King show
Hello TB User Discussion List,
The Watch replies in.. feature is very nice, but it appears to
require a chat folder. Each time I receive a reply, a chat dialog
is triggered.
Is there any way to turn that chat feature off? I've tried with and
without the chat folder checked under the main
On Sun 18-Jul-04 5:19pm -0400, Zeynel A. Öztürk wrote:
Monday, July 19, 2004, 12:47:12 AM, you wrote:
Is there any way to turn that chat feature off? I've tried with and
without the chat folder checked under the main window's Special/Watch.
Either way I get the chat dialog.
To turn
Hello Ben,
On 3 Jun 2004 at 02:09:54 +0100 GMT [03:09 CEST] you wrote:
BA Howdy TBUDL,
BA In folder properties it in the bottom left hand corner that is a
BA button that says watch by. If clicked it brings up the folder
BA structure with option to select or deselect all. What
Howdy TBUDL,
In folder properties it in the bottom left hand corner that is a
button that says watch by. If clicked it brings up the folder
structure with option to select or deselect all. What is this for?
Is it a method of getting other folders to become trainee MI5
Hello Thomas,
I think the point Miguel is trying to make here is that filters behave
differently depending on how they are triggered. That is inconsistent
to the degree of being dangerous. I see absolutely no sense in it, and
I would think that the word bug is not completely unrelated.
Hello Allie,
I see no bugginess here and see perfect sense is what is being
achieved through the various options.
See my reply to your [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The difference, and the problem as I see it, comes because of the fact
that TB filters *force* a move to a folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:'
MAU If the option *is* checked, the string match is carried out and
MAU the messages matching the rule(s) are Ignored (in my case) and
MAU moved to Inbox.
Ok. It is *now*
Hello Miguel,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:26:15 +0200 GMT (03/10/02, 13:26 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
MAU Finally some one who understand me! Do you want to marry me? ;-)
Is that now allowed in Spain as well? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
99
Hello Thomas,
MAU Finally some one who understand me! Do you want to marry me? ;-)
Is that now allowed in Spain as well? ;-)
Not yet but, who cares! ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
Current
is not moved.
But why the same filter behaves differently if I do a Re-Filter
Messages than if I execute it with with a shortcut?
In my specific case, my incoming Ignore filter (almost the same that
your Watch one) is set for Inbox-Inbox. It works normally for
incoming messages and it is my Tbudl filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Miguel,
@2-Oct-2002, 09:10 +0200 (08:10 UK time) Miguel A. Urech [MAU] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MAU ... if I Re-Filter my TBUDL folder the messages that match the
MAU Ignore rules *are* moved to Inbox. However, if I
Hello Miguel,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:10:32 +0200 GMT (02/10/02, 14:10 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
MAU Now, if I Re-Filter my TBUDL folder the messages that match the
MAU Ignore rules *are* moved to Inbox. However, if I execute my
MAU Ignore filter with the keyboard shortcut on one or more
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, at 02:15:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:15:28
PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
JS IOW, if you leave it alone, TB never moves the message at all.
JS But if you actively configure it to move the message to the
JS inbox, then it actually does?
Manually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:'
MAU In my specific case, my incoming Ignore filter (almost the same
MAU that your Watch one) is set for Inbox-Inbox. It works normally
MAU for incoming messages and
Hello Thomas,
I don't know what is WAD,
Working As Designed :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Allie,
With the option disabled the first two pages of filter setup is
basically ignored so no string matching is carried out, nor is the
message moved. Only the filter actions are carried out.
Oh darn! That's dangerous then!
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Hello Marck,
MAU Are you saying this is WAD?
No. I think that there are anomalies in the re-filter logic. I too
have often cursed the dumping of vast swathes of messages to the
inbox during a re-filter.
It's no big problem anyway. If messages are moved to Inbox when doing
a re-filter, all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:'
With the option disabled the first two pages of filter setup is
basically ignored so no string matching is carried out, nor is
the message moved. Only the filter actions
Hello Allie,
MAU Oh darn! That's dangerous then!
Well, no. Not if you understand how it works and then let it do what
you need.
Well, yes. Precisely because I now understand how it works is why I
think it's dangerous :)
snipped a bit
I am therefore happy that the option exists since you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:'
MAU But that is where I see the danger, if I want to prevent the
MAU movement I take the risk of applying the actions to messages
MAU that don't match the rules.
You select
Hello Allie,
You select the messages to apply the action to and then hit the
hotkey. The filter actions are applied to selected messages as the
reply, delete or any other command. I don't see the risk or danger
involved unless you really aren't sure of what the filter is setup
to do. If I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:'
MAU OK, let's take my Ignore filter. I have a number of subjects
MAU and/or MIDs in the Alternatives. If I make a mistake when
MAU selecting messages they will be Ignored
Hello Allie,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:42:10 -0500 GMT (03/10/02, 04:42 +0700 GMT),
Allie C Martin wrote:
ACM You select the messages to apply the action to and then hit the
ACM hotkey. The filter actions are applied to selected messages as the
ACM reply, delete or any other command. I don't see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas F. [TF] wrote:'
TF I think the point Miguel is trying to make here is that filters
TF behave differently depending on how they are triggered. That is
TF inconsistent to the degree of being
Hello Allie,
Say you wish to delete some messages. What happens if you make a
mistake and select the wrong messages to delete? They will be
deleted.
OK, let's put it this way then. I select N messages, but I don't want
to Ignore the N messages, just those that match the filter rule(s).
The
but...
While the use of my specified HotKey combo no longer moves the
selected messages (as long as the Move to...folder is set to
Inbox, that is) the filter itself _is_ _copying_ incoming messages
back to the Inbox eventhough
A) The Watch filter is set to continue processing other
filters and
B) My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Miguel,
@1-Oct-2002, 19:16 +0200 (18:16 UK time) Miguel A. Urech [MAU] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MAU Like you, I don't understand why they are not moved. That is
MAU what I find odd. A bug perhaps? A _useful_ bug?
No, an
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, at 00:06:08 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:06:08
PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MAU Like you, I don't understand why they are not moved. That is
MAU what I find odd. A bug perhaps? A _useful_ bug?
No, an intended feature. It has always been so and designed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi James,
@1-Oct-2002, 21:03 -0400 (02:03 UK time) James Senick [JS] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... when the source and destination folders of a filter are the
same then a message is not moved.
JS Assuming you mean in
Hello Marck,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 04:00:02 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:00:02
PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
You are. The watch filter works on the Inbox. It highlights any mail
you are currently watching, moving it to the Inbox (i.e. not moving
it at all). The mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi James,
@30-Sep-2002, 07:24 -0400 (12:24 UK time) James Senick [JS] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You are. The watch filter works on the Inbox. It highlights any
mail you are currently watching, moving it to the In
Hello Marck,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 12:43:21 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:43:21
AM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
JS ... if you wanted to set a hotkey to apply this filter to
JS already 'in-house' threads / messages, they'd be moved back to
JS the inbox from the folder you were browsing.
Hello Marck,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 08:09:46 [GMT -0400] (which was 8:09:46
AM in NY, USA) James Senick wrote:
Not necessarily. I just added Ctrl-Alt-W as the hotkey for the
filter and left the Check the selected message against this rule
unchecked. It works perfectly, applying the watched
the message in place.
Thanks for the idea. I use the colour code and filter combination for
a future Watch, and it works fine. Your suggestion works fine for
past messages, but only one-by-one. Can I apply somehow for all past
messages in a tread simultaneously?
--
Best regards,
Peter
ht click, navigate to
Colour group and set it?
With all of this automation, we sometimes forget where we started
:-).
I would add that my own watch thread colour is for unread messages
only, so that they stand out in the ticker. Once I've read them, I
don't really care that much any more.
- -
Hello Batters,
New wish list item for consideration...or is it necessary? I
really miss an old Watch Thread feature that I think I came
across first in XNews. For lists, I'd really like to be able to
highlight incoming messages of a thread interesting or important
to me. Perhaps some would
the necessary work
on them. With news you only load down those messages you are
interested in; the Watch Thread feature therefore automates this for
you.
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Zoo.Write4U.de
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
The Bat 1.61
Hi James,
On Sunday, September 29, 2002 12:52 your local time, (22:37 my local
time), you [JS] wrote:
JS New wish list item for consideration...or is it necessary? I
JS really miss an old Watch Thread feature that I think I came
JS across first in XNews.
IMO, RITLabs should consider improving
Agent
DH are both (AFAIK) off-line newsreaders. E-mails are usually
DH transferred from the server to your machine to do the necessary work
DH on them. With news you only load down those messages you are
DH interested in; the Watch Thread feature therefore automates this for
DH you.
Methinks you're
On Sunday, September 29, 2002, Dierk Haasis wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DH XNews and Agent
DH are both (AFAIK) off-line newsreaders.
Dierk,
I think that's true for Agent, but it's not for Xnews. Xnews is
strictly an online newsreader, although it has the ability to
Hello Scott!
On Sunday, September 29, 2002 at 7:31:57 PM you wrote:
Methinks you're missing the point. Mark Thread
Sorry if I did. As I understood it, James wanted what XNews and Agent
offer, not mere colouring ...
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Zoo.Write4U.de
PGP
are both (AFAIK) off-line newsreaders. E-mails are usually
transferred from the server to your machine to do the necessary work
on them. With news you only load down those messages you are
interested in; the Watch Thread feature therefore automates this for
you.
I understand the differences
, if you're accustomed to doing it.
If you're referring to a filter...I don't want to move the
message nor create hundreds of filters over time regardless of
how easy it is. Plus any filter solution (at least any I have
thought of) would leave out the important need to un-watch an
entire thread. If I
On Sunday, September 29, 2002, James Senick wrote:
J Hello Batters,
J New wish list item for consideration...or is it necessary? I
J really miss an old Watch Thread feature that I think I came
J across first in XNews.
The Watch Thread feature has been in news readers long pre-dating
XNews.
J
Hello pmf,
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 15:34:49 [GMT -0400] (which was 3:34:49
PM in NY, USA) pmf wrote:
J New wish list item for consideration...or is it necessary? I
J really miss an old Watch Thread feature that I think I came
J across first in XNews.
The Watch Thread feature has been in news
customed to doing
it.
JS If you're referring to a filter...I don't want to move the
JS message nor create hundreds of filters over time regardless of
JS how easy it is. Plus any filter solution (at least any I have
JS thought of) would leave out the important need to un-watch an
JS entire threa
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 23:51:23 [GMT +0100] (which was 6:51:23
PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Every time a new thread comes up that I want to watch, I just add
the subject as an alternative search. Works a treat! Every so often
I tidy the filter up and remove old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 30 September 2002 at 11:32 a.m. James wrote:
JS Oh my! I feel dumb. I completely forgot about the alternative
JS sets. Thanks Marck.
You're not the only one! :-)
- --
Carren
PGP public key:
mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Marck,
I do *exactly* this. I have a watch filter. It's near the top of
my filters, moves from Inbox to Inbox, marks the message bright red
and continues processing.
Every time a new thread comes up that I want to watch, I just add
the subject as an alternative search. Works a treat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 30 September 2002 at 10:51 a.m. Marck wrote:
MDP I do *exactly* this. I have a watch filter. It's near the top
MDP of my filters, moves from Inbox to Inbox, marks the message
MDP bright red and continues processing.
MDP Every time a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Carren,
@30-Sep-2002, 14:53 +1200 (03:53 UK time) Carren Stuart [CS] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
CS I want to create a watch filter as you have, for my TBUDL
CS mail.
A watch filter should not be associated with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 30 September 2002 at 2:53 p.m. I wrote:
CS OK ... I am a bit thick here. I am trying to do this but so far
CS it's not working. I want to create a watch filter as you have,
CS for my TBUDL mail. I have a TBUDL filter already which moves
ges back into the Inbox if
CS I ever need to do a re-filter messages.
That's true, but how often do you do that? Anyway, you just have to
set the watch filter to manual or turn off active before you
do it.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.62/Beta5 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Servic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote:'
MDP A watch filter should not be associated with any list. It just
MDP watches for a subject and highlights the message.
This can be the case only if you don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 30 September 2002 at 3:14 p.m. Marck wrote:
MDP That's true, but how often do you do that? Anyway, you just have
MDP to set the watch filter to manual or turn off active before
MDP you do it.
:-) OK, I guess I can't have everything
Hi Peter,
On Friday, June 14, 2002, 1:25:49 AM, you wrote:
PK No, there is not. But if many of us ask for, maybe it will be added to
PK Version 2.0 Lets start a campaign to add next to the flag. (I used a
PK lot in Agent)
OK campaign started. Anyone who wants a watch thread feature in
TB
Hello Ben,
Oh and are there any plans for TB to support Usenet in the future as
Id love to use it for that too.
Look in the archives for:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Newsgroups with The Bat! and MailTraq
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 08:57:35 +0100 Ben Kennish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK campaign started. Anyone who wants a watch thread feature in
TB!, reply with Aye!
Aye! :-)
--
syafril
---
Syafril Hermansyah[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current
On Friday, June 14, 2002, 8:57:35 AM, Ben Kennish wrote:
OK campaign started. Anyone who wants a watch thread feature in
TB!, reply with Aye!
What would a watch thread feature do? I used to use the Watch
Thread feature in Agent (when I had time to look at newsgroups
Hello Ben,
Anyone who wants a watch thread feature in TB!, reply with Aye!
I'd rather have first an Ignore feature (just the opposite to
Watch). It think it would have more sense for e-mail in general and
particularly for mail lists. As Julian says, Watch may have more sense
for Usenet
Hello Peter!
On Friday, June 14, 2002 at 2:25:49 AM you wrote:
No, there is not.
Depends, if you want to know where a new message has come in, there is
- the thread becomes bold. If you want to use it as in Agent -
downloading messages automatically and only for a watched thread -,
there
campaign started. Anyone who wants a watch thread feature in
BK TB!, reply with Aye!
I have a suggestion for compromise:
If the Flag could be made so that when used, it would flag any
future messages in the same tread, it would solve the watch request
without adding a new column. To keep
Hello Ben,
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 4:14:48 PM, you wrote:
BK Hi all,
BK Is there a way to watch a thread in a mailing list in TB?
No, there is not. But if many of us ask for, maybe it will be added to
Version 2.0 Lets start a campaign to add next to the flag. (I used a
lot in Agent)
BK
Hello Peter!
On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 10:45:15 PM you wrote:
cut
JN Current Ver: 1.60q
JN FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
JN Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JN Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
JN Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JN TBTech List:
Hello Dierk,
Saturday, June 8, 2002, 4:04:05 AM, you wrote:
DH Hello Peter!
DH On Friday, June 7, 2002 at 10:45:15 PM you wrote:
DH cut
JN Current Ver: 1.60q
JN FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
JN Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JN Archives :
Hello Joseph,
I think you misunderstood my request.
Thursday, June 6, 2002, 10:23:50 PM, you wrote:
JN Although TB! doesn't exactly have that watch feature, it does have
JN features which do the same thing, only slightly differently.
JN First, you could view your messages by thread, so
There is a very useful feature missing from BAT:
A way to mark a message so that it would automatically flag any new
follow up messages in that tread, like a WATCH for.
Sometimes a message is interesting and would like to see the
follow-ups, replies, suggestions, but with so many
Although TB! doesn't exactly have that watch feature, it does have
features which do the same thing, only slightly differently.
First, you could view your messages by thread, so that messages with
the same subject or reference or sender, or whatever you choose, are
grouped together
76 matches
Mail list logo
