On Monday, September 8, 2003 @ 10:55:07 PM [-0700], Neal Laugman wrote:
I haven't found a way to turn off the tool tips in the message window.
These tool tips show message counts for the folder and can be
annoying. Can they be turned off?
If you mean the columns that show the unread and
Hello John,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:59:43 +1000 GMT (09/09/2003, 11:59 +0700 GMT),
John Phillips wrote:
Options / Preferences / Display Connection Center / choose Always
Thanks for the tip, but can't seem to find that in 2.00.6
I use the same version. Options / Preferences opens in the General
Matt,
If you mean the columns that show the unread and total messages, you'll
need to just adjust the column to zero, so to speak. Click and hold the
line next to the Total at the top of the column and drag it over till
it's gone.
No, not the columns. These are the [yellow] tooltip windows
Monday, September 8, 2003, 6:50:12 PM, Alexander wrote:
Can you for just a *moment* think of how you would feel if you registered
TB 1.x about 2.01 months ago (like danger h), please? Can you answer me,
then, if it maybe seems unfair, or if you feel ripped off? Come n...
I was hired in
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rant
Once I'm at it, box quotes are also a bad idea for quotes; with this
I mean quoting from the previous email. You diodn't do it here, but I
have seen some people do it because it looks nicer. Tell you what,
it messes up
George M. Menegakis wrote:
If a company forgets that updates to their products are actually worth
money and then suddenly charge each and every user the same... ungh, how
many times did I repeat this, enough...
If I understand correctly you prefer to pay, even if it is a reduced
amount for
Hello,
in an article
http://www.landfield.com/usefor/drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-article-11.txt
I read that X-Mailer etc. headers are obsolete (in News Articles) and
that the defined standard for that header information is User Agent:
NOTE: This header supersedes the role performed redundantly
* Thomas Fernandez:
Peter Fjelsten wrote:
,- [ Error message ]
| Invalid HTML !
| Please forward this message to developers.
| Thanks.
| EConvertError '1012101210121012101210121012' is not a valid integer value
`-
,- [ Message that caused it (running MyGate
Hello MAU,
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 10:04:41 +0200 GMT (07/09/2003, 15:04 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mygate/
OK, I'm too stupid.
I have subscribed to a newsgroup, using MyGate.
TB connects fine to localhost but find 0 messages in the mailbox. I
thought when I hit Receive
Hello Thomas,
Server: news.cis.dfn.de
That server requires a username and password, are you sure they are
correct on the Authorization tab of the gate?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current
Hello MAU,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:31:06 +0200 GMT (09/09/2003, 15:31 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
Server: news.cis.dfn.de
That server requires a username and password,
Oh!
are you sure they are correct on the Authorization tab of the gate?
No, I don't have any username and password for the
Hello Jernej Simoni,
On Monday, September 8, 2003, at 21:37 Lithuanian Time, you wrote:
JS They aren't (unless the sender chooses so).
Well, I've spent some time Testing how The Bat! v2 behaves with this base64
and PGP signing stuff. Well, results are:
- the Bat! always coverts to base 64 if
Hello Thomas,
Oh!
Ah! :)
No, I don't have any username and password for the server.
See http://news.cis.dfn.de/, they have changed names.
Just for testing purposes, could you name a server that does not
require authorisation?
You can find a few here:
Thomas,
On 09-09-2003 06:29, you [T] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
T On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 01:29:04 +0200 GMT (09/09/2003, 06:29 +0700 GMT),
T Peter Fjelsten wrote:
,- [ Error message ]
| Invalid HTML !
| Please forward this message to developers.
| Thanks.
| EConvertError
Hi Alexander,
@9-Sep-2003, 06:57 +0200 (05:57 UK time) Alexander [A] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Doug:
... or are you using a local spam-catching proxy that times out?
Opening the mail dispatcher to sort it out manually on the
server.
A So it sounds like the connection to the server
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, Steve Mary King wrote:
Version 2.00.6 doesn't show the thread indicators, +-, in the message list
Subject column. Can this be turned on/off, if so how, or is this a bug in
this version?
no problem here, can You create screenshot and send us link to
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
While that may be true, bugs are explored on TBBETA and expunged by
use of the BugTraq system (I don't know if that's back up yet).
yes, BT is up and running.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
I'm using The Bat V2 (although this appeared to be the same in V1.X)
and I've noticed a problem with embedded URL's in messages.
If the message contains a URL in this format http://foobar.com then
The Bat correctly identifies it as a URL and makes it a hot spot.
But if it is sent in this format
Am I missing something, or is it not possible for the HTML editor in
v2.00 to be set as the default?
I was expecting much fuller HTML editing support in v2.00 ... i.e.
HTML default editor HTML templates.
I don't want to open a can of worms here (or maybe I do) but what
is wrong with using HTML
AA So far so good - but when he receives a mail from one user and replies
AA using the template above the reply has the word Message before the
AA quoted text. So it would appear like this:
AA MessageHi Fred...blah blah blah...
I've noticed the same thing when I reply in plain text to an
Sean H., [SH] wrote:
SH Thanks Allie! That's not the exact message I was looking for (the
SH one I remember was from over 6 months ago at least) but I think I'll
SH be able to get it to work using your instructions. Just need to
SH translate it to Win9x speak...
If you're having problems please
Hi Steve,
on Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:15:51 -0700GMT (09.09.03, 03:15 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
SMK Version 2.00.6 doesn't show the thread indicators, +-, in the message list
SMK Subject column. Can this be turned on/off, if so how, or is this a bug in
SMK this version?
Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote:
I would like to add color groups to all my headings with out
having to define in each folder.
TF I'm not sure I know what you mean, but try the above.
TB! has supported a column that displays the message colour group for
quite some time now.
You can then easily
Edvinas Matiuaitis, [EM] wrote:
EM - When signing to PGP/MIME The Bat! is always converting to base64.
EM Even in cases when message body consist entirely of 7 bits
EM characters and should not be converted.
Another trigger for conversion to base64 is the presence of trailing
spaces. One such
Hello pk,
Monday, September 8, 2003, 9:28:37 PM, you wrote:
i am using hotmail account presently configured in Outlook express , is it
possible to configure my hotmail account to bat v2.00.6 which is reportedly
having enhanced IMAP support
Hotmail doesn't use IMAP. But, you can use Hotmail
Hello Allie Martin,
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 14:27 Lithuanian Time, you wrote:
AM Another trigger for conversion to base64 is the presence of trailing
AM spaces. One such trailing space is in our signature delimiter.
Any reason why those trailing spaces trigger that?
AM Are you
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 7:27:58 AM, Allie wrote:
A Another trigger for conversion to base64 is the presence of
A trailing spaces. One such trailing space is in our signature
A delimiter.
Apparently not all the time. F9 on your message showed the sig
delimiter as '--=20' - that's
Dave Kennedy, [DK] wrote:
DK Apparently not all the time. F9 on your message showed the sig
DK delimiter as '--=20' - that's dash-dash-equal-two-zero.
I have forced TB! here to use quoted printable. I did so via the account
options encoding. I prefer quoted printable to base64 since it's
David Boggon, [DB] wrote:
DB Am I missing something, or is it not possible for the HTML editor in
DB v2.00 to be set as the default?
It's not possible.
DB I was expecting much fuller HTML editing support in v2.00 ... i.e.
DB HTML default editor HTML templates.
HTML mail really aught to be
Edvinas Matiuaitis, [EM] wrote:
AM Another trigger for conversion to base64 is the presence of trailing
AM spaces. One such trailing space is in our signature delimiter.
EM Any reason why those trailing spaces trigger that?
It's done in order to preserve those trailing spaces, maintaining them
David,
On 09-09-2003 12:59, you [D] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
D I've heard the purists talk of 'bloatmail'/bandwidth issues, but why
D is this such an issue?
Because an HTML mail is at least 3 times the size of a plain text mail.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten
Hello David,
On 09/09/2003, 12:59:41 (My Time), you wrote:
DB Surely the enormous formatting flexibility available with HTML
DB email outweighs the bandwidth issue. After all, we're not on the
DB brink of bandwidth rationing, are we?
Some users connect their laptops using GPRS Phones,
Hi Allie,
DB I can make plain text messages look OK in TB! but I'm aware whenever I
DB send mail that the P.T. usually looks pretty dreadful on recipient's
DB machines.
AM Would you explain this further?
I was thinking back to my Outlook Express days ... plain text messages
looked, well,
Hello Thomas,
Friday, September 5, 2003, 12:04:17 AM, you wrote:
TF Hello Paul,
TF On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:18:08 +1000 GMT (04/09/2003, 12:18 +0700 GMT),
TF Paul Berger wrote:
I am receiving allot of spam. When the messages arrive which I do not
want I have set up filters to deal with them.
It seems that David Boggon said ...
D Many end users don't know enough/have enough time/have the inclination
D to delve into the plain text display settings of their client, and so
D plain text messages with fixed width fonts and no bold italics and
D font sizes/colours look very plain indeed
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 6:59:41 AM, David Boggon wrote:
DB I don't want to open a can of worms here (or maybe I do) but what is
DB wrong with using HTML in email? what is behind TB's relegation of
DB HTML to the backburner?
DB I've heard the purists talk of 'bloatmail'/bandwidth issues,
Hello Vishal,
Thursday, September 4, 2003, 12:22:01 PM, you wrote:
V Hi Robyn
V Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 9:09:56 PM, you wrote:
A I used TB! 1.62 with ZA Pro 2.6 until recently using automatic mail
A checking on one mail account and it worked fine. I've now switched to
A TB! 2 and ZA
Hello !
Since yesterday, when I upgraded from 1.62 to 2.00.6, outlook express
users are now receiving my messages with no text in the main part,
my message in a text file, and my pgp signature in .dat file ?
It does work perfectly with the 1.62... Is it a bug ?
--
Cedric - mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Dajabo,
@9-Sep-2003, 13:39 David Boggon [D] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Allie:
D Many end users don't know enough/have enough time/have the
D inclination to delve into the plain text display settings of
D their client, and so plain text messages with fixed width fonts
D and no bold
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 8:59:49 AM, Bill wrote:
B If the goal is COMMUNICATION, plain text wins. If the goal is
You are trying to emphasize COMMUNICATION, right? That's why
it's capitalized? I wonder if HTML would have been able to
present that across better by using italics or bold font?
B
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 14:58:18, Cedric Fontaine wrote:
It does work perfectly with the 1.62... Is it a bug ?
It's a bug. In Outlook Express. You can work around it by disabling
PGP-MIME.
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
http://deepthought.ena.si/
David Boggon, [DB] wrote:
DB Having said all this, if it really is an issue of principle, I
DB applaude TB! for not selling out. The purist attitude to me does
DB seem a little groupy, though ... and I wonder how sustainable it is
DB in reality.
The direction of conventions/standards as these
Hello TB List,
this was the old QT for deleting quote signs, can somebody write it new for
TB 2.x
,- [ QQ ]
| %REM=_Nachricht in Kommentarmakro kopieren_%-
| %COMMENT='%text'%-
| %REM=_Vorlage QQ2 aufrufen_%-
| %QINCLUDE=qq2%-
`-
,- [ QQ2 ]
| %IF:%-
| %-
|
It seems that Dave Kennedy said ...
D That's kind of a simple-minded view. Presentation counts. There
D have been a few snipes recently about how FoxMail does a lousy
D job at wrapping lines, etc. That's presentation and it clearly
D matters to even us plain-text techy types.
That's because I'm
Hello Danger,
Monday, September 8, 2003, 10:37:48 AM, you wrote:
D Hello Danger,
D Friday, September 5, 2003, 3:30:28 PM, you wrote:
D Hello Christopher,
D Friday, September 5, 2003, 2:51:12 PM, you wrote:
CB Hi Julien,
dh I have not found posted the Amnesty policy for newly registered 1.x
Hello,
Is there something wrong with [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list ? I have no
traffic there, posted a few days a question on it, and got no answer, but no
other traffic as well ?
Also I heard of some colleguas they get regulary unsubscribed over there ? Can
someone clarify ?
--
Rgds,
Hello David,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:59:41 AM, you wrote:
DB I don't want to open a can of worms here (or maybe I do) but what
DB is wrong with using HTML in email?
I'm a broadband user so I don't care about bandwidth so it's a most
point for me. Most people are never going to
After two emails and one phone call I received my new bat key!
--
Best regards,
Dangermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi Wilfried,
@9-Sep-2003, 16:05 +0200 (15:05 UK time) Wilfried Mestdagh [WM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
WM Is there something wrong with [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
WM list ? I have no traffic there, posted a few days a question on
WM it, and got no answer, but no other traffic as well ?
It's
Hi All,
It seems some mail clients are incapable of wrapping mails at a
sensible limit. Now as I'm viewing TB! at 1600x1200 an unwrapped
mail line is very long. Is it possible to set the viewer to force
the mail to wrap at 80 columns?
--
Jamie Dainton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Marck,
on 9/9/03 we wrote:
AM I hate when HTML mail forces me to read it with a particular
AM font and font size.
MDP Precisely.
D Well yes, that's precisely my point.
MDP It's not. It's the opposite of your point!
My point is freedom of choice
D TB too makes it difficult for people to
Hi Steve
Saturday, September 6, 2003, 12:29:23 PM, you wrote:
SMK I'm beginning to feel that the standard 30-day trial
SMK period just isn't enough, and that maybe users should push for 60 to 90 days.
For TB? How about one year? It might be enough :)
Cheers,
-Vishal
Hi Allie
Thursday, September 4, 2003, 4:57:25 AM, you wrote:
AM The thing with TB! is that if you wish for it to behave just like some
AM of the mainstream clients, you'll get frustrated and think it's flaky.
Partly. My main reason to consider it so is the bugs I've experienced and the
Hi Jack
Saturday, September 6, 2003, 10:56:16 AM, you wrote:
JM Many of TB's features go unused by me because:
JM 1. I don't even know some of them are there
JM 2. I don't know how to put them to good use
Hear hear. I'd *really* like to see some nice complicated things that people do
with TB.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
Monday, September 8, 2003, 12:58:21 AM, you wrote:
TF I also haven't read this. Or I must be getting old - let me find my
TF Gingko Biloba. Hm. Can you point me to a mid saying that anybody got
TF a free key because he registered
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:08:21 AM, Jamie wrote:
I'm also terribly prejudiced against fonts, if you want me to think
you're a 5 year old feel free to use Comic Sans, otherwise use a
businesslike font. It's a pain for me to have to set things up so that
stupid unreadable fonts are
Hello,
Can someone tell me wy the thread: Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks
- works for anyone? is not sorted as thread ? I see only 1 reference every
time and the Re[x] is always incremented.
I saw same fenomene in other mailing lists also with persons using The bat.
--
Hello Vishal,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 2:56:30 AM, you wrote:
AM to manually change my signatures
Now *that* I find really interesting. How do you do this - by having different
quick templates for different signatures?
Yes.
If so, doesn't remembering all those
keyboard combinations get
Hi Deborah
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 9:01:10 AM, you wrote:
DW - HTML slows the recipient's computer - not always noticeably, but it
DW always does.
Would you elaborate on this? Rendering might be slower, but the computer as a
whole? The rendering does not take up so much extra CPU power
Bonjour Danger,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 4:18:06 PM, j'ai pu lire:
D After two emails and one phone call I received my new bat key!
I'm happy for you. But I have not received any answer yet. I'll try
sending one more mail, because it is about a week since my first
email.
Thanks for the
Hello Danger,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 8:08:02 AM, you wrote:
,-- [ Is this really necessary to quote? ]
| D Hello Danger,
|
| D Monday, September 8, 2003, 10:37:48 AM, you wrote:
|
| D Hello Danger,
|
| D Friday, September 5, 2003, 3:30:28 PM, you wrote:
|
| D Hello Christopher,
|
|
The bat does not show quoted text properly in this message by the same
poster in the same NG (showing it here without boxquote! :) I know it
shows correctly here, but the original message doesn't.
As always, I have replaced @ with at
Hello tbudl,
Is it my imagination, or does the spell checker not work with the HTML editor?
--
Best regards,
Freddie mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
I think this may be the offending header (for the problems with marking
quotes):
Content-Type: (text/plain; format=flowed;)* charset=utf-8
* My parantheses.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 2.00.6 /thebat version
os Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service
Hello Danger,
Monday, September 8, 2003, 10:37:48 AM, you wrote:
D Hello Danger,
D Friday, September 5, 2003, 3:30:28 PM, you wrote:
D Hello Christopher,
D Friday, September 5, 2003, 2:51:12 PM, you wrote:
CB Hi Julien,
Important to quote all of these to get your in-line reply in context,
Hello Leif,
Please trim replies to context.
Ooops! I should have waited before replying to Danger :(
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 17:02:19, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
I think this may be the offending header (for the problems with marking
quotes):
This should be already known...
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
http://deepthought.ena.si/
The shortest
Sunday, September 7, 2003, 2:34:06 AM, Gordon wrote:
G I have been trying the Selective Download filters to avoid
G downloading the SoBig infected files
I've been keeping an eye on this, but haven't seen any responses.
Did you figure out how to do it?
--
Dave Kennedy
Hi Thomas
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 12:49:19 AM, you wrote:
TF Hello Vishal,
TF On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 00:34:14 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 11:34 +0700 GMT),
TF Vishal wrote:
It can check email automatically? No need to press Alt+F2? It looks like
everyone who can do this properly is not
Hi Marck
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 9:11:20 AM, you wrote:
D Hmmm. While some people who use HTML mail may abuse it, it is the
D spammers etc themselves who are at fault, not HTML, I think.
MDP That is not correct. The fault lies in the ability to write
MDP over-formatted messages.
I think
Hi Jeffrey
Monday, September 8, 2003, 1:30:46 PM, you wrote:
JAS I notice that many of the threads in this group end up broken. This
JAS seems especially obvious when The Bat! is threading based upon
JAS reference (Alt-1). I would have thought that since the bulk of us are
JAS using The Bat!,
Hi tracer
Monday, September 8, 2003, 9:01:52 PM, you wrote:
t There was a problem in the past that in Zonealarm you had to make the
t internet connection itself trusted.
Ridiculous. And this has been fixed, you say?
t Due to a very flakey connection I see not all posts or see them very
t late
Hi Daniel
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:40:14 AM, you wrote:
Now *that* I find really interesting. How do you do this - by having different
quick templates for different signatures?
DR Yes.
If so, doesn't remembering all those
keyboard combinations get to be a pain after a while?
DR
Hallo Wilfried,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:16:54 +0200GMT (9-9-03, 16:16 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
WM Can someone tell me wy the thread: Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks
WM - works for anyone? is not sorted as thread ? I see only 1 reference every
WM time and the Re[x] is
Hallo Freddie,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:03:46 -0700GMT (9-9-03, 17:03 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
FF Is it my imagination,
No.
FF or does the spell checker not work with the HTML editor?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Current version is 2.00 |
Hi Roelof
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:39:58 AM, you wrote:
WM Can someone tell me wy the thread: Re[3]: zonealarm and automatic mail checks
WM - works for anyone? is not sorted as thread ? I see only 1 reference every
WM time and the Re[x] is always incremented.
RO I'm viewing
Hello Allie,
TB! has supported a column that displays the message colour group for
quite some time now.
Please take a look at: http://perso.wanadoo.es/murech/threads.htm
Does this happen also on V2.0?
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Hello Danger,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:11:37 AM, you wrote:
D Sorry Leif I was overcome with Joy.
No problem. It happens to all of us! grin
--
Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user).
Using The Bat! 2.00 under Windows 2000 5.0
Build 2195 Service Pack 3 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with
Hello Leif,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:54:13 AM, you wrote:
Sorry Leif I was overcome with Joy.
--
Best regards,
Dangermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
Hi Dhrakol,
@9-Sep-2003, 11:03 -0400 (16:03 UK time) Vishal [D] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
D Hmmm. While some people who use HTML mail may abuse it, it is
D the spammers etc themselves who are at fault, not HTML, I
D think.
MDP That is not correct. The fault lies in the ability to
Hello Dave,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 4:31:02 PM, you wrote:
I'd still like for TB! to allow me as the end-user to select the
HTML editor as my default editor. I mean. really, there is an
option to turn on/off the little menu navigator thingy that I
ignored for at least a year until
Hello Jernej,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:13:40 +0200 GMT (09/09/2003, 22:13 +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simoni wrote:
I think this may be the offending header (for the problems with marking
quotes):
This should be already known...
Yes, it has been reported, and once again I confirm that the message
Hello David,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:17:11 +0100 GMT (09/09/2003, 21:17 +0700 GMT),
David Boggon wrote:
MDP It's not. It's the opposite of your point!
My point is freedom of choice
Your choice is costing me money. But I'm still lucky; the days of
paying extremely high prices per minute of
Hi Vishal,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:19:54 -0400 you wrote:
V Yes, same problem here. And no it shouldn't be a fastmail problem as you
V mentioned elsewhere since I don't use it.
Good to hear that someone else is seeing it with The Bat!. I think
that Thomas' point was that it was our
Hello Marck,
MDP It's working just fine. I saw your posts there. It's just a low
MDP traffic list.
Thank you. Do you think I should repost it here ?
I hade the impression this list was more for _use_ problems, the other one
more for _tech_ problems. If that's right, then I should not
Hello tracer,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:42:53 +0700 GMT (09/09/2003, 07:42 +0700 GMT),
tracer wrote:
Now incase anyone wonders why it says I am thomas as registered user,
Nobody is seeing this, unless he hits alt-F1 on your computer.
Happy to see that you have gotten granis to work again. But why
Hello Vishal,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:06:30 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 22:06 +0700 GMT),
Vishal wrote:
TF Account / Properties / Options / Periodical Check every xx Minutes.
That's what my original post was about. ZA doesn't allow this to happen. Only
manual mail checks using alt-F2 or the
Hello Marek,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:59:15 +0200 GMT (09/09/2003, 16:59 +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
yes, BT is up and running.
Hm. I tried to report a bug and got this message:
Maintenance Time - 07 Sep 2003 04:17 - ray
Bughtracker will be offline for maintenance from 4:30 CDT (11:30 GMT)
Hallo Vishal,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:55:43 -0400GMT (9-9-03, 17:55 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
V I'm having the same problem. I don't purge the messages, but I do delete them
V quickly.
That amounts to the same. When you delete messages from the beginning
of a thread, the rest won't
Hi Thomas,
on 9/9/03 you wrote:
My point is freedom of choice
TF Your choice is costing me money.
And exactly how much extra is it costing you?
TF so why do you advocate HTML mails?
I never said I did.
--
David Boggon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The UN estimates that the world's poorest
Dear Bats
Here is an odd bug. Can anyone verify.
I have the bat set to minimise to the taskbar (rather than the
system tray) although I doubt this makes a difference.
The standard windows keyboard shortcut for minimising all open
windows in Winkey-M. All programs I have except the Bat main
It seems that David Boggon said ...
TF Your choice is costing me money.
D And exactly how much extra is it costing you?
Does it matter? Doing something that you know costs someone else money is
rude, even if it's no more than one cent.
--
Bill Blinn Technology Editor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -
P Oh, I can't do that here...
Eh?
--
regards
Clive Taylor
Using TB 2.00.6
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, September 09, 2003
1:56:15 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: zonealarm and automatic mail checks - works for anyone?
Greetings Thomas,
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:31:19 PM, you wrote:
TF Account / Properties / Options / Periodical Check every xx
--- Original Message
From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday September 09 2003 10:51AM PT
M Here is an odd bug. Can anyone verify.
M I have the bat set to minimise to the taskbar (rather than the
M system tray) although I doubt this makes a difference.
M The standard windows keyboard
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 5:09:16 AM, Vishal wrote:
V It's all part of another problem I was having with some messages
V being delayed a lot before arriving here. I got her reply to you
V before your original message.
Seems that there's a lot of messages being affected that way - I keep
seeing
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 5:48:33 AM, Alexander wrote:
A ... I may not be of help with the initial problem (which looks incomplete
A HTML filtering to me since the TITLE tag itself is filtered while its
A contents remain)...
Yes but is that a TB! bug or something to do with the generating
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 4:16:21 PM, Vishal wrote:
t There was a problem in the past that in Zonealarm you had to make the
t internet connection itself trusted.
V Ridiculous. And this has been fixed, you say?
Yes this is no longer the case in ZA4 - internet connections go in the
Internet
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 11:20:33 AM, Mark wrote:
MA But if it is sent in this format URL:http://foobar.com then it is
MA not.
Even if it's not clickable, if you highlight the URL - the
http://foobar.com bit only - and right click there's an entry in the
context menu that says Open URL -
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 12:00:56 PM, Coyle306 wrote:
C I've noticed the same thing when I reply in plain text to an html
C message. Message appears at the very beginning of the quoted
C original message text.
Is this a bug that needs reporting then?
--
Cheers,
Anne
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
