Re: v3.0 b1

On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:45:13 +0200, Peter Fjelsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: cursory read Does that mean "cursing, while reading"... ? ;-) -- Greetings, Alexander Kunz Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstone

Re: Ritlabs *is* a business...

On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:15:18 +0100, Clive Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm on a bit of a jihad against the really stupid use of smilies, LOL, etc. Wow. Can I join your club please? LOL! ...whooops... SCNR ;-) -- Greetings, Alexander Kunz

Re: Ritlabs *is* a business...

> I'm on a bit of a jihad against the really stupid use of smilies, LOL, etc. Wow. Can I join your club please? -- Clive T Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Alternative emailers

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:27:33 +0200, Roland Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Add Mulberry (especially when you use IMAP). And add Marlin! ...oh, and add... ;-) Maybe not complete, but a useful resource for more mail clients than you've ever heard about is: http://email.about.com/od/windowsemai

Re: Alternative emailers

Hi Thorvald, on Thursday, September 2, 2004 at 01:04 you wrote in message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others: > Hæ! > Thursday, September 2, 2004, 00:47, dAniel hAhler wrote: >> mahogany >> Thunderbird >> Becky >> Pocomail >> Bloomba >> Foxmail > Add Mulberry (especially when you use IMAP). And

Re: thebat v3 and unicode

Hæ! Thursday, September 2, 2004, 06:44, WL wrote: > Is unicode in in header/body of the email supported as well? I'm > trying out v3 right now, but it doesn't seem like unicode characters > are displaying correctly. No, it is not. I guess I am complaining about the miserable Unicode-support since

Re: Version3 ?!

Hæ! Thursday, September 2, 2004, 02:26, Robin Anson wrote: > I think I will go back to 2.11 as soon as I have a moment to reinstall > it. 2.12 continually stops working for periods of up to a minute, and > doesn't always show the content of folders when they are selected. Can't confirm with v2.12

Re: Re[2]: move a mail to another folder - takes 10+ seconds?

> > so, avoid creating VFs with "filters". use "fast search" whenever > > possible. > > Hmmm. Whats the use of VF's then? This would limit their usability quite a > bit... i know. but that seems to be a limitation of thebat and cannot be improved shortly (i guess they are all working on 3.0 and

Re: Re[2]: move a mail to another folder - takes 10+ seconds?

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 21:33:17 -0700, Samson wrote: so, avoid creating VFs with "filters". use "fast search" whenever possible. Hmmm. Whats the use of VF's then? This would limit their usability quite a bit... I beg pardon for sounding negative, but the topic "VFs" really annoys me ATM. --

thebat v3 and unicode

Hello, all. Just looking through the feature list on ritlabs.com and browsing through the mailing list. I see a reference to the anti-virus API now supports unicode in version 2.12. Is unicode in in header/body of the email supported as well? I'm trying out v3 right now, but it doesn't seem like

Re[2]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1

Hello John, John Phillips wrote: JP> Hi Morgan, JP> On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 11:15:27 [GMT+0100] (which was 20:15:27 Australian JP> Eastern Time) you wrote: >> The funny thing is Outlook is now a better client than TB!. Outlook >> 2003 has virtual folders, an excellent filtering system, secure

Re[3]: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1

Hello Mark, Mark Partous wrote: MP> Hello Martyn, MP> Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:38:28 PM, you wrote: >>> Does it still top post? MD>> Unfortunately it does. But thankfully somebody came up with a solution to MD>> that and this is what I've been using for many months without any issue

Re: Re[2]: move a mail to another folder - takes 10+ seconds?

> My guess is that it's the complexity of the virtual folders' filters. > When I move a message to an ordinary folder, it takes a fraction of a > second. THIS IS IT!! you figured it out. that slow folder has 4000 messages, and 4 VFs associated with it (I mean, 4 VFs use it as source folder). w

To Allie

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 23:31:06 GMT, Mark Wieder wrote: > Thanks for your moderation over the years, and your > level-headedness and voice of sanity, and for putting up with > the rest of us. I missed your initial post, Allie. I'm sorry to see you go. Thanks much for being one of the Pillars of

Viewing w/Proportional Fonts, but Sending w/Plain Text

Hello TBUDL, I was just wondering ... if I choose to "view" my messages in a proportional font (Tahoma) and use the HTML/Windows Editor, this just affects my viewing, but not sending of messages, right? I would rather send "plain" text in email, since that's what most people prefer. I just li

Re: Change of heart

On 9/1/2004 8:49 AM my time, Nick wrote: ND> Wow - now that's quite a package. I got all excited until I realised ND> that it sits on top of Outlook. Shame that it hasn't got it's own ND> client built in. Ho mum, back to Bloomba... Hi Nick, It is quite a package indeed. The outlook part coul

Re: Change of heart

On 9/1/2004 8:07 AM my time, John wrote: JP> By the look of that page, you run it with Outlook? Hi John, Yes, it does require outlook. Kinda of a bummer but the email program is so fantastic at what it does, I easily forget it. -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 " [---

Re: The msi installer is giving me a problem under Xandros

On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 12:58:27 AM, Ben wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] B> Isn't there a way of extracting the exe file out of the msi? Or would B> that now work as it is a new major build? My son seemed to think there used to be but that it had been ... er ... withdrawn aft

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

Hello DZ-Jay, 01-Sep-2004 22:43, you wrote: > Well, I use Mutt, which is a console MUA for Linux. Liar - "Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)" ... :-) > The only thing that might be a problem to some is that its not > point-and-clicky, i.e. its a console application, driven by keyboar

Re: The msi installer is giving me a problem under Xandros

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 7:59:36 PM, MikeD wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M> Can you fire up a version of windows long enough to get the install to M> work? Then you can just 'migrate' the results to your linux box. M> I keep a small Windows partition on most of my linux boxes f

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 7:55:31 PM, Jack wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] J> Now, let's count the days before Ritlabs actually confirms that, okay? Jack they already did - Maxim posted earlier about it which is where I read it. -- Cheers, Anne Registered Linux user #345132 Fl

V3 home Thumbs up

Howdy Fellow Users of the Flying Rodent, I just thought I would say before going to bed that I like Version 3 and am happy with it. I have paid for it already. I also agree that a little bit more (or any) forewarning would have been nice. I would expect that RIT will deal with re

Re: Extracting Password

Hi Joseph, On 1 Sep 2004 22:38:12 (my local time 2 sep 2004 00:38:12), Joseph N. wrote: JN> Roel, it worked like a charm; thank you very much. How in the world JN> did you know? New features are often introduced into beta's, but never discovered by 'normal' use, so the place to be is tb-beta

Re: Version3 ?!

This is my third attempt to get this comment through to the list. Apologies if the other two suddenly appear as well. On Wed 1 September 2004, 20:35:56 +1000, Mau wrote: >> I think I will stick with 2.12 and look for another client :( > > If you don't want to upgrade for whatever reason, I sugges

Testing

Batlovers Please ignore this message. It is a test because I can't seem to get through to the list. -- Robin Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://

Re[2]: Problems With Spam Filters and Filters

Howdy, I deleted all traces of old filters in the sorting office, as well as all traces of any anti-spam plugin. (Including the new version) I then noticed that my filters started working again. That one problem fixed. Now when I reinstalled the SPAM filter and retaught it using 1591 SPAM messages

Re: The msi installer is giving me a problem under Xandros

Howdy Anne, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 5:17:24 PM, Anne wrotened: Anne> I've been using TB! under Xandros Linux (via Crossover Office) Anne> for the better part of 6 months and it has worked fine for me. Anne> Now I have a major problem with the upgrade to v3... I cannot Anne> install it onto

Re[2]: move a mail to another folder - takes 10+ seconds?

S>> the freeze is about 10 sec on the P4 home PC, worse on the P3 S>> (15-20 sec). S>> i have noticed this since thebat 2.12 (might be earlier, but 2.12 is S>> the first version that i started to pay attention to this annoying S>> thing), and still exists in latest lucky/6. RO> Moving one message

new msg under TB! or TB! on top of new msg

Battyfolk, I must have missed a setting somewhere but this is a PITA. How do I change it? TIA -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield CT USA TB! v3.0 W2K v5.0 Service Pack 4 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.sil

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 22:53:08 +0200, @ @ when MAU wrote: > Hello Mica, MAU. :-) >> It depends, Miguel. (-: Have you ever tried to work (especially >> estimating something new) anything more seriously with

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

Hello Anne, > It also happens when you click to create a new account Miguel. Sorry, I didn't know that. I haven't created a new account in many months. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0 Current versio

Re: [News] TheBat! 3.0 new version announcement **SPAM** **SPAMP2Pplugin BODY**

On Wednesday, September 01, 2004 it appears that Mike email (The Bat!) wrote the following in regards to "[News] TheBat! 3.0 new version announcement **SPAM** **SPAMP2Pplugin BODY**": MeTB> [snip] version 2 licence on MeTB> 20th August after my 30+10 days free trial ran out and it stopped MeTB>

Re: Tenure as List Moderator Ends

Allie- Getting out before the trout gets hot, eh? Thanks for your moderation over the years, and your level-headedness and voice of sanity, and for putting up with the rest of us. -- -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 __

Re: Tenure as List Moderator Ends

Howdy Allie, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:05:32 PM, Allie wrotened: Allie> I'll be stepping down as one of the moderators of the lists Allie> (TBUDL, TBBETA and TBTECH), effective as of now. The only thing i can think of to say is thank you for all your hard work. Allie> Note that I'l

Re: v3.0 b1

On Thursday, September 2, 2004 @ 6:21:01 AM, MAU wrote: [snips] >> But where's the cut-off point? MAU> How long is a piece of rope? How many grains make a bunch of rice? My point exactly. Seeing as Ritlabs are maintaining their usual communication policy (ie nothing useful, no help, no answers

Re: Alternative emailers (was: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1)

Hæ! Thursday, September 2, 2004, 00:47, dAniel hAhler wrote: > mahogany > Thunderbird > Becky > Pocomail > Bloomba > Foxmail Add Mulberry (especially when you use IMAP). -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media [The Bat! v2.12.03 without BayesIt on Windows 2000 Service P

Re: Tenure as List Moderator Ends

Hi Allie, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 8:05:32 AM, you wrote: AM> I'll be stepping down as one of the moderators of the lists (TBUDL, AM> TBBETA and TBTECH), effective as of now. My genuine thanks to you for your efforts through your tenure. I've always found your messages easy to understa

Re: access violations with sorting office

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:17:13 PM, Dwight wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] D> In v.2, there was a button to push to move filters up or down. Can't D> find it in new one. When I try to drag filters, holding down alt key, D> it has worked a couple of times, but Dwight, right click

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:53:08 PM, MAU wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M> Yes. TB's _only_ popup is when starting it to remind you how many of M> evaluation you still have left. Many software do that. It also happens when you click to create a new account Miguel. -- Cheers,

Alternative emailers (was: [thebat] Re: v3.0 b1)

Hello TBUDL, on Wed, 1. Sep 2004 at 12:13:28 +0200 Graham Dodd wrote: > Anyone got any other suggestions for mail clients ? This is my list-to-test.. mahogany Thunderbird Becky Pocomail Bloomba Foxmail -- shinE! GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc ICQ#152282665 Random software

Will BayesIt 0.6.0 work with TheBat! 2.12.00?

BayesIt's history.txt says: "Version 0.6.0 - this version is written to be included in The Bat! 3.0 distribution" Is anyone successfully using BayesIt 0.6.0 with TheBat! 2.12.00? Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.9, MyMacros 1.11, gMacrosPlugin 0.80 Windows 2000 v5.0

Re: Extracting Password

On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:25:11 GMT, Roel wrote: > There's a file 'protocol.ini', change 'logging=0' to 'logging=1' Roel, it worked like a charm; thank you very much. How in the world did you know? -- JN Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using T

Re: How to Move to the new filter system - For new users.

Hello Dean, > Ok with all the other mail going on in both BETA AND TBUDL it is > hard to find one good explanation on how to transfer to the new V3 > filter system. OK, your are familiar with OFS (Old Filtering System), right? Well, just for the records, these filters are kept in a *.SRX fi

Re: v3.0 b1

Hello M, > But where's the cut-off point? How long is a piece of rope? How many grains make a bunch of rice? ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' informati

Re: Registered Home Ed.

Hello Ben, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 you wrote in BA> I registered V3 Home Edition. However in Help\About (alt+f1) it says BA> I am using the professional edition. Am I allowed a confused BA> expression? I'll join you with that confused expression 'cos it's the same

Registered Home Ed.

Howdy Flying Rodent fans, I registered V3 Home Edition. However in Help\About (alt+f1) it says I am using the professional edition. Am I allowed a confused expression? Someone explain this to me pretty please. -- Have Fun, |> |> |>en is |\ohop [EMAIL PROTECTED] crashing T

Re: Does 3.0 properly render Outlook email?

On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, jwayne wrote... >>> A major problem with 2.x was that it wouldn't render Outlook email properly. It >>> often concatenates words. Very annoying, especially when one wants to >>> reply/forward the message. >>> The bug was reported long ago but was never fixed. Do

Re: (no subject)

> On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Doug Weller wrote... > >> I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account   >> properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it >> isn't  in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't?  How do I get >> NFS in  version 3? >> > > The NFS is no

Re: (no subject)

> How do I get NFS in version 3? NFS? What's that? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.0 with POPFile 0.21.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.si

Re: (no subject)

Hello Doug, > I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, but I'm pretty > sure > it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? > How do > I get NFS in version 3? Just open the Sorting Office. NFS is the only option in v3.0. -- Best

Version 3.0 but still my common folders disappear

Hi list, a couple of months ago all my common folders suddenly vanished. They are still in my mail folder, but fail to show in TB. Whenever I recreate them, they appear back, but just for the running session. When I close TB and reopen it, they are gone again. For instance: If I mark a message

Re[2]: Does 3.0 properly render Outlook email?

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 4:43:05 PM, Jonathan Angliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: JA> On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, jwayne wrote... >> A major problem with 2.x was that it wouldn't render Outlook email properly. It >> often concatenates words. Very annoying, especially when one wants

Re: (no subject)

Hello Doug, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 you wrote in DW> How do I get NFS in version 3? The filters are NFS. You now have no option and so far they seem to be working better than in version 2 or maybe I'm lucky. -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0 & SpamPal | Windows XP (b

Re: Vanishing Tick Box

Hm, Pocomail doesn't automatically warn when you haven't included a subject! > I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, > but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 > final. Now you see it now you don't?  How do I get NFS in version 3? > > Doug > > >

Re: (no subject)

On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Doug Weller wrote... > I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account > properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't > in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get NFS in > version 3? The NFS is no longer optional as

Re: Version3 ?!

Hello ETM, > (who hates the perpetual interjections about top and > bottom posting and cut marks) With TB is is quite easy to filter them and send directly to the trash bin :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0 ___

Re: tool bars

Hello Dwight, > I haven't been able to figure out how to modify the tool bar. Not possible yet. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.sil

Re: What do I do with this MSI file?

Hello Jernej, >> I've got my upgrade license. What am I supposed to do with this 15,341 >> byte file, "thebat_professional.msi"? > > Download it again (it should be 8.415.744 bytes, ... No, 'professional' is 15MB because it includes the International pack. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech

Re: What do I do with this MSI file?

Hello Thomas, > Does one have to be connected to the internet while running the msi > file? No, just for downloading it :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL'

(no subject)

I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get NFS in version 3? Doug Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBU

Re[2]: Version3 ?!/Foxmail

Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:16:40 AM, you wrote: >> Do you know if Foxmail handles IMAP? MM> No. I mean it doesn't. As far as I know. The version MM> I have, and am MM> talking about, is 4.1, and if they made a newer one I MM> didn't see it, MM> yet. OK ... write that one off :-) [snip]

Re: Extracting Password

ON Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 7:19:13 PM, you wrote: JN> I need the plaintext version of a password to one of my POP accounts JN> that is in TB!'s account properties. I seem to have changed it since JN> I last recorded it, and now I need it again. TB! won't let me copy JN> the p/w field in

Re: tool bars

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 3:23:44 PM, Allen Day wrote: A> Pretty sure the "customizeable toolbar" has nothing to do A> with hiding/showing/adding buttons. I'm pretty sure that hiding/showing/adding buttons was an oft requested feature which has been promised in the past. For some

Re[4]: Refund Claim

Hi Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 2:58:03 PM, Morgan Pugh wrote: MP> Hi Mark, MP> Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 2:35:24 PM, you wrote: MP>> Hello John, MP>> Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:17:18 PM, you wrote: That being said, I must say that as far as the law is concerned, you won'

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

Hello Mica, > It depends, Miguel. (-: Have you ever tried to work (especially > estimating something new) anything more seriously with a slapping > popups, constant interruptions and disabled features around? Yes. TB's _only_ popup is when starting it to remind you how many of evaluation you stil

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 18:56:39 +0200, @ @ when Mica Mijatovic wrote: > Another essential thing, which causes such attitude, is *relationship* > an author/company builds toward its customers/users. This is a

Re: TB! v3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 19:29:09 +0200, @ @ when Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > Hello Mica Mijatovic, > 01-Sep-2004 18:56, you wrote: >> It depends, Miguel. (-: Have you ever tried to work (especially >> estimat

Re: [News] TheBat! 3.0 new version announcement

Hello Mike email (The Bat!), 01-Sep-2004 22:32, you wrote: > I shall have to pay another 14 GBP. They have screwed me for £13.60 One year ago, when things were exactly the same with the release of v2, people in a similar situation wrote a personal mail to Ritlabs and got a new license key for fr

Re: SSL cert store in The Bat! 3?

On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Martyn Drake wrote... > Well, I think I've figured out what the cause of the problem was with > The Bat! version 3 not being able to pick up mail from my cPanel server > earlier this morning. > As the certificate contains a different host name to that what I'm

access violations with sorting office

In v.2, there was a button to push to move filters up or down. Can't find it in new one. When I try to drag filters, holding down alt key, it has worked a couple of times, but Usually, the focus point jumps down four times, stops and I get an access violation at address 00402601. This address is a

Re: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

Hello Jack, > Why would I want to revert back to a set of standard glyphs that I rejected > once before? I thought you wanted to take a look at the new icons, that's all. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0

Re: Does 3.0 properly render Outlook email?

On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, jwayne wrote... > A major problem with 2.x was that it wouldn't render Outlook email properly. It > often concatenates words. Very annoying, especially when one wants to > reply/forward the message. > The bug was reported long ago but was never fixed. Does 3.0 fi

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

Alexander S. Kunz wrote: The problem may very well be that there is none. When it comes to VF's, the filtering and the macros (and the wish to have those features together in an email client), is there an alternative? Well, I use Mutt, which is a console MUA for Linux. You can run it under Cygwin

Re: The msi installer is giving me a problem under Xandros

Hello Anne, > Does anyone know of a way around this at all please? BTW suggesting > going back to using Windows is *not* an option! ;) I can't guaranty it will work because I have no way of testing it here (no Linux box), but I am pretty sure that if you get thebat.exe from a .msi installation on

Bouncing Emails

To me, the thing that sets TheBat is its ability to bounce (in addition to forward) emails. I don't see that in Mozilla, Thunderbird, but it is there (sort of) in Outlook. What other email clients have the ability to bounce emails? Thanks. --

Re[3]: [News] TheBat! 3.0 new version announcement **SPAM** **SPAMP2Pplugin BODY**

Hi Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:35:21 PM, Morgan Pugh wrote: MP> Perhaps the problem was how Ritlabs announced this? I think they MP> should have put an announcement on there site for the past month or MP> so, then it wouldn't be such a big shock. Then I would not have paid 27.55 GBP for a

AVG & Bat! Does it really work

Hi Bat! Fans, A change from the hoo hah re version 3.0 for a while. I have AVG running with Bat!, kept updated, and set up through Bat! preferences. Whenever I run Trend Micro House Call http://housecall.trendmicro.com/ Trend Micro discovers one or more viruses (virii???) in Bat! attachments.

Re: Sorting office

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 8:03:43 AM, Paul Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PJ> Hi, PJ> I amusing V3 PJ> Can anyone tell me how to move all my filters to common so that I can PJ> then share them with the relevant accounts? PJ> Also is there any reason not to put all the filters in commo

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

Hello DZ-Jay, 01-Sep-2004 21:59, you wrote: > Lack of information after such a big outcry from their paying and loyal > customers that we have seen during the past few days on the lists, is > enough for most of us to loose faith in and respect for RitLabs. Who knows about Ritlabs intentions to

Re: TheBat! downloading very slowly

Hi Doug, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 17:44:51 [GMT+0100] (which was Thu, 2:44:51 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > My wife's 2.0.4.7, with only a few messages in it, took 4 minutes 40 > seconds to download 25 messages. We left them on the server and > tried Agent. That took 25 seconds. What's go

Re: v3.0 b1

Hi Chris, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 22:57:01 [GMT+1000] (which was 22:57:01 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > I saw on the Beta list, it doesn't matter how long you've had > the licence. Quoting from the email: I doesn't actually say that. -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat

Re[2]: Ritlabs policy is not great...

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 3:59:40 PM, DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (snip) DJ> Sorry, but I also paid for v2.x about 4 months ago and will not update DJ> to v3, ever. I will continue using v2.12 until that time when I find a DJ> better program. Me too. What's keeping me back is the

tool bars

I haven't been able to figure out how to modify the tool bar. Since I can't seem to locate any what's new for v.3 (what's new in 2.12?!?) figured I'd ask here. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 3.0 on Win

Re: Ritlabs policy is not great...

Alexander S. Kunz wrote: As long as you don't know how your registration will be treated (maybe you get a free update because you only registered three months ago, it would be more than fair in my eyes), why do you complain? So the problem is: lack of information! Lack of information after such a b

Re[2]: Opening links in a browser

Hi Peter, > and click on Download. After downloading close Firefox and execute the > downloaded registry key. > Please note, that I haven't tried this myself. I just translated what is > on that link. :-) It worked!!! Thank you for your help! -- Best Regards, Joe O _

Re: Help file in V3 is still the V2 help file!

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 2:22:09 PM, Morgan Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: MP> Hi The Bat! User DL, MP> Just checked the help and it is all about "whats new in Version 2" MP> heh. Surprise surprise. They just don't get it, do they? jon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re[2]: TB! v3 (Was: Re: v3.0 b1)

Hello Alexander, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 you wrote in ASK> So, the v3 trial isn't only time-limited, but also lacking functionality? No, it's just time limited -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0 & SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 1

the bat! v3.0

Because of all the arguments I looked at Pocomail and Becky today. I kind of liked Pocomail but because of the filters I am back to try the bat! v3.0. If it is not an improvement to v2.12 I think I am will go back to 2.12 because it still suits me the best.. -- cheers, Henk.

Re: The msi installer is giving me a problem under Xandros

Hello Anne, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 11:17:24 AM, you wrote: A> I've been using TB! under Xandros Linux (via Crossover Office) A> for the better part of 6 months and it has worked fine for me. A> Now I have a major problem with the upgrade to v3... I cannot A> install it onto my Linux box.

Re: Mod: Cut mark

Dear Jim, @1-Sep-2004, 12:31 -0600 (01-Sep 19:31 UK time) Jim McMaster [JM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hmmm - dissension in the ranks? JM> Do you realize the constant moderator interjections are more JM> annoying than the behavior you are trying to address? You think? You are entitled to th

RE:Ritlabs *is* a business...

Hello M, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 3:23:49 PM, you wrote: > On Wednesday, September 1, 2004 @ 8:29:31 PM, Nick Dutton wrote: > [snips] Nick>> I'd bet that this is where their real money comes from, not in keeping Nick>> a (vocal) few of the faithful happy. They are a business after all. >

Re[2]: What do I do with this MSI file?

Hello Marck, MDP> @1-Sep-2004, 10:45 -0500 (01-Sep 16:45 UK time) Lawrence Johnson [LJ] MDP> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: LJ>> I've got my upgrade license. What am I supposed to do with LJ>> this 15,341 byte file, "thebat_professional.msi"? MDP> Run it? It is a "MicroSoft Installer" file an

Re: Extracting Password

Hi Joseph, On 1 Sep 2004 17:19:13 (my local time 19:19:13), Joseph N. wrote: JN> How else can I figure out what password my mailer is sending to my JN> webmail service?? * Close tb * In windows explorer, go to the account-files on your hard drive. There's a file 'protocol.ini', change 'loggin

Re: TB V3 pro and personal...

Hello Michael, On 01 September 2004, 09:20 -0700 (01/09/200417:20 local time) Michael L. Wilson [MLW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MWT>> The new Professional version replaces SecureBat. MLW> According to other messages, Professional contains a spell checker and MLW> home does not. There is

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: TheBat! downloading very slowly)

On Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 12:21:16 PM, Leif Gregory wrote: > Hello Doug, > Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 10:44:51 AM, you wrote: DW>> Thanks. DW>> Doug > > Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not > just to the person being replied to, even if their post ma

Re: v3.0 b1

> I am quite sure Ritlabs will consider that fact. A 10 days old user > should not be charged for the upgrade. From the email from Maxim Masiutin (one of the developers of The Bat!) I saw on the Beta list, it doesn't matter how long you've had the licence. Quoting from the email: "The Bat! 3.0 v

Re: Version3 ?!/Foxmail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 08:51:13 -0700, @ @ when Lynn wrote: > Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 5:35:49 AM, you wrote: . > As this is kind of off-topic, I hope you don't mind me emailing you > directly ..

Help file in V3 is still the V2 help file!

Hi The Bat! User DL, Just checked the help and it is all about "whats new in Version 2" heh. -- Morgan http://mpugh.co.uk PGP Key: http://mpugh.co.uk/pgp.asc Using TB! 3.0 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Usi

Re[2]: v3.0 b1

Hi Chris, Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 1:52:17 PM, you wrote: >> As a new user who bought my v2 licence on 20th August, try *very* >> annoyed. C> Yeah, I know how you feel Mike - I only got my licence on the C> 6th of August myself. I found out about the v2.13 beta on BetaNews, C> & was looking

The msi installer is giving me a problem under Xandros

I've been using TB! under Xandros Linux (via Crossover Office) for the better part of 6 months and it has worked fine for me. Now I have a major problem with the upgrade to v3... I cannot install it onto my Linux box. CO only allows installation of .exe files and hasn't a clue what to do with the

  1   2   3   >