Suggestions?

2001-11-12 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello All, Monday, November 12, 2001, 5:07:26 AM, you wrote: Has anyone come up with an efficient system to export the message to a txt file for archiving purposes? I have multiple accounts and multiple folders within each account. I would like to find an automatic way to combine all these

Re[2]: Suggestions?

2001-11-12 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Jan, Monday, November 12, 2001, 11:00:11 AM, you wrote: JR Hello Kenneth JR At 10:18 AM on Monday, November 12, 2001 you wrote the JR following on the posted subject 'Suggestions?': Kenneth Has anyone come up with an efficient system to export the Kenneth message to a txt file for

Re[2]: Suggestions?

2001-11-12 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Jan, Monday, November 12, 2001, 11:41:04 AM, you wrote: JR Make the filter manual apply it to the messages left in JR the folder that are of interest to you. In the 'Rule' JR dialogue you can select 'Manual. I think that's the only option. I guess it's better to create 20 rules

Re[2]: Suggestions?

2001-11-12 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Jan, Monday, November 12, 2001, 12:05:00 PM, you wrote: JR Sounds a little convoluted but it may work for you. Others JR may have a much better idea. Thanks. I will give it a try. -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re[2]: Suggestions?

2001-11-13 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Januk, Monday, November 12, 2001, 4:41:43 PM, you wrote: JA However, on another list, people have reported that they enjoy using a JA product called Mailbag Assistant to deal with their archiving needs. Thanks. I've downloaded and tried it. It's fantastic. Fast, automatic, and you can

Re[2]: Suggestions?

2001-11-13 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Eddie, Tuesday, November 13, 2001, 6:30:39 AM, you wrote: EC Did I miss someone's posting where the URL is mentioned? Could you EC please re-post the URL for the 'Mailbag Assistant'? Thank you. No., you didn't. I did a Google search. Here is it:

Re[3]: HTML-mail

2001-11-30 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Rick, 30 Nov 2001, 4:08:52 PM, you wrote: RR Although for the most part I also despise HTML emails, I'm not so RR certain that at least having the option to use it occasionally would RR be such a bad idea. The only HTML I used was some occasional bolding RR or italics which I didn't think

Re: Virus

2001-12-02 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Kevin, 2 Dec 2001, 2:40:33 PM, you wrote: What virus? I don't think I have received such e-mail lately. -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives :

Re[3]: Virus

2001-12-02 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Kevin, 2 Dec 2001, 3:02:05 PM, you wrote: KC The Virus is the W32.Badtrans Virus, Quite a KC Dangerous one which goes through the address book KC and Emails all contacts, i believe this is what KC has happened. I'm familiar with it and my NAV 2002 has that within its

Re[2]: TB Palm m500

2001-12-24 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Nick, 24 Dec 2001, 8:40:07 AM, you wrote: NA TB, as far as I know, has no such integration although some claim it's NA possible if you use vCards, but I think it's a hit and miss type NA operation. There is nothing in TB or Palm specifically designed for NA synchronisation between the two

Re[2]: TB Palm m500

2001-12-24 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Nick, 24 Dec 2001, 9:18:50 AM, you wrote: NA What exactly do you mean by _built it_? AFAIK, without Pocket Mirror, NA there is no Sync with Outlook, and without IES by Qualcomm you cannot NA Sync with Eudora. I would never use OE, Lotus or MS Exchange... at least NA not willingly ;o), so

Re[2]: HTML email's will not show content?

2002-01-05 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Marck, 5 Jan 2002, 3:58:30 PM, you wrote: MDP It is understood that TB V2 may eventually provide an option that MDPwill cover this. Am I wrong that we've been waiting for this for a long time? Love to be able to read Japanese/Korean/Chinese characters Love to be able to compose

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
doesn't look like a Windows application. You know you can change the skin to make it look different. I see Poco as more powerful in terms of setting up the display. -- Kenneth S. Rhee, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/14/2002 -- Archives

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
it while the folder or mailbox is empty. It's not that hard. -- Kenneth S. Rhee, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/14/2002 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[4]: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
-mail program, then you can charge more than the combined price of two, and I'll buy. That would be a killer application. -- Kenneth S. Rhee, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/14/2002 -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators

Re: [OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails

2002-01-14 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
both the BAT and Pocomail, and I have to say there is no best product for me. Each does something well and others not so well. There is an option for word wrapping in Pocomail, and you don't have to keep it on if you don't like it. -- Kenneth S. Rhee, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/14/2002

FW: I love the Bat , but why can't the Bat allow me to editHTMLdocuments or read my USENET news groups. Standard Email features

2003-01-17 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Agreed. If the Bat developers take such narrow and rigid stand on these issues, they will drive away current and potential users, and I am afraid that would be the end of product development. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Miguel A.

RE: FW: I love the Bat , but why can't the Bat allow me to editHTMLdocuments or read my USENET news groups. Standard Email features

2003-01-17 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Oh, Boy, here we go again. I try to refrain, but couldn't help with this one. I for one am glad that you do not run the world we live in. I wasn't advocating that we use the html mail (I for one don't use it 99% of the time, but there are a few occasions I use it to take advantage of rich text

RE: Re[2]: FW: I love the Bat , but why can't the Bat allow me toedit HTMLdocuments or read my USENET news groups. Standard Email features

2003-01-17 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
I'm sorry if I missed your point, but I was responding not only to the content of your message but the strong tone it contained. If you look at my earlier message I was agreeing with the notion of having multiple options so that folks with different choices/preferences can happily coexist without

Error message--invalid argument to date encoded

2003-02-05 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Has anyone get the error message--invalid argument for date encoded when you start the BAT?Any possible solutions? Thanks. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Error message--invalid argument to date encoded

2003-02-05 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Marck, Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 12:22:00 PM, you wrote: MDP This happens when you have imported addresses from the OE address MDP book and allowed it to import Birth Dates too. MDP One thing - Incomplete message? Anyway, when I uncheck the vcf option in the preference menu, the

Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT

2003-02-06 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello tbudl, Is there a way to empty trash on multiple accounts w/o existing the program? Right now I have to do this on individual account if I don't want to exit. -- Best regards, Kenneth mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT

2003-02-06 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Deborah, Thursday, February 6, 2003, 1:03:02 PM, you wrote: DW Folder menu - Purge all folders - will empty trash from all folders, in DW all accounts, using the settings you've chosen :-) It doesn't work on my system. I usually have fresh messages on my trash, and nothing gets rid of

Re[2]: Empty trash on multiple account w/o exiting the BAT

2003-02-06 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Marcus, Thursday, February 6, 2003, 1:18:11 PM, you wrote: MO Right click the folder you want emptied and tick mark Maximum number MO of stored messages is. Leave the number at zero. Next time you purge MO all folders the messages in this folder will be deleted. Thanks. It worked. --

Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-07 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Looks like html editing has finally made it to the BAT. I'm sure it will be greeted with delight or scorn depending on your preference. -- Best regards, Kenneth mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 |

Re[2]: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-07 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Jurgen, Friday, February 7, 2003, 11:49:05 AM, you wrote: One thing I like it is it's not obtrusive, and I can turn it on or off at will. Here is my first message using the html editor. Could use a few more features like bullets, etc. JH Hello Csaba, JH Friday, February 7, 2003,

Re[4]: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-07 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Spike, Friday, February 7, 2003, 12:20:02 PM, you wrote: S Unobtrusive?? How can I remove the above gibberish from showing S up in my text window?? S Back to the drawing board! It showed up in my BAT fine w/o any problem. Normally, I don't send a html-based e-mail, but I wanted to test

Re[2]: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-07 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Csaba, Friday, February 7, 2003, 1:53:07 PM, you wrote: CK I am sorry if I sounded mean. I still think that it does not CK mean if BAT is capable of doing this then CK it has to be done. You are perfectly OK not to use the new feature if that doesn't suit you, but that doesn't give you

reply all with selected text?

2003-02-07 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello tbudl, One thing I love and is time saving is to use F4 command after selecting text. However, this doesn't work when you want to reply to all. Is there a similar command (or trick) for reply to all? -- Best regards, Kenneth mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-07 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Mary, Friday, February 7, 2003, 5:51:59 PM, you wrote: MB I truly dislike this! I had to put your message into the Reply text MB editor in order to read it. MB The colors are garish--on my screen--and hurt my eyes. The type is MB only half as large as the Courier New that I have set up to

Re[2]: Looks like html makes to the BAT

2003-02-07 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Mary, Friday, February 7, 2003, 7:04:34 PM, you wrote: MB I do not ever want to see neon-bright colors and motion (of course, MB you didn't put motion, but that is possible, as I understand it, with MB html) on my screen. MB It gives me a headache. I do appreciate your sparing me this in

Re[2]: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-07 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello John, Friday, February 7, 2003, 7:22:14 PM, you wrote: JP Are you highlighting the selected text first? F4 only works with selected text, but it is limited to simple reply function. I couldn't find a similar command for reply to all with selected text. -- Best regards, Kenneth

Re[2]: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Roelof, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 3:08:10 AM, you wrote: RO Next time you want to reply to all with selected text only do this: RO Select the text RO Ctrl-C RO Reply to all RO Call your quick template (type 'F4'followed by Ctrl-space) RO My quick template is very limited, you could

Re[2]: reply all with selected text?

2003-02-08 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Roelof, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 11:47:23 AM, you wrote: RO Now you only need a reason to do so. Can't remember the last time I RO did a reply-to-all for non testing purposes. Usually it's not required. However, I belong to a few listservers that if I don't do reply all, the e-mail

Re[2]: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Jurgen, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 1:11:13 PM, you wrote: JH LOL in some ways that reminds me of the good old times in the FIDO net JH when the Amiga Users and the Atari ST Users were at each others JH throats *sigh* Why does it have to be either or. I vote for peaceful coexistence.

Re[2]: HTML sectarianism :-)

2003-02-08 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello marek, Saturday, February 8, 2003, 2:25:47 PM, you wrote: mj Allow me to respectfully disagree. I believe that before we move on, mj we all should make independent, informed decisions about whether the mj proposed direction is beneficial. Ah! Therein lies the problem I see. I have not

Re: TB!, Best Version for New User

2003-02-10 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Paddy, I tend to recommend the new person to stay away from the beta. However, if the person has good computing experience and wants to write html mail, then go with 1.63 beta6. Since installed last week, I haven't had any major problems to speak of, and a couple of new features such as

Re[2]: NOD32 (was: Grisoft AVG)

2003-03-12 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello John, There are a number of good AV programs in the market. You don't have to knock one down in order to make yours look better. I use NOD since it's one of the fastest in scanning my system. It has also won the 2003 Power Tools Forum award, and I have to say there are many programs in

Nod 2.0 b4 released

2003-03-29 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Just to let folks know that the new beta has been released. I had a problem with b2 with my Spameat Pro 4, but now the problem has been fixed. The new interface is easier to use than ever. Get it at http://www.nod32.com/download/download.htm

Re[2]: Nod 2.0 b4 released

2003-03-30 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Bill, I believe you are right. I installed the regular one. I uninstalled the previous version (3.x) before installing this one just to be safe. -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunday, March 30, 2003, 3:38:10 PM, you wrote: BK I see they

Re[2]: TB (v1.62) Conflicts with ZA (v2.6.362) (probable bug?)

2003-06-02 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello, Sunday, June 1, 2003, 6:43:03 PM, you wrote: DJ If I shutdown ZoneAlarm, TB works fine. Now, I could think it is a DJ problem with ZoneAlarm, of course, except that it does not happen DJ with any other program (that I use) and it didn't happen with the DJ previous version of TB. You

Re[2]: Support for creating HTML message?

2003-06-20 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello ETM, Friday, June 20, 2003, 6:49:20 PM, you wrote: ESoV Why wouldn't those who want such things simply go to OE and get ESoV them? Reminds me of non-smokers and non-drinkers who insist on ESoV using tobacco shops and bars, then demanding that they cease and ESoV desist in being what they

Top posting

2003-07-03 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
If I remember, there was a spirited discussion on top versus bottom (or strategic) posting. The forum guideline and the general consensus on this forum was that the bottom posting is more logical and preferred. I was monitoring another listserver today, and there seems to be another thought

Re[2]: Top posting

2003-07-03 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Leif, Thursday, July 3, 2003, 5:42:19 PM, you wrote: LG Or better yet... If people would trim their quotes. I would second that. . . -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r

Re[2]: Top posting

2003-07-03 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Thomas, Friday, July 4, 2003, 12:30:05 AM, you wrote: TF I see your point but am amazed that you see more and more people TF migrating *to* that technology. I would have thought it's very TF nineties. Actually smartphones are 21st century technology (cell + PDA). The first popular PDA

Re[2]: Top posting

2003-07-03 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Thomas, Friday, July 4, 2003, 1:06:15 AM, you wrote: TF Yes, I have seen one guy recentlywith what looked like a very huge TF mobile phone with which he could also do other things. Looked bulky TF and uncomfortable to me. Also, I fail to see why someone needs to be TF reachable by email

Re[2]: Top posting

2003-07-04 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Roelof, Friday, July 4, 2003, 5:12:37 AM, you wrote: RO I'd prefer trimming quotes above top posting. I might be generalizing, RO but I've never received a top posted message with trimmed quotes. What RO I receive on a regular base are messages like this: RO ,- [ ] RO | Yes RO | 2 RO

Re[2]: Top posting

2003-07-04 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Carsten, Friday, July 4, 2003, 8:39:09 AM, you wrote: CT If you want to communicate and don't have enough bandwidth ... CT --/.-/-.--/-.../. -.--/---/..- ...//---/..-/.-../-.. -/.-./-.-- CT .../---/--/. -././.-- ---/.-../-.. -/.-./.-/-./.../..-././.-. CT

Re[2]: Top posting

2003-07-04 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Carsten, Friday, July 4, 2003, 2:16:10 PM, you wrote: CT Don't these toys give you access to a webmail application via a CT builtin browser or can't you install a ssh client[1] on them? CT * Can't you use IMAP? That means reading mails online and downloading CT only those mails that

Re: NOD32 v2 question

2003-07-11 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Marck, Friday, July 11, 2003, 5:57:47 AM, you wrote: MDP NOD32 have just released v2, but the TB plug-in isn't working right MDP when using it to check outbound mail with attachments. Is there a MDP way to configure it to work correctly? There is no need to use the plug in. It scans the

Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question

2003-07-11 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Marck, Friday, July 11, 2003, 6:51:54 AM, you wrote: MDP Yes, it's working well for inbound mail. It's the outbound mail MDP check that's failing. Sorry about that. You still don't need the plug in. The AMON will catch the virus infected file if you try to attach the file using the

Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question

2003-07-11 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello Marck, Friday, July 11, 2003, 7:27:38 AM, you wrote: MDP It's not for me - I use AVG. It's for someone who wants his MDP outbound messages certified virus free by NOD. NOD is saying that MDP the attachment is not valid and stalling the mail send. I see. Interesting. This has never

Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question

2003-07-11 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello ravi, Friday, July 11, 2003, 10:14:43 AM, you wrote: r How about forwarding an an infected message including the r attachment? r A virus could have been received and not detected prior to a r signature update. Assuming you are forwarding a message that has already been scanned, it should

Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question

2003-07-11 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello ravi, Friday, July 11, 2003, 11:23:18 AM, you wrote: r As I said, one could have received a virus before the virus r signature was updated to detect it. Yes, I got it. That would be possible, but likely for me. I would really have to be out of my mind to forward a message to

Re: Blank mails

2003-08-25 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello John, Monday, August 25, 2003, 6:23:28 AM, you wrote: JP Hi Bat! Fans, JP Queer problem. JP Some (rare) e-mails received are completely blank except for the JP header. JP How ever if I click on the Reply arrow, I can then read the mail. JP Any clues? I'm experiencing the same thing.

Re: Blank mails

2003-08-25 Thread Kenneth S. Rhee
Hello John, Monday, August 25, 2003, 6:23:28 AM, you wrote: JP How ever if I click on the Reply arrow, I can then read the mail. I forgot to add that I can't read even if I hit reply or forward either. However, when I get another e-mail from someone else who has replied to the original