Well, I've looked but I probably can't see the wood for the trees. I'm
slowly getting to grips with all the features of this programme but can't
find a way to move messages from the Inbox to a specific folder which
contains 60 names. I want to sort mail from all or any of those names to
the
Hello Miguel,
Saturday, October 5, 2002, 10:22:53 AM, you wrote:
MAU Go to the Advanced tab of the filter and scroll down, you will see the
MAU option Address(es) must be listed in address book. Once you select
MAU this, you also have the option to The address entry must belong to
MAU groups.
When I open The Bat my mail is sent and downloaded perfectly and,
thereafter, nothing happens apart from could not connect to the server
messages.
In Account/Properties/Network I have Use account specific network
settings and LAN or manual connect ticked.
I have the same in Options/Network
This happens while you're connected?
Yes, and my other mail programme works perfectly alongside it (no, they
aren't RW In Account/Properties/Network I have Use account specific
network RWsettings and LAN or manual connect ticked.
RW I have the same in Options/Network and Admin.
When
Hello Alexander,
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 at02:27:43[GMT +0300](which was 00:27 where I live)
you wrote:
AC Are you running ZoneAlarm by any chance? If yes, it is probably
AC the culprit. To fix this, add your pop server's IP in ZoneAlarm's
AC local zone and all should be fine.
That's already in
Hello ETM,
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 at20:51:04[GMT -0400](which was 01:51 where I live)
you wrote:
E I am using medium for local and high security for internet and am
E on cable and it works. Have you tried that in ZoneAlarm? (I am
E using free, not pro version, and prefer the earlier version, not
Hello Gary,
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 at20:13:39[GMT -0500](which was 02:13 where I live)
you wrote:
G It is *not* TB! It is any MUA. They all use the same standard ports.
G This is because when you send and recieve mail, it uses 2 ports, 25 for
G SMTP and 110 for POP3. If you use SSL or IMAP,
Hello Gary,
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 at20:55:34[GMT -0500](which was 02:55 where I live)
you wrote:
G On second thought, you probably do not need to keep port 25 (SMTP) open,
G unless you are running your own mail server. Try closing that down, and
G sew what happens when you send mail. You should
Hello Gary,
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 at21:12:06[GMT -0500](which was 03:12 where I live)
you wrote:
G It takes time to learn all the features that are available in TB! However,
G these additional things are not necessary to get or send mail.
It certainly does. I'll get there in the end because I
Hello Sudip,
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 at08:22:16[GMT +0545](which was 03:37 where I live)
you wrote:
SP You haven't missed anything. TB! is a plain text mail client. While it
SP can view inbound HTML messages, you can't composed HTML messages with
SP TB!
OK. It's just that in AMEOL, my offline
Hello Miguel,
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 at11:22:53[GMT +0200](which was 10:22 where I live)
you wrote:
MAU Go to the Advanced tab of the filter and scroll down, you will see the
MAU option Address(es) must be listed in address book. Once you select
MAU this, you also have the option to The address
Well,
I set up a filter for a mail group as described earlier and only half
the group messages make it to the relevant folder, the rest stay
obstinately in the inbox :-(
I have the rule adressees are sender to group .
Also how do I get my replies to messages from that group to go into
the
Hello Mark,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at12:12:36[GMT -0700](which was 20:12 where I live)
you wrote:
MW I think one of the main things that people trip over is that the
MW strings in the Filtering strings box are treated as AND clauses
MW rather than OR clauses. In other words, if you have more than
Hello Gerard,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:14:54[GMT +0200](which was 18:14 where I live)
you wrote:
G - You need to determine a UNIQUE filtering characteristic that does not
G change over time.
G The simplest being the email address a person.
I thought I had but I've been told one answer, the
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at01:35:27[GMT +0700](which was 19:35 where I live)
you wrote:
TF Check whether this is always true. Is sender the group? I believe in
TF this group, it isn't.
Now you've got me thinking. As my name is not in the group or the
address book I assumed sender was
Never had this before.
I sent a message about three hours ago and there's absolutely no sign
of it anywhere even though it's in the sent folder. I've now sent it
with another programme ((Ameol) and it went instantly and has now also
just arrived here too as I'm typing this!
Strange.
--
Best
Hello Scott,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:58:54[GMT -0500](which was 01:58 where I live)
you wrote:
SM Email is not guaranteed to get there. If you want to be sure that it
SM got there, request a receipt. Some software and users don't send
SM receipts, so even that is no guarantee.
OK,
Hello Leif,
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 at20:00:27[GMT -0600](which was 03:00 where I
live) you wrote:
LG Just wanted to check. Have you read:
LG http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/filtering.shtml
Yes I have but it's all far too complicated and for me and leaves me
half way down page one!
--
Best
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at11:43:36[GMT +0700](which was 05:43 where I live)
you wrote:
TF I filter mailing lists only at incoming time. Outgoing filters are
TF important for normal mail, where your sent message doesn't come back
TF to you.
Oh, I thought *all* mail comes back to me, at
Hello Scott,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at21:29:53[GMT -0500](which was 03:29 where I live)
you wrote:
RW Yes I have but it's all far too complicated and for me and leaves me
RW half way down page one!
SM What are you still having trouble with? I'm trying to figure out
SM regular expressions
Hello Michael,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at03:20:06[GMT +0100](which was 03:20 where I live)
you wrote:
MT Sometimes mailservers just get clogged, and have loads of work. Maybe
MT that email was stuck in aque, and the second one you sent was
MT re-routed thru other servers to miss the clog
Some
Hello Carren,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at15:45:56[GMT +1300](which was 03:45 where I live)
you wrote:
CS It's not just you! I have noticed the same thing, which is kind of
CS weird as I had assumed that most of us were using TB! I guess perhaps
CS some people are posting from work or other places and
Hello Richard,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at08:19:30[GMT +0100](which was 08:19 where I live)
you wrote:
CS It's not just you! I have noticed the same thing, which is kind of
CS weird as I had assumed that most of us were using TB! I guess perhaps
CS some people are posting from work or other places
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at09:53:35[GMT +0100](which was 09:53 where I live)
you wrote:
RW Some queue, it's still missing 8 hours lateer :-(
MDP Have you checked your account log in TB to make sure the message was
MDP actually sent?
Too late, it's gone from the log. I've never looked
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at22:40:47[GMT +0700](which was 16:40 where I live)
you wrote:
TF No, I mean a mail that I sent just to a recipient, not to a list. For
TF example if I send a message directly to your address. It will not come
TF back to me, unless I include my own address as
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at07:42:37[GMT -0500](which was 13:42 where I live)
you wrote:
SM Is it possible that you had a line with only a single space on it, and
SM TB! didn't fix it to conform to RFC standards? Failing to fix might
SM have had that result with certain anti-spam
Hello Mark,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at14:28:11[GMT -0700](which was 22:28 where I live)
you wrote:
MW I got lost somewhere in the circular logic here, but...
You're lost!! :-)
MW The messages you send out end up in your Sent Mail folder.
That doesn't mean they reach their destination though. I've
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at07:57:44[GMT -0500](which was 13:57 where I live)
you wrote:
SM I tried a test message and it went through perfectly ok, so it's not
SM that, unless there's a bug in how TB! does it.
I've just spoken to one of the recipients of my supposed undelivered
mail
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at02:37:59[GMT +0100](which was 02:37 where I live)
you wrote:
MW Are you saying you want *another* copy sent to you?
RW Well some of my mail (most if it actually) comes to the inbox
RW anyway so why doesn't it all so that it can all automatically
RW get
Hello Mark,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at19:37:27[GMT -0700](which was 03:37 where I live)
you wrote:
MW Are you saying you want *another* copy sent to you?
RW Well some of my mail (most if it actually) comes to the inbox anyway
RW so why doesn't it all so that it can all automatically get threaded?
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at21:53:39[GMT -0500](which was 03:53 where I live)
you wrote:
SM I suspect that you're confusing messages for a mailing list and normal
SM non-list messages.
SM When you send a normal (non-list) message, TB sends the email, then
SM plops it into the
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at11:31:35[GMT +0700](which was 05:31 where I live)
you wrote:
RW Even more baffled. So, if I send a mail to someone who is not in my
RW address book or on a mailing list, I have to CC it to myself to get a
RW copy?
TF It has nothing to do with your
Hello Dierk,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at07:51:57[GMT +0200](which was 06:51 where I live)
you wrote:
Why should that be when all other mails, certainly to this
particular person, all go into the Inbox without any fuss whether
they are replies or new mails?
DH Because one of your filters
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at02:18:50[GMT +0100](which was 02:18 where I live)
you wrote:
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
RW ... The messages from TB! still remain missing. after years of
RW never losing a message I have 3 in the space of 24 hours. A bit
RW worrying, especially
Hello Dierk,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at07:53:33[GMT +0200](which was 06:53 where I live)
you wrote:
DH I am not sure the messages have been lost. From your other messages I
DH deduce (perhaps wrongly) that you use the wrong method to test wether
DH a message has been sent/delivered.
I'll agree with
Hello myob,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at14:54:54[GMT +0100](which was 14:54 where I live)
you wrote:
MO Could it be your ISP automatically adding a BCC to you on every mail you
MO send? Ask them!
m IIRC, Richard, that's what CIX/Ameol does.
Yes it does but I was still getting mail in my TB inbox
Hello Gerard,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at09:42:44[GMT +0200](which was 08:42 where I live)
you wrote:
RW Then some messages started not showing up in the Inbox or the other
RW reader and I'm now told, obviously correctly, that I have to put a
RW rule in the Outbox redirecting my mail to the Inbox so
Hello Scott,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at22:53:39[GMT -0500](which was 04:53 where I live)
you wrote:
SM If it's not a mailing list, then it doesn't really make sense, unless
SM you have (had) some kind of configuration problem where TB! thought that the
SM inbox folder was the Sent Mail folder.
I
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at21:53:39[GMT -0500](which was 03:53 where I live)
you wrote:
MW Are you saying you want *another* copy sent to you?
RW Well some of my mail (most if it actually) comes to the inbox anyway
RW so why doesn't it all so that it can all automatically get threaded?
Hello,
I've looked through all the key strokes and cannot find a way to be
able to toggle between the reply that has just been sent and the
original message. I would like this as, sometimes, the messages are
far apart. Even though there is quoting to help it is sometimes better
to read the
Hello Anthony,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 at 01:06:08[GMT -0700](which was 09:06 where I
live) you wrote:
I've looked through all the key strokes and cannot find a way to be
able to toggle between the reply that has just been sent and the
original message.
AXC Ctrl + Backspace
Not here it doesn't
Hello Markus,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 at 11:06:34[GMT +0200](which was 10:06 where I
live) you wrote:
MG Select a message that you replied to (visualized
MG by some arrow icon on MG the envelope) and hit Ctrl+Backspace, that
MG should work.
That's not what I want though. When a new message arrives
Hello Roelof,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 at 11:46:33[GMT +0200](which was 10:46 where I
live) you wrote: RO Hallo Richard,
RO If you're filtering these messages into the same folder, you can find
RO the original message fast by viewing threads. The way to view threads
RO can be altered in one
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 at 11:07:57[GMT +0100](which was 11:07 where I
live) you wrote:
RW ... and then X replies. By this time the original has moved
RW way up (or down) the list and I want to be able to jump straight
RW to it and then back to the reply again with a single key stroke
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 at 07:54:41[GMT -0500](which was 13:54 where I
live) you wrote:
RW Yes but it *still* doesn't help my jump from one message, past all the
RW messages that have been posted in the meantime, to the original
RW message that it was replied to.
SM Click on the mid:
I have one rule in my Inbox to direct all TB! mail into my BAT folder.
I have then set up a separate rule in the BAT folder to remove any
messages that have, for instance, '[PGP]' in the Subject line and to
move any message containing that to the Trash folder.
The trouble is the rule doesn't
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 at 19:52:29[GMT -0500](which was 01:52 where I
live) you wrote:
SM Ok, after clicking upon the mid: link (above), click on View | Message
SM List.
SM Needless to say, not of much help with messages that don't show the
SM MSGID info for the prior message.
Hello Leif,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 at 21:04:26[GMT -0600](which was 04:04 where I
live) you wrote:
LG Try this as your filter string:
LG [PGP] No quotes or anything.
Well, I can't for the life of me see where I am going wrong. I've
tried with and without quotes and everything.
At the moment the
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 at 22:38:39[GMT -0500](which was 04:38 where I
live) you wrote:
RW [PGP]
RW Sender
RW yes
SM Don't you mean subject, not sender?
Oh heck, that's what comes of posting at 3am. Yes, of course I meant
subject :-(
--
Best regards,
Richard
Windows 2000 5.0 Build
Hello Marcus,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 at 09:54:11[GMT +0200](which was 08:54 where I
live) you wrote:
MO Not without manually including the message ID of the root message in
MO your removal filter.
Ah, probably not worth the trouble then. Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Windows 2000 5.0 Build
Hello Joseph,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 at 17:51:18[GMT -0500](which was 23:51 where I
live) you wrote:
JN If the filter is in your read section, then it will only act on
JN messages after you have read them.
No, I filter after they've been marked read.
JN the PGP messages: you haven't read them
Hello Salvador,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 10:03:10[GMT +0300](which was 08:03 where I
live) you wrote:
SE Dear Bat users,
From my account properties panel I chose to keep the file attachments of
SE my incoming and outgoing emails in a separate folder
SE (\MAIL\Account\Attach). What I've found out
Hello Marcus,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 10:22:04[GMT +0200](which was 09:22 where I
live) you wrote:
MO I repeat what I've already said; post the filter here and let us
MO evaluate it.
I should have done what you said the first time and saved a lot of
trouble. I have continually checked all the
Hello Marcus,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 10:57:57[GMT +0200](which was 09:57 where I
live) you wrote:
MO So, is your filter working like expected now?
Yup :-)
--
Best regards,
Richard
Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
Current version
Hello Don,
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 at 00:04:17[GMT -0400](which was 05:04 where I
live) you wrote:
DZ Still, although I would like to stick a Bat Board up, there's no point in
DZ doing so if it just sits there with empty forums and no users. That's why I
DZ posted the idea to the list; to get an
Hello Jonathan,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 at 00:24:18[GMT -0500](which was 06:24 where I
live) you wrote:
JA I believe the original poster meant he'd wait until an official
JA release where it is shipped as a self-extracting setup program...
JA which comes in the form of a .exe :)
Spot on :-)
--
Hello Jonathan,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 at 09:31:57[GMT -0500](which was 15:31 where I
live) you wrote:
JA Or UltimateZip if you can live with a small sponsor splash...
JA www.ultimatezip.com handles rar files just fine, and it free. Don't
JA know about WinRar though
Thanks, that sounds more like
Hello Sudip,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 at 17:59:53[GMT +0545](which was 13:14 where I
live) you wrote:
RW I'll wait for the proper programme release.
SP If I may say so, it's worthwhile having WinRar (www.rarlab.com) on
SP your machine. It can compress/decompress many formats including zip.
SP So,
Hello Thomas,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 at 23:44:05[GMT +0700](which was 17:44 where I
live) you wrote:
TF TB does that all the time after compressing the folders. The main
TF message list has the latest message at the bottom, I also have to
TF scroll down often. I wish I could make TB go to the
Hello Mary,
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 at 20:21:41[GMT -0500](which was 02:21 where I
live) you wrote:
MB I am a true newbie and am using version 1.61 of The Bat! on a trial
MB basis. Thought I could get some help here, but maybe this List is too
MB advanced for me. Do you have a Rank Beginner's List
Hello Miguel,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 at 10:50:36[GMT +0200](which was 09:50 where I
live) you wrote:
.I also have to scroll down often. I wish I could make TB go to
the bottom of the list in those cases, instead of to the top.
MAU Did you try hitting End key ? :)
I didn't know about that
Hello Marck,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 at 10:35:08[GMT +0100](which was 10:35 where I
live) you wrote:
RW I'd still like it to take me to the first unread message,
RW however the sorting is set.
MDP That would be Ctrl-]
Yes I use that already. I suppose it's because I've recently migrated
from Ameol
Hello Marck,
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 at 11:21:38[GMT +0100](which was 11:21 where I
live) you wrote:
MDP As an *option* this is good. Maybe. Although I don't think I'd ever
MDP use it. As a default it is a problem. Elsewhere in this thread are
MDP reports of TB moving the cursor to the top of the
Hello Mary,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 at 15:11:08[GMT -0500](which was 21:11 where I
live) you wrote:
MB There are a mighty lot of Keys to sort through, for one used to
MB doing almost everything via the mouse.
There certainly are, 4 sides of A4 printed in 10 pt and trimmed as
neatly as possible!
I
Hello Venu,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 at 07:12:12[GMT +0530](which was 02:42 where I
live) you wrote:
V I do not have much of mail in my accounts. Yet, when I see the
V amount of disk space The Bat occupies,it takes up 250MB.
V Checking the Mail folder of all the individual accounts, I find
V that it
Hello Gary,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 at 12:29:07[GMT -0500](which was 18:29 where I
live) you wrote:
G I too agree in total with Thomas, and for additional reasons, one that
G being a webboard is not email, or will be used by email, which is the
G essence of TB! Also, by using and contributing to
Hello Thomas,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 at 23:05:44[GMT +0700](which was 17:05 where I
live) you wrote:
TF If you are talking about addressbook groups, I suspect you may have
TF your own address in that group too. So when you send a message to the
TF whole group, you'll get it as an incoming mail, of
Hello TBUDL,
Two questions please.
Firstly how do I get a message header to an address group when using
Quick templates
Secondly can I personalise some of the messages to the Address Group
when using quick templates.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Hello Richard,
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 at 03:06:01[GMT +0100](which was 03:06 where I
live) you wrote:
RW Firstly how do I get a message header to an address group when using
RW Quick templates
RW Secondly can I personalise some of the messages to the Address Group
RW when using quick templates.
Hello,
Sorry to seem so thick but how do I install the beta with the .rar
extension?
--
Best regards,
Richard mailto:rwakeford;cix.co.uk
Using The Bat! 1.61 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
Current
Hello Scott,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 22:40:10[GMT -0500](which was 04:40 where I
live) you wrote:
RW Sorry to seem so thick but how do I install the beta with the .rar
RW extension?
SM http://www.rarlab.com/
Oh heck I really can't be bothered :-)
I'll wait for the proper programme release.
--
Hello Dwight,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 at 23:34:11[GMT -0500](which was 05:34 where I
live) you wrote:
I'll wait for the proper programme release.
DAC it will be a .rar file as well
Surely not. It will either be a ZIP or EXE file?
--
Best regards,
Richard
Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service
Hello Luc,
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 at 21:14:34[GMT +0200](which was 20:14 where I
live) you wrote:
L Worked fine for me on Opera 6.05
Yup here too but I do have another problem. when I go back (or even
when I first open the site) I get the following message :
Error: name: TypeError message: Value
Hello Angel,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 at 00:44:13[GMT -0700](which was 07:44 where I
live) you wrote:
A I'm still waiting for my password to arrive... and I registered early
A this morning .. :(
Gosh, mine arrived instantly.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Using The Bat! version 1.62/Beta6 with Windows
Hello Luc,
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 at 05:32:47[GMT +0100](which was 04:32 where I
live) you wrote:
L Maybe
L a have a cyber guardian angel lol.
Maybe :-)
I've just come back to the page after a good night's sleep and still
the same errors but, on trying the new PHBB page, this one not only
loads
Hello,
All this talk of different Anti-Virus programmes. Am I the only one
using this one? I am also fortunate in that my ISP uses Brightmail
which catches a lot of virus but F-Prot has caught a couple that were
missed. It sits in the background and you wouldn't know it was there
(but I hope it
Hello Mark,
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 at 12:13:04[GMT -0800](which was 20:13 where I
live) you wrote:
MW * I can also even *emphasize* certain words, or quote them. If
MW necessary, I can even SHOUT.
Yes but, if Joseph's wishes were acceded to, your *emphasize* would
actually show as bold font. No
Hello,
I have an address list of 55 people and, the last time I sent a
message with an attachment, 55 individual mail attachments were sent
along with 55 individual messages after I had used the Mass mailing
using template option to invoke a quick template. I can't remember
this happening before
Hello Miguel,
Sun, 3 Nov 2002 at 22:10:26[GMT +0100](21:10 where I live) you wrote
in mid:7035679314.20021103221026;ermspain.com :
MAU If the message includes an attachment it will be send
MAU along with each message, in your case 55 times. If you want to only
MAU send the attachment once you
Hello Thomas,
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 at 12:30:24[GMT +0700](05:30 where I live) you wrote
in mid:15144815284.20021104123024;gmx.net :
TF Funny, I don't undersand your sentiment. Personalisation was the exact
TF reason for the mass mailing feature. Please explain why this is not so
TF good.
I send out
Hello Mary,
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 at 00:04:51[GMT -0600](06:04 where I live) you wrote
in mid:577703435.20021104000451;premiernet.net :
TF Hello Richard,
MB And then you appended this sig:
Ye gods, where (or in which message) was that because I can't see it
here? My sig is all in English - I can't
Hello Richard,
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 at 09:31:49[GMT +](09:31 where I live) you wrote
in mid:10735531812.20021104093149;cix.co.uk :
RW Ye gods, where (or in which message) was that because I can't see it
RW here? My sig is all in English - I can't speak German - and I've
RW checked my posting in
Hello Mary,
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 at 07:35:08[GMT -0600](13:35 where I live) you wrote
in mid:1332579947.20021104073508;premiernet.net :
MB Are you subscribed there? It's an interesting list.
Well I wasn't and still am not. Joined Yahoo but kept getting asked
for password umpteen times so gave up in
Hello Thomas,
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 at 23:27:52[GMT +0700](16:27 where I live) you wrote
in mid:1691724950.20021104232752;gmx.net :
TF You don't need to become a Yahoo member to subscribe. Just send an
TF empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and answer the
TF confirmation message.
Thanks again for your
Hello Chris,
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 at 14:34:09[GMT -0600](20:34 where I live) you wrote
in mid:6915450787.20021106143409;airtightweb.com :
CM If I wanted to make a modification (add one line) to my signature when
CM posting to specific mailing lists, what would be the easiest way to do
CM that?
Hope
Hello,
I read messages by using CTRL + Right arrow to select the first unread
message. However the focus stays on the mailbox and I sometimes select
delete to get rid of the unwanted mail and I, of course, get the
dialogue box asking if I want to delete the entire folder. One of
these days I'm
Hello Chris,
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 at 15:47:36[GMT -0600](21:47 where I live) you wrote
in mid:16919858625.20021106154736;airtightweb.com :
CM Great, that should do it. I had standard templates set already for the
CM entire group, but setting the specific tabs on individual mailing list
CM addresses
Hello Thomas,
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 at 09:55:14[GMT +0700](02:55 where I live) you wrote
in mid:1492663037.20021107095514;gmx.net :
TF Hit the tab key once. It'll move the focus to the messages list.
That's the one, thanks. I've used it before and forgot. I suppose it's
a matter of getting used to
Hello,
Is it possible to word wrap incoming messages that haven't been
wrapped? I have two members of another mailing list who insist on
posting unwrapped messages which means scrolling from here to next
year to the right - a real pain and I can't be bothered to read the
messages it's so
Hello Thomas,
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 at 08:47:08[GMT +0700](01:47 where I live) you wrote
in mid:137929429.20021108084708;gmx.net :
TF They appear wrapped when you view them.
No they don't and that's why I asked the question. My replies are
wrapped fine because I use %Wrapped=%Quotes.
TF They can't
Hello Marck,
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 at 10:14:16[GMT +](10:14 where I live) you wrote
in mid:1441023762.20021108101416;silverstones.com :
MDP Now, I view my mail in a folder view (the ticker virtual folder)
MDP using the RTV and incoming messages are always wrapped to the
MDP window width, however
Hello Allie,
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 at 05:52:23[GMT -0500](10:52 where I live) you wrote
in mid:16534648173.20021108055223;landscreek.net :
ACM The autowrap setting is important for the fixed width viewer and
ACM not the rich text viewer. So if you wish to see messages window
ACM wrapped and have
Hello Marck,
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 at 11:58:03[GMT +](11:58 where I live) you wrote
in mid:507250175.20021108115803;silverstones.com :
MDP Anyway, you know what a PITA it is to see messages that are badly
MDP wrapped, so why not have a reminder to wrap yours properly g?
No, my outgoing messages
Hello ETM,
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 at 21:58:37[GMT -0500](02:58 where I live) you wrote
in mid:3836051145.20021109215837;yahoo.com :
E Can someone please direct me to information about creating taglines
E for regular alternating rotation on my mail?
E Many thanks in advance.
E Elaine
Put the
I have a very simple address book for one user - me. I call it Mine
with 10 groups in it. I have a few addresses that are not grouped at
all but, what I can't fathom out is, why don't *all* the addresses
show when I close and just select the main Mine? Some of the
addresses from the groups show
Hello tbudl,
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 at 10:33:49[GMT +](10:33 where I live) you wrote
in mid:12538671747.20021110103349;cix.co.uk :
RW I have a very simple address book for one user - me. I call it
RW Mine with 10 groups in it. I have a few addresses that are not
RW grouped at all but, what I can't
Hello Marck,
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 at 10:43:17[GMT +](10:43 where I live) you wrote
in mid:64516562.20021110104317;silverstones.com :
MDP It's in the Group properties. Each group has a Hide items if net
MDP explicitly selected property. If checked then members
MDP exclusively in that (or
Hello Roelof,
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 at 11:59:56[GMT +0100](10:59 where I live) you wrote
in mid:156114082333.20021110115956;krakeel.org :
RO It's a default enabled option when you create a new group. That
RO means that you probably didn't enable it on purpose. ;-)
Correct :-)
--
Best regards,
Hello Deborah,
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 at 07:17:11[GMT +](07:17 where I live) you wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Ah, I was searching for signatures and taglines and things like
that - never thought to search for cookie - thanks :-)
But do a search for email taglines on the
Hello Paddy,
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 at 09:53:27[GMT -0800](17:53 where I live) you wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
I am sure Marck will be happy to hear that Opera 7.0(early beta) now
renders the FAQ as intended.
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/tbfaq.html
not if you don't
1 - 100 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
