Re: Anti-virus? message

Hallo Jack, On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:26:28 -0500GMT (22-3-2011, 17:26 , where I live), you wrote: JSL> Ok. Well as you can see (http://imgsrc.com/?v=untitlquq.) JSL> there does appear to be some sort of anti-virus but I have JSL> no idea of how it got there. I'd suggest that

Re: Anti-virus? message

uld I find out? RO> options -> preferences -> virus/trojan alert -> anti virus Ok. Well as you can see (http://imgsrc.com/?v=untitlquq.) there does appear to be some sort of anti-virus but I have no idea of how it got there. I un-ticked the "Check outgoing mail for viruse

Re: Anti-virus? message

Hallo Jack, On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:56:16 -0500GMT (22-3-2011, 14:56 , where I live), you wrote: RO>> Have you got an plug-in for virus scanner installed with TB? JSL> Not that I'm aware of. How would I find out? options -> preferences -> virus/trojan alert -> anti viru

Re: Anti-virus? message

Hello Roelof, On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 you wrote: RO> Hallo Jack, RO> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:42:13 -0500GMT (22-3-2011, 13:42 , where I RO> live), you wrote: JSL>> I get this warning every time I attach something to an JSL>> email. RO> Have you got an plug-in for virus scanner installed with

Re: Anti-virus? message

Hallo Jack, On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:42:13 -0500GMT (22-3-2011, 13:42 , where I live), you wrote: JSL> I get this warning every time I attach something to an JSL> email. Have you got an plug-in for virus scanner installed with TB? -- Groetjes, Roelof Moderators - I guess everyone has to get of

Anti-virus? message

aste making sure the period is included in the copy.) http://imgsrc.com/?v=untitlbnb. Anyway, the popup continues to re-appear about every 20-30 seconds regardless of how it's disposed of; either clicking OK or clicking the red X. I assume it's almost certainly coming from my Comodo anti-vi

Re: anti-virus/firewall/etc - Vipre; MAXA cookie manager

Hello Gary, Saturday, September 25, 2010, 2:11:20 AM, you wrote: > Another, related topic, is getting rid of cookies tracking you web > activities. The best program I\'ve found is MAXA cookie manager. I've another candidate: SUPERAntiSpyware. Fast, precise, and astonishingly inexpensive. Unde

Re[2]: anti-virus/firewall/etc - Vipre; MAXA cookie manager

hough my recall is fuzzy. GO>> Moved to Vipre months ago. Am quite satisfied with its features GO>> and performance. Vipre integrates well with the Bat! for GO>> anti-virus. GO>> Regards, GO>> Gary Odom GO>> g...@waterfire.us GO>> Friday, September 24, 2

Re: Anti-virus plugin

Hello Stuart, Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 10:24:31 PM, you wrote: SC> Can you let me know how you make out. I have it installed on a Windows 7 machine SC> and it was very slow when scanning IMAP mail. Well, I've simply installed and trusting it is going to behave smoothly. I don't hav

Re: Anti-virus plugin

Hello Cesar, Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 3:12:08 PM, you wrote: CS> Thanks. I've already done. Can you let me know how you make out. I have it installed on a Windows 7 machine and it was very slow when scanning IMAP mail. -- Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm Using T

Re: Anti-virus plugin

Hello MFPA, Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 6:56:00 PM, you wrote: >> Is there any way to use anti-virus Microsoft >> Security Essentials in conjunction with the program >> TheBat!? If so how to install? M> You would just install and configure Microsoft Security Essen

Re: Anti-virus plugin

Hi On Wednesday 13 January 2010 at 7:44:05 PM, in , Cesar Santos wrote: > Hello TheBat users > Is there any way to use anti-virus Microsoft > Security Essentials in conjunction with the program > TheBat!? If so how to install? You would just install and configure Micros

Anti-virus plugin

Hello TheBat users Is there any way to use anti-virus Microsoft Security Essentials in conjunction with the program TheBat!? If so how to install? Thanks -- Cheers , Cesar Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' informa

Re[2]: Location of Anti-Virus Plugin

Hello MFPA, Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 12:53:53 AM, you wrote: > I used to have that file but it disappeared all on its own when I > upgraded to v4. Had to re-install Windows. When I downloaded and installed TB! I see it has come back... -- Best regards, MFPA mailt

Re: Location of Anti-Virus Plugin

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:53:53 +, MFPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I used to have that file but it disappeared all on its own when I >upgraded to v4. Hi, Odd - I upgraded to v4 a few days ago, and it was still listed afterwards. Oh well, I ended up deleting it. I have NOD32 installed, I'll jus

Re: Location of Anti-Virus Plugin

Hi On Monday 17 March 2008 at 10:42:57 AM, in , Grumpy Gamer wrote: > Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The > Bat is? I have an errant plugin ("Generic DLL Plugin") listed in > Options-AntiVirus (with a status of 'error') and I want t

Re: Location of Anti-Virus Plugin

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:42:09 +0100, Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >when is plugin created by its vendor, like AVG, Avast or Kaspersky, plugin >is installed to antivirus home directory and program adds path to plugin >into The Bat!'s TBPLUGIN.INI configuration file. > >If You have AVG in

Re: Location of Anti-Virus Plugin

Grumpy Gamer @ 2008-3-17 5:42:57 AM "Location of Anti-Virus Plugin" > Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The > Bat is? My AVG anti-virus plugin is located at: C:\Program Files\AVG\avgbat.bav -- Christopher Using The Bat! v4.0.14 on Windows Vist

Re: Location of Anti-Virus Plugin

Hello all, Monday, March 17, 2008, Grumpy Gamer wrote: > Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The > Bat is? I have an errant plugin ("Generic DLL Plugin") listed in > Options-AntiVirus (with a status of 'error') and I want to get rid of

Re: Location of Anti-Virus Plugin

> Hi everyone, > Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The > Bat is? I have an errant plugin ("Generic DLL Plugin") listed in > Options-AntiVirus (with a status of 'error') and I want to get rid of > it if it isn't for

Location of Anti-Virus Plugin

Hi everyone, Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The Bat is? I have an errant plugin ("Generic DLL Plugin") listed in Options-AntiVirus (with a status of 'error') and I want to get rid of it if it isn't for an anti-virus I currently have insta

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hello Code, > NOD32 is incapable of scanning (like .tbb) will do nothing. NOD32 is > still incapable of peaking inside the file. I know. But even if it was capable, I wouldn't let NOD32 (or any other antivirus) fiddle with my mail folders. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain

Re[2]: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

>> A test message with Eicar string attached in a txt file is sent >> without AMON shouting about it but picked up by IMON on receipt. M> And that was a big surprise to me because I was sure (without actually M> testing it) that AMON would detect it. But no, you are right, I have M> been testing

Re[2]: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

M>>> or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan. >> >> Where do you have a list of file extensions to scan? I only see a(n empty) >> list of extensions NOT to be scanned... M> In the 'Extensions Editor', try deselecting the 'Analyse all files' tick M> box at the bottom and it will now

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hello MAU, Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 5:41:10 PM, you wrote: M> In the 'Extensions Editor', try deselecting the 'Analyse all files' tick M> box at the bottom and it will now list the extensions to scan. Thanks. Ticked "Analyse all files" again though... -- Best Wishes, Mark

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hello Mark, M>> or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan. > > Where do you have a list of file extensions to scan? I only see a(n empty) > list of extensions NOT to be scanned... In the 'Extensions Editor', try deselecting the 'Analyse all files' tick box at the bottom and it will n

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hello MAU, Sunday, January 28, 2007, 1:00:38 PM, you wrote: M> or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan. Where do you have a list of file extensions to scan? I only see a(n empty) list of extensions NOT to be scanned... -- Best Wishes, Mark using The

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hello MFPA, > A test message with Eicar string attached in a txt file is sent > without AMON shouting about it but picked up by IMON on receipt. And that was a big surprise to me because I was sure (without actually testing it) that AMON would detect it. But no, you are right, I have been testing

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 12:47:29 PM, you wrote: >> FWIW, I appear to have v2.51.26 of NOD32. > I have 2.50.25 and clicking on "update now" tells me my > installation is up to date and no update is required. Latest version is 2.70.23 - however at this point you still have to download this man

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hi On Saturday 27 January 2007 at 1:06:07 AM, in , George Mitchell wrote: > FWIW, I appear to have v2.51.26 of NOD32. I have 2.50.25 and clicking on "update now" tells me my installation is up to date and no update is required. -- Best regards, MFPA Consistency i

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hi On Tuesday 30 January 2007 at 1:25:04 AM, in , MFPA wrote: > Hi > On Sunday 28 January 2007 at 12:00:38 PM, in > , MAU wrote: >> Check you AMON configuration. Either you have some excluded directories >> or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan. > I just checked mine and added

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hi On Sunday 28 January 2007 at 12:00:38 PM, in , MAU wrote: > Check you AMON configuration. Either you have some excluded directories > or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan. I just checked mine and added TMP. I believe it was not there by default, as I don't recall previously

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hello all, Saturday, January 27, 2007, Code 2 wrote: > You're right, George, we can use the plug-in to scan outgoing mail. I > notice that the plug-in is a test version (version 0.1) and appears to > have been developed several years ago for NOD32 version 1. The > plug-in seems to work with NOD32

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hello Code, M>> 2.- You forward the message after NOD32 signatures have been updated. > M>> Then there is nothing to worry about. Why? Even though NOD32's 'IMON M>> does not scan outgoing email' and 'on-demand scanner does not scan tbb M>> files', the infected email/file you are trying to send wil

Re[2]: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

lipped the key sentence from the end of my paragraph: "Since NOD32's IMON module does not scan outgoing mail, I could unwittingly forward it to, and infect, an unsuspecting recipient." At best, it would be embarrassing to forward infected mail to a client. At worst it would be unprofe

Re[2]: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

>> Having said that, a situation could arise where I receive an >> infected e-mail which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize >> (as happened to me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That >> infected e-mail would sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several >> NOD32 on-demand scans. Since NO

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Hello Code, > Having said that, a situation could arise where I receive an infected > e-mail which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize (as happened > to me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That infected e-mail would > sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several NOD32 on-demand scans. >

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Code 2 wrote: C2> You're right, George, we can use the plug-in to scan outgoing C2> mail. I notice that the plug-in is a test version (version 0.1) C2> and appears to have been developed several years ago for NOD32 C2> version 1. The plug-in seems to work with NOD32 version 2.7 C2> except it gene

Re[2]: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

C2>> ...a situation could arise where I receive an infected e-mail C2>> which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize (as happened to C2>> me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That infected e-mail would C2>> sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several NOD32 on-demand C2>> scans. Since NOD32's

Re: NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Code 2 wrote: C2> ...a situation could arise where I receive an infected e-mail C2> which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize (as happened to C2> me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That infected e-mail would C2> sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several NOD32 on-demand C2> scans. S

NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!

Here's a heads-up for users of NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!. NOD32's technical support people confirmed to me that NOD32's on-demand scanner cannot scan inside The Bat's messages.tbb data files and therefore cannot spot infected e-mails. However, NOD32's IMON module s

Re[2]: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

Howdy Mica, Saturday, September 16, 2006, 11:31:40 PM, Mica wrotened: Mica> Full name of the program is Avira AntiVir PersonalEdition Classic. Mica> Direct link for download is: Mica> Mica> Happy anti virusing. That inter

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 16 Sep 2006, @ @ at 22:18:16 +0100, when MFPA wrote: > On Sunday 10 September 2006 at 8:55:49 PM, in > , Susanne wrote: >> Do I have to go back to NAV? > Entirely up to you.

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

Hi On Sunday 10 September 2006 at 8:55:49 PM, in , Susanne wrote: > Do I have to go back to NAV? Entirely up to you. Never used NAV but heard plenty bad stories about it. Could not get on with AVG but my sister loves it. Nod32 came highly recommended, requires no plugin, works well for me (alth

Re[2]: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

On Monday, September 11, 2006, at 7:31:14 AM, Robin Anson wrote: > Under e-mail scanner select configure and tell it to certify the > incoming mail. Then it will leave a message on the incoming mail once > it has been scanned Interesting. My plug-in has both incoming and outgoing certification ch

Re[3]: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

>>> Is the plugin enabled and ready to go? Is email scanning >>> enabled in the control Centre? Susanne>> Yes to both, but I can detect no obvious sign of the email getting Susanne>> scanned (I'm new to the program, so I'm not sure if there is Susanne>> anything showing the email is being scan

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 at 18:47:28 -0700, Susanne wrote: > Yes to both, but I can detect no obvious sign of the email getting > scanned (I'm new to the program, so I'm not sure if there is > anything showing the email is being scanned). Under e-mail scanner select configure and tell it to certify the

Re[2]: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

Howdy Susanne, Monday, September 11, 2006, 2:47:28 AM, Susanne wrotened: >> Is the plugin enabled and ready to go? Is email scanning enabled in >> the control Centre? Susanne> Yes to both, but I can detect no obvious sign of the email getting Susanne> scanned (I'm new to the program, so I'm n

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

Amen. It's bloated and unreliable, IMO. P.S. I don't think that discussing anti-virus programs and software firewall programs with which to back up The Bat!'s inherent security is all that far Off Topic. Not everyone is subscribed to TBOT. And TBOT is quite erratic about timely posting o

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

11 September 2006 - 06:48 Hello Susanne, Sunday, September 10, 2006, 8:55:49 PM, you wrote: S> I'm trying out the free AVG version and have some trouble S> getting it to scan TB email. Slightly OT but as soon as I opened your message NOD32 displayed its always-reassuring signature update di

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

Hi, Sunday, September 10, 2006, 1:58:04 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is the plugin enabled and ready to go? Is email scanning enabled in > the control Centre? Yes to both, but I can detect no obvious sign of the email getting scanned (I'm new to the program, so I'm not sure if there is an

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

Susanne @ 2006-9-10 2:55:49 PM "Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?" > The plug-in is there, but during today's complete scan AVG found a > TB mail with the netsky virus that it didn't detect when I > downloaded the email. It also didn't remove the virus after

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

Howdy Susanne, Sunday, September 10, 2006, 8:55:49 PM, Susanne wrotened: Susanne> I'm trying out the free AVG version and have some trouble Susanne> getting it to scan TB email. Susanne> The plug-in is there, but during today's complete scan AVG Susanne> found a TB mail with the netsky virus tha

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

Hello Susanne & everyone else, on 10-Sep-2006 at 21:55 you (Susanne) wrote: > The plug-in is there, but during today's complete scan AVG found a TB > mail with the netsky virus that it didn't detect when I downloaded the > email. Which simply means that the virus code is sitting somewhere in one

Re: Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

On Sunday, September 10, 2006, at 2:55:49 PM, Susanne wrote: > I'm trying out the free AVG version and have some trouble > getting it to scan TB email. Since switching from Eudora to TB! a couple of months ago, my AVG Email scan has never once found anything in the incoming mail. When I was using

Setting up AVG anti virus with TB?

Hi, I'm trying out the free AVG version and have some trouble getting it to scan TB email. The plug-in is there, but during today's complete scan AVG found a TB mail with the netsky virus that it didn't detect when I downloaded the email. It also didn't remove the virus after the complete scan.

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Kevin, On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:19:07 -0400 GMT(4/3/2005, 11:19 AM -0600 GMT), per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin Coates wrote: > I think these types of discussions help elevate awareness of both the > problems and the solutions. Words of wisdom! -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat!

Re: Anti Virus S/W

MFPA writes: > If I trust somebody, they are trusted. > > The trust may, of course, be misplaced. Exactly. By definition, someone must be trusted in every computer system. Whether or not that person is really trustworthy is irrelevant from a security standpoint; what matters in computer securit

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hi On Wednesday 6 April 2005 at 3:38:26 PM, in , rich gregory wrote: > Considering such a system or user trusted don't make it so! If I trust somebody, they are trusted. The trust may, of course, be misplaced. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hi On Tuesday 5 April 2005 at 3:22:20 AM, in , Tim Casten wrote: > Hello Anthony, > Monday, April 4, 2005, 6:41:58 PM, you wrote: >> I have OE 6, and I don't see any such option. > it a feature in the sp2 version And in the version I have used since 2002. I do not hav

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Use Avast instead. Works like a charm with The Bat!, Thunderbird and Courier. I use them all on a Win XP system... AJ *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 01.04.2005 at 11:05 Jeff Gaines wrote: >Hello Group > >Apologies if this is way off topic for this group but Norton An

Re[4]: Anti Virus S/W

Hola, Maggie, Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 3:22:30 PM, you wrote: M> Hi Cuco, M> On Tuesday, April 05, 2005 at 12:25:26 PM you wrote: >>PATCO lives!! M> Yesss! :gdr: Glad there are people that still remember, Maggie, you made my day!!! Cuco, ZSU CERAP. -- Ramon L. Negron (Cuco) PATCO lives!!

Re[3]: Anti Virus S/W

Hi Cuco, On Tuesday, April 05, 2005 at 12:25:26 PM you wrote: >PATCO lives!! Yesss! :gdr: -- Regards, Maggie There has been opposition to every innovation in the history of man, with the possible exception of the sword. __

Mod: Dead horse (was: Re: Anti Virus S/W)

Hallo Thomas, On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:16:14 +0700GMT (5-4-2005, 15:16 +0200, where I live), you wrote: TF> Should this be moved to TBOT? Yes. I haven't got an appropriate QT to declare a thread a dead horse, but please take this elsewhere. It's not really TB-related anymore. That counts for all s

Re: Anti Virus S/W

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 5 Apr 2005, @ @ at 20:16:14 +0700, when Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Hello Mica, My wai. [...] > Are we going in circles yet? I don't know. I see the things circling around me

Re: Anti Virus S/W

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 5 Apr 2005, @ @ at 17:36:21 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > I am self confident enough that I don't need any approval for my > attitude and position. > Please, stop anal

Re: Anti Virus S/W

rich gregory writes: > There is NO SUCH THING as a trusted source, ever. Yes, there is such a thing, depending on one's security policies. For example, most operating systems consider any user with a valid password for a given identifier to be a trusted user of that identifier. -- Anthony

Re[2]: Anti Virus S/W

Hola, Dwight, Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 11:57:50 AM, you wrote: DAC> On Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 8:16:14 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> Should this be moved to TBOT? DAC> No. I don't want to read any more of it there either. Enough already, stop this nonsense, somebody close this thread, please

Re: Anti Virus S/W

On Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 8:16:14 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Should this be moved to TBOT? No. I don't want to read any more of it there either. -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Mica Mijatovic & everyone else, on 05-Apr-2005 at 15:11 you (Mica Mijatovic) wrote: > In other words, you need just an echo of your attitudes (to feel "safe" > and "accepted") You don't know me other than from some characters on your screen that appeared after I tapped a few keys here and

Re: Anti Virus S/W

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 04 Apr 2005, @ @ at 16:16:37 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:46:50 +0200, Mica Mijatovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> /// So, it *is* about mon

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Mica, On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:11:18 +0200 GMT (05/04/2005, 00:11 +0700 GMT), Mica Mijatovic wrote: >> The problem is that you usuallly don't know it until being told. In >> the meantime, you might have shared infected files. MM> In the meantime you could learn too. There are many ways. Once

Re: Re[2]: Anti Virus S/W

On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:22:20 +0200, Tim Casten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have OE 6, and I don't see any such option. it a feature in the sp2 version Its definitely not only in the SP2 version (I activate it on all systems where the people insist to use OE, and only a fraction of that is XP-SP

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Tim Casten writes: > it a feature in the sp2 version Oh. Well, it was too little, too late, as I now use TB for my e-mail (despite several annoying bugs). I haven't even installed SP2, since I'm sure it will break applications, and I can't afford to spend hundreds or thousands of dollars upgrad

Re[2]: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Anthony, Monday, April 4, 2005, 6:41:58 PM, you wrote: > I have OE 6, and I don't see any such option. it a feature in the sp2 version -- Best regards, Timmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.0.1.33

Re: Anti Virus S/W

MFPA writes: > Is there a risk to Flash? Flash contains instructions that are executable on the local machine; therefore there's always a risk. There have been some reported virus infections of Flash content. I don't have any legitimate use for Flash so I have no Flash software installed. I wo

Re: Anti Virus S/W

MFPA writes: > Tools | Options | Read tab | Read all messages in plain text > in OE 6; dunno about other versions. I have OE 6, and I don't see any such option. -- Anthony __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 __

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello MFPA & everyone else, on 04-Apr-2005 at 20:26 you (MFPA) wrote: > Is there a risk to Flash? ...you're male, so... probably not. SCNR! -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Our dreams dream us. -- Anonymous __

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hi On Monday 4 April 2005 at 3:43:09 PM, in , Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: > I have all the ActiveX turned off in MSIE, and nowadays I use > Firefox, anyway, in which I've also turned off everything I can, > including Flash. Is there a risk to Flash? -- Best regards, M

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hi On Monday 4 April 2005 at 4:56:12 PM, in , Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: > I switched to TB from Outlook Express because OE wouldn't let me turn > off display of HTML mail, Tools | Options | Read tab | Read all messages in plain text in OE 6; dunno about other versions.

Re: Anti Virus S/W

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 04 Apr 2005, @ @ at 11:01:00 -0500, when Allie Martin wrote to Anthony: > Your security model just isn't practical for many if not most users. Security model is only one, and i

Re: Anti Virus S/W

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 4 Apr 2005, @ @ at 22:17:47 +0700, when Thomas Fernandez wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:54:04 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 21:54 +0700 GMT), > Mica Mijatovic wrote: MM>> If I know th

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hi Anthony, On 04/04/2005 06:14 PM +0200, you wrote: Most can avoid them; they just don't want to. The urge to see a video of Paris Hilton is just too strong. Your funny. :) -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm -=-=- Nothing is impossible for anyone impervious to

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Allie Martin writes: > Nah. You're just able to avoid doing a lot of things others can't. Most can avoid them; they just don't want to. The urge to see a video of Paris Hilton is just too strong. -- Anthony __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Anthony, On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:58:56 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 22:58 +0700 GMT), Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: >> My point is that some oneone who sent me uninfected files one day, may >> send me an infected file the next. AGA> Then that person is not a trusted source. Not, they aren't. Yet, I

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hi Anthony, On 04/04/2005 05:56 PM +0200, you wrote: I've been good at what I do for a very long time. Nah. You're just able to avoid doing a lot of things others can't. I find it disturbing that you imply that your method will work for others. This implies that what you merely desire and can t

Re: Anti Virus S/W

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 4 Apr 2005, @ @ at 16:44:00 +0200, when Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: > Allie Martin writes: >> It's ridiculous now and we simply have to run the software rather >> than sit thin

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hi Anthony, On 04/04/2005 05:40 PM +0200, you wrote: Not for me. If this is only about you, then there's nothing to discuss. General advice on security can never be based on individual needs or specialized measures. The best security measures are never generic. They're based on the profile of t

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Thomas Fernandez writes: > My point is that some oneone who sent me uninfected files one day, may > send me an infected file the next. Then that person is not a trusted source. > Not for me. Well, if they send me .exe files, I do ask them to send me > sensible files. But an Excel atttachment is

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Allie Martin writes: > From reading your other messages it would seem that your use of your > system and why *you* require or need allows you the luxury of being > able to simply avoid risky practices. More power to you that you're > able to actually do this. Unfortunately, this isn't practical

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Anthony, On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:39:51 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 22:39 +0700 GMT), Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: >> You are not in business or academy. In those fields, attached files >> with macros are common. AGA> I'm in both, and macro-laden files comprise only a tiny minority of AGA> attached

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Anthony G. Atkielski & everyone else, on 04-Apr-2005 at 17:40 you (Anthony G. Atkielski) wrote: >> Impractical. > Not for me. I've used eBay without the need for ActiveX. That conversation ends here, because it start to get redundant. See mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Alexand

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Alexander S. Kunz writes: > Impractical. Not for me. I've used eBay without the need for ActiveX. -- Anthony __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 3.0.1.33

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Alexander S. Kunz writes: > So, every Netsky virus that sends itself around with a fake sender address > would come from a trusted source by that definition. Trusted sources are verifiable sources. Digital signatures come in handy here. -- Anthony __

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Thomas Fernandez writes: > You are not in business or academy. In those fields, attached files > with macros are common. I'm in both, and macro-laden files comprise only a tiny minority of attached files. > Right. There is no 100% protection, if you need to open those files. Often, you don't ne

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hi Anthony, On 04/04/2005 04:44 PM +0200, you wrote: It only gets dangerous when you stop thinking. From reading your other messages it would seem that your use of your system and why *you* require or need allows you the luxury of being able to simply avoid risky practices. More power to you t

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Anthony G. Atkielski & everyone else, on 04-Apr-2005 at 16:43 you (Anthony G. Atkielski) wrote: > Don't use the advance picture service Impractical. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) A learned blockhead is a greater blockhead than an ignorant one. --

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Anthony G. Atkielski & everyone else, on 04-Apr-2005 at 16:48 you (Anthony G. Atkielski) wrote: > Files from a trusted source are clean by definition So, every Netsky virus that sends itself around with a fake sender address would come from a trusted source by that definition. Thats secure

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Alexander, On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:17:37 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 21:17 +0700 GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >> Does this sounds arrogant (or elitaire) or is it just me? ASK> Nope, its not only you. OK, thanks for the heads-up. -- Cheers, Thomas. Fettflecken werden wie neu, wenn man sie

Re: Anti Virus S/W

Hello Mica, On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:54:04 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 21:54 +0700 GMT), Mica Mijatovic wrote: MM> If I know that someone is not practising appropriate methods in making MM> his/her machine "safe", I will not accept an invitation, for instance, MM> to "chat" with him/her, will not share f

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >