5/16/2009
JF> Yes, i have 8xPOP and 1xIMAP running, just create a new Account with
JF> IMAP.
Yes, it went beautifully! Very easy!
Thanks!
--
Lynn
:Hawthorne: :usflag: :canadaflag:
theli...@comcast.net * * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2
TBv.4.1.11
N
Samstag, 16. Mai 2009 at 00:15, Lynn wrote:
> I need to access some IMAP accounts, but all my current accounts are
> POP.
>
> Is it possible to do both?
Yes, i have 8xPOP and 1xIMAP running, just create a new Account with
IMAP.
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me
5/16/2009
DAC> yes. start, i think, it's been ages since i did this, by creating a
DAC> new account, and pick imap, then it's just a matter of knowing
DAC> addresses for your servers, etc.
It was just that simple, and didn't even make me chase server info! I
love it when things work so beautif
5/16/2009
SC> Are you talking about accessing the same accounts as IMAP and POP or some
IMAP
SC> and some POP. The latter is possible for sure.
[snip]
Yes, I am and I did and it was simple and is working beautifully.
This is why I won't give up TB :-)
Thanks -
--
Lynn
:Hawthorne: :usf
On Friday, May 15, 2009, 5:15:09 PM, Lynn wrote:
> Is it possible to do both?
yes. start, i think, it's been ages since i did this, by creating a
new account, and pick imap, then it's just a matter of knowing
addresses for your servers, etc.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to f
Hello Lynn,
Friday, May 15, 2009, 5:15:09 PM, you wrote:
L> I need to access some IMAP accounts, but all my current accounts are
L> POP.
L> Is it possible to do both?
Are you talking about accessing the same accounts as IMAP and POP or some IMAP
and some POP. The latter is possible for sure.
Hi Batters -
I need to access some IMAP accounts, but all my current accounts are
POP.
Is it possible to do both?
tia -
--
Lynn
:Hawthorne: :usflag: :canadaflag:
theli...@comcast.net * * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2
TBv.4.1.11
NT5 SP4
_
MFPA,
On 10-09-2008 20:20, you wrote in
:
>> It means that it disconnects from the server if you do not "work" with
>> it. On xDSL there should be no reason for this.
> Does it have any adverse effect on the server performance if there are
> lots of people logged on but not active?
Well, I assum
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:49:40 PM, in
, Bob Riley wrote:
> I was thinking of conserving bandwidth in the whole system.
Further to my previous message, I would imagine being logged on but
not actually doing anything uses very little bandwidth (-;
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:37:17 PM, in
, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
> It means that it disconnects from the server if you do not "work" with
> it. On xDSL there should be no reason for this.
Does it have any adverse effect on the server performance if there are
lots of people logged on
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:49:40 PM, in
, Bob Riley wrote:
> I was thinking of conserving bandwidth in the whole system. I think
> of IMAP as very handy (convenient) but perhaps using much more
> bandwidth than POP. Am I mistaken?
Logic would suggest that IMAP (and webmail, for
Hi Peter from the Danish Peninsula, home of the late Victor Borge,
Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 11:37:17 AM, you wrote:
> Bob,
> On 10-09-2008 19:12, you wrote in
> :
>> One of the last Mail Management pane items to be possibly checked is
>> this, "When inactive, disconnect after (X) seconds."
Bob,
On 10-09-2008 19:12, you wrote in
:
> One of the last Mail Management pane items to be possibly checked is
> this, "When inactive, disconnect after (X) seconds." Is it better to
> check that or to not check it when one has an always-on DSL
> connection?
I'd not check it.
It means that it
Hi Everyone,
I have been using TB 4 for IMAP with my Gmail account. So far (since
mid-July), I think TB has done well with Gmail's IMAP. I have a
question about an IMAP account setting, however.
One of the last Mail Management pane items to be possibly checked is
this, "When inactive, disconnect
Thursday, April 22, 2004, 10:52:24 PM, you wrote:
CT> I know this topic must be boring the pants off non IMAP users but
I'm glad to see it ...
I recently got a little Gentoo server up, with an IMAP
mail server, and TB won't let me make any folders for
that account ..
I've been trying to f
On Thursday, April 22, 2004, Allie Martin wrote...
AM>>> You can either do this manually, or have TB! do it upon exiting
AM>>> IMAP folders. For the latter, look at the account properties.
SC>> Oh, if only it were so. I have tried manual and automatic
SC>> Compress/Purge and neither get rid of th
Stuart Cuddy, [SC] wrote:
SC> The way the problems with IMAP crop up it seems there may be a
SC> likelihood that it is the difference with the IMAP servers that
SC> accentuate the problem. Is it possible to find out what server you
SC> are connecting to? Maybe we could create a list.
I use my own
Hello Allie,
Thursday, April 22, 2004, 6:49:02 PM, you wrote:
SC>> What is the 4<*>? This is under the unread column, but I don't see
SC>> any unread messages.
AM> This means that there are 4 unread messages in the IMAP folder, but
AM> TB! hasn't yet sync'd with the server. This is why you don't
Hello Allie,
Thursday, April 22, 2004, 11:36:45 PM, you wrote:
AM> IMO, even at a basic level of usability, IMAP is definitely still a
AM> work in progress. However, I have confidence in the development teams
AM> abilities to optimize it and have it working well. I just hope the
AM> timeliness of
Stuart Cuddy, [SC] wrote:
AM>> You can either do this manually, or have TB! do it upon exiting
AM>> IMAP folders. For the latter, look at the account properties.
SC> Oh, if only it were so. I have tried manual and automatic
SC> Compress/Purge and neither get rid of the message count.
It works he
Hello Allie,
Thursday, April 22, 2004, 6:49:02 PM, you wrote:
snip
SC>> although this number seems to just accumulate despite the fact I
SC>> have been using the Trash for deleted items.
AM> Deleting messages from an IMAP folder doesn't mean that they're
AM> actually deleted. They're just marked
Stuart Cuddy, [SC] wrote:
SC> Can someone explain what these numbers represent in my IMAP inbox.
SC> This is from my Blogstreet Account.
SC> Inbox4<*> 410 <19>
SC> I assume that the 410 is the total messages in the folder,
Yes.
SC> although this number seems to just accumulate despite
Hello tbudl,
Can someone explain what these numbers represent in my IMAP inbox.
This is from my Blogstreet Account.
Inbox4<*> 410 <19>
I assume that the 410 is the total messages in the folder, although
this number seems to just accumulate despite the fact I have been
using the Trash fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TheBat,
I am having a problem in that I delte my messages but they never get purged on the
server, what do I need to do as I am getting a message almost every hour :)
Sean
- --
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Wh
Hello chinchi,
Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 7:49:23 PM, you wrote:
c> Hi Adam,
c> Thursday, January 30, 2003, 4:21:08 AM, you wrote:
c>>> I have TB set up so that mail from these particular folders come in
c>>> to the same name folder, locally. But setting up a filter, doesn't
c>>> let me
Hi Adam,
Thursday, January 30, 2003, 4:21:08 AM, you wrote:
c>> I have TB set up so that mail from these particular folders come in
c>> to the same name folder, locally. But setting up a filter, doesn't
c>> let me modify the source folder. How would I do that?
A> Ignore the source folder.
Hello chinchi,
Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 6:36:44 PM, you wrote:
c> Hi,
c> I thought I would ask this one again since it's not been replied to
c> ... seems hardly any people use IMAP with TB?
Seems like.
c> I have TB set up so that mail from these particular folders come in
c> to the
Hi Jonathan,
Thursday, January 30, 2003, 3:55:49 AM, you wrote:
JA> On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, chinchi wrote...
>> I want all new messages that get filtered a particular folder on the
>> IMAP server when receiving mail, to automatically be marked as read.
>> How do I do set this up?
JA> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, chinchi wrote...
> I thought I would ask this one again since it's not been replied to
> ... seems hardly any people use IMAP with TB?
It isn't that hardly anybody use it... it's that it doesn't work
right. TB! v1.6 tr
Hi,
I thought I would ask this one again since it's not been replied to
... seems hardly any people use IMAP with TB?
I want all new messages that get filtered a particular folder on the
IMAP server when receiving mail, to automatically be marked as read.
How do I do set this up?
I ha
Britta wrote:
>
> In fact, I found the IMAP Inbox on my server in the end.
> The bit I don't understand is: where (if anywhere) are the other
> default folders kept? Outbox/Sent/Trash. Does TB! create those? Or is
> this where we have to wait for version 2 implementation?
These are local mail fo
> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 19:40:51 -0400
> From: Mark Knipfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> When you press F2 to check e-mail on the server, click Details in the
> window and watch the details in the window scroll down.
thanks, Mark. Funny thing ... I've never before checked out that
Details window. I'm
Britta wrote:
>
> Mark - how did you find that out?
> I would like to check myself *where* exactly the location of my IMAP
> inbox is on my server - it should be the path you quoted, but I can't
> find it there. Where/how can I trace this?
When you press F2 to check e-mail on the server, click D
> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:19:53 -0400
> From: Mark Knipfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: IMAP folders do not appear!
>
> I checked my IMAP e-mail account in TheBat! 1.46d. TheBat found my IMAP
> mail folders:
>
> /home//mail/*
>
Mark - how did you find that out?
I would like to check myse
Hello all,
on Thu, 12 Oct 2000, at 14:51:03 local time (GMT -0400), Mark wrote:
> I cannot find anywhere in TB to specify the mail paths on the mail server
> for IMAP.
i only had to specify the host-name of the IMAP-server, no paths ...
Account properties -> Transport -> Mail server
and pick IM
I downloaded and installed TheBat! 1.46d (TB) version in Windows 2000
Professional and trying to use TB with IMAP. I cannot find anywhere in
TB to specify the mail paths on the mail server for IMAP. I am seeking
an alternative e-mail client to possibly become my primary e-mail
client. I current
36 matches
Mail list logo
