the period is included in the copy.)
http://imgsrc.com/?v=untitlbnb.
Anyway, the popup continues to re-appear about every 20-30
seconds regardless of how it's disposed of; either clicking
OK or clicking the red X. I assume it's almost certainly
coming from my Comodo anti-virus but I'm not positive about
Hallo Jack,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:42:13 -0500GMT (22-3-2011, 13:42 , where I
live), you wrote:
JSL I get this warning every time I attach something to an
JSL email.
Have you got an plug-in for virus scanner installed with TB?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Moderators - I guess everyone has to get off
Hello Roelof,
On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 you wrote:
RO Hallo Jack,
RO On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:42:13 -0500GMT (22-3-2011, 13:42 , where I
RO live), you wrote:
JSL I get this warning every time I attach something to an
JSL email.
RO Have you got an plug-in for virus scanner installed with TB?
Hallo Jack,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:56:16 -0500GMT (22-3-2011, 14:56 , where I
live), you wrote:
RO Have you got an plug-in for virus scanner installed with TB?
JSL Not that I'm aware of. How would I find out?
options - preferences - virus/trojan alert - anti virus
--
Groetjes, Roelof
- preferences - virus/trojan alert - anti virus
Ok. Well as you can see (http://imgsrc.com/?v=untitlquq.)
there does appear to be some sort of anti-virus but I have
no idea of how it got there. I un-ticked the Check
outgoing mail for viruses and then started another email
including an attachment. The pop
Hallo Jack,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:26:28 -0500GMT (22-3-2011, 17:26 , where I
live), you wrote:
JSL Ok. Well as you can see (http://imgsrc.com/?v=untitlquq.)
JSL there does appear to be some sort of anti-virus but I have
JSL no idea of how it got there.
I'd suggest that you select and delete
Hello Gary,
Saturday, September 25, 2010, 2:11:20 AM, you wrote:
Another, related topic, is getting rid of cookies tracking you web
activities. The best program I\'ve found is MAXA cookie manager.
I've another candidate: SUPERAntiSpyware. Fast, precise, and
astonishingly inexpensive. Under
to Vipre months ago. Am quite satisfied with its features
GO and performance. Vipre integrates well with the Bat! for
GO anti-virus.
GO Regards,
GO Gary Odom
GO g...@waterfire.us
GO Friday, September 24, 2010 2:52:51 PM
GO The Bat! version 4.2.36.4
GO OS = Windows XP 5.1
GO Friday, September 24
Hello TheBat users
Is there any way to use anti-virus Microsoft Security Essentials in
conjunction with the program TheBat!? If so how to install?
Thanks
--
Cheers
, Cesar
Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http
Hi
On Wednesday 13 January 2010 at 7:44:05 PM, in
mid:162638507.20100113174...@gmail.com, Cesar Santos wrote:
Hello TheBat users
Is there any way to use anti-virus Microsoft
Security Essentials in conjunction with the program
TheBat!? If so how to install?
You would just install
Hello MFPA,
Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 6:56:00 PM, you wrote:
Is there any way to use anti-virus Microsoft
Security Essentials in conjunction with the program
TheBat!? If so how to install?
M You would just install and configure Microsoft Security Essentials
M according to Microsoft's
Hello Cesar,
Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 3:12:08 PM, you wrote:
CS Thanks. I've already done.
Can you let me know how you make out. I have it installed on a Windows 7 machine
and it was very slow when scanning IMAP mail.
--
Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm
Using
Hello Stuart,
Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 10:24:31 PM, you wrote:
SC Can you let me know how you make out. I have it installed on a Windows 7
machine
SC and it was very slow when scanning IMAP mail.
Well, I've simply installed and trusting it is going to behave
smoothly. I don't have
Hello MFPA,
Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 12:53:53 AM, you wrote:
I used to have that file but it disappeared all on its own when I
upgraded to v4.
Had to re-install Windows. When I downloaded and installed TB! I see
it has come back...
--
Best regards,
MFPA
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:53:53 +, MFPA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to have that file but it disappeared all on its own when I
upgraded to v4.
Hi,
Odd - I upgraded to v4 a few days ago, and it was still listed
afterwards. Oh well, I ended up deleting it. I have NOD32 installed,
I'll just
Hi
On Monday 17 March 2008 at 10:42:57 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Grumpy Gamer
wrote:
Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The
Bat is? I have an errant plugin (Generic DLL Plugin) listed in
Options-AntiVirus (with a status of 'error') and I want to get rid
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The
Bat is? I have an errant plugin (Generic DLL Plugin) listed in
Options-AntiVirus (with a status of 'error') and I want to get rid of
it if it isn't for an anti-virus I currently have installed. Problem
is, I can't
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The
Bat is? I have an errant plugin (Generic DLL Plugin) listed in
Options-AntiVirus (with a status of 'error') and I want to get rid of
it if it isn't for an anti-virus I currently have installed. Problem
Hello all,
Monday, March 17, 2008, Grumpy Gamer wrote:
Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The
Bat is? I have an errant plugin (Generic DLL Plugin) listed in
Options-AntiVirus (with a status of 'error') and I want to get rid of
it if it isn't for an anti-virus I
Grumpy Gamer @ 2008-3-17 5:42:57 AM
Location of Anti-Virus Plugin mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know where the location of the anti-virus plugins in The
Bat is?
My AVG anti-virus plugin is located at:
C:\Program Files\AVG\avgbat.bav
--
Christopher
Using The Bat! v4.0.14 on Windows
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:42:09 +0100, Marek Mikus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when is plugin created by its vendor, like AVG, Avast or Kaspersky, plugin
is installed to antivirus home directory and program adds path to plugin
into The Bat!'s TBPLUGIN.INI configuration file.
If You have AVG instaled
Hello MFPA,
A test message with Eicar string attached in a txt file is sent
without AMON shouting about it but picked up by IMON on receipt.
And that was a big surprise to me because I was sure (without actually
testing it) that AMON would detect it. But no, you are right, I have
been testing
Hello MAU,
Sunday, January 28, 2007, 1:00:38 PM, you wrote:
M or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan.
Where do you have a list of file extensions to scan? I only see a(n empty)
list of extensions NOT to be scanned...
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The
Hello Mark,
M or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan.
Where do you have a list of file extensions to scan? I only see a(n empty)
list of extensions NOT to be scanned...
In the 'Extensions Editor', try deselecting the 'Analyse all files' tick
box at the bottom and it will now
Hello MAU,
Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 5:41:10 PM, you wrote:
M In the 'Extensions Editor', try deselecting the 'Analyse all files' tick
M box at the bottom and it will now list the extensions to scan.
Thanks. Ticked Analyse all files again though...
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
M or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan.
Where do you have a list of file extensions to scan? I only see a(n empty)
list of extensions NOT to be scanned...
M In the 'Extensions Editor', try deselecting the 'Analyse all files' tick
M box at the bottom and it will now list the
A test message with Eicar string attached in a txt file is sent
without AMON shouting about it but picked up by IMON on receipt.
M And that was a big surprise to me because I was sure (without actually
M testing it) that AMON would detect it. But no, you are right, I have
M been testing also
Hello Code,
NOD32 is incapable of scanning (like .tbb) will do nothing. NOD32 is
still incapable of peaking inside the file.
I know. But even if it was capable, I wouldn't let NOD32 (or any other
antivirus) fiddle with my mail folders.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Hello all,
Saturday, January 27, 2007, Code 2 wrote:
You're right, George, we can use the plug-in to scan outgoing mail. I
notice that the plug-in is a test version (version 0.1) and appears to
have been developed several years ago for NOD32 version 1. The
plug-in seems to work with NOD32
Hi
On Sunday 28 January 2007 at 12:00:38 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MAU wrote:
Check you AMON configuration. Either you have some excluded directories
or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to scan.
I just checked mine and added TMP. I believe it was not there by
default, as I
Hi
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 at 1:25:04 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Sunday 28 January 2007 at 12:00:38 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MAU wrote:
Check you AMON configuration. Either you have some excluded directories
or *.tmp is not in the list of file extensions to
Hi
On Saturday 27 January 2007 at 1:06:07 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], George Mitchell
wrote:
FWIW, I appear to have v2.51.26 of NOD32.
I have 2.50.25 and clicking on update now tells me my
installation is up to date and no update is required.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 12:47:29 PM, you wrote:
FWIW, I appear to have v2.51.26 of NOD32.
I have 2.50.25 and clicking on update now tells me my
installation is up to date and no update is required.
Latest version is 2.70.23 - however at this point you still have to
download this
Hello Code,
M 2.- You forward the message after NOD32 signatures have been updated.
M Then there is nothing to worry about. Why? Even though NOD32's 'IMON
M does not scan outgoing email' and 'on-demand scanner does not scan tbb
M files', the infected email/file you are trying to send will be
Hello Code,
Having said that, a situation could arise where I receive an infected
e-mail which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize (as happened
to me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That infected e-mail would
sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several NOD32 on-demand scans.
Having said that, a situation could arise where I receive an
infected e-mail which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize
(as happened to me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That
infected e-mail would sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several
NOD32 on-demand scans. Since NOD32's
could unwittingly forward it to, and infect, an unsuspecting
recipient.
At best, it would be embarrassing to forward infected mail to a
client. At worst it would be unprofessional, negligent and harmful. I
don't think it's too much to expect an anti-virus application to be
able to locate viruses
Here's a heads-up for users of NOD32 anti-virus and The Bat!. NOD32's
technical support people confirmed to me that NOD32's on-demand
scanner cannot scan inside The Bat's messages.tbb data files and
therefore cannot spot infected e-mails. However, NOD32's IMON module
scans all POP3 traffic
Code 2 wrote:
snip
C2 ...a situation could arise where I receive an infected e-mail
C2 which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize (as happened to
C2 me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That infected e-mail would
C2 sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several NOD32 on-demand
C2 scans.
C2 ...a situation could arise where I receive an infected e-mail
C2 which NOD32's IMON module does not yet recognize (as happened to
C2 me last week with the Fuclip.A worm). That infected e-mail would
C2 sit undiscovered in my inbox despite several NOD32 on-demand
C2 scans. Since NOD32's IMON
Code 2 wrote:
C2 You're right, George, we can use the plug-in to scan outgoing
C2 mail. I notice that the plug-in is a test version (version 0.1)
C2 and appears to have been developed several years ago for NOD32
C2 version 1. The plug-in seems to work with NOD32 version 2.7
C2 except it
Howdy Mica,
Saturday, September 16, 2006, 11:31:40 PM, Mica wrotened:
Mica Full name of the program is Avira AntiVir PersonalEdition Classic.
Mica Direct link for download is:
Mica http://dl7.avgate.net/down/windows/antivir_workstation_win7_en_h.exe
Mica Happy anti virusing.
That
Hi
On Sunday 10 September 2006 at 8:55:49 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Susanne wrote:
Do I have to go back to NAV?
Entirely up to you.
Never used NAV but heard plenty bad stories about it.
Could not get on with AVG but my sister loves it.
Nod32 came highly recommended, requires no plugin,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 16 Sep 2006,
@ @ at 22:18:16 +0100, when MFPA wrote:
On Sunday 10 September 2006 at 8:55:49 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Susanne wrote:
Do I have to go back to NAV?
don't think that discussing anti-virus programs and software
firewall programs with which to back up The Bat!'s inherent security
is all that far Off Topic. Not everyone is subscribed to TBOT. And
TBOT is quite erratic about timely posting of messages. Erratic daily,
that is.
--
Best regards,
Mary
Howdy Susanne,
Monday, September 11, 2006, 2:47:28 AM, Susanne wrotened:
Is the plugin enabled and ready to go? Is email scanning enabled in
the control Centre?
Susanne Yes to both, but I can detect no obvious sign of the email getting
Susanne scanned (I'm new to the program, so I'm not
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 at 18:47:28 -0700, Susanne wrote:
Yes to both, but I can detect no obvious sign of the email getting
scanned (I'm new to the program, so I'm not sure if there is
anything showing the email is being scanned).
Under e-mail scanner select configure and tell it to certify the
Is the plugin enabled and ready to go? Is email scanning
enabled in the control Centre?
Susanne Yes to both, but I can detect no obvious sign of the email getting
Susanne scanned (I'm new to the program, so I'm not sure if there is
Susanne anything showing the email is being scanned).
On Monday, September 11, 2006, at 7:31:14 AM, Robin Anson wrote:
Under e-mail scanner select configure and tell it to certify the
incoming mail. Then it will leave a message on the incoming mail once
it has been scanned
Interesting. My plug-in has both incoming and outgoing certification
Hi,
I'm trying out the free AVG version and have some trouble
getting it to scan TB email.
The plug-in is there, but during today's complete scan AVG
found a TB mail with the netsky virus that it didn't detect
when I downloaded the email.
It also didn't remove the virus after the complete scan.
On Sunday, September 10, 2006, at 2:55:49 PM, Susanne wrote:
I'm trying out the free AVG version and have some trouble
getting it to scan TB email.
Since switching from Eudora to TB! a couple of months ago, my AVG Email
scan has never once found anything in the incoming mail. When I was
using
Hello Susanne everyone else,
on 10-Sep-2006 at 21:55 you (Susanne) wrote:
The plug-in is there, but during today's complete scan AVG found a TB
mail with the netsky virus that it didn't detect when I downloaded the
email.
Which simply means that the virus code is sitting somewhere in one of
Howdy Susanne,
Sunday, September 10, 2006, 8:55:49 PM, Susanne wrotened:
Susanne I'm trying out the free AVG version and have some trouble
Susanne getting it to scan TB email.
Susanne The plug-in is there, but during today's complete scan AVG
Susanne found a TB mail with the netsky virus that
Susanne @ 2006-9-10 2:55:49 PM
Setting up AVG anti virus with TB? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The plug-in is there, but during today's complete scan AVG found a
TB mail with the netsky virus that it didn't detect when I
downloaded the email. It also didn't remove the virus after the
complete scan
Hi,
Sunday, September 10, 2006, 1:58:04 PM,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the plugin enabled and ready to go? Is email scanning enabled in
the control Centre?
Yes to both, but I can detect no obvious sign of the email getting
scanned (I'm new to the program, so I'm not sure if there is
11 September 2006 - 06:48
Hello Susanne,
Sunday, September 10, 2006, 8:55:49 PM, you wrote:
S I'm trying out the free AVG version and have some trouble
S getting it to scan TB email.
Slightly OT but as soon as I opened your message NOD32 displayed its
always-reassuring signature update
Hello Kevin,
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:19:07 -0400 GMT(4/3/2005, 11:19 AM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin Coates wrote:
I think these types of discussions help elevate awareness of both the
problems and the solutions.
Words of wisdom!
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat!
Hi
On Tuesday 5 April 2005 at 3:22:20 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim Casten wrote:
Hello Anthony,
Monday, April 4, 2005, 6:41:58 PM, you wrote:
I have OE 6, and I don't see any such option.
it a feature in the sp2 version
And in the version I have used since 2002. I do not have SP2
Hi
On Wednesday 6 April 2005 at 3:38:26 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], rich gregory wrote:
Considering such a system or user trusted don't make it so!
If I trust somebody, they are trusted.
The trust may, of course, be misplaced.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
MFPA writes:
If I trust somebody, they are trusted.
The trust may, of course, be misplaced.
Exactly. By definition, someone must be trusted in every computer
system. Whether or not that person is really trustworthy is irrelevant
from a security standpoint; what matters in computer security
Use Avast instead.
Works like a charm with The Bat!, Thunderbird and Courier. I use them all
on a Win XP system...
AJ
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 01.04.2005 at 11:05 Jeff Gaines wrote:
Hello Group
Apologies if this is way off topic for this group but Norton Anti
Virus (AKA
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 04:22:20 +0200, Tim Casten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have OE 6, and I don't see any such option.
it a feature in the sp2 version
Its definitely not only in the SP2 version (I activate it on all systems
where the people insist to use OE, and only a fraction of that is
Hello Mica,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:11:18 +0200 GMT (05/04/2005, 00:11 +0700 GMT),
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
The problem is that you usuallly don't know it until being told. In
the meantime, you might have shared infected files.
MM In the meantime you could learn too. There are many ways. Once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 04 Apr 2005,
@ @ at 16:16:37 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:46:50 +0200, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
/// So, it *is* about money,
Hello Mica Mijatovic everyone else,
on 05-Apr-2005 at 15:11 you (Mica Mijatovic) wrote:
In other words, you need just an echo of your attitudes (to feel safe
and accepted)
You don't know me other than from some characters on your screen that
appeared after I tapped a few keys here and there,
On Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 8:16:14 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Should this be moved to TBOT?
No. I don't want to read any more of it there either.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP
Hola, Dwight,
Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 11:57:50 AM, you wrote:
DAC On Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 8:16:14 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Should this be moved to TBOT?
DAC No. I don't want to read any more of it there either.
Enough already, stop this nonsense, somebody close this thread, please
--
rich gregory writes:
There is NO SUCH THING as a trusted source, ever.
Yes, there is such a thing, depending on one's security policies.
For example, most operating systems consider any user with a valid
password for a given identifier to be a trusted user of that identifier.
--
Anthony
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 5 Apr 2005,
@ @ at 17:36:21 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
I am self confident enough that I don't need any approval for my
attitude and position.
Please, stop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 5 Apr 2005,
@ @ at 20:16:14 +0700, when Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Hello Mica,
My wai.
[...]
Are we going in circles yet?
I don't know. I see the things circling around me but
Hallo Thomas,
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:16:14 +0700GMT (5-4-2005, 15:16 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TF Should this be moved to TBOT?
moderator on
Yes.
I haven't got an appropriate QT to declare a thread a dead horse, but
please take this elsewhere. It's not really TB-related anymore.
That
Hi Cuco,
On Tuesday, April 05, 2005 at 12:25:26 PM you wrote:
PATCO lives!!
Yesss! :gdr:
--
Regards,
Maggie
There has been opposition to every innovation in the history of man, with the
possible exception of the sword.
Hola, Maggie,
Tuesday, April 5, 2005, 3:22:30 PM, you wrote:
M Hi Cuco,
M On Tuesday, April 05, 2005 at 12:25:26 PM you wrote:
PATCO lives!!
M Yesss! :gdr:
Glad there are people that still remember, Maggie, you made my day!!!
Cuco, ZSU CERAP.
--
Ramon L. Negron (Cuco)
PATCO lives!!
Air
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:29:15 +0200, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Okay, it's about money. I could write some 5-6 KB on this topic,
This is not about money, this is about the quality of the
software, is that SO hard to understand?
--
Gruesse / Greetings,
Alexander Kunz
Monday, April 4, 2005, 2:12:15 PM, Paul wrote:
PB Have you asked the List about grouping? The list has helped me over
PB the years.
Oh, yes! I had a gripe quite recently and many tried to help, but to no
avail.
--
Cheers,
Allister
:flag-newzealand:
New Zealand / Aotearoa
Hello Arjan de Groot everyone else,
on 04-Apr-2005 at 00:07 you (Arjan de Groot) wrote:
You really believe this, do you?
I do. I've been using personal computers for almost 20 years
now and never needed any protection against virusses, trojans or
whatever, whatsoever.
There was one
Hi Alexander,
On 4/4/2005 12:54 PM +0200, you wrote:
This was such an everyday situation, I dare say it could've happened
to everyone... especially since the standard accounts creating during
the Win XP installation are administrative accounts, anyway...
I got adware/spyware on my machine under
Hello Anthony,
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:38:33 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 03:38 +0700 GMT),
Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
AGA Antivirus products, generally speaking, are inferior substitutes for
AGA safe computing practices.
They are better than nothing.
AGA The only threats that truly justify automated
Hello Anthony,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:02:13 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 11:02 +0700 GMT),
Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
[...]
AGA Then they will get what they deserve.
[...]
AGA Shared computers are never a good idea.
Does this sounds arrogant (or elitaire) or is it just me?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Hello Alexander,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:54:53 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 17:54 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Yes. Poor Average Joe User. Buys Norton Antivirus in a shop and
believes he's safe...
ASK I see postings here that blame the average user, I don't think that is
ASK fair. Melissa
Re: Anti Virus S/W,
(ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Size:4106 bytes) is marked
for DELETION by the filter C5AM-new
...so I would please you to send it again, addressed properly.
Also, I would like if you would read again my message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], about mechanisms of external
authorities, and big
with some comment about anti-virus precautions. I
turned off the certifications and resent the same message. It got
through and was replied to.
--
Best regards,
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:46:50 +0200, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
/// So, it *is* about money, since the value system used to estimate a
software, is directly derived, to a significant extent, from what money
means/represents to someone, a particular person, or a group of them.
This
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:34:50 +0200, Thomas Fernandez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AGA Then they will get what they deserve.
[...]
AGA Shared computers are never a good idea.
Does this sounds arrogant (or elitaire) or is it just me?
Nope, its not only you.
--
Gruesse / Greetings,
Alexander Kunz
Alexander S. Kunz writes:
There was one incident that change my attitude towards this. I'm
normally using Opera, but in order to use some pages, as you surely
know, one must use Internet Explorer. One of these sites that require
IE *and* ActiveX is ebay when you want to sell something and use
Allie Martin writes:
It's ridiculous now and we simply have to run the software rather
than sit thinking that we alone can make the difference.
It only gets dangerous when you stop thinking.
--
Anthony
__
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP
Thomas Fernandez writes:
They are better than nothing.
Yes, but safe computing practices are better than A/V products, and they
are free and do not interfere with the functioning of the OS.
Firewalls have nothing to do with AV software.
They have a lot to do with safe computing, though. In
Thomas Fernandez writes:
Does this sounds arrogant (or elitaire) or is it just me?
Some people think the mere notion of people having computers at home is
arrogant and elitist.
--
Anthony
__
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 4 Apr 2005,
@ @ at 12:54:53 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
I see postings here that blame the average user, I don't think that is
fair. Melissa Reece mentioned a bit of
Hello Anthony,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:48:35 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 21:48 +0700 GMT),
Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
They are better than nothing.
AGA Yes, but safe computing practices are better than A/V products, and they
AGA are free and do not interfere with the functioning of the OS.
You
Hello Mica,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:54:04 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 21:54 +0700 GMT),
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
MM If I know that someone is not practising appropriate methods in making
MM his/her machine safe, I will not accept an invitation, for instance,
MM to chat with him/her, will not share files
Hello Alexander,
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:17:37 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 21:17 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Does this sounds arrogant (or elitaire) or is it just me?
ASK Nope, its not only you.
OK, thanks for the heads-up.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Fettflecken werden wie neu, wenn man sie
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else,
on 04-Apr-2005 at 16:48 you (Anthony G. Atkielski) wrote:
Files from a trusted source are clean by definition
So, every Netsky virus that sends itself around with a fake sender address
would come from a trusted source by that definition. Thats secure
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else,
on 04-Apr-2005 at 16:43 you (Anthony G. Atkielski) wrote:
Don't use the advance picture service
Impractical.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
A learned blockhead is a greater blockhead than an ignorant one. --
Hi Anthony,
On 04/04/2005 04:44 PM +0200, you wrote:
It only gets dangerous when you stop thinking.
From reading your other messages it would seem that your use of your
system and why *you* require or need allows you the luxury of being
able to simply avoid risky practices. More power to you
Thomas Fernandez writes:
You are not in business or academy. In those fields, attached files
with macros are common.
I'm in both, and macro-laden files comprise only a tiny minority of
attached files.
Right. There is no 100% protection, if you need to open those files.
Often, you don't need
Alexander S. Kunz writes:
So, every Netsky virus that sends itself around with a fake sender address
would come from a trusted source by that definition.
Trusted sources are verifiable sources. Digital signatures come in
handy here.
--
Anthony
Alexander S. Kunz writes:
Impractical.
Not for me. I've used eBay without the need for ActiveX.
--
Anthony
__
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Current version is 3.0.1.33
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else,
on 04-Apr-2005 at 17:40 you (Anthony G. Atkielski) wrote:
Impractical.
Not for me. I've used eBay without the need for ActiveX.
That conversation ends here, because it start to get redundant. See
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Anthony,
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:39:51 +0200 GMT (04/04/2005, 22:39 +0700 GMT),
Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
You are not in business or academy. In those fields, attached files
with macros are common.
AGA I'm in both, and macro-laden files comprise only a tiny minority of
AGA attached
1 - 100 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
