[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

ciao Reakforblue "... if I can ever become comfortable with CSS and TW as a whole" CSS is as flexible in TW as it is anywhere. But we have been poor at making it easy to innovate with it. It is still cumbersome. Just MO TT On Thursday, 1 August 2019 12:04:33 UTC+2, Reaktorblue wrote: > >

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

The OneNote that's currently in circulation is being webified, if you can call it that. Just like most other Microsoft products. I don't know if it would be possible to get those records into TW but if I can ever become comfortable with CSS and TW as a whole, I'd probably abandon the whole

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Ciao Reaktorblue i see the inflex in OneNote *Maybe we should explore more HOW to leverage getting it's records into TW?* One thing I want to comment is OneNote is OLD software already. Some of its inflexibility arises, I trhink, purely because of its need to support its own legacy. Best

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

OneNote is now bundled with Windows 10 and that's pretty much the version you get. I'm an Office 365 Insiders subscriber and OneNote is no longer part of that package. One of the biggest issues I take with OneNote is that the UI is not configurable at least not at this current point in time.

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Ciao Werner Your point was well taken by me. For PRACTICAL work. Its easier to use one method. I'm thinking. "How complex is the OneNote format?" Anyd could TW import it? Best wishes TT On Thursday, 1 August 2019 11:37:41 UTC+2, Werner wrote: > > > > Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2019 08:06:43 UTC+2

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Agree In OneNote's favour, over the years, its got better at not being quite so proprietary. In its early versions it was heavily linked into other Microsoft products. It is mature software now and does a bunch of things needed in a more open way. I think the "bottom-line" in TW is maybe "WE

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2019 08:06:43 UTC+2 schrieb TonyM: > > Werner > > Thanks for sharing. A few quick notes; > > I don't think one notes functionality is diminishing in office 365 in some > ways its stronger than ever in the o365 platform. I stand to be corrected. > > One note is an

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Am Dienstag, 30. Juli 2019 14:32:11 UTC+2 schrieb Mat: > > Werner wrote: > > >> To be fair, the search function in ON is great. >> > > What makes it great? > > <:-) > Just wanted to be fair and not seem to be bashing OneNote. It's fast and it spans over multiple notebooks which I found

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Werner Thanks for sharing. A few quick notes; I don't think one notes functionality is diminishing in office 365 in some ways its stronger than ever in the o365 platform. I stand to be corrected. One note is an application, a single app, be it designed to support cross application notes or

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

There is no WYSWIG editing. The toolbar is nice, but not the same. It makes things a lot easier when you don't have to toggle back and forth. You can embed images, but at the cost of slowing your TW down. With the extension, it inserts HTML code which is noisy and pretty much impossible to

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

1. WYSIWYG editing 2. embedded images. 3. FF extension for clipping articles. Doesnt TW5 have a good enough Editor Toolbar, support embedding images and Tiddlyclip? Can you elaborate on what makes experience with zim counterparts better? -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

I have Zim wiki on my Win 7 machine. Don't remember what hoops I had to jump through to make that possible. The main pluses it has to offer compared to TW is WYSIWYG editing (for basic formatting) and embedded images. There is also a FF extension for clipping articles. It was at the top of my

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Riz wrote: > > Slant lists are funny. > As far as I understand, the lists are not professionally curated but anyone can add a product and then other people can add Pro's and Con's. And "comparisons" such as the one starting out this thread, are not really comparisons but merely side-by-side

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Are they not talking about people who have addons like uMatrix installed which will prevent any javascript from being run? Slant lists are funny. For eg: this lists lists org-mode at the top, while a similar one

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Werner wrote: > To be fair, the search function in ON is great. > What makes it great? <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Ciao Werner Its a shame we have no "re-tweet" on Google Groups. Its an interesting, very relevant set of comments. TT On Tuesday, 30 July 2019 14:17:57 UTC+2, Werner wrote: > > > > Am Montag, 22. Juli 2019 04:57:41 UTC+2 schrieb Mark S.: >> >> I came across this accidentally. Maybe everyone

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Am Montag, 22. Juli 2019 04:57:41 UTC+2 schrieb Mark S.: > > I came across this accidentally. Maybe everyone else is familiar with it? > > > https://www.slant.co/versus/2130/5116/~microsoft-onenote_vs_tiddlywik > > I found the "con" that said "Without JavaScript nothing is visible" to be >

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Mat & @Reaktorblue Mat wrote: > > @Reaktorblue > > I think it is very valuable for the TW project with input like what you > just wrote... > I agree. So, the following may seem like I'm defending TW but I'm not... > >> R: [...] every time I want to use TiddlyWiki, I have to take a lot of >>

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

One drive is packaged SharePoint and I have tiddlywiki running on sharepoint, so I do not see a compatibility issue. I have full access to OneNote but do not use it as it does not have the same structure, features and design capabilities. It is much harder to set standards on yourself to

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

In fairness, I use OneNote to a very basic degree. With that said, it's broken down such that OneNote is the application but I have many notebooks that can be loaded and unloaded. The notebooks themselves would be like having a folder on my PC with many TW files in it. Each notebook within

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

@Reaktorblue I think it is very valuable for the TW project with input like what you just wrote. Even if there's probably nothing directly actionable to improve TW in it, it does give more context to why people choose TW or not which and this chisels out what defines TW. So, the following may

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

For me personally, I use OneNote a lot. In fact, I use OneNote much more than TiddlyWiki. The two biggest reasons being that changes to the browser don't break functionality and that it's ready to go out of the box with no need for configuration. TiddlyWiki on the other hand is so much more

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

I should clarify: No *built in* multiuser functionality or via *official* plugin. Of course Jed is creating incredible stuff with his Bob variants. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Mat wrote ... > > > A major Con, which surprisingly is not listed, is the > no-multiuser/collaboration/sharing aspect. > Did you read this on the internet? It's not reliable. :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

Yes, I think I added TW there some years ago. I found the "con" that said "Without JavaScript nothing is visible" to be > incredibly silly. Like "without electricity light bulbs are useless." > I don't even understand what the claim means - "not visible"??? Probably that you can't easily add

[tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki vs OneNote (comparison on slant.co)

I used OneNote a while. It looks nice. Part of the issues with it I think is that "interface takes over". The neat look trumps the utility for purpose. I have a long of history with "free form databases" -- as they used to be called. I was, and am, always interested in *emergent* pattern