Is the idea of shared tiddlers plugin that was part of TwC useful in this
context ? It seems if we could get it to work in TW5 context it would also
help with reducing the tiddlywiki file size and help organising information
better ...
On Saturday, June 9, 2018 at 6:08:28 PM UTC+5:30, Mat wrot
Jed,
Sorry, the invitations are slow because I am asleep at the time. I sent it
recently
Good to see the federation connection.
In relation to the node version, I just found I may be able to use hosting
accounts to serve nodeJS and they are working on making it a more user
configurable choice
Tony,
Yammer isn't sending me a confirmation email so I can't join there.
The way that you describe subscribing to something is used by twederation.
Subscribing is done completely on the subscribing wiki and doesn't have any
effect on the wiki that is being subscribed to. And each wiki has a ti
Josiah,
I believe you are correct, but someone building a solution now that they
can see the end of the tunnel. are possibly already informed by the past,
but it is important that people with a "naive disregard [for perceived]
fundamental problems" just have a go, and the wise and experienced s
Mat,
I can loosely commit some time to furthering this. If I could ask you to
Join Yammer at https://www.yammer.com/tiddlywiki and we continue the
conversation in a group,
However I am sure a few of the above requirements will need some deeper
developer skills.
Another thing I realised the ot
@TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> I hope this is clear.
Honestly, it sounds interesting but I don't understand what you're talking
about. Could you perhaps start another thread about it?
<:-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsub
>
> Mat: maybe I'm naive and disregard fundamental problems?
>
I think you are Hot On -- EXCEPT on the question of legacy. On which you
don't seem to see the issue.
The future will come not just with a shiny new system (I am in favour of)
it will also be because of a BRIDGE to the past.
My c
Tony
First, if you're up for it; let us (you and I) set up something together to
see how far we can get. I could start with this in about a week or two from
now. How about you? Anyone else interested?
But generally; I agree that what I am calling for is the, as you put it,
"ultimate integrated
Post Script,
Allowing people to annotate or comment on tiddlers, perhaps part of this
need to share tiddlers could also be achieved with NoteSelf using the local
pouchDB to save changes, the user can then export their annotations and
send an email, post etc... a json file to the site owner who
I would like to add something here and I hope I may be able to state it
clearly.
- We can already effectively store and share tiddlers and groups of
tiddlers, we can drag and drop, import and export.
- It seems to me this thread is considering the "Ultimate" integrated
transfer or
Jed Carty wrote:
>
> I tried to start a listing of plugins that I was hoping to extend to other
> tiddlywiki resources that is similar to what you are describing but then I
> got distracted and I don't think anyone else really started using it. What
> I made is here: http://inmysocks.tiddlyspot.
Jed Carty wrote:
>
> I tried to start a listing of plugins that I was hoping to extend to other
> tiddlywiki resources that is similar to what you are describing but then I
> got distracted and I don't think anyone else really started using it. What
> I made is here: http://inmysocks.tiddlyspot.
I tried to start a listing of plugins that I was hoping to extend to other
tiddlywiki resources that is similar to what you are describing but then I
got distracted and I don't think anyone else really started using it. What
I made is here: http://inmysocks.tiddlyspot.com/#Plugin%20twCard
Mat,
>
> Mat: Nobody can know this yet.
I disagree. I DO think it is important a few people, TW "experts", examine
it to make sure its broad enough. But to say "Nobody can know" is just
silly.
> Twitter has that fixed number of characters limit so if, for some reason,
> sharing typically ends u
Exactly why TW in the wild inclines to the "centrifugal".
The "centripetal" is MISSING. That lack maybe part causes the fragmentation
you are talking of.
I don't think this is about waiting around more ... I mean how many years
you (everyone reading) been here already?
GIVE me a format. Lets
TiddlyTweeter/Josiah
My bullet list is only to give a general idea of what should be possible.
It is in deed broad but it is also very unspecific because not only could
each bullet probably be implemented in several ways, it might also depend
on how the sharing-of-tiddlers is actually implement
Jed Carty wrote:
>
> I am working on the external server component needed by Bob to make it
> into the optional nodejs server component we had discussed as an extension
> of twederation. [...]
While pondering over how to interpret this I realized I have this basic
question:
With a public TW b
I have long thought we need a way to upgrade plugins, which would require
fetching tiddlers! I agree its super important!
On Saturday, June 9, 2018 at 3:05:20 PM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> Ciao Mat
>
> Further to my last, and hopefully on-point.
>
> IF I, say converted David's list, WHAT
Ciao Mat
Further to my last, and hopefully on-point.
IF I, say converted David's list, WHAT would be the best format (basically
fields defined and filled for every Tiddler?) that is optimal for sharing?
Where's the list :-)?
This immediately brings up the issue of legacy. IMO getting legacy a
Ciao Mat
Ciao Mat
I think concrete examples help.
My use case. I like to try promote TW (though promotion is not on your
list :-) on Twitter because its effective and Twitter I know well. There is
an infinite listening audience there. I am doing 7,000% less than I could
because every bl**dy T
I am working on the external server component needed by Bob to make it into
the optional nodejs server component we had discussed as an extension of
twederation. I have a publicly accessible website set up serving Bob right
now and it works well enough to use, but I don't have the SSL certificat
21 matches
Mail list logo
